The contribution of NGOs to the cultural diversity: the case of Balochistan
Zaidi, Syed Raza Irfan Shah and Ghutai, Gul and Zaman, Nadeem Uz
Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Quetta, Pakistan, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women University, Quetta, Pakistan
14 March 2012
Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37357/
MPRA Paper No. 37357, posted 14 Mar 2012 20:01 UTC
1
c e h
T o n t r i b u t i o n o f N G O s t o t h e c u l t u r a l d i v e r s i t y : t h e c a s e o f B a l o c h i s t a n
i d i a Z h a h S n a f r I a z a R d e y S , r o s s e f o r P t n a t s i s s
A BalochistanUniversityo fInformationTechnology , n
a t s i k a P , a t t e u Q , s e c n e i c S t n e m e g a n a M d n a g n i r e e n i g n E
,i a t u h G l u G ,
r e r u t c e
L SardarBahadur KhanWomen University ,Quetta ,Pakistan
n a m a Z z U m e e d a N ,
r o s s e f o r P t n a t s i s s
A BalochistanUniversityo fInformationTechnology , n
a t s i k a P , a t t e u Q , s e c n e i c S t n e m e g a n a M d n a g n i r e e n i g n E
2 1 0 2 , h c r a M 5 1
2
t c a rt s b A
n
A NGO- though no ta permsi isble term- i sa nongovernmenta lorganzia iton o r n
a associa iton made fo rthe weflare of society a sa chartiable rtust ,non-proif t l a t n e m n r e v o g f o t r a p a s i o h w n o s r e p n o m m o c r e h t o r o n o it a d n u o f , n o it a r o p r o c
s O G N . r o t c e
s haveplayed a con isderablyimpotrant r ole in t hedevelopmen to f s
e ir t n u o c g n i p o l e v e d
% 0 6 d n a s e ir t n u o
c obtain thei r aid through NGOs . In e
h t n a t si h c o l a
B NGO shave been acitvely engaged in regiona,l l ocal ,na itona l e
b r i e h t e c n is s s e n is u b d n a t n e m n r e v o g h ti w s r e tt a m l a n o it a n r e t n i d n
a ginning .
l a r u tl u c e h t d e tf i h s e v a h o t d i a s n e tf o e r a s O G N e h t e m it r e v o , e r o f e r e h T
y lt c e ri d n i r o y lt c e ri d r e h ti e s r e h t o e h t r o s y a w e m o s n i e c n i v o r p e h t f o y ti s r e v i d
ri e h t h g u o r h
t opera itons ,srtuggle sand improved understanding o fsocie ite .s I n y
d u t s s i h
t wehave dsicusse d thei mpac to fNGO sand t hei rilmtis i n theprovince l
a c it ir c a s i h c i h
w par tand anoppo trunsi itcs tateo fPaksitan ,Balochsitan .
: s d r o w y e
K shitfsi nt hecutlura ldiverstiy ;NGOs ;Balochistan
3
n o it c u d o rt n I
d e s u s i h c i h w S O G N m r e t e h T . tl u c if fi d s i s O G N f o n o it i n if e d e h t d l e if c i m e d a c a n I
. s e c a l p d n a s e m it t n e r e ff i d n i y a w t n e r e ff i d n i d o o t s r e d n u d n
a In Encyclopedia
t o n , n o it a zi n a g r o e t a v ir p a s i t i , s a d e n if e d s i O G N , w a L l a n o it a n r e t n I f o
o g a y b d e h si l b a t s
e vernmen tor i nterna itona lagreement ,which i scapable o f e s o h w d n a s e it i v it c a s ti f o e u tr i v y b s ri a ff a l a n o it a n r e t n i n i e l o r a g n i y a l p
, y lr a li m i S . ) 8 0 0 2 , n a n l a C t t o c S ( s t h g ir g n it o v t n e d n e p e d n i y o j n e s r e b m e m
e l c it r
a .1 oft heEuropeanConven itonont heRecogni itonoft heLega lPersonaltiy n
o N l a n o it a n r e t n I f
o -Governmen tOrganzia itons ,deifne sNGO sa sassocia itons , n
o n a e v a h h c i h w , s n o it u ti t s n i e t a v ir p r e h t o d n a s n o it a d n u o
f -proif tmaking aim
c a n o y rr a c ; w a l y b d e h si l b a t s e n e e b e v a h ; y ti li t u l a n o it a n r e t n i f
o itvi ite sin a t
s e it r a p e h t f o e n o f o y r o ti rr e t e h t n i s e c if f o l a i c if f o r i e h t e v a h d n a s e t a t s o w t t s a e l
.) 8 0 0 2 , n a n l a C t t o c S ( n o it n e v n o C e h t o
t Howeve rmoregenerallyt het erm r efer s e n s i h c i h w y ti v it c a e h t d e r e d is n o c h c i h w n o it a zi n a g r o e l b a ti f o r p n o n t a h
t tihe r
t a h t s i n o it i d d a t n a tr o p m i n A . r o t c e s s s e n is u b a r o n r o r o t c e s e t a t s h ti w e t a l e r
t if e n e b s e it i v it c a e s o h w n o it a zi n a g r o t if e n e b l a u t u m d n a s e v it a r e p o o c e k il n u
, s e i d o b l a u t u m h ti w p a lr e v o s i e r e h t h g u o h tl A . s r e b m e m r i e h t y lt c e ri d e r o m
p l e h o t m i a s O G
N interested o fmanyandunspeciifedpersons . O
G
N ifrs t invented by the Untied Na iton (UN ) and i t descirbe s ti , “A non- s
i ) O G N ( n o it a zi n a g r o l a t n e m n r e v o
g a not- rf -o profti ,voluntary ctizien sgroup , s
i h c i h
w organzied on a l ocal ,na itona lor i nterna itonal l eve lto address sisues i n .
d o o g c il b u p e h t f o t r o p p u
s Task o irented and made up o f people wtih a n a ir a ti n a m u h d n a s e c i v r e s f o y t e ir a v a m r o fr e p s O G N , t s e r e t n i n o m m o c
n e m n r e v o G o t s n r e c n o c ’ s n e zi ti c g n ir b , s n o it c n u
f ts ,montio rpoilcy and program
e h t t a s r e d l o h e k a t s y t e i c o s l i v i c f o n o it a p i c it r a p e g a r u o c n e d n a n o it a t n e m e l p m i
. l e v e l y ti n u m m o
c They provide analy is sand expetrsie ,serve a sea lry warning e m o S . s t n e m e e r g a l a n o it a n r e t n i t n e m e l p m i d n a r o ti n o m p l e h d n a s m si n a h c e m
c e p s d n u o r a d e zi n a g r o e r
a iifc sisues ,such a shuman irghts ,the envrionmen to r
4 h
tl a e
h ” (Lynn R .Kahle ,Angeilne G .Close ,2011) .Bu tNGO scame to wolrd l ong l a t n e m n r e v o g n o n d n a c it a m e l b o r p e r a s O G N . t p e c n o c d n a e m a n e r o f e b
f o w e i v f o t n i o p e h t m o rf d e r u t c u rt s s a w t I .s n o it a i c o s s
a governmen tand gained
. s n o it a zi n a g r o l a t n e m n r e v o g n o n s a s e ir a d n u o b s ti
t I . y t e i c o s f o t n e m p o l e v e d l a i c o s h ti w d e h c a tt a e r a n o it a l e r ri e h t d n a s e l o r s O G N
e r a fl e w e h t r o f t li u b s
’t I . e r u li a f t e k r a m d n a e r u li a f t n e m n r e v o g t a h t d l e h s i
o t c e s t e k r a m r o f d n a m e
d r .NGO splan the weflare o feconomy i n the chartiy b
g n ill o r f o t c e j o r
p ack t he rfon iter soft hestate .These canplay bes tpo is itve r ole e h t e c n e u lf n i n a c d n a s e v it a it i n i y c il o p y tr e p o r p l a u t c e ll e t n i e r u t u f g n i p a h s n i
n o
n -governmenta lpubilcac itona swell (DuncanMaththew ,s2011).
, g n i n n a l p o t s e c i v r e s f o n o is i v o r p t c e ri d e h t m o rf e l o r e h t e g n a h c s O G N
s O G N d n a t n e m n r e v o g y b d e d i v o r p s e c i v r e s f o g n it a l u g e r d n a g n ir o ti n o m
e h t n i y t e i c o s l i v i c n o t c a p m i s O G N . s e it i v it c a t n e m n r e v o g f o e l a c s e h t e c u d e r
e s r u o
c o fsocia lchange .NGO swork closely to thei rgovernmen ta spa trner .s I n d n a s t n e m n r e v o g d n a s r o n o d r i e h t o t d n u f d e v i e c e r s O G N s e ir t n u o c g n i p o l e v e d
.l a o g c i g e t a rt s a h ti w s r e d i v o r p e c i v r e s f o e l o r e h t m r o fr e p
d d n a e r a fl e w , n o it a c u d e , h tl a e h t u o y rr a c s O G
N evelopmen t func itons ,
. ) 1 1 0 2 , e v o L o n a m is u C n n a y r a M ( s e t a t s k a e w n i y ll a i c e p s
e More ac itvi ites
, g n it o m o r p e r a g n i d i v o r p e c i v r e s s a s O G N f o n o it c n u f e h t h ti w g n i v l o v n i
f o s y a w r o s e c i v r e s w e n g n it n e v n i , s d e e n e l p o e p g n is s e s s a , m si r e e t n u l o v
s t o o r s s a r g l l a m s g n i d n u f , s tl u s e r g n it a u l a v e , s e c i v r e s g n ir e v il e d , n o is i v o r p
. c t e s n o it a zi n a g r
o They may cont irbute isgniifcan ytl to socio economic e h t n i d e t c ir t s e r g n i e b t u o h ti w d r a e h s e c i o v r i e h t e k a m n a c s O G N . t n e m p o l e v e d
s e ir t n u o c n i e l o r y e k a y a l p s O G N . s r e tt a m l a n o it a n s n a rt r o l a n o it a n r e t n i f o e s a c
s s e r p o t r e w o p s ti s e s u b a t n e m n r e v o g e r e h
w down individua’l s rfeedom and
g n i k e e s t o n e r a s O G N . t h g i e w r e t n u o c a s y a l p s O G N r o t c e s e t a v ir p e h t n I . s t h g ir
t e g r a t r i e h t o t y e n o m d n a e zi s , e l a c s r i e h t n i y ti s r e v i d f o e s u a c e b t if o r p
c a r i e h t n i e v it a v o n n i e l b i x e lf e r o m e b o t d i a s e r a s O G N . s e ir a i c if e n e
b itvi ites .
5
t u b e l b a t n u o c c a g n i e b t o n s a s O G N . e l p o e p f o s d e e n t u o d n if o t k c i u q e r a y e h T
r o t i c il p x e s i ti r e h t e h w e g n a h c o t l a i c o s o t t n e m ti m m o c g n o rt s a e v a h s O G N
t n e m p o l e v e d d n a f e il e r l a n o it a n r e t n i n i s r e y a l p y e k e m o c e b e v a h s O G N . t o n
e c u d e r t I . s tr o ff
e spovetry and promote ssustainable development .I tseem s e
h t s s e r d d a o t y a w e h t t u o d n if o t e v it c e ff e s
’t I .s r o n o d r o f r e n tr a p l a e d
i solu iton
f
o problem.
s a h c u s s e u s si l a t e i c o s f o t si l a e d u l c n i e v it c a e r a s O G N h c i h w n i s a e r a e h T
a ir a ti n a m u h , s t h g ir n a m u
h n reilef , envrionmenta l degrada iton , heatlh and .
) 6 0 0 2 . r u a S . G . K , t ti W . W e v e t S ( t n e m p o l e v e d c i m o n o c
e NGO ba iscally
d n a n o it a d n u o f , n o it a zi n a g r o e l b a ti r a h c , s e it e i c o s n i n o it a i c o s s a n a d e t s e g g u s
n o
n -proftiable corpora iton ,which doe sno toperate unde rthe restirc iton o f .
e v it o m n r a e t if o r p y n a e v a h t o n o d y e h t ,t n e m n r e v o
g tiI f ear sproif ,t ti doe snot r
e v o g r o l a g e l r e h t o e k il d e t u b ir t si
d nmen torganzia iton s I(cnl ,1997)
Every coun rty alway stires to ge tan i ndependent ,vigorou sand ful lo fenergy s
O G
N es cto rduet o
. n o it a it o g e n d n a n o it a s r e v n o c f o t h g ir e h t g n i v a H ) A
s n e s e h t e t o m o r P )
B eoft oleranceandpa itence.
. y ti li b a t s l a i c o s d n a l a c i m o n o c e d n a w a l f o e l u r e u rt f o g n it si x E ) C
. y c n e i c if f E ) D
.r o t c e s s s e n is u b e t a v ir p n i y ti li b a t S ) E
d n a d o o g A )
F stablemarke teconomy . I(cnl ,1997)
t u b y rt n u o c t n e r e ff i d f o e l p o e p t n e r e ff i d n i n o it p e c r e p t n e r e ff i d e v a h s
` O G N
t n e m r e tt e b n a m u h r o f e t a v it c a h c i h w s e it it n e c is a b a s a r e d is n o c s i ti y ll a r e n e g
ti f o r p r o f t o
n (Salmon ,1997). Some itme NGOs created some othe rac itvi ite so r
6
e c n u o n n a y e h t e k il , y l e s o l c e t u b ir t n o c o t y t e i c o s f o s n o s r e p l l a e g a g n e o t l li w
) 9 9 9 1 , h si rI ( s t n e d u t s r o f s p i h s r a l o h c s e m o
s .
n
I some countire si ti simpo tran tfo rthese enit ite stha tthey have to take the t
si n i m d n a t n e m n r e v o g f o l a v o r p p
a ry to work there ,e.g .the work o fNG Os y l n o t o n s O G N . c t e y rt si n i m n o it a c u d e , y rt si n i m h tl a e h m o rf l a v o r p p a t e g d l u o h s
d n a t n a c if i n g is o t e v a h y e h t ,t n e m h si l b a t s e f o m e t s y s d o o g f o s e s a b e h t n o k r o w
l n c I(
l l e w s a s r e m m a r g o r p l u f g n i n a e
m ,1997 )
r a e l c e w s
A some NGO sworker swtih the permsi ison o fgovernmen tsame ilke t
u o h ti w s e i c n e g a r i e h t p u e s o l c t o n n a c y e h
t thepermsi ison o fgovernmen tilkei n d
n a h s e d a l g n a B , n a t si k a
P Srlianka)(Salmon ,1997) e
m it e m o s , e r u t a n y
B NGO sface problem s(Ma trens ,2002:277) .Before Paksitan e
m a
c in to being isnce tha t itme NGOs are i n proces sbu twel ldeveloped i n d
n a s 0 8 9
1 1990s (Boone,Paul ,2009) buti nt hecurren tenvrionmentt housand so f n i y ll a i c e p s e , s e ir t n u o c e s e h t f o t n e m r e t t e b e h t r o f g n i d e e c o r p e r a s O G N
e k il s r e y a l p y e k s
’ d lr o w e h t r o f e c n a tr o p m i c i g e t a rt s t a e r g s a h h c i h w n a t si h c o l a B
. c t e K U , A S
U NGO splaya keyr olei nt heprocesst odevelopmen to fcoun rtyand s O G N f o l e n n a c h g u o r h t d i a
% 0 6 t n e m p o l e v e d r i e h t d e si a r s e ir t n u o c y n a m
) 4 0 0 2 , o r e t tr u F
( .Thi sdevelopmen tsi i n t he f orm ofi nterna itonal r eile fand e ffo trs . s
O G N e r e h w s e it i n u m m o c r o o p e h t r o
F honor bulid l ocal r esource sfor l ow cos t d n a o m u F , s b b i U ( y g o l o n h c e t n r e d o m a h g u o r h t s d e e n c is a b e h t l li f l l u f h c i h w
) 9 9 9 1 , y b u K
ti e v o r p s O G
N ssel fa nidea lpa trne ro rdonor i n t hework t o r educe pove try and n
o it o m o r p t n e m p o l e v e d e l b a n i a t s u
s (Fur ttero, 2004) ilke in Balochsitan where e
v o p e h
t try ra ito i smuch more than othe rprovince so fPaksitan ,many NGO s e
u s si s i h t f o d ir t e g o t d r a h g n i y rt e r
a .The projects o fNGO sare suppotred by y t e i c o s l i v i c d n a n o it a zi n a g r o l a t n e m n r e v o g n o n h c i h w n i 9 9 9 1 n i k n a b d lr o w
,s b b i U ( d e v l o v n
i Fumo and Kuby , 199 ). 9 NGO s aslo addres s the f dun ablitiy
7 y
a w e v it c e ff e n i s m e l b o r
p (Futrtero, 2004) .The idea suppotred the e ffect so f t
a h t d n o y e b n o it a i v e ll a y tr e p o r p e h t s e v r e s h c i h w d i a n g i e r o
f (Burn isde and
,r a ll o
D 02 4). G0 overnmen tNGO sand dono rthese rela itonship increased the e
v i g t i e s u a c e b s O G N o t t n a tr o p m i e r o m s i r o n o d g i b d i a f o e r a h
s s more
e r a s O G N s e c r u o s e r f o n o it a c o ll a e h t r o f d e s u s i h c i h w s e c n e u lf n i l a c it il o p
y b d e x if s l a o g d e n if e d l l e w r o n o it c a f o e p o c s r i e h t g n i v a h s a d e zi r e t c a r a h c
a s e ir t n u o c r o n o
d nd recipien tgovernment .Governmen trela iton i sdriec lty to d n a f e il e r y c n e g r e m e y t e i c o s f o e r a fl e w e h t n i y a l p S O G N . s O G N f o d i a e h t
) 4 0 0 2 , o r e tt u r F ( n o it c u d e r y tr e v o
p .
O G
N i s a socia l nongovernmenta l insttiu iton which ifrs t aim o f stage i s t
n e m p o l e v e
d (Shsihkareava, 2006) .NGOs aslo focus social lfie o fstate ,lega l s
r e m m a r g o r p t n e m n o ri v n e d n
a . NGO s aslo connec t wtih foreign dono r O G N n o it a zi n a g r o t if o r p n O . s n o it a c i n u m m o c s l e d o m l a v r e t n i d n a s e i c n e g
a s do
t o
n force on people weatlh and share o fproif tamong thei rshareholder sto l
o
s ve socia land economic problems .NGOs implemen ta va irou sprojec twhich s
e c r u o s e r r e h t o d n a e c n a n if f o n o is i v o r p h ti w k n il t c e ri
d . NGO s ful l fli l thei r
y ti n u m m o c h ti w s i s O G N f o k n il t c e ri d n i e h t y t e i c o s d r a w o t s e it ili b is n o p s e
r o f
r i e h t m r o fr e p s O G N e v it a it i n i s e ir a v t r o p p u s f o n o it c e ll o c h g u o r h t s s e n is u b
a v e a b m y l A ( e r a fl e w y t e i c o s o t s l e v e l l a rt n e c d n a l a c o l h t o b r o f s e it ili b is n o p s e r
, a v e e k a t S d n
a 2006) .NGO saslo do patrnership wtih dono rwtih reduc iton o f e
r u tl u c ir g a , y tr e v o
p development ,heatlh care ,educa iton and fu trhe rso on . , n o it a zi li b o m t p m o r p o t t h g ir n e m o w g n it c e t o r p h c i h w n e m o w r o f s O G N
r o w t e n d n a y ti r a d il o
s kingproblems( Shsihkarava ,2006) s
O G
N are playing very i mpo tran trole i n di fferen twolrd dsiaster satlhough fi i t n a e v a h s O G N w o n k r o w e s e h t m o rf e p o c s d n a l r o k c i u q h tr a e r o i m a n u s t s a w
n i g n i c it c a r p e r a s O G N s e li f o r p c il b u p l a n o it a n d n a l a b o l g t n a n i m o
d reducing
e s a e r c n i d n a y tr e v o
p in developmen to fcountires (Edward sand Hulme, 1992) f o s d e r d n u h , n a t si k a P f o s a e r a t n e r e ff i d n i e k a u q h tr a e t s e g g i b a 5 0 0 2 , t c O n i e k il
8
e h t e m o c r e v o o t e l p o e p f o s d n a s u o h t d e p l e h d n a y l e r e c n is d e k r o w s O G N
N . e fi l l a m r o n e h t o t e m o c d n a r e t s a si
d GO sare aslo mos lty become targe to f e
k il m si c it ir
c mos tNGO swork f or r eilgious t eache swhich are desrtoying ou rown t s a p t a d e k r o w y e h t s a w o n k r o w s O G N t a h t k n i h t e l p o e p t s o m s e h c a e t s u o i g il e r
f o s e h c a e t e v i g d n a s t n e m o m y r a n o is si m f o s e h c a e t d i d y e h t n e h
w gospe l
o n
a ther complain t agains t NGO s i s tha t i t ha s grown to corporate and r
e h si F ( d e zi l a n o is s e f o r
p ,1997) .I ti scomplex ambiguou sand con rtover isa lbu t l a c ir o t si h o i c o s f o n o it c e lf e r e r a y e h t s e it il a u q c is n ir t n i y ll a s r e v i n u e v a h s O G N
h c i h w n i e l p o e p f o n o it i d n o
c theyare ilvingbu toppostiesays t ha tNGO sareno t e r u tl u c d lr o w n r e d o m w e n r o f k r o w s ti s e u l a v l a c ir o t si h o i c o s r u o n i d e t s e r e t n i
d n a y n e g o r p d n i m n a m n o t n e m p o l e v e d c i m o n o c e e s a e r c n i o t t n a w t s u j d n a
s g n i v il f o d r a d n a t s e s a e r c n i o t t s u j k r o w s ti f e il e
b o feconomy (Far irngton and
Bebbington, 1993) .NGO s ifeld i svery wide and i nten isve which have no range d n a s m i a t n e r e ff i d e v a h e n o y r e v e a e r a t n e r e ff i d e c a f s O G N y r e v e d n a
d e p o l e v e d n o k r o w t i t a h t w o h s s O G N n o h c r a e s e r t n e s e r e h t s e g n e ll a h c
d n a s e ir t n u o
c undevelopingcount ires(Lewi ,s2006) d
o h t e
M ology ir t n u o c s
’r o n o
D e sand recipients ’government shave differen t preference o r (
l a o g d e n if e d l l e w e l g n is a e n o d e zi l a i c e p s g n i e b y ll a u s u s O G N . s e it ir o ir
p maybe
n
i povetry reduc iton o remergency reilef cet ) .Thsi would imply tha tdono’r s a
s l e n n a h
c rehighe rshare o faid ,NGOsi n countire swhoha snot sufifcientf und s and i n countire stha tare no ts rtategicallyi mpotrant f o rthei rpoil itca lagenda .I f
m t a h t e zi l a e r lli w e w , s e it il o P l a n o it a n r e t n I f o k o o l a e v a h e
w ajortiyo fNGO sare
n is u b e h t m o rf , l a ti v y ll a c i g e t a rt s e r a h c i h w s e ir t n u o c e s o h t n i g n i k r o
w es sand
t
“ e k il w e i v f o t n i o p l a c it il o
p he area o fpresent-day Balochsitan i n Paksitan has r o f s r e d a rt d n a s r e lt t e s , s r e r o l p x e , s r o r e u q n o c f o s d a o r s s o r c e h t t a n e e
b al lo f
e h t m o rf t s a o c e h t g n o l a l e v a rt r o f d e ti u s y ll a e d i si n o it a c o l s tI . y r o t si h d e d r o c e r
d n a o t s d o o g r o f b u h l a c it ir c a l l e w s a , d n o y e b d n a a i d n I d r a w o t t s a E e l d d i M
9
s u o ir u c s i ti , d a o r s s o r c r o j a m a s A . h tr o n s t n i o p d n a a is A l a rt n e C , n a t si k a P m o rf
t a h
t the area should be so uninhabtied ,a deser to fmystery and unknown” )
1 1 0 2 , a h tr u M . R n o s a J
( .
t p m e t t a t s ri f e h T . t h g i e w d n a e c n a v e l e r s e r u s a e m o w t e d i v o r p e w r e p a p s i h t n I
s t n e i p i c e r t a h t s e r u s a e m t I .t n e i p i c e r a o t d e t u b ir t si d s a w e g a t n e c r e p l a t o t t a h t
r e
w e how much i mpotran tfo rdonors. I n second a ttemp ttota lasssitance wa s t r o p p u s s ti e l b a d n e p x e s s e l e h t e g a t n e c r e p e h t r e h g i h e h T . s r o n o d m o rf g n i m o c
e l p o e p f o t s o p t n e r e ff i d h c i h w n i t n e m tr a p e d s O G N m o rf t c e ll o c e w a t a d l a t o t
a o g c i g e t a rt s e n o n i d e v l o v n
i l .Wecollectt hedata byt hemethodofi nterviews . . m e l b o r p e h t t u o d n if o t e k a m e w n a l p e h t n i e m it l l u f e v i g s t n e d n o p s e r e h t l l A
s a w g n il p m a s e m o
S aslo dsitirbuted among the NGOs workers .In interview s p
t u o b a s t n e d n o p s e r o t d e k s a s a w g n i n o it s e u q s e ir a
v e rcaptia lincome and
n a t a h w d n a s r e t s a si d l a r u t a n y b e l p o e p d e t c e ff a d n a y c n a t c e p x e e fi l e g a r e v a
n o t c a p m
i Balochsitan .Ou rpane ldata wa snotr ejec itngt hehypothessit hat t he .
d e if i c e p s ll e w s i l e d o m
a t a D
,s O G N o t s w o lf n o a t a
D are no treadliy avaliable the mode lconssi twtih NGO s e r e w e W . d o o g y r e v t i d n if t n e d n o p s e r , m o rf s w e i v r e t n i n i d e t c e ll o c a t a d e h t
r o f a t a d d e li a t e d a t a d d n if o t e v o b
a Balochsitan .There donor sfund mainly o
w t a h t s O G N l a n o it a n r e t n i e m o s d n a s O G N l a n o it a
n rk wtih l oca lpa trner sin
f o e p o c s l l u f e h T . s e ir t n u o c g n i p o l e v e
d Balochsitan include the developmen t n o m m o c r e h t o y b d e r e t si n i m d a e r u ti d n e p x e s a l l e w s a m a r g o r p n o it a r e p o o c
d e d i v i d s i m a r g o r p d i a e h t ) s P G O ( s e i d o b t n e m n r e v o g l a c o l d n a e t a t s , h tl a e w
f o t n
i ive main sub program scounrty and regional ,global ,corporate services , a
s i n a t si h c o l a
B cen rte f or i nterna itona lagircutlural r esearch (ACIAR )and OGD G
N . s O G N f o
% 5 9 e r u ti d n e p x
e O s speciifc scheme emergency rehablitia iton u
o c r o f s d n u f e t a r e n e g s e it i v it c
a n rty .Duirng t he peirod a dono rdsiturbed i none
0 1
e r a w tf o s a n i n o it a m r o f n i ll a e s e h t t u p d n a e g a r e v a t a h t s d n if o sl a s a w e w d o p
. s tl u s e r e h t si s y l a n a o t m a r g o r
p
d n a s tl u s e
R Discussion
e h t l l a g n il o o p , e l p m a s e l o h w e h t f o s is y l a n a e h t h ti w n i g e b e W
e c n a t si s s a t n e m p o l e v e d f o e r a h s e h t s i e l b a ir a v t n e d n e p e d e h t.
s n o it a v r e s b o
d e l e n n a h
c through NGO sin percentage points .In the resul twhen including
n a ir a ti n a m u H . t n a c if i n g is s i f o s e r u s a e
m need sdono tseem t o bemajor f acto r d
i a f o e g a t n e c r e p e h t g n it c e ff
a funneled through NGOs .Thsi i sa con isderable e h t y b d e t u b ir t si d d i a e h t f o e r a h s r e g g i b a e v i e c e r s t n e i p i c e r n e h w t c e ff e
r o n o d t a h t d e t s e g g u s s i h T . e s a e r c e d s O G N o t g n i o g
% e h t , r o n o
d i s more
y e k a d e y a l p e v a h s O G N t a h t d e t s e g g u s t l u s e r r u O . t n e m n r e v o g o t t n a tr o p m i
e c u d e r o t y lt s o m k r o w s O G N . s tr o ff e t n e m p o l e v e d d n a f e il e r l a n o it a n r e t n i n i e l o r
n i t n e m p o l e v e d e l b a n i a t s u s e t o m o r p d n a y tr e v o
p Balochsitan .NGO sdrieclty
e w e h t n i d e v l o v n
i flare o fcivi lsocieite so fQue tta .NGO scan be e ffecitve way a
d n u f f o m e l b o r p e h t s s e r d d a o
t blitiy.
GrowthofNGOsisr elatedt othegrowthoft hecivi lsocie yt inBalochistan
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 4 2 42.0 42.0 42.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 5 2 52.0 52.0 94.0
a e d i o
n 4 4 .0 4 .0 98.0
1 1 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g a si
d 1 1 .0 1 .0 99.0
e e r g a y l g n o rt
s 1 1 .0 1 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
Theaboves tatements howst ha t42%o fpeoples tronglyagreet ha tgrowtho f s
' O G
N i sdriecltyr elatedt ot hecivlis ocietywhere4%havenoi deaaboutt he t
a t
s emen .tThsii so fpar itcular i mpotrancei nBalochsitanast hegrowthoft he e
h t o t e u d y r u t n e c t s a l e h t n i w o ls y l e m e rt x e d e n i a m e r s a h y t e i c o s li v i c
t n e m n o ri v n e l a i c o s c it si l a d u e
f oft heprovince .Thu ,st heNGO shavehastened .
e c n i v o r p e h t n i y t e i c o s li v i c e h t f o h t w o r g e h t f o e c a p e h
t Thus ,wecon isdert hi s
e h t f o t x e t n o c l a b ir t e h t n i s O G N e h t y b d e v e i h c a e n o t s e li m t n a tr o p m i n a s a
n i e l p o e p e h t f o s t s e r e t n i d e v o r p m i s u h t d n a a e r
a common .Thsii nf ac tagrea t
.s e u l a v l a b ir t f o e c n a if e d a d n a e c n i v o r p e h t n i k c o h s l a r u tl u c f o n g is
N OG s'havebeendeilveirngsocia lserviceswhichgovernmen tareunableo r .
e d i v o r p o t g n il li w n u e m it e m o s
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 4 9 49.0 49.0 49.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 4 6 46.0 46.0 95.0
a e d i o
n 3 3 .0 3 .0 98.0
t a h w e m o
s 2 2 .0 2 .0 100.0
2 1 e
e r g a si d
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
n
I thsis tatemen t49% o fther espondent ss rtonglyagreet ha tgovernmentha s n
e tf
o falie od t provideo rdeilveirngs ocials ervice .sThus ,NGO sareassociated s a h t n e m n r e v o g e r e h w s a e r a n i e l p o e p f o s d r a d n a t s g n i v il e h t g n i v o r p m i h ti w
. d e li a f s a h t e k r a m e h t e r e h w n e v e r o d e li a
f Thi sagainani mpotran t isgnt oward s s
O G N e h t f o y ti li b a e h
t toi n lfuencet hemassesi nt heprovince .Theyf ee las ense .
n o it a zi n a g r o h c u s r o f n o it a ili ff a d o o g e v a h s u h t d n a e r a c f o
NG Osarequick t oassesst heactua lneedso fpeopleint heprovince.
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 7 6 76.0 76.0 76.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 1 5 15.0 15.0 91.0
a e d i o
n 3 3 .0 3 .0 94.0
t a h w e m o s
e e r g a si
d 6 6 .0 6 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
s g n i d n if o t k c i u q e r a s ' o g N t a h t e e r g a y l g n o rt s e l p o e p f o
% 6
7 theneed soft he
e c n i v o r p e h t n i e l p o e
p . Amidt hef eeilngo fbeingneglectedwtihint hena itona l
3 1 o
i c o
s -economicdevelopmen ,tt hepeopleo fBalochsitanespeciallyt he .
s O G N e h t r o f t c e p s e r e m o s d e p o l e v e d e v a h e l p o e p s u o n e g i d n
i Thu ,st hrough
s s e s s a y l k c i u
q theneed soft hepeopleand r espondingNGO shass otfened t he e
h t s d r a w o t n o it a g il b o r i e h t d n a e r u tl u c n g i e r o f s d r a w o t e l p o e p f o s tr a e h
s d r a w o t e g n a h c r o f e c a p s a s e t a e r c r o n o d n g i e r o f ri e h t d n a n o it a zi n a g r o
e h t f o d ir t e g d n a t n e m p o l e v e d f o s t p e c n o c n r e d o
m i robsoletecutlura lvalue .s
N OG s'haveahugei nteres tininlfuencingpubilcpoilcy andsocia lchange.
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 3 6 36.0 36.0 36.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 4 6 46.0 46.0 82.0
a e d i o
n 1 4 14.0 14.0 96.0
t a h w e m o s
e e r g a si
d 3 3 .0 3 .0 99.0
y l g n o rt s
e e r g a si
d 1 1 .0 1 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
Whliei nlfuencingpubilci nNgo' swhere36%s rtonglyagree46s omewha tagree e
m o s a e d i o n e v a h 4
1 whatdsiagreeo r1%s rtonglydsiagreet hes tatemen .tThi s g n it fi h s e h t n i e l o r t n a tr o p m i e v a h s O G N e h t t a h t d e t c e p x e y d a e rl a n e e b s a h
. e c n i v o r p e h t f o y ti s r e v i d l a r u tl u c e h t n i s e u l a
v
4 1
N OG s'competewtihr adica lsocio-poilitca lmovementsandf undamentailsm.
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 3 4 34.0 34.0 34.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 1 4 14.0 14.0 48.0
a e d i o
n 3 8 38.0 38.0 86.0
t a h w e m o s
e e r g a si
d 1 3 13.0 13.0 99.0
e e r g a y l g n o rt
s 1 1 .0 1 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
r o f d e c n u o n e d y l h c n u a t s y r e v e r a s O G N e h t s a n o it c u d e d t n a tr o p m i n a s i si h T
s i e c n i v o r p e h T . e c n i v o r p e h t n i m si l a c i d a r l a r u tl u c d n a s u o i g il e r e h t g n i c u d e r
s t n e d n o p s e r e h t d n a n o i g il e r e h t r o s m r o n d l o e h t h g u o r h t d e c n e u lf n i y l n i a m
h s O G N e h t t a h t e v i e c r e
p avechangedt hestiua itoni nt herif avor f o rmany .
s n o s a e r
o t r e d r o n i s k s a t ri e h t ll if l u f n e tf o e h t , s t n e m e ri u q e r g n i d n u f f o e r u s s e r p o t e u D
l a i c o s e h t t s n i a g a o g s e m it e m o s h c i h w , s r o n o d r i e h t f o s l a o g e h t h s il p m o c c a
. s m r o n
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P
5 1 d
il a
V s rtongly e e r g
a 4 5 45.0 45.0 45.0
t a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 4 5 45.0 45.0 90.0
a e d i o
n 9 9 .0 9 .0 99.0
y l g n o rt s
e e r g
a 1 1 .0 1 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
d a e t s n i t s ri f r o n o d s i h y f si t a s o t s m e e s s' o g N s e s a c e h t f o t s o m n
i o fpoo rpeople
. e e r g a y l g n o rt s e l p o e p 5 4 e r e h
w Thi sconclu isons uppor tou rdsicus isonearile r tf
o s d e t a e r c e v a h s O G N t a h
t -heatrednesst owardsf oreigndono randt he s
e u l a v r i e h t f o n o it a i c e r p p a d n a e c n a t p e c c
a ,whichcreatesr oomf or t he
g i e r o f f o e c n a t p e c c
a nvalue sandcutlure . t
s o m e h
T inlfuenitalpe irodoft heNGOS ont hecutlurei sobservablei nthel ate 0
2 thandealry21stcentury.
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 3 5 35.0 35.0 35.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 3 2 32.0 32.0 67.0
a e d i o
n 2 5 25.0 25.0 92.0
t a h w e m o
s 4 4 .0 4 .0 96.0
6 1 e
e r g a si d
y l g n o rt s
e e r g a si
d 4 4 .0 4 .0 100.0
l a t o
T 1 00 100.0 100.0
2 3 t n e m e t a t s e v o b a h ti w e e r g a e l p o e p 5
3 somewha tagree25havenoi deao r g
a si d
4 r e e wtihthes tatemen .tThi sagains uggestst hef asts pread oft heNGOsi n 0
2 e h t f o e d a c e d t s a l e h t n i e c n i v o r p e h
t thcenturyandt hef ris toneoft he21st l a r u tl u c e h t n i s tf i h s t s e t s a f e h t t a h t e e s e w y ll a c ir o g e t a c g n iz y l a n A . y r u t n e c
d e v r e s b o e r a s e u l a
v int hes ame itmepeirod .Thought herecanbes evera l . s tf i h s e h t f o s e c r u o s t n a tr o p m i s a s O G N r e d is n o c s t n e d n o p s e r e h t ,s i h t f o s e s u a c
.t n e m p o l e v e d e l b a n i a t s u s e t o m o r p d n a y tr e v o p e c u d e r o t k r o w s O G N
Frequency Percent
d il a V
t n e c r e P
e v it a l u m u C
t n e c r e P d
il a
V s rtonglyagree 5 1 51.0 51.0 51.0 t
a h w e m o s
e e r g
a 2 6 26.0 26.0 77.0
a e d i o
n 1 1 11.0 11.0 88.0
t a h w e m o s
e e r g a si
d 7 7 .0 7 .0 95.0
e h t n i y l h g i h d e t u b ir t n o c e v a h s O G N t a h t e t a c i d n i s tl u s e r e h t n i a g a e c n O
s a h d n a e c n i v o r p e h t n i e l p o e p e h t f o s d r a d n a t s g n i v il e h t f o t n e m e v o r p m i
n e m o w f o n o is u l c n i , n o it a c u d e s d r a w o t e l p o e p r o o p e h t f o s s e c c a e h t d e d i v o r p
7 1 s
e l , y t e i c o s m a e rt s n i a m e h t o t n
i se rchlidl abo randi mprovedunderstandingo f n i d e tl u s e r o sl a s a h s d r a d n a t s g n i v il e h t n i t n e m e v o r p m i ,s u h T .s e u l a v l a b o l g e h t
, d e t a d t u o e h t m o rf y tr e b il d n a s r a d r a s d n a s d u e f e h t f o e c n e d n e p e d r e s s e l
. s e u l a v l a r u tl u c e n a m u h n i
s n o it a d n e m m o c e R
Whethe r a new genera iton o f organic intellectual s can emerge rfom the l
a i c o s l a c i d a r g n i n o e g r u
b movemen t which can avoid the NGO' s became s
r e b m e m l a r g e t n
i o fthe nex trevolu itonary wave. In word thi spetty bourgeoi s e
h t m o
rf radical wing o fneo-ilbera lestablsihment sthe NGO' s if tpoilitcally in c it s e m o d e h t k r o w k n a b d lr o w F M I e h t e li h w s t si g e t a rt s t si l a ir e p m i f o g n i k n i h t w e n
o t p o t e h t t a s e ti l
e p irvliegetheeconomy. Conclusion
h ti w w o r g t o n n a c y t e i c o s li v i
C ou tapoil itcals ocia lenvrionmentt ha tencourage s N
.
ti GO' smus tbe examined toasce train theway i n which they accomplsih the e
ri s e
d resutl. NGO' sand buliding thei rcapactiy the socia ls rtuctura lterm sthe .
s O G N f o n o is n a p x
e tI relfects the emergence o fnew peit tbourgeoi sdsi itnc t o
e h t m o
rf ld shopkeepe'r s rfee profes isona la swel las t he new pubilcemployee s
p u o r
g .Thi ssubcon rtacted i scloser t oearile rcomprado rbourgeoi isei n sof a ras h ti w s e si r p r e t n e l a ir e p m i k n il o t s e v r e s t u b s e it i d o m m o c e l b i g n a t o n d e c u d o r p t i
p y ti d o m m o c y tt e p l a c o
l roduce'r s engaged in micro-enterprsies. I t ha s to it
n a n a e n i b m o
c -statsi tappea lwtih populsi ’ts r heto irc .Hence ,the convo ac iton r e v o c o t s u o u g i b m a y lt n e i c if f u s e r a s n o it a n y t e i c o s l i v i c e h t d n a y a w d ri h t e h t f o
. s e s a b h t o
b NGOs i sno ta l egalt erm ti i sa nongovernmenta lorganzia itonr efers f
o e r a fl e w r o f e d a m n o it a i c o s s a n a o
t society , chartiable rtust , non-pro if t l a t n e m n r e v o g f o t r a p a s i o h w n o s r e p n o m m o c r e h t o r o n o it a d n u o f , n o it a r o p r o c
n o n d e ll a c t u b g n i n r a e t if o r p r o f e t a r e p o t o n s i t I . r o t c e
s -governmenta l
, s e h c r u h c , s e it r a p l a c it il o p , s n o i n u e d a rt e d u l c n i t o n s e o d h c i h w n o it a zi n a g r o
8 1
f o s s e c o r p e h t n i e l o r r o j a m a y a l p s O G N . c t e s e v it a r e p o o c s n o it u b ir t si d t if o r p
d i a r i e h t e t e l p m o c s e ir t n u o c g n i p o l e v e d
% 0 6 d n a s e ir t n u o c f o t n e m p o l e v e d
h T . s O G N h g u o r h
t e non-governmenta lorganzia iton s(NGOs) i n i ndustiralzied o r e
r a e k il s e ir t n u o c d e zi l a ir t s u d n i n o
n clealry wtines sin repor tand data .NGOs l a n o it a n r e t n i d n a l a n o it a n , l a c o l , l a n o i g e r n i g n i g a g n e y l e v it c a n e e b e v a h
c n is s s e n is u b d n a t n e m n r e v o g h ti w s r e tt a
m e thei rbeginning. I n the opera iton , t n a tr o p m i n a y a l p s O G N s e it e i c o s f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u g n i p o l e v e d d n a g n il g g u rt s
a n i s ti m il r i e h t d n a s O G N f o t c a p m i e h t s s u c si d l li w I y d u t s s i h t n I . e l o r
n a t si h c o l a
B .
9 1 s
e c n e r e f e R
.
1 Aida Alymbaeva ,AnaraAlymkulova ,Elmria Shsihkaraevaand Berme t ,
a v e e k a t
S 2006,Reviewoft heHsitoryo fEstablsihmen tandDevelopmen t K
e h t n i r o t c e s O G N e h t f
o yrgyzRepubilc ,Bsihkek .
2 BooneLoui sE. ,David L .Ku trz ,2009 ,Contemporary Marke itng ,USA :South- b
u P e g a g n e C n r e t s e
W lsiher .
.
3 Craig Burn isde ,David Dollar ,2004 ,Aid ,Poilcie sand Growth ,USA :South- .
r e h si l b u P e g a g n e C n r e t s e W .
4 Chrsitophe r Gibbs , Clasudia Fumo and Thoma s Kuby , 1999 , : A S U , s t c e j o r P d e tr o p p u S k n a B d lr o W n i s n o it a zi n a g r O l a t n e m n r e v o g n o N
n o it a c il u P k n a B d lr o W .
5 Duncan Maththews , 2011 , Intellectua l Propetry , Human Right s and r
e h si l b u P r a g l E d r a w d E : w o g s a l G , K U , t n e m p o l e v e D .
6 Edwards Michael, David Hulme , 1992 , Making A difference , USA : s
r e h si l b u P n a c s h tr a E .
7 FsiherGlen ,1997 ,Mindset ,2ndEdi iton ;USA :Intercutlura lPressI ncorpora iton .
8 Far irngton John and Anthony Bebbington ,1993 ,Reluctan tPa trners ,USA : e
s i c n a r F
&
r o l y a
T - iLbrary
.
9 Fru ttero ,Decembe r3 ,2004.determinants o fforeign aid lfow sto NGO’s , :
A S
U NewYork .Universtiy. .
0
1 Icnl ,1997 ,TheI nterna itona lCenterf o rNot- rf -o Proif tLaw .wwwi.cn.lorg .
1
1 rI sihLoraS. ,1999 ,Clas iscCarvingPa tterns ,USA :Taunton press .
2
1 Jason R . Mutrha , 2011 , The S rtategic Impotrance o f Balochsitan ,USA : h
c S e t a u d a r g t s o P l a v a
N ool ,Calfiornia .
3
1 Lewsi , D.Mensah , P. , O.2006 , Moving forward research agenda s on l
a n o it a n r e t n
i NGOs .London .Universtiyo fBergen . .
4
1 LynnR .Kahle ,AngeilneG .Close ,2011 ,Consume rBehavio rKnowledgef o r :
A S U , k r o Y w e N , g n it e k r a M t n e v E d n a s tr o p S e v it c e ff
E Taylo r& Franci se-
r e h si l b u P y r a r b iL
0 2 .
5
1 Matrens Ber itn , 2002 , The Insttiu itona l Economic s o f Foreign Aid , UK : s
s e r P y ti s r e v i n U e g d ir b m a C . 6
1 Maryann Cu ismano Love , 2011 , Beyond Sovereignty , 4th ediiton ;USA , r
e h si l b u P h tr o w s d a W : n o t s o B . 7
1 Richard Salmon , 1997 , Henry Jame s & The Cutlure o f Pubilctiy , UK : s
s e r P y ti s r e v i n U e g d ir b m a C . 8
1 Scot tCalnan ,2008 ,The e ffec itvenes so fDomes itc Human Right sNGOs , s
r e h si l b u P f f o h ji N s u n it r a M : d n a lr e h t e N . 9
1 Shsihkaraeva ,E .2006 .Hsitory o festablsihmen tand developmen to fNGOs .
r o t c e
s Kyrgyz .Theassocia itono fcivlis ocietys uppor tcenter sBsihkek. .
0
2 Steve W .Wtit ,K .G .Saur .2006 ,Changing Role so fNGOs i n the Crea iton , , K U , s e ir t n u o C g n i p o l e v e D n i n o it a m r o f n I f o n o it a n i m e s si D d n a , e g a r o t S
r e h si l b u P A L F I : w o g s a l G
