Essays on Precedent and Statute
Volltext
(2) Promotiecommissie Promotoren:. Prof.dr. M.G. Faure LL.M. Prof.dr. F. Faust. Overige leden:. Prof.dr. S. Oded Prof.dr. H.B. Schäfer Prof. A. Ogus. Co-promotor:. Dr. E. Kantorowicz-Reznichenko.
(3) This thesis was written as part of the European Doctorate in Law and Economics programme. An international collaboration between the Universities of Bologna, Hamburg and Rotterdam. As part of this programme, the thesis has been submitted to the Universities of Bologna, Hamburg and Rotterdam to obtain a doctoral degree..
(4)
(5) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ǡ
(6) ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ péripéties Ǥ
(7) Ǧǡ
(8) ǡ Úǡ
(9) Ǥ
(10) Ǥ ǡ˚ˈ˓˅ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ Ǧ ȋǨǨǨȌ ǡ ǡ Ƭ ǡ ¦Ï ǡ
(11) ǨǨǨǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ± . bussage ǡ ȋ ǨǨǨȌǡ Ǥ ʐˎ˃ˆˑˇ˃˓ˢˋː˃ʛ˃ˢǡ˒ˑːˈˉˈˋˏ˃ˏ˔ˏˈ˕ˍ˃Ǥ ʐˎ˃ˆˑˇ˃˓ˢ ˔˝˜ˑ ː˃ ʙˑˎ˚ˑ ʓˑ˄˓ˋ˚ˎˋˢ˕˃ǡ ˒˓ˋˢ˕ˈˎˍ˃˕˃ ˏ˖ ʠ˅ˋˎˈː˃ǡ ˚ˋ˚ˑ ʙˑˎ˟ˑǡ ˅˔ˋ˚ˍˋ ˇ˓˖ˆˋ ˍ˓˝˚ˏ˃˓ˋǡ ʏ˚ˑǡ ʏːˍ˃ ˑ˕ ʞˈ˕ˎˈ˛ˈ˅ǡ ʑˎ˃ˇˋˏˋ˓
(12)
(13) ǡ ʞˎ˃ˏˈː˃ ȋǨȌǡ ʕˑ˓ˑ ʞˋˎˈ˕ˑǡ ʚˡ˄ˑǡ ʏ˕˃ː˃ǡ ʞˎ˃ˏˈː ʞ˕ˋ˙˃˕˃ǡ ʮ˅˚ˑǡ ʤ˓ˋ˔˕ˑ˔˚ˑǡ ʏ˓ˋ˔ ˋ ˇ˓˖ˆˋ ˊː˃ˌːˋ ˋ ːˈˊː˃ˌːˋǡˍˑˋ˕ˑˏːˑˆˑˑ˕ˇ˃˅ː˃˔˝ˏː˃ˇ˓˃˔˕ː˃ˎǤ ʞ˃˚ˋːˍ˃Ǩ ʜ˃ ˒ˑ˔ˎˈˇːˑ ˏˢ˔˕ˑǡ ˄ˎ˃ˆˑˇ˃˓ˢ ː˃ ˏ˃ˌˍ˃ ˔ˋ ˋ ˄˃˜˃ ˔ˋǡ ː˃ˌǦˏːˑˆˑ ˓˃ˊ˄ˋ˓˃ ˔ˈ ˊ˃ ˒˃˓ˋ˕ˈǡːˑˑ˕˚˃˔˕ˋˋˊ˃ˇˑ˄˓ˑ˕ˑː˃˔˕˓ˑˈːˋˈǤ. . .
(14) . .
(15) CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. 1. I. II. III. IV. V. VI.. ϭ ϯ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ. Certainty Information Technology Method Relevance Structure. CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW. 13. I. II. III. IV. V.. ϭϯ Ϯϯ Ϯϴ ϯϬ ϯϯ. The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis Rules versus Standards Information under Precedent and Statute Discussion Conclusion. CHAPTER III. TWO TYPES OF LEGAL UNCERTAINTY. 35. I. II. III. IV. V. VI.. ϯϱ ϯϳ ϰϯ ϰϲ ϱϮ ϱϳ. Legal Uncertainty, Legal Theory, and Law-and-Economics Applicative and Hierarchic Uncertainty An Example The Relationship between Applicative and Hierarchic Indeterminacy A Second Example Conclusion. CHAPTER IV. ECONOMICS OF THE FACT-LAW DISTINCTION. 59. I. II. III. IV. V. VI.. ϲϬ ϲϰ ϲϳ ϲϵ ϳϮ ϳϱ. Definitions Bifurcation in a Pure Rationalist System Bifurcation in a Pure Subjectivist System Bifurcation in a Mixed System Implications Conclusion. CHAPTER V. FACT, LAW, AND LEGAL CHANGE. 77. I. II. III. IV. V.. ϳϵ ϴϱ ϵϰ ϭϬϬ ϭϬϭ. Fact and Law A Model of Legal Judgments The Mechanism of Legal Change Implications Conclusion. CHAPTER VI. REMOTENESS IN CONTRACT – AN EXAMPLE I. II. III. IV. V.. Remoteness The Judgment in The Achilleas From Hadley v Baxendale to The Achilleas Implications Conclusion. ϭϬϯ ϭϬϳ ϭϬϵ ϭϭϳ ϭϭϴ. . 103.
(16) . CHAPTER VII. METARULES VERSUS METASTANDARDS. 119. I. Definitions II. Precedent III. Common Law Metastandards: Two Examples IV. Statute V. Precedent versus Statute VI. International Law VII. Conclusion. ϭϮϭ ϭϮϵ ϭϯϯ ϭϯϳ ϭϰϭ ϭϰϰ ϭϰϵ. CHAPTER VIII. INFORMATION, PRECEDENT, AND STATUTE. 151. I. II. III. IV.. ϭϱϯ ϭϲϲ ϭϳϴ ϭϴϱ. The Basic Model Refinements Applications Conclusion. CHAPTER IX. PRECEDENT IN THE CIVIL AND COMMON LAW I. II. III. IV. V.. Preliminary Matters Precedent in France, Italy, Germany, and England Comparison Analysis Conclusion. CHAPTER X. CONCLUSION I. II. III. IV.. 188 ϭϴϵ ϭϵϰ ϮϬϭ ϮϬϱ ϮϭϮ. 213. Lawmaking as Production The Choice between Precedent and Statute Applications Ending. Ϯϭϯ Ϯϭϱ Ϯϭϵ ϮϮϵ. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Ϯϯϭ. . .
(17) Table of Figures ͳǣ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳ ʹǣ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͷͳ ͵ǣǡ ǡ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͺͶ Ͷǣǡ ǡ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͺͻ ͷǣǡ ǡ ǤǤͻ͵ ǣǡ ǡ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤͳͲ ǣ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤʹͳ͵ ͺǣ ǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤʹͳ . . .
(18) . .
(19) Chapter I INTRODUCTION ǤȂ ǫ
(20) Ȃ ǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(21) ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(22) ǡ Ǥǡ ǤȂǡ ǡ ǡǤǤ ǡ ǡǤ
(23) ȋǮǯȌ ȋǮ ͷͲ Ȁ ǯȌǤ Ǯ ǯ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ . &ŝŐƵƌĞϭ͗'ĞŶĞƌĂůŶĂůLJƚŝĐĂů&ƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ. ǣ ǮǯǦ Ǥ
(24) Ǥ
(25) ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
(26) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǦǦ ǡ ǦǦ Ǥ ǮǯǡȂ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǯ ǯǡ Ǥ Ǯ ǯ ϭ .
(27) Ǥ ǡ ǤǮ ǯǡ ǯ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ ǡǡǤ Ǥ
(28) Ǯ ǯ ǡ ǯ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤ
(29)
(30)
(31) Ǥ
(32) ǡǡ Ǥ
(33)
(34) Ǥ ǡ
(35) ǯ
(36) Ǥ
(37) ǡ
(38)
(39) Ǥ
(40) ǡ ǡ
(41) Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ Ǥ
(42) ǡ Ǥ ǡǡǡ ǡǤǡ ǡ ǯ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǯ ǯǤ ǡ
(43) ǤǮǯ
(44) ǯ Ǥ
(45) ǡ Ǥ Ȃ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ
(46) Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(47) ǡǡ ǣ ǡ ǫ. Ϯ .
(48) ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(49)
(50) Ǥ
(51) ǦǦ ǡ Ǥ
(52) ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(53) ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(54) Ǧǡ
(55) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǤǮ ǯǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(56) ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(57) ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡ Ǥ
(58) ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
(59) Ǥ
(60) Ǥ
(61) ǦǦ ǡǮǯ Ǥ
(62) ǡ ǦǦ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ
(63) ǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ
(64)
(65) Ǥ
(66) ǡǦ Ǥǡ
(67) Ǥ
(68)
(69) Ǥ
(70) ǡǮ ǯǮǮ ǯǤ . ϯ .
(71) Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǯ ǯǫ ǯ ǤǡǡǤǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(72) Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǦ ǤǦ ǡǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǮ ǯ ǯǤ ǡ ǦǦ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ȃ Ǯ ǯǡ Ǥ Ǯ ǯǮ ǯǤ
(73) Ȃ ǡ Ȃ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ȂǮ ǯǡ ǡ Ǯ ǯ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ ǮǯǮǯǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǦǦ ϰ .
(74) ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǡǡ ǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(75) ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ȃ ǦȂǦ Ǥ
(76) ǡǦ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(77)
(78) Ǯ ǯǤ Ǧ ǣ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡǡǣ ǡ ǫ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ȃ Ȃ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(79) ǡ Ǥ ͉ͳͲǡͲͲͲ Ǧ ǡ ͉ͷͲǡͲͲͲǤ ǡ ǡ ǡǮͳͲ ǯǡ Ǯ ǯǡ͉͵ͲǡͲͲͲǤ Ǥ
(80) ǡ ǣ͉ͳͲǡͲͲͲ͉͵ͲǡͲͲͲǤ
(81) ǡ ǡ ǣ ͉ͷͲǡͲͲͲ ϱ .
(82) ǡ͉͵ͲǡͲͲͲ Ǥ
(83) ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(84)
(85)
(86) Ǥ
(87) ǣ ǡ ǡǡǤ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ
(88) ǡǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ ȂǦ ǤǡǡǦ Ǥ ǡǤ Ȃǡ ǡ Ǥ
(89) Ǥ
(90) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(91) ± ò . Ǥ
(92) Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥǡǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǮǯǤ ϲ .
(93) ǡ Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǯ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(94) Ǥ
(95) Ȃ Ǧ Ǥ
(96)
(97) ǯ Ǥ
(98) Ǥ
(99) Ǥ ǦǦ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(100) Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ
(101) ǡ Ǥ
(102) Ǥ
(103) ǡ Ǥ
(104) Ǥ ǡ
(105) Ǥ
(106) ǣ Ǧ Ǥ Ǥ
(107) ǡȋceteris paribusȌǮ ǯ Ǥ
(108) ǡ
(109) Ǥ
(110) ǡȋǡceteris Ȍǡ Ǥ
(111) ǡǡ Ǥ
(112) Ǥ ǡ
(113) Ǥ
(114) ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ
(115) ʹǤ Ǧ Ǧ Ǥ
(116) ǡǯ ǡǡ ǡǡǤ
(117) ǡ ǡǤ ǡǡǤ ϳ .
(118)
(119) Ǥ
(120)
(121) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(122) Ǥ
(123)
(124) Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǦǦ Ǥ ǦǦ ǤǦ Ǧ Ǥ
(125) Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ ǦǦ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(126)
(127) Ȃ Ǥ
(128) ǡ ǦǦ Ǥ ǡ
(129) Ǥ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ
(130) ǡǡ ǡ Ǥ
(131) Ȃ Ǥ ǡ
(132) . Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǯǯǯ ǡ Ǥ
(133) ǡ
(134) Ǥ Ǥ
(135) ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(136) ǡǡǡ Ǥ
(137) ǡǤ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǯ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǣ Ǥ
(138) ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ϴ .
(139) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(140)
(141) Ǥǡ
(142) ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(143) ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ȃ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ȃ Ǥ
(144) ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(145) ǡǡǤ
(146) ǡsingle Ǥ Ǧ ǡǡ Ǥ Donoghue Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ
(147) Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ
(148) ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ
(149) Ǥ ǣǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡǤ Ǧǡǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(150) Ǥ ǡ
(151) Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(152) ϵ .
(153) Ǯ ǯȂ Ǥ
(154) ǦǦ ǦǦǤ
(155) Ǥǡ
(156) ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
(157) ǡ
(158) ǡ
(159) Ǥ
(160) ͵ǡ
(161) Ǥ
(162) ǡ
(163) Ǧ Ǥ ǡ
(164) ǡǮǯ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ
(165) Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ͷǡ ͷǡ Ǥ
(166) ǡ Ǯǯǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡʹǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(167) Ǥ ǡ
(168) ͶǤ
(169) Ǥǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE
b) Nun gehen wir zum eigentlichen Beweis über. Dazu genügt es, nachzuweisen, d a ß M -{- Az ein Gitter von ganzen Elementen in 9t ist, da M ja maximales Gitter ganzer Elemente
including: 1) relevant international obligations and commitments to other countries; 2) whether the export complies with international non-proliferation efforts and China’s
Silima, Deputy Minister of Home Affairs of Tanzania; Mr Theoneste Mutsindashyaka, Executive Secretary of Regional Centre on Small Arms in the Great Lakes Region the Horn of Africa
Seminar Numerik und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen || Chapter 2: A Simple Example ||.. Michael Kreim || 21.01.07 ||
• Vorbelegungen für gering, mäßig und stark verschmutzte Flächen..
2.1 A seminar presentation is a means of communication with a specific audience (in the case of seminar presentations, with your fellow students).. It is NOT
"characteristics. This, too, spreads out as time goes on, and there finally occurs a time when the two cones overlap. Consider, again, the given equation. The second
To see how ‘From frequency’, ‘To frequency’ and ‘smoothing’ determine the shape of the filter, press the help button (in the command box entitled ‘Sound: Filter (pass