• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Airborne sea ice thickness sounding

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Airborne sea ice thickness sounding"

Copied!
25
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Airborne sea ice thickness sounding

Stefan Hendricks1, Christian Haas2, Lasse Rabenstein1, John Lobach3

1. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Germany

2. University of Alberta, Canada 3. Ferra Dynamics Inc., Canada

(2)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

2

Arctic Sea Ice

Arctic Sea Ice Minimum September 2007

(3)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Sea Ice Thickness Retrieval

CryoSat 2

ICESat

Local Scale

Regional Scale

Global Scale

(4)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

4

Principle: Frequency EM

Transmitter Coil Receiver Coil

Electrical Eddy Currents Conductive Medium

Electrical Insulator Primary Field

Secondary Field

Amplitude

Phase

(5)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

EM: Application on Sea Ice

High conductivity contrast between sea water & other media

Conductivity in sea ice anisotropic (brine channels)

(6)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

6

Groundbased EM

• Standard instrument: Geonics EM31

(7)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

EM Bird

Tx Laseraltimeter

GPS

Rx

Cx Bx

Length : 3.4m

Weight : 100 kg

Coil Separation : 2.7 m

Frequency : 3.68 (4.06) kHz Recording Frequency : 10 Hz

Operation Height : 10 – 15 m

Footprint : 40 – 50 m

Tx Transmitter Coil

Rx Receiver Coil

Bx Bucking Coil

Cx Calibration Coil

© Eric Brossier

Haas, 2007

(8)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

8

EM – Bird: Operations

Ship Based

Ice Camp

Various types of helicopters Land Based

(9)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

EM Bird – Accuracy

• Instrument errors

– Noise

– Temperature changes – Pitch & Roll

• Other error sources

– Conductivity Variations (bottom melting)

– Sea Ice Porosity

• Over Level Ice

– Noise ± 5 cm – Accuracy ± 10 cm

Pfaffling, 2007 Haas et al., 2007

(10)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

10

• Footprint ~ 4 instrument altitude

• Smoothing of underice topography

• Underestimation of pressure ridge thickness ~ 50 %

3D Modelling: Comsol Multiphysics

EM Bird – Limitations

(11)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Sea Ice Thickness Transpolardrift

2004

2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 PDF (m-1 )

2004 2001

1998 1996 1991

(12)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

12

IPY Cruise Arctic Ocean 2007

• IPY Polarstern Arctic Cruise Summer 2007

SPACE (Synoptic Pan-Arctic Climate and Enviroment Study)

(13)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Transpolardrift - Summer 2007

(14)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

14

Variability of Thickness Pdf‘s

(15)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Sea Ice Thickness Transpolardrift (incl. 2007)

2004

(16)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

16

Comparison with Groundbased Methods

Biased by floe selection?

Biased by sea ice porosity?

(17)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Retreat of Perennial Sea Ice

(18)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

18

Beaufort Sea

APLIS 2007 Ice Camp

SIZONet 2007/2008

APLIS

Barrow

(19)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

SIZONet 2008

5 4 3 2 1 0

Frequency (%)

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

Ice Thickness (m) 200804130010

10 8 6 4 2 0

Frequency (%)

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

200804122356

5 4 3 2 1 0

Frequency (%)

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

Ice Thickness (m) 200804141917

(20)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

20

SIZONet 2007/2008

(21)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Global Measurements

Airborne EM applicable on the regional scale

Limited in spatial & temporal coverage

Logistics Weather

Global measurements only with satellites

Measurements of freeboard height

Laser/Radar

Requirements

Highly accurate elevation Sea surface height

Snow thickness

Airborne EM + DGPS provides validation data

(22)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

22

EM Bird – Freeboard Retrieval

• Laser range correction with DGPS → Freeboard

GPS Altitude

(23)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Freeboard Characteristics

Thickness = R Snow Freeboard

(24)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

24

Conclusions

• Airborne EM provides a direct method to estimate sea ice thickness

• Field campaigns in the Arctic and Antarctic since 2001

• Results from the Arctic ocean in late summer 2007 confirms the retreat of thick perennial sea ice in the full thickness pdf

• DGPS data give additional information like laser freeboard

• Upcoming field campaigns this spring

– Laptev Sea – Lincoln Sea

(25)

Sea Ice Physics

Stefan Hendricks

Outlook

Polar Airplane : Polar 5

Total Pole Airship

Fixed Wing EM System

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Before filling the two months with model data, the correlation was also high (r=0.68). FESOM data were unrealistic and omitted. The negative correlation with local ECMWF surface

Figure 4.5 shows maps of mean ice drift and thickness in the Arctic and Southern oceans, as derived from two coupled ice–ocean models operated at the Alfred Wegener Institute (North

Here, we present results of an extensive synoptic airborne EM ice thickness survey, carried out in April 2009, over key regions of the Arctic Ocean north of Svalbard, Greenland,

• Very variable, thicker ice in 2009 than 2008 – Sea Ice Thinning in the central Arctic. • Yes

interannual variations, Figure 2 compares this thickness distribution with an individual HEM profile obtained on September 8, 2001, close to the North Pole as well (cf. 1),

• Inphase less dependent on ridge conductivity than Quadrature.

• Modal thickness decreased from 2.5 m (1991) to 0.9 m (2007) in the Transpolar Drift. – Retreat of perennial

In addition, coincident measurements of total thickness and surface elevation allow the retrieval of snow