• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Teilchenphysik 2 — W/Z/Higgs an Collidern

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Teilchenphysik 2 — W/Z/Higgs an Collidern"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

KIT-Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik

Institut f¨ur Experimentelle Teilchenphysik Dr. Matthias Schr¨oder

Teilchenphysik 2 — W/Z/Higgs an Collidern

Sommersemester 2019

Exercises No. 6

Discussion on July 9, 2019

Please read the paper:

Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks by the CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 121801

NB: Access to PRL is only free within the KIT-network. An alternative perprint- version of the paper is available https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08242.

Please prepare answers to the following questions:

a) What is the goal of the presented analysis?

b) How many H → bb events do you expect in total in the analysed dataset, assuming a Standard Model Higgs boson?

c) Why is VH the most sensitive production process in the search for H → bb decays at the LHC and the Tevatron? What are the problems with the other channels?

d) Which final states in which channels does the analysis target? Why these and not other ones?

e) How is the signal extracted and what is the purpose of the control regions?

f) What are the main Standard Model background processes and how are they modelled?

g) What is the benefit of clustering jets from the particle candidates reconstructed with the particle-flow algorithm? Are there further benefits of the particle- flow-based object reconstruction?

1

(2)

h) During the reconstruction, physics-objects like jets are corrected for energy deposits from pile-up collisions. How?

i) What are the primary event selection criteria?

j) How are the V-boson and the Higgs-boson candidates reconstructed?

k) How is the dijet invariant mass m(jj) of Higgs-boson candidate decays cali- brated? Why is the mass not used as final sensitive variable in the analysis?

l) How are the signal and control regions defined? Which distributions are used in the final binned profile likelihood fit?

m) What is the signal strength µand and which value is measured with the 2017 data? What do we learn from this value about the properties of the Higgs boson?

n) What are the dominant systematic uncertainties?

o) How is the analysis method validated?

p) Which measurements are combined to achieve the observation of H → bb decays?

q) What is the probability that the observed signal is just a statistical fluctuation?

What is the difference between the observed and the expected significance?

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The equations of motion of a system described by the field Φ(x) can be derived from the Lagrange density L using the Euler-Lagrange equations.. ∂

In the Standard Model, the mass terms for the gauge bosons W ± and Z emerge dynamically from their coupling to the Higgs field via the covariant

In the Standard Model, the mass terms for the gauge bosons W ± and Z emerge dynamically from their coupling to the Higgs field via the covariant

In this exercise, we want to measure the efficiency of a high-level trigger path that requires the presence of one jet with transverse momentum p T above a certain thresh- old, in

Precise Measurement of the W-Boson Mass with the CDF II Detector, Phys. An alternative perprint- version of the paper is available http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.0275.. Please

The depen- dence of the momentum scale on the difference of the muon polar angles is used to calibrate the polar angle measurement and the residual bias in track curvature as a

Classifier Output Signal

Please bring a laptop and make sure beforehand that there is a working installation of a recent ROOT6 version (the exercise has been tested with ROOT version 6.06/06).. Also, please