• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Dissociation of gas hydrates in marine sediments triggered by temperature increase: a theoretical model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Dissociation of gas hydrates in marine sediments triggered by temperature increase: a theoretical model"

Copied!
19
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Dissociation of gas hydrates in marine sediments triggered by temperature

increase: a theoretical model

Lihua Liu, Klaus Wallmann, Tomas Feseker, Tina Treude Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences (IFM-GEOMAR),

Germany

lliu@ifm-geomar.de

(2)

Introduction: Global warming

(Source: Climate Research Unit, Univ. of East Anglia, UK)

(3)

Introduction: Ocean warming

Source: IPCC (2007)

0.1°C

World Ocean, 0 – 700 m water depth

(4)

Tishchenko, Hensen, Wallmann & Wong (2005)

Introduction:

Stability of gas hydrates

Hydrate

Gas Water

(5)

Introduction: Consequence of ocean warming

Bottom waters increase 3ºC, 80% of the vast

methane reservoir along the continental margins might be destabilized.

(Buffett and Archer 2004).

The Arctic region is particularly sensitive to climate change. Arctic ocean is one the most rapidly

warming places on Earth and also a large reservoir

of methane.

(6)

Introduction: Important

biogeochemical processes

water column

reduced sediment CH4

Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) Aerobic oxidation of methane

atmosphere

archaea sulfate- reducing bacteria

Boetius et al. 2000

(7)

7

Hydrate dissociation

& methane release

gas hydrates

deep sea continental margin

H2O + CH4

free gas rising

CH4 SO42-

AOM

(8)

Questions: Effect of seafloor warming on the stability of gas hydrates

How will heat be transferred from the water to the sediment column?

How fast will the gas hydrates dissociate under realistic environmental conditions?

How much methane will be released?

How much methane can be dissolved in porewater?

How much methane can be consumed by microorganism (eg., AOM)?

(9)

Model parameters

Sediment column: 100 m Simulation time: 100 year

AOM reaction rate constant: 10-2 m3 mol-1 yr-1

Initial conditions

no free gas in the sediment column

Boundary condition

Upper boundary: increase 3°C/100 yr

Lower boundary: a constant geothermal gradient

Simulation method: 1 D multiphase

reactive transport model

(10)

Simulation method: 1 D multiphase reactive transport model

Combination of:

- heat transfer from water column to sediment and

- mass balance of gas hydrate, methane (gas and dissolved), water, and sulfate.

Multiphase mass transfer and transport, coupled with diffusion and biogeochemical reaction.

(gas hydrate, dissolved methane, free gas, consumed by AOM)

- Heat transfer in each phase

- Gas transports in the sediment and into the water column, where gas bubbles rise and dissolve in water

synchronously.

(11)

Simulation results: Temperature profile in the sediment column

°C

(12)

Simulation Results: Gas hydrate volume fraction profile in the sediment column

Vgas Hydrage

Vsediment

(13)

Simulation results: gas volume

fraction profile in the sediment column

Vgas

Vsediment

(14)

Simulation results: AOM rate profile in the sediment column

mol m3.yr

(15)

020406080 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

Simulation results

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.4 1.0 2.0 3.0

01020304050 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030

0

10

20

30

40

50

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03

0

1.0

2.0

3.0

0.0 1.0 2.0

Temperature °C Gas hydrate volume fraction

Free gas volume fraction

AOM rate (mol m-3 yr-1)

t=0 t=100 yr

t=50 yr

Depth (m)

(16)

Conclusion: Methane mass distribution

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

0 30 yr 50 yr 100 yr

Initial gas hydrate inventory

Melted gas hydrate Free gas escape

Free gas in sediment column Dissolved methane escape Consumed by AOM

20000

mol m-2

(17)

Conclusions: Answer the questions

The dissociation of gas hydrate slows down temperature increases in the seafloor.

Under simulation conditions, 10 % of the gas hydrates will melt in 100 yr. Of the released methane:

> 30 % rises into water column as gas bubbles

> 30 % remains in the sediment column as free gas.

~ 30 % dissolves into the sediment porewater ~ 3 % diffuses into the water column and

> 2 % is consumed by AOM.

(18)

Outlook

Future work will focus on the Arctic shelf, where gas hydrate destabilization caused by bottom water temperature increases

could become a major problem in the near

future.

(19)

Acknowledgements

Cluster of Excellence “The Future

Ocean” funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)

Dr. Giovanni Aloisi

All of my colleagues

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

R OUNDED POLYHEDRAL CRYSTALS OF GH ( WHITE ) GROW PREFERENTIALLY TOWARDS THE CENTER OF THE PORE SPACE ; THEY DO NOT ADHERE TO THE Q Z ( GRAY ) SURFACE , WHICH IS COVERED BY

Following the same temperature ramp for the small diameter core sample as in the experiments, the numerical model resulted in a pressure differential along the core shown in

In detail, a geochemical transport-reaction model has been applied to predict sub-seafloor gas hydrate distributions under varying envi- ronmental conditions and constrained by

In this study, we present the record of living (Rose Bengal stained) foraminiferal assemblages found in different biological zones (bacterial mats, clam fields, surrounding

Questions remain about the rate at which hydrate- bearing material released from the sea floor can transit the ocean water column, the dissolution rates of solid hydrates.. in

During intervals of data retrieval and OBH/OBS refitting, a total of 1490 km of seismic reflection profiles were acquired using five different source (broad frequency range) and

5: Gas release in relation to (a) general salinity, (b) pore solution concentration, and (c) organic matter content according to monitoring weil 6l0-P-2

NASA and Department of Energy Scientists expressed that emission of CO 2 and other heat-trapping gases have warmed the oceans, and are leading to energy imbalance