• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Cross validation of in situ, airborne and remote sensing data from East Antarctica

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Cross validation of in situ, airborne and remote sensing data from East Antarctica"

Copied!
23
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Cross validation of in situ, airborne and remote

sensing data from East Antarctica

A. Pfaffling 1 , T. Worby 2 &

R. Massom 2

(1) formerly AWI, now Consultant, Germany.

(2) Australian Antarctic Division & ACE CRC, Australia.

(2)

Sea Ice data X-Validation

• Database & Sensors

• in-situ validation

• Remote sensing

(3)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 3

ARISE 03 Expedition

(4)

Cruise track

(5)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 5

Ice station layout

(6)

Flight map ARISE

110°

110°

112°

112°

114°

114°

116°

116°

118°

118°

-66°30' -66° 0' -65°30' -65° 0' -64°30'

030929 NNW/2 031002_1 NNE/3 031002_2 SSE/7 031003_1

021003_2 NE/4 031008 SE/8 031018

031019 031020_1 031020_2

(7)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 7

Sea Ice data X-Validation

• Database & Sensors

• in-situ validation

• Remote sensing

(8)

Gadgets

• AWI HEM sensor total thickness

• Aerial photogr.

• IR thermometer

classification

(9)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 9

Sea Ice data X-Validation

• Database & Sensors

• In-situ validation

• Remote sensing

(10)

Expedtition “ARISE”

Sep/Oct 2003

RSV “Aurora Australis”

Ice Station 4 3 days

999 drillings

20 m 500 m

B A

C

(11)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 11

6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

total thickness [m]

500 400

300 200

100 0

profile [m]

drillings

Drilled total thickness

(12)

6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

total thickness [m]

500 400

300 200

100 0

profile [m]

drillings

200 150 100 50 0

Depth [m]

10 100

Bulk conductivity [mS/m]

50 0

Depth [m]

10 100

Bulk conductivity [mS/m]

Drilled total thickness

(13)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 13

4 3 2 1 0

Ice thickness [m]

500 400

300 200

100 0

Profile [m]

Drilled thickness 3.68 kHz IP 3.68 kHz Q

Heli-EM thickness

(14)

0.16

0.12

0.08

0.04

0.00

1.2 1.0

0.8 0.6

0.4 0.2

0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0

3.0 2.5

2.0 1.5

1.0 0.5

0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

unfilterd TTem smooth f1 IP smooth f1 Q drillings Probability vs. ice thickness

(15)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 15

HEM precision & accuracy

25 m

doughnut foot-

print 10…50 cm

Point-by- Point

thickness

≥ 500 m

“swath”

profile subset 1…5 cm

Level ice

thickness

(16)

Sea Ice data X-Validation

• Database & Sensors

• in-situ validation

• Remote sensing

(17)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 17

MODIS

scene plus EM track

145 km

(18)
(19)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 19

MODIS +

HEM +

aerial photos

155 km

(20)
(21)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 21

(22)
(23)

03.08.2006 Pfaffling et.al. Sea Ice X-Validation 23

Next moves

• Get into quantitative x-comp.

• HEM - AMSR-E = Ice thickness?

• Heliborne impulse radar snow thick. in concert with HEM ->

Weddell Sea

Sep/Oct 06

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

• polar climate properties (e.g. snow accumulation rates) can be inverted from microwave remote sensing data, with more accurate tools

CH 4 emission rate results in kt CH 4 yr −1 for the coal mine ventilation shafts Theodor Shaft and Bockraden Shaft using the Gaussian plume model and the Gaussian integral

After a recent instrument modification, retrievals of the column averaged dry air mole fractions for methane XCH 4 (or for carbon dioxide XCO 2 ) derived from MAMAP observations in

To contribute to the interpretation of the remotely sensed sea ice thickness products, which are mainly based on freeboard determination from altimeter measurements, available

• Our results from field spectroscopy of dominant brown algae of the order Fucales and Laminariales indicate that species of the same genus are difficult to distinguish

From these data the in-situ water leaving remote sensing reflectance ρ w is calculated in order to validate MERIS remote sensing reflectance and to estimate errors in the MERIS

Our approach to airborne remote sensing uses the hyperspectral imaging sensor AISA Eagle.. Within two projects, Innohyp and CoastEye*, the sensor AISA Eagle was integrated into a

Combining gravity and topographic data from VISA aerogeophysical campaigns with a global gravity field model a regional geoid for Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica, will