School on Pulsed Neutrons - October 2005 - ICTP Trieste
"Methods and Techniques"
Experimental Techniques for the Study of Magnetism
Prof. Dr. Thomas Brückel
Institute for Scattering Methods
Institute for Solid State Research
first compass
History: Loadstone Fe 3 O 4 ( ≈ 800 BC)
100 A.D.
Chinese "south pointer"
first compass
History: Loadstone Fe 3 O 4 ( ≈ 800 BC)
100 A.D.
Chinese "south pointer"
"perpetual motion machine"
1269
Europe: Petrus Perigrinus
"Epostolia de Magnete"
first compass
History: Loadstone Fe 3 O 4 ( ≈ 800 BC)
100 A.D.
Chinese "south pointer"
"perpetual motion machine"
1269
Europe: Petrus Perigrinus
"Epostolia de Magnete"
what’s new ? what’s new ?
magnetic nanostructures correlated electron systems
...
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
Magnetic Nanostructures
Thin Film Multilayer:
Fe 50 Pt 50 Nanoparticle Network by colloidal self organisation
Sun et al; Science 287 (2000), 1989
Magnetic Nanostructures
Thin Film Multilayer:
⇒Surfaces,
⇒Interfaces,
⇒Proximity effects
Fe 50 Pt 50 Nanoparticle Network by colloidal self organisation
Sun et al; Science 287 (2000), 1989
Magnetic Nanostructures
Thin Film Multilayer:
⇒Surfaces,
⇒Interfaces,
⇒Proximity effects
Fe 50 Pt 50 Nanoparticle Network by colloidal self organisation
Sun et al; Science 287 (2000), 1989
Interlayer Exchange Coupling
Peter Grünberg:
Interlayer Exchange Coupling in Fe/Cr Multilayers Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986), 2442
Oscillatory coupling as function of interlayer thickness:
Co Cu Co
Co Cu Co
Ferromagnetic Antiferromagnetic
Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR)
P. Grünberg et al.
Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989), 4828 (and independently: A. Fert, Paris)
GMR-effect
Fe/Cr/Fe
1.5 %
Artificial Nano-Structures
→ purpose designed properties
Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR)
P. Grünberg et al.
Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989), 4828 (and independently: A. Fert, Paris)
GMR-effect
Fe/Cr/Fe
1.5 %
Fe/Cr/FeArtificial Nano-Structures
→ purpose designed properties
Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR)
P. Grünberg et al.
Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989), 4828 (and independently: A. Fert, Paris)
GMR-effect
Fe/Cr/Fe
1.5 %
Fe/Cr/Fe1
Artificial Nano-Structures
→ purpose designed properties
Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR)
P. Grünberg et al.
Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989), 4828 (and independently: A. Fert, Paris)
GMR-effect
Fe/Cr/Fe
1.5 %
Fe/Cr/Fe1
Artificial Nano-Structures
→ purpose designed properties
Applications: Hard Disks
Applications: Hard Disks
Moor's Law
Applications: MRAM
MRAM MRAM
Magnetic Random Access Memory:
Applications: MRAM
MRAM MRAM
Magnetic Random Access Memory:
• 100 Million storage elements per mm 2
• 1 /100 Million gram mass per cm 2
Applications: MRAM
MRAM MRAM
Magnetic Random Access Memory:
• 100 Million storage elements per mm 2
• 1 /100 Million gram mass per cm 2
independently 1988 A. Fert
Applications: MRAM
MRAM MRAM
Magnetic Random Access Memory:
• 100 Million storage elements per mm 2
• 1 /100 Million gram mass per cm 2
independently 1988 A. Fert
"Spintronics":
Information transport, storage and processing
with the spin of the electron (not the charge!)
Complex transition metal oxides:
High T C Superconductors; CMR-Manganates; …
New phenomena appear from the New phenomena appear from the bottom of the Fermi sea due to bottom of the Fermi sea due to electronic correlations:
electronic correlations:
• Magnetism
• Superconductivity
• Metal-insulator transition (CMR)
• Charge- & orbital order
• Multiferroica
Highly correlated electron systems
High T C Materials (YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6+x ):
Magnetism ↔ Superconductivity Materials with collosal Magnetoresistance
Spin ↔ Charge ↔ Lattice ↔ Orbital order Oxides
No simple Fermi liquids; competing interactions
La Mn
O
Highly correlated electron systems
Fundamental microscopic understanding !
Fundamental microscopic understanding !
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
Susceptibility and Magnetisation
Susceptibility and Magnetisation
M
H
H M = χ ⋅
linear response theory
Susceptibility and Magnetisation
Scattering
Scattering
→ Internal structure? (atom positions, moment arrangement)
→ Microscopic dynamics? (atom movements, spin dynamics)
⇒ Macroscopic properties (conductivity, susceptibility, ...)
Scattering
Scattering:
interaction sample ↔ radiation weak
⇒ non-invasive, non destructive probe
for structure & dynamics
v N
µ N
Generalised Susceptibility
linear response theory:
perturbation of magnetic system described by spacial and temporal varying magnetic field H (r, t)
system reaction:
local magnetisation M (r,t)
linear response theory → susceptibility )
, ( r t χ
( ) ( )
,
0, =
=ld H
ld
t M R t
R
M
β β( , ' ) (
' ', ' ) '
' '
'
'
t R R t t dt
R
t
H
d l ld d
l
d
∫ ∑∑
−∞ l− −
+
αβα
α
χ
( , ' ) ( ) (
0 ', ' )
1
'
Q t t e
iQ R R0 'R
ldR
dt t
dd
d
ld
− −
=
− ∑
⋅ −αβ
αβ χ
χ
( ) Q e
dd( ) Q t dt
t i
dd
,
',
' 0
αβ ω
αβ
ω χ
χ = ∫
∞ −v N
µ N
Generalised Susceptibility
linear response theory:
perturbation of magnetic system described by spacial and temporal varying magnetic field H (r, t)
system reaction:
local magnetisation M (r,t)
linear response theory → susceptibility )
, ( r t χ
Fourier transform:
( , ) = ( , )
=0ld H
ld
t M R t
R
M
β β( , ' ) (
' ', ' ) '
' '
'
'
t R R t t dt
R
t
H
d l ld d
l
d
∫ ∑∑
−∞ l− −
+
αβα
α
χ
( , ' ) ( ) (
0 ', ' )
1
'
Q t t e
iQ R R0 'R
ldR
dt t
dd
d
ld
− −
=
− ∑
⋅ −αβ
αβ χ
χ
( ) Q e
dd( ) Q t dt
t i
dd
,
',
' 0
αβ ω
αβ
ω χ
χ = ∫
∞ −Neutrons: Length and Time Scales
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
Magnetic Structures
Mn
2+b=a a=4.873 Å
c= 3. 31 Å
Collinear Antiferromagnets:
F -
MnF
2:
Modulated Structures:
Cr:
MnO:
Complex Structures:
Er
6Mn
23:
Rare Earth:
General description in Fourier representation:
∑ ⋅ − ⋅
=
k k l
e
m i k R
m
ij ijexp( )
Neutron-Matter-Interaction
First Born Approximation: 2 2
|
|
|'
2 ⎟ | < >
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
= ⎛
Ω m k V k
d d
π h
σ
Neutron-Matter-Interaction
First Born Approximation: 2 2
|
|
|'
2 ⎟ | < >
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
= ⎛
Ω m k V k
d d
π h σ
r d e
r V
r d e r V e
r Q i
r k i r
k i
3 3 '
) (
) (
⋅
−
−
∫
∫
⋅
=
Neutron-Matter-Interaction
First Born Approximation: 2 2
|
|
|'
2 ⎟ | < >
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
= ⎛
Ω m k V k
d d
π h σ
r d e
r V
r d e r V e
r Q i
r k i r
k i
3 3 '
) (
) (
⋅
−
−
∫
∫
⋅
? =
Neutron-Matter-Interaction
First Born Approximation: 2 2
|
|
|'
2 ⎟ | < >
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
= ⎛
Ω m k V k
d d
π h σ
r d e
r V
r d e r V e
r Q i
r k i r
k i
3 3 '
) (
) (
⋅
−
−
∫
∫
⋅
? =
• strong interaction n ↔ nucleus
• magnetic dipole-interaction with B-field of unpaired e
-major
Magnetic Interaction Potential
e -
v e
µ e
R
B µ n
n
magnetic moment of the neutron:
⋅ σ γµ
−
=
µ n N
magnetic field of the electron:
L
S B
B
B = +
dipolar field of the spin moment: ; 2 S
R R
B x e B
e 3
S ⎟⎟ ⎠ µ = − µ ⋅
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
× ⎛ µ
∇
=
field due to the movement of the electron (Biot-Savart): L e 3 R
R v
c
B = − e ×
n B
m = − µ ⋅ V
Zeeman energy:
Magnetic Scattering Cross Section
σz Vm k
σz‘ k‘
z 2 m
z 2
n 2 k ' ' k
2 m d
d ⎟⎟ ⎠ σ σ
⎜⎜ ⎞
⎝
⎛
= π Ω
σ V
h
( ) z ( ) z 2
B
0 2 ' M Q
2 r 1
d
d σ ⋅ σ
− µ γ
Ω = σ
σ ⊥
cm 10
539 . 0
r 0 = ⋅ − 12 γ
→"equivalent scattering length" for 1 µ
B(S=
2
1 ): 2.696 fm ≈ b
co( ) Q Qˆ M ( ) Q Qˆ
M ⊥ = × ×
( ) Q = ∫ M ( ) r e ⋅ d r
M i Q r 3
( ) r M ( ) r M ( ) r
M = S + L
( ) = − µ ⋅ ( ) = − µ ∑ δ ( − )
i i i
B B
S r 2 S r 2 r r S
M
1. Born approximation
Directional Dependence
Q k‘
M
k
M⊥
( ) Q Qˆ M Qˆ
M ⊥ = × ×
Illustration: scattering from the dipolar field
Only the component of the magnetisation perpendicular to the scattering vector gives rise to magnetic scattering!
M || Q M
Q
Planes with equal phase factor
M ⊥ Q M
Q
Pure Spin Scattering
Ri rik
tik Sik
Si
Atom i
Separation of intra-atomic quantities for localised moments:
( ) = − µ ∑ δ ( − ) ⋅ +
=
ik ik ik
B S
ik i
ik R t ; M r 2 r r s
r
( ) Q = ∫ M ( ) r e ⋅ d r
M S i Q r 3
∑ ∑ ⋅
∑ =
= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
i i Q R k i Q t ik ik ik
r Q
i s e e s
e i i ik
Expectation value of the operator for the thermodynamic state of the sample:
( ) Q = − 2 µ B ⋅ f m ( ) Q ⋅ ∑ e i Q ⋅ R ⋅ S i
M i
( ) = ∫ ρ ( ) ⋅
Atom
r 3 Q s i
m Q r e d r
f
( ) ( ) 2
i
R Q i i
2 m
0 f Q S e i
d r
d = γ ∑
Ω
σ ⊥
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
normalized form factor
sin(Θ/λ)
nuclear scattering
orbital
x-ray
spin
Chromium
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
sin(Θ/λ)
Q || b Q || a
a b
form factor
Form Factor: Spin, Orbit, Anisotropy
M(r)
λ
F
i. a. anisotrop:
in general anisotropic:
Magnetic Bragg Diffraction from a Type I Antiferromagnet on a tetragonal body-centered lattice
amplitude
→ intensity
nuclear structure factor
squared
square of structure
factor
Magnetic Neutron Scattering
Neutron Powder Diffraction
10 K RT
E. Gorelik (2004)
Distorted
Perovskite
structure
Magnetic Neutron Scattering
Neutron Powder Diffraction
10 K RT
E. Gorelik (2004)
Distorted
Perovskite
structure
Magnetic Neutron Scattering
Neutron Powder Diffraction
10 K RT
E. Gorelik (2004)
Spin Structure:
Distorted
Perovskite
structure
v N
µ N Interaction:
Magnetic Dipole-Dipole
) ' ,' ( )
' , ,' , ( )
,
( r t r r t t H r t
M = χ ⋅
(
0)
21 ' ( )
2z B z
mag n
Q M d r
d ω σ γ µ σ σ σ
⋅
⊥−
=
Elastic scattering:
Magnetic Neutron Scattering
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Chemical structure, but not
Magnetic Structure
La 7/8 Sr 1/8 MnO 3 -Kristall
Perßon, Li, Mattauch, Kaiser, Roth, Heger (2004)
La 7/8 Sr 1/8 MnO 3 -Kristall
Perßon, Li, Mattauch, Kaiser, Roth, Heger (2004)
< 112>
T = 120 K
ESRF @ Grenoble, France 6 GeV
APS @ Argonne/Chicago, USA 7 GeV
SPRING8, Japan, 8 GeV
Synchrotron Sources
X-Ray Probes of Magnetism
- Kerr-microscopy - Faraday effect
- Linear x-ray magnetic dichroism - Circular x-ray magnetic dichroism
- Spin resolved x-ray absorption fine structure SEXAFS - Magnetic x-ray diffraction (non-resonant scattering) - Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering (X-ray resonance
exchange scattering XRES) - Nuclear resonant scattering - Magnetic x-ray reflectivity - Magnetic Compton scattering
- Angular- and spin resolved photoemission
X-Ray Probes of Magnetism
- Kerr-microscopy - Faraday effect
- Linear x-ray magnetic dichroism - Circular x-ray magnetic dichroism
- Spin resolved x-ray absorption fine structure SEXAFS - Magnetic x-ray diffraction (non-resonant scattering) - Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering (X-ray resonance
exchange scattering XRES) - Nuclear resonant scattering - Magnetic x-ray reflectivity - Magnetic Compton scattering
- Angular- and spin resolved photoemission
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
E
H E
H
H H
E
E
interaction re-radiation
-e
-e
-e µ
µ force
-eE
-eE
grad(µH)
torque Hxµ
E-dipole
H-quadr.
E-dipole
H-dipole
σ
σ
σ
σ
σ
π,σ
π
π
µDe Bergevin & Brunel 1981
Nonresonant Scattering: Classical
Thomson scattering from charges
⇒ Structure
E
H E
H
H H
E
E
interaction re-radiation
-e
-e
-e µ
µ force
-eE
-eE
grad(µH)
torque Hxµ
E-dipole
H-quadr.
E-dipole
H-dipole
σ
σ
σ
σ
σ
π,σ
π
π
µDe Bergevin & Brunel 1981
Nonresonant Scattering: Classical
Thomson scattering from charges
⇒ Structure
But: X-rays are electromagnetic
radiation ⇒ non resonant magnetic x-ray
scattering
⇒ Magnetism
Cross Section for Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
Non-relativistic treatment in second order perturbation theory ( Blume 1985, Blume & Gibbs 1988 )
• Hamiltonian for e - in e-m field:
)) 2 (
2 (
1 A r j
c j e j m P
H = ∑ −
+ ∑
ji V ( r ij )
∑ ⋅ ∇ ×
− j s j A r j mc
e h ( )
)) (
( ) 2 (
) (
2 A r j
c j e j s j E r j P
mc
e ∑ ⋅ × −
− h
2 ) ) 1 ( ) (
∑ ( + +
+ λ ω λ λ
k h k c k c k
kinetic energy
Coulomb interaction Zeeman energy -µ · H
spin-orbit coupling -µ·H~s·(E×v)
self energy of e-m-field
• Vector potential in plane wave expansion:
2 1 q 2 V c q 2 )
r (
A = ∑σ ω π
⎟⎟
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
h × [ ε ( q σ ) c ( q σ ) e i q ⋅ r + ε * ( q σ ) c + ( q σ ) e − i q ⋅ r ]
H = H o + H r + H int
e
--system e-m-wave interaction
→ perturbation theory (Fermi's "golden rule")
first order for terms quadratic in A second order for terms linear in A
2
int
, ,
,'
,' f H k i d k
d σ ∝ ε ε
Ω
Cross Section for Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2 magnetic~ |f M | 2
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2 magnetic~ |f M | 2 interference~ f C · f M
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2 magnetic~ |f M | 2 interference~ f C · f M
π/2 phase shift
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2 magnetic~ |f M | 2 interference~ f C · f M
π/2 phase shift h/mc = 2.426 pm
Intensity ratio: I I
2 ' 2
2 2
' εε
ε ε
σ
f C
mc e d
d ⎥ ⋅
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
non-resonant elastic scattering cross section:
r e = 2.818 fm
incident and final polarization
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
charge ~ |f C | 2 magnetic~ |f M | 2 interference~ f C · f M
π/2 phase shift h/mc = 2.426 pm
10 6
~ 2 f S
N f M N M
d c
~ I M C
I −
⋅
⋅ ⋅
Intensity ratio: I I λ
cross section:
scattering geometry:
Cross Section: Nonresonant
2 ' '
2 2 2
' ε ε ε ε
ε ε
λ σ
M C
C f
i d mc f
e d
d ⎥ ⋅ +
⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
= ⎡ Ω →
Q=k’-k
Amplitude-matrices:
to \ from σ π
σ ' ρ ( Q ) 0
π ' 0 ρ (Q) cos2 ( θ )
<f
C> for charge scattering:
⇒ charge density ρ(Q)
Amplitude-matrices:
to \ from σ π
σ ' ρ ( Q ) 0
π ' 0 ρ (Q) cos2 ( θ )
<f
C> for charge scattering:
⇒ charge density ρ(Q)
e
-E Hertz
Dipole
Radiation
Amplitude-matrices:
to \ from σ π
σ ' ρ ( Q ) 0
π ' 0 ρ (Q) cos2 ( θ )
<f
C> for charge scattering:
⇒ charge density ρ(Q)
e
-E Hertz
Dipole Radiation
to \ from σ π
σ ' S 2 ⋅ cos θ [ ( L 1 + S 1 ) ⋅ cos θ + S 3 ⋅ sin θ ] ⋅ sin θ
π ' [ − ( L 1 + S 1 ) ⋅ cos θ + S 3 ⋅ sin θ ] ⋅ sin θ [ 2 L 2 ⋅ sin 2 θ + S 2 ] ⋅cos θ
<f
M> for the magnetic part:
⇒ spin density S(Q) and orbital angular momentum density L(Q)
Amplitude-matrices:
to \ from σ π
σ ' ρ ( Q ) 0
π ' 0 ρ (Q) cos2 ( θ )
<f
C> for charge scattering:
⇒ charge density ρ(Q)
e
-E Hertz
Dipole Radiation
to \ from σ π
σ ' S 2 ⋅ cos θ [ ( L 1 + S 1 ) ⋅ cos θ + S 3 ⋅ sin θ ] ⋅ sin θ
π ' [ − ( L 1 + S 1 ) ⋅ cos θ + S 3 ⋅ sin θ ] ⋅ sin θ [ 2 L 2 ⋅ sin 2 θ + S 2 ] ⋅cos θ
<f
M> for the magnetic part:
⇒ spin density S(Q) and orbital angular momentum density L(Q)
Charge scattering: "NSF"
Magnetic scattering: "NSF" (S
2, L
2) – ┴ scattering plane + "SF" (S
1, S
3, L
1) – in scattering plane
⇒ Separation S ↔L
50 m
5 mm properties calculable
small source
size wiggler clean ultra-high
vacuum source
time structure
intense continuous spectrum highly collimated
undulators
.
. polarised
Synchrotron X-Ray Source
Outline
• What's new in magnetism ?
• Experimental techniques
• Elastic magnetic neutron scattering
• X-ray techniques for magnetism
• Nonresonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Resonant magnetic x-ray scattering
• Example: Non-resonant scattering from transition metal di-flourides
• Example: Resonance exchange scattering from mixed crystals
• Summary
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
resonance exchange scattering
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
resonance exchange scattering
( )
2 0
M
mag E E i / 2
E / d
d
Γ
−
−
∝ α Ω
σ
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
resonance exchange scattering
( )
2 0
M
mag E E i / 2
E / d
d
Γ
−
−
∝ α Ω
σ
neutron scattering
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
Resonant Magnetic X-Ray Scattering
εF
2s 2p 2p
1s
1/2 3/2
4f ↑ 4f ↓
s-p-d
up E down
exchange splitting
resonance exchange scattering
( )
2 0
M
mag E E i / 2
E / d
d
Γ
−
−
∝ α Ω
σ
neutron scattering
resonant x-ray scattering
γ
LIIIE1: 2p3/2→5d5/2 E2: 2p3/2→4f7/2
Hannon, Trammell, Blume & Gibbs PRL 61 (1988), 1245
7942 eV 7938 eV 7935 eV 7933 eV
ω 0
1000 2000 3000
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8
co un ts / se c
energy
7924 eV 7930 eV
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0 50 100 150 200 250
7920 7925 7930 7935 7940 7945 7950
peak intensity [a.u.] flourescence yield [a.u.]
energy [eV]
GdS 9/2 1/2 1/2
LII edge
GdS: L II Edge Resonance
Brückel, Hupfeld, Strempfer, Caliebe, Mattenberger, Stunault, Bernhoeft, McIntyre; Eur. Phys. J B19 (2001); 475
) ( )
( )
( )
1 (
lin E f circ E
f o E
f E E
f res = + +
Dipole Approximation:
⎥⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
⎟⎡
⎠⎞
⎜⎝
⎛
ε ε⋅ + + −
= 1
F 1 1 1 F ' ) E 0 ( f
⎥⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
⎟ ⎡
⎠⎞
⎜⎝
⎛
ε × ε ⋅ − − +
= 1
F 1 1 1 F m '
i ) E circ ( f
( )
⎥⎦
⎢ ⎤
⎣
⎟ ⎡
⎠⎞
⎜⎝
⎛
ε ⋅ ε ⋅ − + − −
= 1
F 1 1 1 1 F
F 0 2 m m
' ) E lin ( f
Amplitudes:
Oscillator Strengths:
2 h res i
1 M
F M ω − ω − Γ
= α
⎟⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝⎛
( ) ... 2
' 1
' '
2 2 2
' = ⋅ + + +
Ω → ⎟
⎠
⎜ ⎞
⎝
⎛
ε ε ε
λ ε ε
ε ε ε
σ E E
f res f M
d i c f c
mc e d
d
Anomalous Scattering: Cross Section
XRES: Resonance Enhancements
elements edge transition energy range [keV]
resonance strength
comment
3d
K 1s → 4p 5 - 9 weak small overlap3d
LI 2s → 3d 0.5 - 1.2 weak small overlap3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
K 1s → 5p 40 - 63 weak small overlap4f
LI 2s → 5d 6.5 - 11 weak small overlap4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
4f
MI 3s → 5p 1.4 - 2.5 weak small overlap4f
MII, MIII 3p → 5d3p → 4f
1.3 - 2.2 medium to strong
dipolar quadrupolar
4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4f5f
MIV, MII 3d → 5f 3.3 - 3.9 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 5fXRES: Resonance Enhancements
elements edge transition energy range [keV]
resonance strength
comment
3d
K 1s → 4p 5 - 9 weak small overlap3d
LI 2s → 3d 0.5 - 1.2 weak small overlap3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
K 1s → 5p 40 - 63 weak small overlap4f
LI 2s → 5d 6.5 - 11 weak small overlap4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
4f
MI 3s → 5p 1.4 - 2.5 weak small overlap4f
MII, MIII 3p → 5d3p → 4f
1.3 - 2.2 medium to strong
dipolar quadrupolar
4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4f5f
MIV, MII 3d → 5f 3.3 - 3.9 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 5fthin films 3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3dXRES: Resonance Enhancements
elements edge transition energy range [keV]
resonance strength
comment
3d
K 1s → 4p 5 - 9 weak small overlap3d
LI 2s → 3d 0.5 - 1.2 weak small overlap3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
K 1s → 5p 40 - 63 weak small overlap4f
LI 2s → 5d 6.5 - 11 weak small overlap4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
4f
MI 3s → 5p 1.4 - 2.5 weak small overlap4f
MII, MIII 3p → 5d3p → 4f
1.3 - 2.2 medium to strong
dipolar quadrupolar
4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4f5f
MIV, MII 3d → 5f 3.3 - 3.9 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 5fthin films 3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
XRES: Resonance Enhancements
elements edge transition energy range [keV]
resonance strength
comment
3d
K 1s → 4p 5 - 9 weak small overlap3d
LI 2s → 3d 0.5 - 1.2 weak small overlap3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
K 1s → 5p 40 - 63 weak small overlap4f
LI 2s → 5d 6.5 - 11 weak small overlap4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
4f
MI 3s → 5p 1.4 - 2.5 weak small overlap4f
MII, MIII 3p → 5d3p → 4f
1.3 - 2.2 medium to strong
dipolar quadrupolar
4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4f5f
MIV, MII 3d → 5f 3.3 - 3.9 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 5fthin films 3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
thin films 4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4fXRES: Resonance Enhancements
elements edge transition energy range [keV]
resonance strength
comment
3d
K 1s → 4p 5 - 9 weak small overlap3d
LI 2s → 3d 0.5 - 1.2 weak small overlap3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
K 1s → 5p 40 - 63 weak small overlap4f
LI 2s → 5d 6.5 - 11 weak small overlap4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar
4f
MI 3s → 5p 1.4 - 2.5 weak small overlap4f
MII, MIII 3p → 5d3p → 4f
1.3 - 2.2 medium to strong
dipolar quadrupolar
4f
MIV, MV 3d → 4f 0.9 - 1.6 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 4f5f
MIV, MII 3d → 5f 3.3 - 3.9 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 5fthin films 3d
LII, LIII 2p → 3d 0.4 - 1.0 strong dipolar, large overlap, high spin polarisation of 3d4f
LII, LIII 2p → 5d2p → 4f
6 - 10 medium dipolar
quadrupolar