• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 7, July 7

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 7, July 7"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 7, July 7

Andreas Kleiner akleiner@uni-bonn.de

Exercises:

1. There is a set of n men,M ={m1, ..., mn}, and a set of pwomen, W ={w1, ..., wp}. If man mi and womanwj are paired, they create a monetary value ofv(mi, wj), single individuals do not create value.

Utility is given by the monetary value an agent realizes.

(a) Suppose that utility is transferable,n=p= 2 and match values are given as follows:

w1 w2

m1 10 18 m2 1 10

Compute the core of the game and draw the set of payoffs for men that are part of core allocations.

(b) Now one additional man arrives, corresponding match values are given as follows:

w1 w2

m1 10 18 m2 1 10

m3 3 5

Determine the payoff vector in the core that men prefer the least. Compare to the payoff vector men prefer the least in part (a).

(c) Consider the general setting withn men andpwomen and arbitrary match values. Suppose that utility is not transferable across agents and each men that is matched receives a share s ∈ (0,1) of the match value, each woman receives a share 1−s. Assume that match values are such that individuals have strict preferences. Show that there is a unique stable matching.

2. Consider the Derman-Lieberman-Ross model from the lecture. Suppose there are 2 objects with quality 0 < q2 ≤ q1. Suppose there are 3 agents and agents’ types are distributed iid uniformly on the unit interval.

(a) Calculate the cutoffs that implement the dynamically efficient policy.

(b) Compute expected welfare.

(c) Calculate the payments that implement this policy.

3. Consider Albright’s model. Suppose the seller has a single object for sale. Buyers arrive accoring to a Poisson process with arrival rateλ = 3. Valuations are iid uniformly on the unit interval. There is a fixed deadlineT = 1 after which no object can be sold.

(a) Suppose the seller uses cutoff 12 throughout. Compute his expected revenue given this policy.

(b) Suppose the seller uses cutoff 12 until period T2 and cutoff 14 thereafter. Compute his expected revenue given this policy.

4. Consider the example about learning from the lecture: There is one object for sale and 2 potential buyers arriving sequentially. Buyers’ valuations are drawn uniformly from [0,1] (with probability 0.5) or from [1,2] (with probability 0.5). Buyers must be served upon arrival and the object cannot be reallocated.

Buyers are privately informed about their valuations. Delayed payments are not possible.

(a) Compute the second-best optimal policy that maximizes welfare among all implementable deter- ministic policies.

(b) Compute the second-best optimal policy that maximizes revenue among all implementable deter- ministic policies.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The theoretical model analysis showed that: in the case of the single monetary policy target, monetary policy and financial stability policy has completely alternative; if and only

In an examination of US metropolitan areas, Bartik (1991) finds that a one-percentage point increase in employment growth reduces unemployment by 0.06-0.07 percentage points in the

With non-controllable auto-regressive shocks, the welfare of Ramsey optimal policy is the solution of a single Ricatti equation of a linear quadratic regulator.. The existing theory

There are issues raised by the BRK customs union that for the outsider could benefit from clarification, first some WTO-related issues (Kazakhstan’s accession to the WTO,

Microeconomics II (PhD) Tutorial 1, April 16. Andreas

Which decision rule should he implement and what is the resulting expected aggregate utility (that is, the sum of the agents expected utilities).. (c) Assume that transfers

All agents’ utility gains in the horse market can be identified with their monetary gains, and the horses are homogeneous goods.. (Note that this is the converse of the standard

Buyers are ex ante symmetric, and buyer i has a value θ i ∈ [0, θ] for the good, where θ is independently distributed according to distribution function F with density f.. Show