• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Table S-1. Distribution of care strategies for localized prostate cancer of various risksDetected byCare strategy Distribution SourceManaging low-risk localized prostate cancer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Table S-1. Distribution of care strategies for localized prostate cancer of various risksDetected byCare strategy Distribution SourceManaging low-risk localized prostate cancer"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Table S-1. Distribution of care strategies for localized prostate cancer of various risks

Detected by Care strategy Distribution Source

Managing low-risk localized prostate cancer

MRI targeted biopsy Watchful waiting 13% Survey of local experts

Active surveillance 63%

Active treatment 25%

Systematic biopsy Watchful waiting 19%

Active surveillance 53%

Active treatment 28%

Managing intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer

MRI targeted biopsy Watchful waiting 17% Survey of local experts

Active treatment 83%

Systematic biopsy Watchful waiting 13%

Active treatment 87%

Managing high-risk localized prostate cancer

MRI targeted biopsy Watchful waiting 3% Survey of local experts

Active treatment 97%

Systematic biopsy Watchful waiting 6%

Active treatment 94%

Note:

1. MRI targeted biopsy refers to the administration of MRI targeted biopsy combined with systematic biopsy following a positive mpMRI.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In the current study, we investigate the effect of electrospray mediated localized chemotherapy using Cisplatin on the mice subcutaneous tumor model of lung adenocarcinoma in

While moderate hypofractionation (2.2–4 Gy) has been proven to be non-inferior to normal fractionation in several large randomized trials for localized prostate cancer, level I

Docetaxel + cabazitaxel 2% Docetaxel with cabazitaxel 20mg per square meter of body surface area every 3 weeks for 10 cycles Docetaxel + abiraterone 7% Docetaxel 75mg per square

[r]

Parameters that are highlighted indicate that the upper bound limit of the parameter led to a lower ICER;2. parameters that are not highlighted indicate that the upper bound limit

Finally, the impact of COVID-19 was seen not only on clinical operations but also on research efforts, with approxi- mately half of the survey participants responding that there has

Conclusion FCH PET/MRI has a higher detection rate than MRI or PET alone for PCa patients with OMD and PSA lev- els > 0.5 ng/mL, prompting a better choice of treatment.. Keywords

Background We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preopera- tively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion