• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, June 25

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, June 25"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, June 25

Andreas Kleiner akleiner@uni-bonn.de

Exercises:

1. Consider a marriage market with strict preferences.

Show: The set of individuals that remain single is the same for all stable matchings.

2. Consider a marriage market with strict preferences.

Show: In the men-proposing deferred acceptance algorithm, truthtelling is a dominant strategy for men.

3. There arei= 1, ...,8 sellers each of one horse andj= 1, ...,10 potential buyers each of one horse in a horse market. All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods. The reserve priceciof the sellers and the maximal willingness-to-payhj

of the buyers are known to be given as in the following tables:

c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8

10 11 15 17 20 21.5 25 26 and

h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9 h10

30 28 26 24 22 21 20 18 17 15

(a) Identify the gains from trade each coalition can achieve.

(b) Show that the existence of two buyer-seller pairs who trade at different prices contradicts the requirements of the core.

(c) Determine the core.

(d) Show that each allocation in the core can be supported by a Walrasian price. (Note that this is the converse of the standard result whereby each Walrasian allocation is in the core!)

4. (a) Consider an assignment game, letx, ybe stable payoff vectors and letube defined by

um= max(xm, ym) ∀m

uw= min(xw, yw) ∀w.

Show: uis also a stable payoff vector.

(b) Show: The set of stable payoff vectors has a minimal and a maximal element.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Let (P, Q, α) be an assignment game, where P denotes the set of potential buyers, Q the set of potential sellers and α ij is the valuation of buyer i for the object of

Which decision rule should he implement and what is the resulting expected aggregate utility (that is, the sum of the agents expected utilities).. (c) Assume that transfers

A mechanism asks the agents to reveal their prefer- ences and applies the men-proposing deferred acceptance algorithm to the reported preferences.. Suppose that (i) men

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard

In part c insert ”implementable” before ”ex post efficient social choice function” and suppose that V i (θ −i ) is I times continuously differentiable for

Suppose there is one object for sale and N

Buyers are ex ante symmetric, and buyer i has a value θ i ∈ [0, θ] for the good, where θ is independently distributed according to distribution function F with density f.. Show

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods2. (Note that this is the converse of the standard