• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

SimpleFractionalDickeyFullerTest Bensalma,Ahmed MunichPersonalRePEcArchive

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "SimpleFractionalDickeyFullerTest Bensalma,Ahmed MunichPersonalRePEcArchive"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Simple Fractional Dickey Fuller Test

Bensalma, Ahmed

Ecole National Superieure de la Statistique et de l’Economie Appliquée (ENSSEA)

24 July 2013

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50315/

MPRA Paper No. 50315, posted 01 Oct 2013 05:31 UTC

(2)

XXIX-th European Meeting of Statisticians, 2013, Budapest

Simple Fractional Dickey-Fuller Test

Ahmed BENSALMA

Ecole National de la Statistique et de l’Economie Applique (ENSSEA), Algiers, Algeria email: bensalma.ahmed@gmail.com; bensalma.ahmed@enssea.dz

This paper proposes a new testing procedure for the degree of fractional integration of a time series inspired on the unit root test of Dickey-Fuller (1979). The composite null hypothesis is that ofd≥d0

against d < d0. The test statistics is the same as in Dickey-Fuller test using as output ∆d0yt instead of ∆yt and as input ∆1+d0yt−1 instead ofyt−1, exploiting the fact that ifyt isI(d) then ∆1+d0yt is I(1) under the nulld=d0. Ifd≥d0, using the generalization of Sowell’s results (1990), we propose a test based on the least favorable case d= d0, to control type I error and when d < d0 we show that the usual tests statistics diverges to−∞, providing consistency. By noting that d−d0 can always be decomposed as d−d0=m+δ, wherem∈Nand δ∈]−0.5,0.5], the asymptotic null and alternative of the Dickey-Fuller, normalized bias statistic nρbn and the Dickey-Fuller t-statistic tbρn are provided by the theorem 1.

Theorem 1. Let {yt} be generated according DGP ∆dyt = εt. If regression model ∆d0yt = b

ρn1+d0yt−1+bϵt is fitted to a sample of size nthen, as n↑ ∞, nρbn and tρbn verifies that b

ρn=Op(log1n) and (logn)ρbn→ −∞,p ifd−d0 =−0.5, (1) b

ρn=Op(n12δ) and nρbn→ −∞,p if −0.5< d−d0<0, (2) b

ρn=Op(n1) and nρbn

1 2

{w2(1)−1}

1

0 w2(r)dr , ifd−d0 = 0, (3) b

ρn=Op(n1) and nρbn

1 2w2

δ,m+1(1)

1

0 w2

δ,m+1(r)dr, ifd−d0>0. (4) tbρn =Op(n0.5log0.5n) and tρbn

→ −∞,p ifd−d0 =−0.5, (5)

tρbn =Op(n−δ) andtρbn

→ −∞,p if −1

2 < d−d0<0, (6)

tρbn =Op(1) andtρbn

1 2

{w2(1)−1} [∫1

0 w2(r)dr]1/2, ifd−d0= 0, (7) tbρn =Op(nδ) and tbρn

p +∞, if 0< d−d0<0.5, (8) tbρn =Op(n0.5) and tbρn

p +∞, ifd−d0≥0.5. (9)

where wδ,m(r) is (m−1)−fold integral of wδ(r) recursively defined as wδ,m(r) =∫r

0 wδ,m−1(s)ds,with wδ,1(r) =wδ(r) and w(r) is the standard Brownian motion.

These properties and distributions are the generalization of those established by Sowell (1990) for the cases−12 < d−1<0,d−1 = 0 and 0< d−1< 12.

References

[A. BENSALMA. (2012)] BENSALMA, A. 2012: Unified theoretical framework for unit root and fractional unit root, arXiv:1209.1031 (September 2012).

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

ҎaXÍa·TÂÃd N6ÃPW@[YX ·TÂÍQ]N@RaX[ËNLŽ\VQVRRTÂ^XÆÅÆaX1RaXHTÂËWËWNXW@Q]ËQ]@[ÃPPQ]Ã?ËT$N..

It is based on Robinson’s (1994) univariate tests and is similar in spirit to the one proposed by Engle and Granger (1987), testing initially the order of integration of

In fact, by a simple statistical argument, often used in test theory, (see section 4) we have shown that it is possible to use the tabulated values of the Dickey-Fuller

Key Words: ARFIMA; Dickey-Fuller test; Fractional Dickey-Fuller test; fractional integra- tion parameter; type II fractional Brownian motion, Fracdiff, EViews

In this paper, we have shown how to compute the period lattice of loosely periodic func- tions, and applied the technique to the computation of the unit group of a finite extension K

For instance, Dolado, Gonzalo, and Mayoral [DGM] (2002) introduced a test based on an auxiliary regression for the null of unit root against the alternative of fractional

In the empirical part of the study we have found same test results for the LNV and Solis (2004) unit root tests for all countries by using all the optimization algorithms

This paper proposes a formal statistical procedure to distinguish between the null hypothesis of unit root without drift and that of unit root with drift, with and with- out