• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Microwave remote sensing of firn properties in Antarctica

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Microwave remote sensing of firn properties in Antarctica"

Copied!
12
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Microwave remote sensing of firn properties in Antarctica

S. Linow, W. Dierking, M. Hörhold, W. Rack

(2)

Ice sheet mass balance:

• mass gain vs. mass loss

• can be modelled, but models need observations for validation

(3)

Ice sheet mass balance:

• mass gain vs. mass loss

• can be modelled, but models need observations for validation

Observations:

• field observations (challenging logistics)

• remote sensing data (passive and active instruments)

Figure: Arthern et al., 2006

(4)

How is the microwave signal generated?

!

• integrated signal over the firn volume under dry snow conditions

!

• signal penetration depth is frequency dependent, in the microwave range

between a few cm and hundreds of meters

Envisat ASAR WS image sigma-0 (dB)

(5)

Layering

• deposition, metamorphism

• different electromagnetic properties depending on density and grain size

What is polar firn?

(6)

depth/age

Images: Electron and Confocal Microscopy Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S.D.A.

• dry snow metamorphism (grain growth, densification) depends on temperature and accumulation rate

• microwave scattering is sensitive to variations in density and grain size

• if there is a link between climate and scattering properties, we should be able to invert the climate signal

(7)

absorption loss, reflection into the medium

(multiple) scattering at interfaces

near-field effects

Radiative transfer into polar firn - radar scattering

(8)

Simplifications

• spherical, spatially separated snow grains

• no roughness at layer interfaces

near-field effects emission

absorption loss, reflection into the medium

Radiative transfer into polar firn - microwave emission

(9)

Example: B36

• 75°S, 0.068°E

• accumulation rate: 0.067 m w.e./year

• mean annual temperature: -44.6°C

• available measurements: high- resolution density and grain size

Impact of firn layering on microwave emission

1. mean profile

2. mean profile + random noise 3. measured variability

(10)

Setup

• DMRT/ML emission model

• physical temperatures from ECMWF reanalysis data (year)

• different layering properties (mean / random / data)

• 12 m firn profile

• calculated microwave emission at 36 GHz (signal penetration depth!)

• comparison to AMSR-E time series (2005/02/15-2006/02/14)

(11)

• seasonal cycle of brightness temperature can be modelled realistically

• discrepancies between model results and measurements due to

unrealistic temperature propagation and grain size parametrisation issues

• realistic firn parametrisation seems important

Page 1

15. 02. 2005120 26. 05. 2005 03. 09. 2005 12. 12. 2005 130

140 150 160 170 180 190

200 AMSR-E, 36 GHz, h-pol

DMRT-ML (mean) DMRT-ML (variability) DMRT-ML (random) Ascending

Descending

date

brightness temperature

[preliminary results]

(12)

• interpretation of the microwave signal can be difficult, and it is

sometimes necessary to pay close attention to the very small scales

!

• ongoing and very active development of microwave radiative transfer models and better representation of firn microstructure properties

!

• polar climate properties (e.g. snow accumulation rates) can be inverted from microwave remote sensing data, with more accurate tools at hand

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The result of the Landsat ETM+ classi fi cation at the Turakh study site in the western Lena Delta consists of 15 land-cover classes, which differ in vegetation cover,

results of the ground-based ISI minima wavelength selection of five dominant tundra vegetation communities: (a) dry tundra; (b) moist acidic tussock tundra; (c) moist

Four MODIS LST pixels were selected representing the dominant land cover types found in the study area, i.e., wet sedge tundra, bare soil, open water, and non-vegetated barren

It is advantageous to apply the fl uorescence retrieval to GOME-2 data, because the satellites, which are already in orbit (MetOp-A, MetOp-B), and the upcoming satellite MetOp-C,

They demonstrate the sensi- tivity of the melt pond fraction (Fig. 7) and spectral albedo (Fig. 8) retrieval to the inaccuracy of aerosol model (aerosol type and optical thickness)

Our comparison between satellite and in situ Z eu for data south of 60°S did not show signi fi cant differences between the approaches for SeaWiFS and slightly better esti- mates of Z

A detailed description of the achievable accuracies can be found in Bamler and Eineder (2005). The colors in Fig. 11b indicate the magnitude of the motion that occurred in the

The land surface temperature (LST) is accessible on the pan-arctic scale through a number of remote sensing platforms, such as the “Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer”