• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Last winter mean Arctic sea ice thickness

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Last winter mean Arctic sea ice thickness"

Copied!
16
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Recent achievements in sea ice thickness derived from radar altimetry

Robert Ricker1, Stefan Hendricks1, Stephan Paul2, Lars Kaleschke3, Xiangshan Tian-Kunze4

1 Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research 2 LMU München

3 Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie,Hamburg 4 University of Hamburg

(2)

Radar altimetry over sea ice

Credit: Stefan Hendricks

(3)

March 2011

Radar altimetry over sea ice

Credit: Stefan Hendricks

(4)

March 2011 March 2011

Radar altimetry over sea ice

Credit: Stefan Hendricks

(5)

Last winter mean Arctic sea ice thickness

• Winter 2017/2018 thickness anomaly

• referenced to 2010-2017 winter mean ice thickness

(6)

Last winter mean Arctic sea ice thickness

• Winter 2017/2018 thickness anomaly

• referenced to 2010-2017 winter mean ice thickness

Arctic Basin Mean Sea Ice Thickness (m)

Credit: Stefan Hendricks

(7)

Consistent sea ice thickness time series

Hendricks et al., in preparation

Minimizing inter-mission biases between subsequent satellite missions, Paul et al. (2018), TCD

Consistent surface-type classification scheme

Adaptive retracker threshold that depends on waveform-characteristics

(8)

Assessing sea ice thickness uncertainties

Reference (Validation Data)

Probability density

Precision Accuracy

Sea ice Thickness

The precision is accessed with an orbit crossover analysis

All CryoSat-2 and Envisat crossovers within 24h

The accuracy can be evaluated with Airborne EM and ULS sea ice thickness data sets

(9)

Orbit 1

Orbit 2

Radius of influence (12.5

km)

CryoSat-2

03/2012 03/2012

Envisat

Orbit crossovers

Reference (Validation Data)

Probability density

Precision Accuracy

Sea ice Thickness

The precision is accessed with an orbit crossover analysis

All CryoSat-2 and Envisat crossovers within 24h

The accuracy can be evaluated with Airborne EM and ULS sea ice thickness data sets

(10)

Orbit crossovers

Binned crossover sea ice thickness differences for Envisat and CryoSat-2 with mean absolute differences (µ) and standard deviation of

differences (σ)

CryoSat-2: 2010-2017 Envisat: 2002-2012

Reference (Validation Data)

Probability density

Precision Accuracy

Sea ice Thickness

The precision is accessed with an orbit crossover analysis

All CryoSat-2 and Envisat crossovers within 24h

The accuracy can be evaluated with Airborne EM and ULS sea ice thickness data sets

(11)

Sea ice thickness validation

A B D

C

CryoSat-2 (2010-2017) Envisat (2002-2012)

Upward Looking Sonar (BGEP-ULS)

Source: WHOI

(12)

Sea ice thickness validation

A B D

C

CryoSat-2 (2010-2017) Envisat (2002-2012)

Upward Looking Sonar (BGEP-ULS)

Source: WHOI

Airborne EM (AEM)

Polar 5 with EM-Bird

March/April 2017

mean thickness CS-2: 2.71 m mean thickness AEM: 2.62 m

R = 0.72

RMSE = 0.81 m

(13)

Reducing uncertainties over thin ice

March 2014

Taking advantage of the complementary thickness retrievals derived from the CS2 altimeter and the SMOS radiometer

An optimal interpolation scheme is used to produce weekly Arctic-wide sea-ice thickness fields

(14)

Reducing uncertainties over thin ice

March 2014

Taking advantage of the complementary thickness retrievals derived from the CS2 altimeter and the SMOS radiometer

An optimal interpolation scheme is used to produce weekly Arctic-wide sea-ice thickness fields

Ricker et al. (2017), TC

+

SMOS daily ice thickness retrievals CS-2 weekly means CS2SMOS

(15)

Applications and future plans

Application of satellite sea ice thickness records

Application in model assimilation, model evaluation, and reanalysis data records, e.g. Mu et al. (2018), Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., Kaminski et al. (2018), TCD

Estimates of Arctic sea ice volume export, , e.g. Ricker et al. (2018), TCD, Friday 10:00 (Atmosphere-Ice-Ocean interactions in the Polar Regions)

AWI CryoSat-2 data products and CryoSat-2/SMOS products are available on:

http://data.seaiceportal.de

AWI CryoSat-2/Envisat timeseries:

CCI Climate Data Store, CCI Open Data Portal

(16)

Applications and future plans

Application of satellite sea ice thickness records

Application in model assimilation, model evaluation, and reanalysis data records, e.g. Mu et al. (2018), Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., Kaminski et al. (2018), TCD

Estimates of Arctic sea ice volume export, , e.g. Ricker et al. (2018), TCD, Friday 10:00 (Atmosphere-Ice-Ocean interactions in the Polar Regions)

AWI CryoSat-2 data products and CryoSat-2/SMOS products are available on:

http://data.seaiceportal.de

AWI CryoSat-2/Envisat timeseries:

CCI Climate Data Store, CCI Open Data Portal Future Plans

providing sea ice thickness products by a service that meets the requirements for climate applications and operational systems

25 years time series of sea ice thickness data records from radar altimetry

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

1D & single frequency EM sea-ice thickness retrieval is and has been a standard tool with a variety of applications. Multi-frequency EM is a bit more tricky but

We show that the main source of freeboard and thickness uncertainty re- sults from the choice of the retracker and the unknown pen- etration of the radar pulse into the snow layer

Figure 4. a) Distribution of sail heights fitted with a negative exponential function. No sails lower than the cut-off height of 0.8 m are detected. b) Histograms of sail spacing

Simulated range variability using Sever snow density measurements shown in Figure 6 and other values from Table 2 as input to the model.. The solid line shows the simulated range

Now: All thickness distributions in Figure 8 and 10 show rather narrow thickness modes less than 0.2 m wide for profile sections over open water and uniform first-year ice. P26:

• Very variable, thicker ice in 2009 than 2008 – Sea Ice Thinning in the central Arctic. • Yes

More importantly, the drift of the ice is closely related to its thickness, and is responsible for the overall thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean.. The thickest ice is

• Results from the Arctic ocean in late summer 2007 confirms the retreat of thick perennial sea ice in the full thickness pdf. • DGPS data give additional information like