• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, May 18

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, May 18"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 6, May 18

Andreas Kleiner akleiner@uni-bonn.de

Exercises:

1. Consider a social choice setting with two alternatives (A and B) and two agents. Each agent has 3 possible types and each type is equally likely (and types are independently distributed). An allocation rule specifies for each type profile the probability with which alternativeAis chosen.

(a) Suppose marginals are given by

Φ1(x11) = 0.1 Φ2(x21) = 0.2 Φ1(x12) = 0.4 Φ2(x22) = 0.5 Φ1(x13) = 0.9 Φ2(x23) = 0.7 Is there an allocation rule inducing these marginals?

(b) Consider the following allocation rule (where the ij’s entry denotes the probability with which alternativeAis chosen if agent 1 has typeti and agent 2 has typetj):

0 0.5 0.1

0.2 0 1

0.4 1 1

Construct an equivalent allocation rule that is pointwise nondecreasing.

2. Consider the bilateral trade setting from the lecture (see slide 62) but suppose that the seller is forced to participate in the mechanism (i.e., there is no participation constraint for the seller). An allocation prescribes a probability with which trade takes place and a payment by the buyer to the seller.

(a) Which mechanism in the class of BIC mechanisms maximizes expected aggregate utility?

(b) Is there a DIC mechanism which achieves the same expected aggregate utility?

3. Consider a setting with 3 alternatives (A, BandC) and 2 symmetric agents, each with two equally likely and independent typesx1< x2. The utility of an agent with typexlisxl+cA in alternativeA,axl+cB with 0< a <1 in alternativeB, andcC in alternativeC (whereaandck are given parameters).

Consider the following allocation rule (wheres= 201 andqkij is the probability of choosing alternativek if agent 1 is of typexi and agent 2 is of type xj):

qA=as

1 1

1 13

, qB =s

9 1

1 1

, qC= 1−qA−qB

(a) Is this allocation rule implementable in Bayesian equilibrium?

(b) All symmetric allocation rules that are P-equivalent are given by

˜ qA=as

2−α α

α 14−α

, q˜B=s

10−β β

β 2−β

, q˜C = 1−q˜A−q˜B

for 0≤α≤2 and 0≤β≤2. For which values ofαandβare these allocation rules implementable in dominant strategies?

(c) Construct an U-equivalent allocation rule that is implementable in dominant strategies!

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Denoting his match by j, show first that i gets a weakly preferred partner if he uses a cutoff strategy that ranks all agents he prefers to j truthful and all other agents

Let (P, Q, α) be an assignment game, where P denotes the set of potential buyers, Q the set of potential sellers and α ij is the valuation of buyer i for the object of

Which decision rule should he implement and what is the resulting expected aggregate utility (that is, the sum of the agents expected utilities).. (c) Assume that transfers

(b) Compute the expected revenue to the seller if she conduts a first-price auction without reserve price and agents follow their symmetric equilibrium strategies that you

Show directly that the revenue-maximizing reserve price is independent of N (i.e., do not solve for the optimal auction, but derive directly the optimal reserve price for a second

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard

Denote by P ≥ I the set of strict rational preference profiles that are single-peaked with respect to some linear order ≥.. that it is a dominant strategy for the agents to report