• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

CaDyTS: Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Simulations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "CaDyTS: Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Simulations"

Copied!
6
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

SUBPART EIGHT

(2)
(3)

CHAPTER 32

CaDyTS: Calibration of Dynamic Traffic

Simulations

Kai Nagel, Michael Zilske and Gunnar Fl¨otter¨od

32.1

Basic Information

Entry point to documentation:

http://matsim.org/extensions→cadytsIntegration

Invoking the module:

http://matsim.org/javadoccadytsIntegration →RunCadyts4CarExampleclass

Selected publications:

Fl¨otter¨od (2010); Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011); Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011a); Fl¨otter¨od (2008); Moyo Oliveros (2013)

32.2

Introduction

Cadyts (Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Simulations)1—licensed under GPLv3 (GNU General

Public License version 3.0)—calibrates disaggregate travel demand models of DTA (Dynamic Traffic Assignment) simulators from traffic counts and vehicle re-identification data. Cadyts is broadly compatible with DTAmicrosimulators, into which it can be hooked through parsimonious interfaces.

As explained formally in Chapter 47 and 48, DTA aims at consistency between a dynamic travel demand model, defining the choice of activity-travel plans, and a dynamic network supply model, capturing spatiotemporal network flows and congestion evolution.

1http://people.kth.se/gunnarfl/cadyts.html

How to cite this book chapter:

Nagel, K, Zilske, M and Fl¨otter¨od, G. 2016. CaDyTS: Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Simulations. In: Horni, A, Nagel, K and Axhausen, K W. (eds.) The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, Pp. 213–216. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/baw.32. License: CC-BY 4.0

(4)

214 The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim

Cadyts adjusts the plan choice probabilities of all agents, resulting in simulated network condi-tions that are consistent with measured real-world data while maintaining the behavioral plausibil-ity of the underlying travel demand model. Within MATSim, plan choice probabilities adjustment is realized by adjusting plan scores, as explained in the next section.

32.3

Adjusting Plans Utility

When traffic counts are the empirical source, plan-specific score corrections are composed of link-and time-additive terms 1Sa(k)for each link a and each calibration time step k (often one hour). When congestion is light and traffic counts are independently and normally distributed, these correction terms become

1Sa(k) =

ya(k) − qa(k) σ2

a(k)

(32.1) where ya(k)is the real-world measurement on link a in time step k, qa(k)is its simulated coun-terpart and σ2

a(k)is (an estimate of) the real measurement variance (assuming its expected value coincides with the prediction qa(k)of a perfectly calibrated simulator).

The score correction of an agent’s given activity-travel plan is calculated as the sum of all 1Sa(k), given that following that plan implies entering link a within time step k. With this, the a posteriori choice probability of agent n’s plan i given the count data y = {ya(k)}becomes

Pn(i | y) ∼ exp  Sn(i) + X ak∈i 1Sa(k)   = exp  Sn(i) + X ak∈i ya(k) − qa(k) σ2 a(k)   (32.2)

where Sn(i)is the a priori score of plan i of agent n, as calculated for example with Equation (3.1) and ak ∈ i reads: “following plan i implies entering link a in time step k”.

Intuitively, if the simulated value qa(k)is smaller than the real measurement ya(k), then a score increase, and thus a choice probability increase, results. The variance σ2

a(k)denotes the level of trust in that specific measurement—a large σ2

a(k)implies a low trust level, taking effect through a large denominator in the corresponding score correction addend.

Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011) is the key methodological reference on Cadyts. It derives the calibration approach from a Bayesian argument and provides more technical information, such as a more general correction of the utility function than in Equation (32.1) that also applies when congestion is present. A lighter presentation is Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011a), where the formulas above are discussed in somewhat greater detail.

32.4

Hooking Cadyts into MATSim

Hooking Cadyts into MATSim is based on the following operations:

1. Initialization: When the calibration is started, it requires all available traffic counts and some further parameters. For this, the Cadyts functionvoid addMeasurement(...)is called once

for every measurement before the simulation starts. It registers a certain measurement type, which has been observed on a specific link.

2. Iterations: The calibration is run jointly with the simulation until (calibrated) stationary conditions are reached.

a. Demand simulation: The calibration needs an access point in the simulation to affect the plan choice. There are various ways to realize this, depending on the simulator. Before a MATSim agent chooses a plan, it asks the calibration through the Cadyts function

(5)

CaDyTS: Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Simulations 215

d o u b l e c a l c L i n e a r P l a n E f f e c t ( c a d y t s . d e m a n d . Plan <L > plan )

for all of this plans’ score offsets. The agent then chooses a plan based on accordingly modified scores.

All selected plans of an iteration are registered to Cadyts by

void a d d T o D e m a n d ( c a d y t s . d e m a n d . Plan < L > plan ) .

Since Cadytshas its own plans format, MATSimplans need to be converted to that format beforehand.

b. Supply simulation: The calibration must observe simulated network conditions to evalu-ate their deviation from real traffic counts. For this, the Cadyts function

void a f t e r N e t w o r k L o a d i n g ( S im Res ult s < L > s i m R e s u l t s )

is called once after each network loading. It passes a container object to the calibration that provides information about the most recent network loading results, particularly on simulated flows at measurement locations.

32.5

Applications

Cadyts has been successfully applied in studies like Ziemke et al. (2015); Zilske and Nagel (2015); Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011a). Z¨urich scenario results illustrate its efficiency, as shown in Fl¨otter¨od et al. (2011b, Slide 8), reproduced in Figure 32.1.

40 30 20 10 0 7 8 9 10 11 12

Mean relative error before calibration [%] Mean relative error after calibration [%]

13

Time [h]

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Mean relative error [%]

Figure 32.1:Z¨urich case study results: mean relative error in link volumes.

(6)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Too fast (or too large) growth might mean that the tourists do not like it any more or that the environment will be damaged too much. The effects on the culture are difficult

This allows the Bayesian calibration of a large-scale patient-specific model of AAA growth based on longitudinal image data.. By using the statistical model for surface measurements,

occurs.. The red line, region one, is one of the outermost zones in our domain. This region consists out of a mixture of newly accreted matter and traces of the ashes of the last

All workers, including new entrants, have the option either of staying with the defined-benefit, pay-as-you-go scheme or switching to the new funded, defined-contribution plan..

At each time step the model first calculates curves of regional liquid fuel demand and supply versus cost, which reflect the changing domestic potential of production, substitution,

Because the morbidity rates and survival probabilities are relatively constant in different regions, it is possible to use the estimation of the morbidity rates and/or

During the period 1953-1971, when the price of energy was not high and India was at a preliminary stage of industrial development, the growth rate of commercial

The DAkkS is signatory to the multilateral agreements of the European co-operation for Accreditation (EA) and of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation