• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

DYNAMICS OF DOM IN THE LENA DELTA REGION (SIBERIA) REVEALED BY PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "DYNAMICS OF DOM IN THE LENA DELTA REGION (SIBERIA) REVEALED BY PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

DYNAMICS OF DOM IN THE LENA DELTA REGION (SIBERIA) REVEALED BY PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS

Funding

Helmholtz Association (Germany), CAPES (Brazil), DAAD (Germany), POLMAR (AWI-Germany)

Aknowledgments

The authors thank to Ivan Dubinenkov (AWI) , Sonja Wiegmann (AWI) and Denis Moiseev (MMBI - Russia) for the collaborations and laboratory assistance.

BREMERHAVEN

Bussestraße 24 27570 Bremerhaven Telefon 0471 4831-1785 www.awi.de

INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS

● Lena expedition: 1-7 September 2013 – R/V “Dalniye Zelentsy”

4 transects – 18 oceanographic stations – 60 samples

● Sensors: CTD casts  Temperature, salinity, UMLD and stratification

● Water samples: CDOM (colored DOM), FDOM (fluorescent DOM) and DOC

● Analyses: - EEM/PARAFAC modeling for DOM (Stedmon & Bro, 2008; Murphy et al., 2013) - DOM modification indices: CDOM slope (SCDOM), specific UV abs (SUVA), humification index (HIX), biological index (BIX)

● Theoretical conservative mixing: Salinity 0 (Stedmon et al., 2011)

Salinity 34.5 (Granskog et al., 2012)

• Hydrography, DOC and CDOM distribution • EEM-PARAFAC components

Contact

rafael.goncalves.araujo@awi.de Rafael Gonçalves-Araujo

1

, Colin Stedmon

2

, Alexandra Kraberg

3

, Astrid Bracher

1,4

1Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), Climate Sciences, PHYTOOPTICS Group, Bremerhaven – Germany

2National Institute for Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund – Denmark

3Alfred Wgener Institute (AWI), Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland – Germany

4University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), Bremen – Germany

Poster: 113 – Abstract ID: 27588

MERIS - First attenuation depth (Heim et al., 2014)

● Lena River – one of the largest rivers in the world  high riverine input into Arctic Ocean - Fresh water: ~20% total fresh water in the Arctic (Cauwet & Sidorov, 1996) - High amounts of sediments and organic matter

● Greatest discharge of organic matter in the Arctic Ocean (Stedmon et al., 2011)

● Large, shallow, dynamic and high diverse ecosystem (Kraberg et al., 2013)

● Under climate changing pressure (Yang et al., 2002)

- Increasing temperatures  permafrost thaw

- Increase in river discharge and riverine material export to the Arctic Ocean

DOM DYNAMICS IN THE LENA DELTA

● Previous works: conservative mixing of DOM - Cauwet & Sidorov (1996)

- Kattner, et al. (1999)

● Non-conservative mixing (Alling et al., 2010) - Removal up to 50%

● Changes in molecular composition - Dubinenkov et al. (2014)

Humic-like Allochthonous Mostly removed

Humic-like Allochthonous Mostly removed

Marine humic-like Autochthonous Removed/released

Humic-like Allochthonous Mostly removed

Humic-like Allochthonous Mostly released

Protein-like Autochthonous Mostly released

Lena expedition Aug. 2013

OBJECTIVES

● to characterize FDOM components

● to assess the DOM mixing behavior

● to evaluate the reactivity of DOM

● to investigate the processes modulating DOM transformation and mixing

r2=0.87 p<0.00001

a350=15.283 e-0.065x

r2=0.99 p<0.00001

Salinity range: 0.90 – 32.63

Temperature range: -1.2 – 10.3°C UMLD < 10m

Shallow stations  vertically mixed

● DOC and CDOM well correlated

● DOM decreases with salinity increase

● Non-conservative mixing

(DOM REMOVAL – up to 54%)

• Optical indices of DOM modification

● Strongly HUMIFIED region (mostly humic-like compounds)

● NO BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION (Mopper & Kieber, 2002)

● Molecular weight/reactivity decreases with salinity

Cluster analysis based on salinity, a350 and DOC

LENA PLUME

● high DOM – Allochthonous

● higher reactivity - Labile

● strong DOM removal

● PHOTODEGRADATION

● SORPTION/FLOCCULATION

MARINE SHELF WATERS

● low DOM

● low reactivity – Refractory

● low input/removal

● PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVE

● LOW TRANSFORMATION

DILUTION

● mod. DOM – Allochthonous

● decrease in reactivity

● moderate DOM removal

● PHOTODEGRADATION

● SORPTION/FLOCCULATION

● LOW RELEASE (C3, C5 & C6)

CONCLUSIONS

● Strongly humified region ● Non-conservative mixing ● Strong DOM removal

(3 different regimes)

● Changes composition/reactivity ● Different processes over DOM

a350 (m-1) a350 (m-1)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

With these facts in mind the overarching aims of our drilling campaigns were to re- trieve deep (&gt; 50m) frozen and unfrozen sediment cores including sediments, ice, and

In other words, this huge carbon inventory in the first meter of the Lena Delta equals the amount 29 million times the mass of the huge MI-8 helicopter (see figure 2) often used

–  to inves&gt;gate the processes modula&gt;ng the DOM mixing within the Lena delta region. à Carbon pathways in

Colored DOM (CDOM) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were highly correlated and, as a response to the hydrographical forcing, the region displayed a

Parallel factorial analysis (PARAFAC) showed the presence of six different components, with four humic-like components, 1 marine humic-like and one protein-like.. The total

• ~20% total fresh water in the Arctic Ocean (Cauwet &amp; Sidorov, 1996). • Greatest discharge of organic matter in

Spring season with sea ice coverage 17-04-2011, MODIS max. Petersburg), Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research, Arctic and Antarctic

In Figure 5.5, simulation results of a model run using measured water surface temperatures as the upper boundary condition are shown and therefore snow cover and