• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 4, May 6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 4, May 6"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 4, May 6

Andreas Kleiner akleiner@uni-bonn.de

Exercises:

1. Solve Exercise 23.E.3 in MWG.

2. Solve Exercise 23.E.5 in MWG.

3. (Variant of an old exam question)

Consider an auction setting: a seller has a single object for sale, which he does not value. There are 2 bidders, who are privately informed about their valuationsθi. Valuations are drawn independently, whereθ1∼U[0,1] andθ2∼U[0,2]. Each buyer has a utility functionui=pi·θi+ti, wherepi denotes the probability that buyerigets the object andti denotes the transfer he receives.

Any auction has to be Bayesian incentive compatible and give each bidder type an interim expected utility of at least 0.

You may use all results from the lecture without proof.

(a) Compute the allocation rule of the revenue maximizing auction. Illustrate graphically why this allocation rule is inefficient.

(b) Compute the interim expected utility of bidder 1 as a function of his type.

(c) Suppose the seller has a commonly known reservation value of 12. His utility is therefore given by uS= (1−p1−p212−t1−t2. Compute the allocation rule of the auction that is optimal for the seller.

(d) Suppose that types are not drawn independently. Instead, types are distributed on [0,1]2according to the densityf(θ1, θ2) = 1 ifθ12 and 0 else (i.e., types are perfectly correlated).

How does an optimal auction look like? Check that incentive and participation constraints are fulfilled. Compute the interim expected utilities of the buyers.

(e) Suppose now that each bidder has either a valuation of 1 or 2.

P rob(θ1= 1, θ2= 1) =P rob(θ1= 2, θ2= 2) = 1 4+ε P rob(θ1= 1, θ2= 2) =P rob(θ1= 2, θ2= 1) = 1

4−ε for someε >0. Compute the optimal auction and the corresponding revenue.

4. Consider an auction setting with a seller who sells a single object which she values at 0. Buyers are ex-ante symmetric and the valuations are iid distributed according to cdf F. Suppose that virtual valuations are increasing.

Show: The revenue of the optimal auction if there arenbidders is weakly less than the revenue from a standard second-price auction (without reserve price) withn+ 1 bidders.

(Hint: Construct an auction withn+ 1 bidders that always allocates the object to a buyer and achieves a weakly higher utility than the optimal auction withnbidders. Following the argument in the lecture, construct the optimal auction in the class of auctions that always allocate the object.)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 1, April 16. Andreas

Which decision rule should he implement and what is the resulting expected aggregate utility (that is, the sum of the agents expected utilities).. (c) Assume that transfers

(b) Compute the expected revenue to the seller if she conduts a first-price auction without reserve price and agents follow their symmetric equilibrium strategies that you

Show directly that the revenue-maximizing reserve price is independent of N (i.e., do not solve for the optimal auction, but derive directly the optimal reserve price for a second

A mechanism asks the agents to reveal their prefer- ences and applies the men-proposing deferred acceptance algorithm to the reported preferences.. Suppose that (i) men

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard

(a) Compute the second-best optimal policy that maximizes welfare among all implementable deter- ministic policies.. (b) Compute the second-best optimal policy that maximizes

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard