Median PFS 3.8 vs. 2.0 M P = 0.008
G8 score ≥14 vs. <14
Supplementary Figure 1
A B
Median OS 9.3 vs. 3.7 M P = 0.0028
Median PFS 3.0 vs. 2.2 M P = 0.55
PS 0 vs 1-2
Supplementary Figure 2
A B
Median OS 8.8 vs. 5.3 M P = 0.21
Volltext
Median PFS 3.8 vs. 2.0 M P = 0.008
Median OS 9.3 vs. 3.7 M P = 0.0028
Median PFS 3.0 vs. 2.2 M P = 0.55
Median OS 8.8 vs. 5.3 M P = 0.21
ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE
A) Bar graphs showing increased RBC, HCT and HGB in the blood of P2H1 mice. B) Genomic PCR analysis of laser microdissected adrenal medulla samples from WT and P2H1 mice. C) Bar
Nuclear size estimation of PC3 xenograft sections. Nuclear size assessment
*Underlines indicate the restriction enzyme sites. Supplementary
Multimodal assessment of results achieved after proximal optimization technique (POT) in provisional. A,B) View of well apposed stent proximal to the bifurcation by direct
Plot shows the enrichment (gene ratio indicated by size of circle; adjusted p- value indicated by color scale) of functional annotations in gene sets that are highly expressed during
Reports were retrieved matching the following search criteria: gastrointestinal stromal tumor AND KIT OR PDGFRA OR molecular biology OR therapy decision test.. Reports that
CTNNB1 site1F CAGGAAGGGATGGAAGGTCTC CTNNB1 site1R TCACGCAAAGGTGCATGATTT CTNNB1 site2F AGACGGAGGAAGGTCTGAGG CTNNB1 site2R GGCCATGTCCAACTCCATCA 100bp.. 250bp 500bp 1000bp
Supplementary Figure 1- cCAR T cell infusion leads to complete remission of stage IV diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).. (A.) Patient was diagnosed with stage IV diffuse large