AXD
THE DECTI}Tß OF TIIE HINING AI{D STBßL ITDUSTBIßS BBYITALIZATION STBATEGIES OF CITIES IN TIIE BI'IIB ABßA'
Michael liegener
Department
of Civil
Engineeri.ngUniversity of
Tokyo7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 1L3
1
INTRODUCTIONLike
Japan, West Ger- nanyis
undergoing a rapid processof structural
eco- nonic change,with
enploy-ment in the primary
andsecondary sectors (mining,/
agriculture
and manufacturing) declining
andin
thetertiary sector
(services) growing. However,unlike in
Japan, the declineof
nanu-facturing
employnent hasstarted earlier and
pro- ceededfarther, while
the growthin service
enploy- nent has been slower,These changes
affect the
urbanregions in
IrestGermany
with different in-
tens
ity.
0n
the
one hand there area
few metropolitanre-
gions which have developedinto manufacturing,
ser-vice, and
communication centersof
Europeanor
evenglobal
inportance such asFrankfurt or
Düsseldorf orhaye attracled the
newgrowing eLectronics-
orinfornation-based
indus-tries
suchas
München orStuttgart
(seeFigure
1).a Paper prepared for the Interna- tional Syrposiul on "Policies for Revitalization of Declining Industrial Cities" , Kitakyushu, 19-20 July 1989.
I core cities N suburban ring E rural regions
Figure 1.
UrbanBerlin
f
L'Lffi
0 100 kn in-Ruhr
Rhe'i n-
Neck a r
Ka rl s ruhe
regions in l{est
Geruany.M. I{EGENER
On
the other
handthere are
nany medium-sized urban regions which con-tinue to lose in
substance comparedwith
those fewlucky cities
aswell
asthrough
outnigration of
population and enploymentfron their
corecities
tothe
moreattractive smaller
townsin their
surroundings. Among thencities with a strong
basein traditional industries
such as mining and heavy manu-facturing (stee1
making,ship building) are
mostaffected. For historical
re&sons,
these 'oLd' industrial cities are aIl located in the
northwesternpart of the
Federal Republic (see Figure1
and Table 1).Table
7. Indicators for selected
urban areasin
f{est Gernany 1970-1986,Urban area
Popula-
tion
change
1 I 70-85
Enploy- nent change
%
1 I 70-85
Unen-
ploy-
nent z 1986
VaIue added
/capita
DM 198 2
Income
tax
/capita
DM 198 5
Hanburg llünchen
Stuttgart
Bhein-Maina
Rhei.n-Ruhr Mitteb
-4 .7 +10. 1
-1. 1 +2,3 -2.4
-10. 4 +14. 3
-3. 3 +5.0 -1. 3
11.9 5.4 4,0 6,0 9.9
35,900 36,500 31,600 34,400 29, 100
617 597 573 547 523 Brenen
Rhein-Ruhr Nordc Aachen
Saarland Berl in
-4. 9 -6. 7 +0.8 -7 ,5
-12.t
-2.4 -8.0
+2.6 -3.2 -9,7
14. 0
13. 7 10.
I
14. 9
9.9
32,200 24,704 20,400 25, 500 29, 100
475
,146
400 329 314 e Prarifurt b Düssel.dorf, liöIn c Euhr Area Source: BfLR 1986.
The
'old' industrial
regions werethe first to
experiencethe
problemsof
urbandecline:
lossesof jobs in the traditional
sectorswithout
compen-sating gains i.n the
more modern technologyor service sectors;
Eass unen- ployment and outnigrati.onof the
economically moreactive
andnobile
young-er
househoJ.ds,r+hile the less
mobiLe,older, poorer,
andless skilled re-
mained;the
growing gap betweenthe declining tax
base andincreasing re- sponsibilities in the fields of welfare, health care
and urbaninfrastruc- ture; the physical decline of the city center indicated by
vacatedbuild- ings, derelict industrial sites,
run-downdwellings,
anddeclining retail
saIes.
So these
cities
werealso the first to
developstrategies to
overconethe
problensof industrial decline. In doing this, they
werepartly
helpedby the
governnent,but
i.n norerecent
yearsthey realized that they
hadto use their
owninitiative
andresources. In
somecities, these strategies
have beenvery successful.
Byintroducing
& newstyle of
urban nanagementand planning
they
have transformedthe traditional role of local
governnentand created
a fresh spirit of
confidence and optimisu.REVITALIZATION STBATEGIES OF CITIES IN THE BUHR ABEA
In this presentation, a brief
overviewof the
mostfrequently
adoptedstrategies
andtheir
degreeof
successor failure will be given.
Special enphasiswill be
placedon transportation
andtransportation-reLated pol- icies.
Howevertransportation
cannot be seenin isolation, but nust
alwaysbe
i.ntegratedinto a
comprehensive viewof other
aspectsof
urban andre- gional
developnent.In order to
makethe presentation
morepracti.cal
andillustrative,
aconcrete region
will
be used as an exanpJ-e. Theregion is the
Ruhr areain the state of Nordrhein-l{estfalen, with particular
referenceto the city of
Dortnund,the location of the
authors honeuniversity
(see Figure 2).2
THE RUHR ABEA AND DORT}TUMDThe Buhr Area
is still the largest industrial re- gion
and urban agglomera-tion in the
Federal Repub-lic of
Germany: on an area of 4,400 square kilometers, whichis
1.8 percentof
thetotal
areaof
the country,its
populationof 5.2 nil- lion, or
8,5 percentof
the national population, produ-ces about 8.3 percent of the national
incone.Growth and
decline of this region are closely related to
the developmentof the coal nining
andsteel industries
which,with about 40 percent of all industrial
employnent,even today
dominate the Buhrindustry (t).
Based onthe large coel
depositsin
thearea, industrialization in
the Ruhr regionstarted in the
1830sand trans-
fornedthis
oncerural re-
gionin
less than a centuryinto one of the largest industrial areas of
the worldwith
ahighly diver- sified
economicstructure centered
aroundthe
coalmining and steel
indus-tries. With the
adventof
cheaper and more convenient forns
of
energy, the demandfor
coalstarted
to decline0 100 200 trr
Figure
2.
The Buhr Area andits
Tocationin l{est
Gernany,Kreis l{egel Reckl. ingheusen Gelsenki rchen
M. WEGENEB
in the
1960swith the result that
em-ploynent
in
the miningindustry of
theregion
has droppedfrom its
peakof
470,000in the
1950sto less
than 100,000today.
Duringthe
sane timethe
world-widedecline in
denandfor steel
andsteel products
caused en- ploynentin
theregions's
steeL indus-try to
drop fromits
peakof
200,000in the
1960sto
110,000 today.The impacts on
the rest of
the Ruhr economy have beensevere: Total
en-ploynent in the region declined
fron2.4 million in the
1960sto 1.8 nil- lion
today andis
expectedto
continueto decline to
1.7niLlion
bythe
year 2000(D. I{hat
nakesthe losses of jobs in the traditional industries
soserious, is that they are not
nearlycompensated by new
jobs in
the servicesector:
Between 1970 and 1982, servicejobs
increased byonly
90,000,or
10percent (compared
with
18 percent na- tionr+ide), which meansthat
only everythird job lost in the
manufacturingsector
was replacedby a
newjob in the service sector.
As a consequence, the unemploymentrate in
the Ruhr areahad
risen to
15 percentby
1985 andhas stayed
high since (Figure
3).Unemployment would have been even
higher if
there hed not been a nassive movenentof outnigration. Fron its
peak population
of
5.75nillion in
the 1960s, the populationof
the Ruhr area has declinedto 5.2 nillion
today andis
expectedto
conti.nueto decline
to4.6 million by the year
2000(2).
Toa Iarge part this decline is
due toforeign
workers who,for lack of
workopportunities, return to their
honecountries in
the southof
Europe(for-
eigners
constitute
7.8 percentof
theregion's population).
However, thereis
also a strongnigration
movement tothe nore
prosperousregions in
thesouth of
Gernany.Since the
1970s,there is also natural decline
due toa drop in birth rates resulting in
arapidly
ageing population (Figure 4).r
950
I960
I970
I980
I990
2000Source: Statlstlcol 0fltces
Figure 3.
Deve)opnentof
enploynentin Dortaund, the
Ruhrarea and
l{estGernany 195A-1986 ( -2000
),
I
950
I960
1970 I980
I990
2000Source: Statlstlcal 0lflces
Figure
4,
Developnentof
poltulationin Dortnund, the
Ruhrarea
and f{est Gernany 1950-1988 ( -2000),
t30
8T o
q
120xG,
:
p noc(u
_A
rooo.E lr.l
90
t30
8
;
a
o r20;
(l,!
:
c3
l t00o.o
o- 90
REVITALIZATION
Dortnund is the
mosteastern
of
the largecities
al-ong
the
RuhrvalJ.ey. It
developed
rapidly from
&small rural town in
theearly
19th centuryto
a m&-jor industrial center.
Coalmining, steel
making andbreweries
usedto be
themajor industries of
thecity. 0f
thesecoal
miningdisappeared when
in
1987the last pit within
thecity
closed down Figure 5).Steel naking in
Dortnund has always been s. synonynfor
the Hoesch corporation.Hoesch
in the
1960s erf,-ployed nearly
40,000 wor-kers in its three steel works in the city.
Todayone
of the three
has beenclosed down and
the
secondwill
be closed soon,in
the Iong term therewill
be be- tween 5,000 and 7,000 work-ers left in the third
andlast one, this,
however,will
be heavily nodernized.So
it is not surprising that
most economicindica- tors for
Dortnundare
even more desolate than the onesfor the Ruhr area as
a r.rhole. Fromits
naxinun en- ploymentof nearly
300,000in the
1960s,the city
haslost
60,000or one fifth (Figure 3).
Morespecifi- cally, it has lost
90,000jobs in
non-service indus-STRATEGIES OF CITIES
IN
THE RUHR AREAFigure 5.
Thelast
closedin
1987, Thisyear earlier.
coaL
nine in
Dortaund wasis pit
Gneisenau cl-osed oneFigsre 6,
Oneof the
three steel- worksin
Dort-nund
hasalready
beenclosed, the
second onewill
be closedduring the next
years.triesr but has
gainedonly
30,000in the service industries - again
thereLation of
onejob
gainedto three jobs lost. In the
1980srthe
growthof service jobs
haspractically
stopped. Unenploynentin
Dortmundtherefore is
even
higher than in the
Buhr area asa
whole: 18 percent.The
population
developmentof
Dortmundreflects its
economicdifficul- ties.
Fromits
naximumpopulation of
660,000in
1965,.it
hasdeclined to
5801000 today and
is
expectedto
havea population of less than
500,000in
the year
2000(Figure 4).
Duringthe
1980s,half of the decline
was due to employnent-related long-distancenigration partly
byforeign
workersreturn-
ing
hone,the renaining half to natural decline
and suburbanization(3).
M. I{EGENEB
3
THE INDUSTBIAL HEBITAGEClearly the nain
causefor the
economicdifficulties of industrial cit- ies like
Dortnund andthe other cities of the
Buhris that their najor in- dustries belong to those suffering
mostfrom
econonicstructural
change.However,
there are other factors closely related to their industrial
pastwhich nade
it
moredifficult for then to restructure their
econoniesin
responseto
newtechnological
challenges and market demands.In the
nid-1960s, whenthe decline of the nining
andsteel industries
becane
serious, the
most importantfactors
were:(1)
an out-datedinfrastructurez
Roads,railways
and canalsin the
Buhrre- gion
werenostly built during the period of rapid iodustrialization
andpri.marily
servedthe
purposesof
heavyindustry.
As mostfrei.ght traffic
has
in
Germanyas in
Japan been taken overby trucks, the
canalsin
the Ruhrarea
wereunderutilized, but
expensiveto naintain.
So Here thenany
industrial railways,
r.rhich criss-crossedthe
region onhigh
dans orviaducts, but
wereunsuitable for
passengertransportation
because theydid
not, servethe
population centers.(2)
lackof educational facilitiesz Traditionally, the
Ruhr area hadno in- stitutes of higher education, for well
known reasons:the
Prussian king clidnot
want knowledgeable workers,for fear of revolution (the
Ruhr be- cane Prussianafter 1815).
Sothe only institute of
technologyin
the western provincesof
Prussi& wasnot established in the rising industri-
a1 Ruhr
region, but in
far-ariay Aachen.(3)
a d.evastated environaent: More than a centuryof industrial activity
hadexhausted
the natural
resourcesof the
Ruhrregion to the 1imit.
Riverswere
polluted, soils contauinated, industrial
emissions, i.nparticular of
sulphurdioxide
anddust,
Hereextraordinary.
The inageof the
Ruhras
the "black country" in the rest of l{est
Germ&ny w&snotoriously
bad.In the
1970s andearly
1980s, irhenthe
abovethree legacies of the in- dustrial past of the region
Here already graduall.v being renoved (see Sec-tion 4), other
aspectsof the industri.al heritage
received moreattention
asserious
obstaclesfor regional
change:(1) an obsolete
Land usesysten: During the industrj.alization period,
thecities of the Buhr
grewalnost r+ithout any
planni.ngcontrol.
Miningpits, factories,
waste heaps and worker housing,hastily
erectedin
the timesof rapid
growth, forneda
disorganized,but rigid
patchworkof in- conpatible land
uses andscattered property rights.
Manyforner
indus-trial sites turned out to be heavily
contaminatedI'Altlasten'l
andcould be reclaimed and cleansed
only with great
expense,if at afl
(4)"Housing are&s
in
mixed-usedareas
('Genengelagen')close to noisy
andpolluting factories
wereless
andIess
accepted bythe
housing market.(5)
lac^kof
urban anbiente: The Ruhrcities
were never elegantor
charming.The ferv
historical buildings that
survivedthe industrialization
period,were destroyed
by the
war bombings.After the
war unimaginative conmer-ciali.zed architecture prevailed in the city
centerslargely
dominated bythe
automobile,while
urban sprawl madethe
suburbsvirtually indistin-
guishable from each other.
REVITALIZATION STBATEGIES OF CITIES IN THE RUHR AREA
Besides,
there
wereothers less tangible factors related to the
socio-political
andinstitutional context of regional policy-naking
and planningthat
havestrongly
influenced and sometime retardedthe
processof
economicrestructuring of the
Buhr area:16)
lack of a regiona)
govern-aent:
Forhistorical
reasonssinilar to
the onesthat
pre-vented the provision
of
high-er education in the
Ruhrarea, the
region never had aunified regional
governnent.Even today
it consists of
53autononous municipalities
organizedin
15 counties un-der 3 district
governnentsall
threeof
which arelocat-
edoutside the
regiion. This meansthat for nost project i.nitiatives extensive
andtime-consuning negotiations and
coordination
proceduresare required (Figure
7).(7\ traditionaL
nanagenentstructures:
Pamperedby
Iong periodsof high
de- mandfor its
products andIimited conpetition
throughstable
governmentcontracts
andsubsidies, both
corporate mana.genent andlabor
unions ofthe
Ruhrindustry
had developedattitudes
andpatterns of political
be-havior not
conduciveto
innovation and change.In periods of
slackened demandfor coal
andsteel,
nanagenent woul-dquickly call for
subsidies bythe
government,while labor
representatives wouldinsist
onthe priv- ileges
andhigher
wages grantedto their clientele in better tines.
This was
the situation at the
beginningof the
1980s, whenit
was becon-ing
obviousthat the
decl-inein
demandfor coal
andsteel
wasnot
a tenpora- r.v phenomenonbut
permanent and requireda
fundamentalrestructuring of
the Ruhr econony.4
GOVERNMENT STBATEGIESThe
first three of the
legaciesof the industrial past of the
Ruhr arealisted
above were addressedfirst,
andsince they fell partly into the re- sponsibility of the Federal
governnent,the first period of revitalizing strategies
H&slargely
determined bystrong
governmentinitiatives.
To
understandthis, it is important to
knowthat
dueto the
Federal organizationof
governmentin l{est
Gernany,there is
nonational
planningin the
Japanese sensein the
FederalRepublic.
Whileregional
planningis
theresponsibility of the
memberstates, the role of the
Federal governmentis restricted to
monitoringregional
developnent andcoordinating the
regionalplanning activities of the
nenberstates, with the
exceptionof
regional econonicaid,
whichis a joint responsibility (5).
However,national raiL-
w&ys, highways and waterw&ys
are in the
Federal donain, as &rethe
construc-tion of public universities
and environmentallegislation.
Figure 7, The
Ruhrarea js
governed by threeoutside district
governnents.M. I{EGENEB
So
it
i+asin
thesefields that the
Federal governmentstarted
alreadyin the
1960sto assist the
Buhr area (besidesgiving direct
subsidiesfor aIle- viating the cost
disadvantagesof
donesticcoal
andvarious indirect
subsi-dies to the steel industry):
Transportation
-
The Ruhr was givenpreferential treatnent in plans for
expandingthe
Fed- eraL motorway('Autobahn') systen.
A hugegrid of five east-rest
andsix
north-south autobahns wasto
providethe region with
anefficient intrare- gional transportation
networklinking it to all parts of the country
and 'riest Europe. Todaythis systen of
motorways has beenLargely
completed,with the
exceptionof a
fer+links
which wereto cut
throughpartly built-
up arees and
therefore net rith
heavylocal opposition
(see Flgure 8).-
Threeof the
new high-speed,high-confort fntercity lines of the
NationalRai lways ( Köln-DüsseLdorf-Hamburg!, Kö1n-Wuppertal-Hamburg, KöIn-Hannover )
were
to
pass throughthe
Ruhr areaneeting at a
comnon nodein
Dortnund.The
lntercity service
has provedto
be oneof the
majorlocational
advan- tagesof the region
(see Figure 8).-
Theregion
wasto get a
nodernintraregional
systemof
commuter railways(S-Bahn) operated
by the National Railways. In addition, subsidies
wereoffered to the cities to
transformtheir
tranway systemsinto partly
un-derground
light rail transit ('Stadtbahn')
systens. Theintegrated
networkof publie rail transportation thus created,
whichis
nownearly
complete, provides goodaccessibility
throughoutthe region.
However, dueto
growingc&r ownership and populätion
decline it is insuffiently utilized
and pro-duces
large deficits,
which &re & severe burdenfor the nunicipalities.
'":,+,.:.;.r, l,
\ t
Kreie
E' \,
\ *«)"r'
Er. \ \
oefl.op'lEi,,.,
.,,t',. \\ .{' (
§
,<oo"its\5"+iz-V"
,
?'Krels ,t-
L,",7---r,V \
«'ort"u,
IntercitY a Universities
0 10
r---i______J20 kr
lines
anduniversities at the
Ruhr"Figure 8,
Autobahns,Intercity
REVITALIZATION STBATEGiES OF CITIES IN THE RUHR ABEA
-
The waterwaysserving the region, nostly
canalsbuilt
more thana
hundredyears ago
for the transport of iron ore,
andthe canal ports
wereto
bedeepened and nodernized
to
accomnodatethe
3000-tonfreight
barges usedthroughout Europe.
Universities
-
The Federal government agreedto finance five
newuniversitj.es
planned bythe state
governmentin the
Buhr area (Duisburg, Essen, Bochum, Dortnund, Hagen). Thesefive universities,
r+hich(together with
sone smallercolleg- es)
today havea student enrollment of nore than
1001000, nay have beentbe
mosteffective of all
governnent neasures. They haveattracted a
large nunberof students from other parts of the country
and abroad and have added anintellectual
conponentio the
predoniaantly workerpopulation of their host cities.
Moreinportantl,v, as it äi1l
be describedlater,
theyhave
greatly ccntributed to the
econonictransfornation of the
region' Environnent-
Alreadyin the election
canpaignsof the
1960s,"a blue
sky overthe
Ruhr"was
an inportant issue. In
1974,the
Federal- InmissionControl
Law wasenacted.
It forced the
Ruhr economyto extraordinary efforts to
reduce the enissi.onsof their production.
Todaythe environnental situation in
theRuhr area has much
inproved,
howeverthe negative
imageof the region is still strong
and hardto dispel.
These
policies, while initiated
by conservative Federal governmentsal-
ready
in the
1960s, weremostly
implementedby the Social
Denocratin
the 1970s. I{henthe
conservatives returnedto
poäerin
1979, they werenot
r+i11-ing to
dovery
nuch morefor the
depressed Ruhrregion with its najority of
Socia1 Democrat voters.
So
the (SociaI
Denocrat)state
governnentof Nordrhein-l{estfalen
wasleft with the responsibility for the Buhr. Its
'RuhrAction Progran' {'Ak-
tionsprograaa
Euhr') of
1979for the first tine
focused onthe
needto re- structure the
Ruhr econony towards new technologies andproducts.
Horever,the
progranalso stressed the
inportanceof inproving the quality of
thäliving
environnentof the region.
Federal andstate
funds together associat- edwith the
prograntotalled
DM7bitlion
(Y490billion) (3).
Yet it
wasall loo
obviousthat
sucha
progran couldnot
be nore than ashort-term
emergency ne&sure.In the
very endthe nunicipalities affected
bythe
economiccrisis
hadto rely
ontheir
owninitiative
and resources.5
DORTMUND,S STRATEGIESThis
wasa
new experiencefor the cities.
Althoughlocal
governnentsin the
Federal Bepublicenjoy a high
degreeof
autonony,in the past they
hadnot
seen economic developnentas important part of their responsibility,
except where land-use andtransportation planning
was coneerned.In fact
there
hadnot
been much needfor
economicpronotion in the tines of
econonicprosperity. In the
goodtimes the role of the cities
had beento allocate
Iand andinfrastructure. This
was predominantly anadninistrative
and engi- neeringactivity.
Now eatrepreneuriafacting
was askedfor.
H.
WEGENERMost
cities
respondedto this
new challenge bysetting
up newor
upgrad-ing existing
econonic promotion departments andvastly
increasingtheir
per-sonnel and money
funds.
Sodid
Dortmund.In
1983,the city fornulated in
an'Economic Development Program'
the principal goals for its future
economic developnent(3):
.
transformationof the loca1
economy away fromthe fornerly
doninant coal andsteel industries
towards modern technology-iutensive growthindustries with a large proportion of small
and nediun-size enterprises;. parallel
promotionof
nodernretail, business, adninistration,
healthcare,
education andcultural facilities;
.
inprovenentof the quality of the living
andrecreation
environmentin- cluding
education andculture,
To achieve these goalsr the
ne!{ Econonic Promotion Departnentis
to engagein the following activities
(3):.
developing neH andreactil:ating
vacatedland for
new enterprises;. inproving fi.nancial aid for
newenterprises by better utilizing existing
funding programs and developing newforns of private
andpublic
financing;.
renovinginfrastructure bottlenecks to attract
new enterprises;.
developingconsulting
andadvisory services for
new enterprises.The
six
years which now have passed sincethis
progran was putinto effect,
represent a new er&in Dortnund's
local
econonicpol- icy.
The new era can be character- ized as
the transition
from pas-sive
responseto active initia- tive
towards the econoniccrisis of the city. But it
r+asalso
atransition
towards a nelistyle
of urban managenent which accepted thefact that nunicipalities
haveto rival
on ahighly
conpet,itive marketfor jobs
and people whereinnovativeness
and flexibility
&re
essential.
So'city
market-ing'
has become an important newfield
(see Figure 9).Most
inportantly,
however,it
was a
transition into
& newstyle
of cooperation between thepublic
andthe private sector. Tradi- tionally in
Dortmundthe
majorgroups
of the
powerstructure - local
government,the
J,arge com-panies, labor unions
and small businesses-
had pursuedtheir part,icularist interests
noreof- ten than not fighting
againstFigpre
like
to9, City narketing:
Dortaund wouLdattract
aore Japanesejnvestors,
REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES OF CITIES
IN
THE BUHB AREAeach
other.
NoHthere
was a consensusthat only joi.nt action
couldsolve
the problensof the city. This
changeof the political climate
was influenced byreports
onsimilar
developnentsin
US Americancities (6)r in particular
bythe
exampleof Pittsburgh,
which wasthe destination of
frequentvisits
ofpoliticians, journalists,
scholars anduniversity
students.In these six years the following five policy fields turned out to
benost important
(see3,
7);(1) Innovation-oriented local
econonicpolicy
These
policies
havethe
highestpriority of all activities
underthe
ner+economic
poli.cy.
Theyain at stinulating the
establishmentof
newor at- tracting existing firns in the field of
high-techor
information-based m€ulu-facturing or services, but also at
supportingthe
innovation processwithin existing loca1 firns.
Speeialattention is given to the
needsof small
and mediun-sized firms.The
University of
Dortmund, whichis in fact
a Technical Uni-versit,v,
plays an important rol,ein this process. Its
conputer science andelectrical,
mechani-cal
and chemical engineering de- partments have developed strongties with
1oca1firns in
ternsof joint projects
andjob
placementof
graduates(Figure
10).However,
the
nainresults
of the cooperation between theuni- versity
andthe region are
thenew Technology Cente
r ('
Technol.o- giezentrun Dortnund') andfuture
technology parkset
up on a vast expanseof land
adjacentto
theuniversity
canpus, a choice loca-tion with
autobahn access, an S- Bahnstation,
and anintra-calpus
monorail.The Technology Center, opened
in
1985,offers laboratory
andoffice
spacefor
leaseto firns
wishing
to
engagein
B&Din
coop-eration
r+ithuniversity
resear- chers. Sofar logistics,
material sciences,electronics
andsoft-
ware development have been
the nain fields of activity.
Denandfor
spacein the
Center soonvastly
exceededcapacity,
soit
had alreadyto
be expanded.Being
jointly
financedby the city, the state
andwith
moneyfron the
Re-gional
Fundof the
European Connunity aswell as by local
banks and indus-trial firns, the
Technology Centeris
consideredto
bethe first
successfulexample
of a
public-private partnersäip originating fron the
new 'Dortmund consensus'(Figure
11).Figure 10.
TheUniversity of
Dortnuadjs
a key
factor in
theregions's
aodernization process,M. WEGENER Although
its actual
employ-ment
effects are small
(todayless than 100 researchers work
in the Center), its spin-offs for the region are substantial. It
certaj-nly has contributed nuch to
dispelling
the negative imageof
the region andgiving it
a fresh, progressive appeal. Ase
conse- quence,there is an
increasinginflow of firms or
subsidiaries or researchlaboratories of
largefirns
x-ishingto settle
downin
Dortmund (anong them Sony andAlps, a
Japanese semiconductor manufacturer ) .To
acconnodate& part of
these newarrivals,
an areaof
37hectares adjacent to the Technol- ogy Center w&s designated
as
a'technology
park' with high ar- chitectural
design and landscap-ing
standards. Thefirst build- ings
onthis
area have beenre- cently
completed, others are un-der construction (Figure
12).An important
part in
estab-Iishing
and mai.ntaining contactsbetween research
institutions
andindustry in the region
playtransfer
asencies established atthe university, the local
poly-technic
and the Chanbersof
Con-nerce and Trade.
Besides these
activities di-
rected
at
theprivate sector,
thecity
and theuniversity
success-fully
lobbiedfor the establish-
ment
of
new government-financed researchfacilities
such as largeinstitutes for logistics,
robo-tics and synchrotron
research supported by the Federal govern- nent.(2)
Enploynentinitiatives
Pressed
by high loca1
unenploynent andthe powerful labor unions'
thecity
has venturedinto a
newpolicy field
ainedat creating job
opportuni-ties outside of established firms in the so-called'infornal' sector of
thelocal
econony.Figtre 11. The
TechnoLogyCenter offers )aboratory or office
spacefor
newenter- prises. Despite recent
expantsion,it
hasalways been occupied
to
capacity,Figsre
12,
The new technologypark
setshigh architecturaL
design and landscapingstandards,
Thefjrst buildings
have beenconpleted,
REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES OF CITIES IN THE RUHR AREA
These
efforts resulted in the
establishmenlof
a nunberof
smallprivate
companies
nostly
workingin the recycling
and novingfield.
Thecity
sup-ports
themby
seed noney fromvarious
sources suchas the
EC Begional Fundof the
Federal Job Creation Progran ('ABM') and byproviding
themwith
cheapspace
in
vacatedindustrial buildings.
However,
the results of these initiatives
haveyet
been inconclusive.Although
they
haveprovided,
andare still providing,
badly needed'jobs,in general these firms
haveso far failed to est,ablish
themselvesa
secureplace in the
market.(3) Industrial
landpolicy
Despite &
growingstock of
vacatedforner industrial land, the city finds it difficult to offer suitable
andattractive sites to firns deliber- ating to settle or relocate to
Dortnund. Amongthe
reasons are unwillingnessof the
land ownersto sell their
propertyor real or potential soil
contani-nation ('Altlasten'),
Moreover, mostfirns prefer virgin land without re- strictions through adjacent land
usesor existing infrastructure,
anpleexpansion space and good highway access. However, environnental considera-
tions
and sometimeslocal citizen opposition
preventunlimited
rezoningof agricultural land for industrial
use.To resolve this
dilemma comnonto all cities in the Buhr, the state
government
in
1982set
upa special
fundfor
landacquisition,
regeneration andresale
(tGrundstücksfondßuhr'). Hith
noneyfron this fund,
Dortmund wasable to
purchase some80
hectaresof former industrial land which, after regeneration,
has now been madeavailable for
newor relocated
firms.(4)
Transportationpolicy
Although, as
it
was shownin
Section4,
the Ruhr area wasgiv-
en an
efficient regional trans- portation
sysLemin
the 1960s and1970s (Figure 13), there
arestilI
several- inprovementsin
the regional infrastructure
necess&-ry. All are controversial.
Äs
mentionedearlier,
sonelinks of the
regional. notorway system were not completed becauseof local opposition.
Twoof
these'missing links'&re located in
Dortmund,leaving it with
only one east-west motorway, the 'B 1' (whichis not a real
notorway asit
hasintersections),
whichis
notoriously congested. Dortnund' sindustrial circles
represented bythe Chanber
of
Commerce have aL- waysinsisted that at least
oneof the two 'missing links'
mustbe
buiIt.
However, under environ-Figare 13.
Dortnund has excelLent auto- bahns,but there are 'nissing links',
M. I{EGENER
t
II
ä: NordstÄdt
oesch Un ( closed )
Technolo Park
-t)
Techno Iogy Center
1I I
\
',,,tffii,;)lllil,
t _--
\ ---- L'l
vz)
\
I Caeinoi+
l:--:-v-_,,ir:iiiii!i:iiiiiii:i;:ir:i;; ",,
Figare 14.
Dortpund:location of itens
nentionedin text,
Eentalist
pressure,the city
hasin the
tseantine rezonedthe land set
&sidefor that
notorway and muchof it
has been already developed, sobuilding
the notorway today wouldrequire
enornouss&crifices.
Becauseof this, it is
nowbeing discussed whether
a gisnt tunnel project
underthe existing
B1
could providethe
necessarycapacity (Figure
14).A simiLar
conflict of lesser
scale arose whenthe
Hoesch company demand-ed
a
notorway &ccessto its najor steel
work lfestfaLenhütte,Against
muchcitizen protest, this
notorway hasrecently
been completed. Moreironic is the following
case. Whenin the late
1970s Hoesch consideredbuilding a
newsteel
work ona large site in the
northwesternpart of the city (Figure
14),it set
as oneof its conditions that
a newlink
fromthe site to the
south-ern
autobahn bebuilt
bythe city.
Todaythe plan of the
newsteel
work haslong been abandoned,
but the
requested highwayis
almostfinished.
The
special relationship
betweenthe city
andits still largest
employeris further illustrated by the
controversy aboutthe
modernizationof
thecanal
connecting Dortmundwith the
Rhineriver
and Dortmund'scanal port
Figure 14).
Hoesch has alwaysinsisted that the canal
andthe port nust
be deepenedto
accommodatethe
3000-ton standard European barge, although todayREVITALIZATION STRATEGIES OF CITIES IN THE RUHR AREA
the firn
shipsonly I
percentof its total freight
volume by wa-ter.
Construction on the canalis
now underway, but the conpany has
so
far
declinedto
comnititself to shifting
alarger
shareof its
shipments
to the
canal.It
has always beena
disad- Yantageof
the Ruhr areathat
the nearestinternational airport is Düsseldorf, 60 kn distant fron
Dortmund.
In light of this,
Dort- nund hasgreatly benefited
froothe recent rise of regional air
t,raf f
ie.
Dortnund' s smallairpori, (Figure 14)
has now turbo-prop connectj.onsto
München,Stutt- gart,
Nürnbergand Berlin,
aflight to
Londonis
considered.One
important factor of
Dort-nund's ai.rport j.s its right
to issue'through-tickets' for
con-necting flights
from München orStuttgart giving
Iong-distance p&ssengers the feederflight fron
Dortnundpractically free.
However,
the future of
theairport is jeopardized by its
unfortunate
location in
a densely populated area wherecitizens
ve- hemently oppose anyfurther
ex- pansionof its flight
operations.Moreover,
it
renains open r+hetherin a relatively small
countrylike l{est
Germanydonestic air traffic
has great prospects con-pared with future
high-speedtrains.
Given Dortmund's excel-lent position in the Intercity
network
(Figure 17),
even todayonly on long relations
such as Dortmund-Mi.inchen si gnificant
tine savings can be achieved by taking theairplane. Iiith future
systemssuch
as the
ICEorr
possibly,the Maglev, these savings
wiII
befurther
reduced. Dortnund cur-rently lobbies in
Bonnfor
a newIntercity line linking it via KasseI to the new
high-speedroute
Hauburg-München.Figtre 15, Dortnund's canaL port:
Jargest
in
f{est Gernany,Figure 16.
Dortuund'sairport
hasflights
to l{ünchen,
Stuttgart,
Nürnberg and BerLin.Figtre 17. Future high-speed Intercity
service
(ICE) nay be noreattractive
thandonestic air travel,
M. WEGENER
(5)
Environnentalpolicy
Many
other activities
can be summarized underthis
heading. They are notor not directly
ainedat
promoting economic developnent,but are part of
aconprehensive long-term
strategy of
modernizingthe
region.One
set of policies is directed at restoring the natural
environnent frondamages
suffered during its industrial past
whereverpossible, by 'renatur- alizing'streams or planting trees.
Onemajor project is the
ecologicalnodel'landscape park'planned to link the
twoparts of the university
can- puswith the
new technologypark, actually eliminating ('retroconstructing') a four-lane
highwaybuilt only twenty years ago,
Anotherproject is
thelarge artificial
Lake andnarina
plannedfor the site
where Hoeschis
not goingto build the
newsteel
work(Figure
14).Another
set of policies is
concernedwith
makingthe city safer
and nore convenientfor
pedestrians throughvarious
neasuresof traffic restraint.
The
city is in the
processof
thoroughly remodelingthe
downtown pedestrian shopping areain
connectionwith a large
underground parking gerage andits
ner.r
city haII. Sinilar smaller projects are
underwayfor
suburban shoppingcenters. In addition, traffic restraint
ne&suresfor residential
areas are implenentedpiece by piece. Traffic restraint in l{est
Gernanyoriginally followed the Dutch 'woonerf'example, but
hassince
developedinto a
con- prehensive philosophyof
improvingthe living environnent in residential
neighborhoods. The
city also
plansto gradually
increasethe
nunberof
sepa-rate
lanesfor bicycles
alongtrunk
roads,Neighborhood improvenent, r+hich
is
alwaysclosely related to traffic restraint,
concentrates onthe older yorker
housing are&s closeto industri- aI plants
('Genengelagen') wherethe
neighborhoodquality is lowest.
Onenotable
exampleis the
Nordstadt prograrndirected at
improvingthe living conditions in the
Nordstadt, oneof the oldest
and most depresseddistricts in
Dortmund.6
OTHER CITIES' STBATEGIESDortnund
is only
oneexanple.
Everywherein the
Ruhrarea cities
newinitiatives are springing up, as if the
needto fight for survival
hadre-
leaseda
new waveof creativeness.
Hereis just a snall
sanple:.
Duisburg has gonefarther
than anyother city in
exercisi.ng entrepreneuri-al thinking
byprivatizing its
econonic pronotion departnent, whichis
nowa seni-private
companyjointly held
bythe city
andthe
tr+o majorfirns of the city,
Thyssen and Krupp..
Oberhausen hopesthat
Canadianinvestors attracted by the 5 to 7 million
consumers
within a radius of
50 knwill erect a
huge covered shoppingnall
onthe site of a forner
Thyssensteel
workwith
15,000jobs,
1,500 shops, and 800restaurants -
muchto the
dismayof local retailers.
.
Bochun hasput its
stakeson leisure
and entertainmentby heavily
subsi-dizing
investmentslike the
Aquadron,a fancy
indoorspool,
andthe Star-
light
HaLL,a theater built exclusively for the presentation of a
Londonmusical.
0na
noreserious note, it
hopesto
beeonea center of the
musicindustry in
Germany.REVITALIZATION STRATEGIES OF CITIES
IN
THE RUHR AREA.
Hattingenplans to transform its steel
work Henrichshütteinto a tourist attraction an industrial
monunent conpleter+ith
rnuseun,industrial
park andhistorical
stean-enSinepuffing
alongthe
Buhrvalley.
.
Dortnund again deservesto
be mentionedfor its
ingeniousidea to
secure oneof the
fewstate licenses for a
gamblingcasino.
The new Casino, nuchto the
chagrinof local
environmeni,alists located on oneof the nost
sce-nic hills of the
Ruhrvalley (Figure 14), is
an enornous success and high- 1yprofitable for the city
throughits
shareof the
ganbling tax.Perhaps
the
most spectacularof all projects is the International Build- ing
Exhi.bition Enscher-Park('IBA')
launched i-n 1988 b.vthe
Nordrhein-l{est-falen state
governnent.Despite
its
naneit is not realLy
anexhibition, but
ananbitious
pro- gramto fundanentally
renodel anarea,
35kf, long
and 10 knwide,
on both sidesof the
Enscherriver
between Duisburgin the
west and Dortmundin
theeast: a longitudinal section
throughthe Buhr area
whereits industrial
legacyis
most depressing,its
environnentnost polluted,
andits
Land-usesysten most disorganized
(Figure
18).Thirteen cities
and one countyare to
cooperateto
produceuntil
1990 aioint strategy for the
developnentof the
Emscherregion
under ecological-, economic andsocial
perspectivefor
inplementationin
subsequentyears.
Thestate
governnent hopes,with
seed noneyof
onj,y DM3.5milLion
(Y245million) to attract private
investmentof
DM3billion
(Y210billion) until
1994.Whether
that is realistic or not
nay be openfor
debate. I{hat countsis
the forward-lookingspirit
expressed bythis project,
which encourages peopleto take a
noreoptinistic
viewof the future of their
region.Figure 78.
TheInternationaL Building Exhibition is
ananbitious
progranto
fundanentally renodelit is nost
desolate.Eascher-Park