• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Marine Mammals in the Antarctic Treaty Area

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Marine Mammals in the Antarctic Treaty Area"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Modelling Cumulative Sound Exposure Along a Seismic Line to Assess the Risk of Seismic Research Surveys on

Marine Mammals in the Antarctic Treaty Area

Monika Breitzke , Thomas Bohlen

1 2

1 2

Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany; : University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany;

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany

Now at Monika.Breitzke@uni-bremen.de

dBre1µPa²s

1 G gun

8 G-gun cluster

8 G + 1 Bolt-gun cluster 3 GI-gun cluster

2 Study Area & Model Parameters

3a Seismic Source

1 Introduction

3 Modelling Approach

3b Sound Propagation (single shot)

4a Amundsen Sea - Deep Water 715

4c Exposure Histories

4d Exposure Zone Radii 3c Exposure Histories2

Amundsen/

Bellingshausen Sea

Station 715

Station 687 Station 7

Station 25

Weddell Sea

Shot 1 0 min

Shot 1

Shot 1 80 m depth

Shots 1-121 30 min

Shots 1-121

Shots 1-121 80 m depth

Shots 1-241 60 min

Shots 1-241

Shots 1-241 80 m depth

dBre1µPa²s

Boat

Boat

Boat

1 G-gun (8.5 l)

8.5

0.7/1.7

2 m 2 m

0.7/1.7 0.7/1.7

8 G-gun cluster (68.2 l) 3 GI-gun cluster (2.2/5.2 l)

8 G + 1 Bolt-gun cluster (100.9 l)

32.8

8.5 8.5 8.5

8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5

8.5 1.5 m

8.5 8.5 8.5

8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5

8.5 2.4 m 1.5 m

10 m

2.4 m

Notional signatures NUCLEUSTM

point source equivalent

black: NUCLEUS red: FD

TM black: NUCLEUS

red: FD

TM

point source equivalent

point source equivalent

Far-field spectra &

Cumulative energy flux Far-field signatures

Zoom to upper 400 m

(near-surface sound channel) Zoom to upper 400 m

(near-surface sound channel)

Numerical modelling of sound propaga- tion is an essential tool to assess the potential risk of air-gun shots on marine mammals and derive exposure zone radii within which certain hearing thresh- olds are exceeded. Here, the results of a detailed 2.5D finite-difference (FD) mod- elling study are presented, which takes the sound velocity profile of the water column, interactions with the seafloor and cumulative effects from multiple shots fired along a seismic line into account, approximates the compact air- gun clusters deployed by R/V

in polar regions by ‘point source equiva- lents’ and simulates marine mammals as static receivers

. It is a contribution to a strategic risk assessment study on the impact of seismic research surveys on marine mammals in the Antarctic Treaty Area

. (i)

(ii) (iii)

Polarstern

(Breitzke and Bohlen 2010)

(Boebel et al. 2009)

The modelling study focuses on the Amundsen/Bellingshausen and the Weddell Seas, where most of the multichannel seismic (MCS) research activities were conducted with R/V since it was taken in service in 1982 ( ). Most of these MCS lines were col- lected during the austral summer months and covered water depths between ~200 - 1000 m and ~3000 - 4500 m ( ). Typical sound velocity profiles show a ~150 - 250 m thick cold low-velocity sound channel close to the sea surface, overlain by a thin (~10 - 30 m) layer of warmer water masses with higher sound velocity, and underlain by a positive sound velocity gradient ( ). From these data the fol- lowing typical models are derived:

Deep water models: 3000 m water depth Seafloor reflection coefficient: R = 0.2 Ship speed: 5 kn

Shallow water models: 400 m water depth Seismic profile length: L = 10 km Shot interval: 10 s - 60 s

Polarstern Fig. 1

Fig. 2 Fig. 3

JanuaryFebruaryMarchApril May June July AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

Amundsen/

Bellingshausen Sea

Weddell Sea

Weddell Sea Amundsen/

Bellingshausen Sea

Water depth (m) km

Weddell Sea

Amundsen Sea

Bellingshausen Sea

7 715

687

25

The modelling approach con- sists of 3 steps: Modelling (a) the seismic source, (b) sound progagation due to a single shot, (c) cumulative SELs due to multiple shots fired along a seismic line and expo- sure histories received by sta- tic marine mammals.

Source signatures are com- puted by the NUCLEUS source modelling package ( ). 4 air-gun configura- tions are considered: A single

TM

Fig. 4

A 2.5D FD code, which implies cylindrical symmetry, is used for modelling sound propagation due to a single shot . From a grid of synthetic seismo- grams, distributed equidistantly over the model, a 2D SEL field of a single shot, displayed for a semi-infinite iso- velocity model and the 4 air-gun configurations ( ), are derived. They show the typical dipole-like directivity of single shots.

(Bohlen 2002)

Fig. 5

The cumulative impact of multiple shots is determin- ed by superposing the 3D SEL fields of the single shots moving along the seismic line according to the ship speed and shot interval. The resulting 3D cumulative SEL field, dis- played in 3 perpendicular planes for a semi-infinite iso-velocity model ( ), shows a tubular-like struc- ture along the seismic line with maximum levels bene- ath the line.

Fig. 6

Time-dependent exposure histories received by static marine mammals can also be extracted ( ). They reach a plateau, if the ship has passed the animal’s position. Close to the sea surface, they strongly depend on the animal’s off- set crossline.

Fig. 7

G gun (8.5 l), 3 GI-gun cluster (2.2 l/5.2 l), an 8 G-gun clus- ter (68.2 l), an 8 G-gun cluster + 1 Bolt 1500 LL (100.9 l).

The configurations are approximated by ‘point source equivalents’. That is, in case of the single G gun the notio- nal signature is used as source signal, in case of the compact air-gun clusters the time-integrated far-field sig- nature is used as source signal

n(t)

f(t) .

4 Application to the Southern Ocean

Weddell Sea – Deep Water (Station 25)

Weddell Sea – Shallow Water (Station 7) Weddell Sea – Deep Water (Station 25)

Weddell Sea – Shallow Water (Station 7)

Amundsen/Bellingshausen Sea Weddell Sea Amundsen/Bellingshausen Sea Weddell Sea

Deep Water - Station 715

Shallow Water - Station 687

Deep Water - Station 25

Shallow Water - Station 7

Application to the Southern Ocean shows, that the near-surface sound channel and the sound velocity gra- dient cause distor- tions of the SEL con- tour lines, especial- ly in deep waters.

But only low to moderate levels are affected (Fig. 8).

3c Cumulative SELs1

4b Amundsen Sea - Shallow Water 687 In shallow waters the influence of the sound velocity channel and gradient is not as obvious as in deep waters ( ). But SELs decrease more slowly due to the stronger reverberations, leading to ~10 dB higher levels in the shallow water model (80 m depth) than in the deep water model.

Compared to the semi-infinite iso-velocity model ( ) SELs close to the sea surfa- ce (in and above the sound channel) are

~20 - 30 dB higher and decrease more slowly with offset in both the deep and the shallow water models due to the seafloor and multiple reflections. This leads to en- hanced seismically induced noise levels, particularly at large offsets ( ).

Fig. 9

Fig. 6

Fig. 10

Exposure histories received by marine mammals above (5 m) and in the sound channel (80 m) do not show pronounced differ- ences between both deep and both shallow water models (

). This indicates, that the fine- scale sound velocity structure of the Southern Ocean does not affect the sound propagation of seismic frequencies significantly.

Fig.

10

Exposure zone radii derived for different thresholds depend on the air-gun configuration, but are almost independent of the envi- ronmental parameters ( ).

In case of single shots radii can be predicted from the source level using a spherical spreading law. In case of multiple shots radii follow a cylindrical spreading law, and the source SEL and shot interval determine the intercept.

Fig. 11

References

Boebel O, Breitzke M, Burkhard E, Bornemann H (2009) Strategic Assessment of the risk posed on marine mammals by use of air guns in the Anzarctic Treaty Area. Information Paper IP51, Agenda Item: CEP 8c, Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXXII, Baltimore, USA, 273 pp.

Bohlen T (2002) Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference modelling. Comp. Geosci. 28: 887-899.

Breitzke M, Bohlen T (2010) Modelling sound propagation in the Southern Ocean to estimate the acoustic impact of seismic research surveys on marine mammals. Geophys. J. Int. 181: 818-846.

170

130 140 160

Ship position Ship position Ship position

Whale position Whale position Whale position Whale position

Single Shots

Multiple Shots

8 G gun cluster

8 G gun cluster

DFS-V: 0 - 256 Hz

model boundary model

boundary Single Shots

Multiple Shots Multiple Shots

Single Shots

Figure 1

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 3

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

This language is trans- formed to model transformation scripts in order to generate annotation models, which separate the annotated information from the target models and,

Our purpose here is to establish exact solutions for the velocity field and the shear stress corresponding to the motion of an Oldroyd-B fluid between two co- axial circular

Thus, there is a chance to understand precisely the cultural production of the actors as identity based strategies that contribute to the emergence of what we

the phenomenon itself is a Linear, time invariant, complete (deterministic) dynamical system. For this case we define optimal deterministic approximations of

Because the morbidity rates and survival probabilities are relatively constant in different regions, it is possible to use the estimation of the morbidity rates and/or

The m-dimensional time series generalization of univariate stationary autoregressive moving average models was first in- troduced by Quenouill e [26] , and further discussed

To be consistent with the Conley, Usher, and Jones-Lee, models, we will postulate an objective function in which the individual maximizes his expected lifetime utility expressed as

Vor dem Hintergrund, dass bereits TTS selbst als Verletzung betrachtet wird, und wiederhol- te TTS zu der schwereren Form der PTS führen kann, ist die Eingangsfrage mit „Ja“ zu