DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9
The ATLAS Collaboration
52
0
0
Volltext
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Abbildung
+7
ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE
64 Iowa State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ames High Energy Physics Group, Ames, IA 50011-3160, United States of America. 65 Joint Institute for Nuclear
Figure 3 shows the object transverse momentum distribution and missing transverse energy distribution for events in the control region compared to A LPGEN , when normalised to data
64 Iowa State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ames High Energy Physics Group, Ames, IA 50011-3160, United States of America. 65 Joint Institute for Nuclear
For example, a hypothetical 5% subjet energy scale uncertainty would a ff ect the shape and normalisation of the log(χ SD ) distribution of both tt and background by an
The E miss T peak at about 40 GeV for W → eν events, as compared with the steeply falling distribution for zero-bias events shown in Figure 1, is a good illustration of the type
To estimate the number of beam-halo events in the empty bunches of the search region, an orthogonal sample of events from the unpaired bunch crossings is used to measure the fraction
For both sub detectors, no path length L dependence is observed in either A (Rate per path length,.. The inner error bars show the statistical uncertainty only, the outer error
Propagating systematic uncertainties associated with the γ-jet, Z+jet and dijet calibrations as well as the systematic uncertainty due to the knowledge of the recoil-system
