• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Problem 1: Control Loop Acceleration

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Problem 1: Control Loop Acceleration"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Concurrency Theory(WS 2011/12) Out: Tue, Dec 20 Due: Mon, Jan 9

Exercise Sheet 10

Jun.-Prof. Roland Meyer, Georgel C˘alin Technische Universit¨at Kaiserslautern

Problem 1: Control Loop Acceleration

Letcyc and grow the word orderings given in class for proving Theorem 7.3. Determinen andp⊕ops≥nwhenp= (a+b)(c+)bandopsis each of:

?a!b?c

!a!b?c?a

!a?c!b?a!c

?c!c!a?a!b!c!a

Specify and argument in which of the four cases discussed in class each sequence falls.

Problem 2: Control Loop Acceleration

Consider the following control loop in a lossy channel system:

q

c?b d!a c!a d!a

c!b d!a d?a d?a

Set up the sequences of channel operationsopscandopsdand determine q,

((b+ε).(a+b))⊕opsc b⊕opsd

.

State and justify the case (1)-(4) that applies for the acceleration ofopscandopsd, respectively.

Give numbersnafter which the effect ofopscandopsdstabilises.

Problem 3: Conditional Construction

Give a construction that implements (by several lcs transitions) the ”transition” outlined below.

q checkmis inc q0

The construction should deadlock if m /∈ W(c) in stateq. Otherwise, it should change state and leave the channel content inq0 identical to the one inqup to lossines.

(2)

Problem 1: Rotation Construction

Remember the lcs sketched in class for proving RSP’s undecidability:

q c!m

d!m

changec’s content fromyi.αtoα.xi changed’s content fromxi.βtoβ.yi

Provide a formal description/implementation of the red ”transition”.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

This fact may then be used to quickly find a very elegant solution of the model in terms of the full set of operatorial (as opposed to mere equations for their eigenvalues)

The Christian Commission for Development in Bangladesh (CCDB) has considerable experience of managing disasters from its different projects spread across

Let ∗ swap and ∗ m the word orderings for SREs given in class for proving the lemma:. Let p be a product and ops a sequence

[r]

(Note that there are several definition in literature for the strict separation but for us it will be just the one defined above) In the present subsection we would like to

14 The estimate of 77 far-right and right-wing MEPs includes 11 western European far- right parties (the French National Front, the Italian Lega Nord, the Dutch Freedom Party,

Since any finite group can be embedded into a symmetric group, using the fundamental theorem of Galois theory we obtain that any finite group can be realised as the Galois group of

Clearly, the rational response to this problem would be to: eliminate all the Bush tax cuts - which even Alan Greenspan thinks is a good idea; 31 raise taxes on the rich