KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und
nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
KIT-Centrum Elementarteilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik KCETA
www.kit.edu
KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und
nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
KIT-Centrum Elementarteilchen- und Astroteilchenphysik KCETA
www.kit.edu
Kern- und Teilchenphysik SS2012
Johannes Blümer
Themen und Inhalte der Vorlesung
1) Di 17. April Übersicht, Notation, Kinematik
Inhaltsverzeichnis, Übungsbetrieb, Literatur, Notationen, Tour de Force, relativistische Kinematik 2) Do 19. April Beschleuniger
HV-Erzeugung, stat. Generatoren, Linearbeschleuniger, zykl. Beschleuniger, Kollider, kosm. Beschleuniger 3) Di 24. April Detektoren 1
Wechselwirkung von Teilchen und Strahlen mit Materie; experimentelle Methoden 4) Do 26. April Detektoren 2
Detektorbaukasten; Grossdetektoren; andere Anwendungen - Di 1. Mai Tag der Arbeit
5) Do 3. Mai Atomkerne 1
Streuversuche, Entdeckung der Atomkerne, Rutherford; Eigenschaften stabiler Kerne 6) Di 8. Mai Atomkerne 2
Masse, Bindungsenergie, Form von Kernen; Kernkräfte und Kernmodelle 7) Do 10. Mai Kernreaktionen 1
Spontane Zerfälle (Alpha, Beta, Gamma-Zerfälle);
8) Di 15. Mai Kernreaktionen 2
induzierte Kernspaltung, Kerntechnik; Kernfusion - Do 17. Mai Himmelfahrt
9) Di 22. Mai Kernphysik im Universum
Elementsynthese im Urknall; ~ in Sternen, Sternentwicklung, Supernovae; Kosm. Strahlung 10) Do 24. Mai Nukleonen 1
Elastische Streuung, Formfaktoren, Ladungsradien 11) Di 29. Mai Nukleonen 2
Tiefinelastische Streuung, angeregte Zustände von Nukleonen, Strukturfunktionen, Partonen, Quarks 12) Do 31. Mai Quarks, Gluonen, Hadronen
Quarkstruktur der Nukleonen, Quarks in Hadronen, qg-WW, Skalenverhalten 13) Di 5. Juni e+e- Kollisionen
Teilchenproduktion, Leptonpaare, Resonanzen, nicht-resonante Hadronproduktion, Gluonen - Do 7. Juni Fronleichnam
14) Di 12. Juni Symmetrien und Erhaltungssätze
Kontinuierliche und diskrete Symmetrien; C, P, CP, CPT 15) Do 14. Juni Schwache Wechselwirkung
Neutronen, Betazerfall, Paritätsverletzung, V-A-Wechselwirkung 16) Di 19. Juni Neutrale Kaonen
Kaonen, CP-Verletzung, CKM-Matrix 17) Do 21. Juni Neutrinos als Sonde
Geladene und neutrale Ströme, Neutrino-Quark-Streuung 18) Di 26. Juni W und Z Bosonen
Entdeckung und Eigenschaften, Bedeutung der Präzisionsmessungen 19) Do 28. Juni Das Standardmodell
20) Di 3. Juli Neutrino-Oszillationen
Neutrinos aus der Sonne, aus Beschleunigern und Reaktoren 21) Do 5. Juli Neutrinomasse
Neutrinomasse im Standardmodell, kosmologische Bedeutung; Betazerfall (KATRIN etc.), 0νββ-Zerfall 22) Di 10. Juli Dunkle Materie
Evidenzen für DM; Teilchenkandidaten; Entdeckungsversuche 23) Do 12. Juli Kosmische Strahlung
Beschleunigung, Ausbreitung in der Galaxie, Luftschauer, extragal. K.S., Bedeutung für Astro- und Teilchenphysik 24) Di 17. Juli Astroteilchenphysik
Die Querverbindungen zwischen Astronomie, Kosmologie, Kern- und Teilchenphysik v. Urknall bis zum Higgs 25) Do 19. Juli Offene Fragen, neue Projekte
Aktuelle und geplante Experimente/Messungen
IKP in KCETA KT2012 Johannes Blümer
Inhalt
2
http://www.auger.de/~rulrich/lehre/kerneteilchen2012/index.html
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Betatron
3
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
2
2
1 2 1 1
2 B p
qr
p E d
B r,t
qr r r dt
B r,t B dS
r
19 19
1. Particles accelerated by the rotational electric field generated by a time varying magnetic field.
2. In order that particles circulate at constant radius: dt E d
r
S d dt B
l d d E
t E B
2
B-field on orbit is one half of the average B over the circle. This
imposes a limit on the energy that can be achieved. Nevertheless the
constant radius principle is attractive for high energy circular accelerators.
Oscillations
about the design orbit are called betatron
oscillations
Magnetic flux,
Generated E-field
r
Betatron
Kerst and Serber built the first Betatron (1941)
Jones
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA 4
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
20
Betatron Motion
Exercise 2: As the oscillations from the design orbit in almost any accelerator are referred in terms of “betatron”
motion it is clearly important to understand this phenomena. Unsuprisingly, it was originally ascribed to oscillation in a betatron, but the name stuck!
In cylindrical coordinates the equation of motion for electrons is:
Where r and z refer to radial outward and vertical upward coordinates, is the azimuthal angle and is the angular velocity.
1. Assume the vertical component of the magnetic flux density is
where n is the field index and R is the reference orbit. Show the radial magnetic field with B r = 0 at z = 0 is
2. Using the normalised radial and vertical coordinates
show that the equations of motion become
Where 0 =v/R=eB 0 /m is the angular velocity of the orbiting particle. Also show that stability requires:
r 2 z
z r
dp dp
mr er B , er B
dt dt
v / r
0 0 1
n z
R r R
B B B n ... ,
r R
z 0 r
r R
nB
B z B z
r R
r R / R and =z/R
2
0 1 n 0 , + n 0 2 0 0 n 1
University of Melbourne
Betatron part of a 35M Volt electron accelerator used in nuclear research
between 1959- 1989.
Jones
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Microtron
5
22
and also by E.M. McMillan at the University of California in late 1945 (McMillan, 143).
The principle behind a microtron is similar to that of a cyclotron, but it is designed to accelerate electrons vice positive ions. The electrons pass through a circular orbit, each of which are all tangent to one another within the RF cavity. Each successive orbit is
longer than the one proceeding it such that
where the frequencies of revolution follow the sequence
RF Cavity x
y
Extraction
1 l
2 l
3 l
4 l
5 l
6 l
Figure 8: Basic principle of a microtron.
, m
0qB
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
schwache Fokussierung
6
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
22
Transverse Control: Weak Focusing
Particles injected horizontally into a uniform, vertical, magnetic field follow a circular orbit.
Misalignment errors and difficulties in perfect injection cause particles to drift vertically and radially and to hit walls.
A severe limitations on machine operation
Require some kind of stability mechanism.
Vertical focusing from non-linearities in the field (fringing fields). Vertical stability requires
negative field gradient. But radial focusing is
reduced, so effectiveness of the overall focusing is limited.
r r if
v m
v qBv m
2 0
2 0
i.e. horizontal restoring force is towards the design orbit.
1
0 d
dB n B
Stability condition:
Weak focusing: if used widely today, scale of magnetic components of a synchrotron would be large and costly
Transverse Control:
Weak Focusing
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Synchrotron
7
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Linearbeschleuniger
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
36
Synchrotron Oscillations Series of accelerating cavities in: (a) synchr otr on and (b) a linac RF
accelerating cavities
RF accelerating cavity In principle, synchrotrons or linacs are designed such that the synchronous particle is accelerated continuously. In practice, non- synchronous particles will require acceleration too! Thus, the question of phase stability , or do particles with different energies and phases remain close to the synchronous phase? L/ v
In order to d er iv e a n e q u at io n f or t h e p as sa ge o f n on -s yn ch ro n ou s p ar ti cl e t h ro u gh t h e accelerator we consider the time interval between passages of two successive modules of accelerating cavities (or sometimes called accelerating stations): where L is the distance between stations and v the particle velocity v:
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
SLAC, Stanford
9
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
68
Linacs
Linacs soon!
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Teilchenoptik und Phasenstabilität
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
25
Sextupoles are used to correct longitudinal momentum errors.
SLAC quadrupole
Focusing Elements
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
“FODO” – Fokussierung
11
R.M. Jones, Physics of Particle Accelerators, PHYS 4722, Circular Accelerators Lecture, 2011.
24
in
out
1 1 1 0
x x x f
x
x
f
f
x x
Effect of a focussing thin lens can be
represented by a matrix In a drift space of
length , x is unaltered
but x x+ x out 0 1 in
1
x x l
x x
In an F-drift-D system, combined effect is...
l f l f
f l l f
l
f 1
1 1 1
0 1
1 0
1 1 1
0 1
2
out in 2
1
0 x
l f
f x x l
Thin lens of focal length f 2 / is focusing overall, if f.
Same applies for D-drift-F ( f - f )
Thus, a system of AG lenses can focus in both planes simultaneously!
“FODO” lattices of this form are almost always used...
Thin Lens Analogue of AG Focusing
D---drift---F
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Kollider: e + e – , ep, p(bar)p
12
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA 13
Beamlines at ANKA 29
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Synchrotronstrahlung
14
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Livingston-Diagramm
15
1930 2010
Gleichrichter mit
Spannungsvervielfacher Elektrostatischer Generator
Zyklotron mit Sektorfokusierung
Protonen-Linearbe- schleuniger
Elektronen-Linearbe- schleuniger
Synchrozyklotron ISR
Elektronensynchrotron starke
Fokusierung
Starke
Fokusierung schwache
Fokusierung
schwache Fokusierung
Protonensynchrotron Speicherringe
(Äquivalent-Energie)
Sp Sp
Tevatron LHC ?
SSC ?
100 keV 1 MeV 10 MeV 100 MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV 10 TeV 100 TeV 1000 TeV 10000 TeV 100000 TeV
1940
Beschleunigerenergie(Laborsystem)
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Betatron
Zyklotron
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA 16
10
010
–210
–410
–610
–810
–1010
1010
1210
1410
1610
1810
20LHC GZK?
Flux x Ener gy
2[r el at iv e u ni ts ]
Energy [eV]
knee
ankle
balloons, satellites
air showers
1/(m
2s
)1/(km
2y
)1/(km
2100y)
LHC bea
Energiespektrum der kosmischen Strahlung
Energy [eV/particle]
10
1310
1410
1510
1610
1710
1810
1910
20]
1.5eV
-1sr
-1s
-2J(E) [m
2.5Scaled flux E
10
1310
1410
1510
1610
1710
1810
19[GeV]
s
ppEquivalent c.m. energy
10
210
310
410
510
6RHIC (p-p) -p) HERA (
Tevatron (p-p) LHC (p-p)
ATIC PROTON RUNJOB
KASCADE (QGSJET 01) KASCADE (SIBYLL 2.1) KASCADE-Grande 2009 Tibet ASg (SIBYLL 2.1)
HiRes-MIA HiRes I HiRes II Auger 2009
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
17
Energiespektrum und Schwerpunktsenergie
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA 18
log(R/cm)
log(B/G)
15
10
5
0
–5
–10 5 10 15 2 0 2 5 3 0
15
10
5
0
–5
–10 5 10 15 2 0 2 5 3 0
Neutron Stars
Active Galactic Nuclei
White Dwarfs
others
Protons Iron
Galactic
Disk Galactic Halo
Radio Lobes
Galaxy Clusters Gamma Ray Bursts
SNR
1 kpc
1 pc 1 Mpc
100 T eV
100 Ee V
Hillas condition and diagram:
E max ~ ß Z B L
Hillas-Diagramm
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Galaktische kosmische Beschleuniger
19
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Extragalaktische kosmische
Beschleuniger
20
IKP in KCETA KT2012 Johannes Blümer
v3 24. April 2012
3
Detektoren 1
Wechselwirkung von Teilchen und Strahlen mit Materie; experimentelle Methoden
Detektoren 2
Detektorbaukasten; Grossdetektoren; andere
Anwendungen
P = (E, p) !
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Was wollen wir messen?
4
KT2012 Johannes Blümer IKP in KCETA
Systematik
5