THEME : Transport Processes in the Atmosphere Environmental Fluid Dynamics II: Atmospheric Portion
Aim : To provide a rudimentary overview of the nature and role of the major atmospheric transport processes.
The “atmospheric” component of EFD II is designed to meet the following three criteria :
- builds naturally upon the material in EFD I, - theme of general “env. sci.” interest, and
- complements “atmospheric dynamics” lectures.
THEME : Transport Processes in the Atmosphere Environmental Fluid Dynamics II: Atmospheric Portion
OUTLINE
I INTRODUCTION
Motivation (- significance of theme, sample issues)
II PRELIMINARY THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Basic & Extended Equation(s) Illustrative flow examples
Scale Analysis & Scale Contraction Integral relation
III SELECTED PHENOMENA / PROCESSES
Troposphere: Conveyor Belts, ....S-T Interface Exchange & Mixing
Stratosphere : Brewer Dobson Circulation Sudden Stratospheric Warming Ozone hole
MOTIVATION: Why this theme ?
Large-scale atmospheric flow is irregular, complex, and chaotic with a resulting
rich range of evolving and intricate patterns and structures for tracers and constituents.
MOTIVATION: Why this theme ?
Influences a variety of processes /cycles.
Seasonal, inter-annual and longer time-scales the magnitude and
distribution of the atmospheric constituents exerts a major control upon - the atmosphere’s radiative heating and transfer properties, and thereby
has a direct influence upon climate,
- air quality characteristics both near the earth’s surface and in the free atmosphere, and thereby has a direct influence upon the habitability and quality of life,
- the impact of volcanic eruptions upon weather and climate, and likewise the levels of ozone in the stratosphere,
- the global cycling of greenhouse gases (including water vapour, carbon dioxide, methane and ozone), is linked to their atmospheric residence time and
geographical distribution,
Central to the atmospheric component of the various bio-geochemical cycles
Assimilation of CO
2Troposphere Stratosphere
ECMWF assimilation / analyses
On day-to-day time-scales the large-scale flow strongly influences
- the space-time distribution of atmospheric pollutants emitted from localized sources, and there are a raft of international conventions that require a better quantification of trans-boundary fluxes,
- the transport between their source and deposition of constituents recorded in ice cores and sediments
.Distribution and evolution of atmospheric quasi-tracers (humidity, ozone,..) provides additional information on the atmospheric state and can thereby help to determine the initial state of the atmosphere for numerical weather prediction
A key atmospheric variable (potential vorticity) that is central to the
Note that
- distribution of constituents in the stratosphere is somewhat counter-intuitive, - maintenance of the ozone hole is indicative of a lack of meridional transport, - evidence suggests that the tropopause is a “leaky” barrier to transport despite its alleged impermeability,
-the time-mean tropospheric circulation is not an effective transporter, but
extratropical cyclones accomplish significant poleward plus vertical transport
along gently sloping isentropic surfaces.
II. PRELIMINARY THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 GENERALIZED SPECIES / TRACER EQUATION 2.1.1 The BASIC EQUATION
A generalised equation governing the development of the mixing ratio / concentration of an atmospheric chemical species / constituent takes the form,
DC/Dt = κ∇2C + R + S + G (1)
where κ is the kinematic diffusivity of the constituent, R is the chemical reaction term,
S is the source (or sink) term, and
G is the transfer rate of the species between the gas and hydrometer phase.
DC/Dt is the Lagrangian rate of change of the constituent C, and DC/Dt = {∂C/∂t + V. Ñ C},
where V is the velocity field (possibly incorporating a fall-speed V*).
2.1.2 THE EXTENDED EQUATION
Equation (1) applies to individual air parcels. However it is often convenient to refer to mean and deviation components. (The mean value, [C], can refer to the space and/ or time average value or to the resolved and non-resolved parts).
deviation components,
C = [C] + C’ , V = [V] + V’,
S = [S] + S’, …. etc.
On substitution into Eq. (1) it follows that
D[C]/Dt = κ∇2[C] + [R] + [S] + [G] + ∇. [V’C’] (2)
The additional term, ∇.[V’C’], denotes the contribution to the mean constituent’s evolution by the deviation (or unresolved) components. It is in effect a flux divergence engendered by the turbulent (or sub-scale) flow. For smaller scale features in the atmospheric boundary layer it is often represented by a Fickian diffusion term, but in general it requires
a more sophisticated turbulent closure formulation.
Other representations of Equation (2) take into account the quasi-horizontal nature of large scale atmospheric flow, and
- split the advection and the flux divergence into horizontal and vertical components,
- examine the change of C on isentropic surfaces (- useful if the process is quasi-adiabatic)
2.1.3 SIMPLIFIED SETTINGS
Consider the simpler advection-diffusion equation,
∂C/∂t + V. ∇C = κ∇2C
and assume a constant coefficient of diffusivity, and two dimensional flow.
To explore the possible influence of advection and diffusion consider their effects separately.
(a) Advection
Here we assume there is no diffusion,
i.e. ∂C/∂t + V. ∇C = 0
stipulate the background flow and consider the evolution of the (perfect) tracer under the influence of the flow for two flow settings deemed to be generic.
SETTING I
A “square-wave” tracer distribution immersed in a pure deformation field.
Deformation field (u = - α x; v = + α y)
Tracer Initial dimensions of square wave (wavelength L; amplitude A) .
Under the influence of the deformation field the wave amplitude increases quasi-linearly (- in essence a stretching) whilst
its wavelength decreases uniformly (in essence a compression) to yield a so-called tendril pattern.
SETTING II :
A “line segment” tracer distribution immersed in a “Rankine-type” vortex.
Vortex azimuthal velocity: v = ω r for r < a v = (ωa2)/ r for r > a
Tracer Initial location of line segment
(aligned radially outward from the centre)
Under the influence of the vortex flow the tracer takes on a whorl (spiral) form and the spacing of the striations evolve systematically in time.
(b) Diffusion
Consider the evolution of a tracer in the half-space (y > 0) with no ambient flow, and with the initial tracer distribution such that C = 0 at t = 0 for y >o
and subsequently C = C0 at y = 0 for t > 0 The tracer satisfies the diffusion equation
∂C/∂t = κ∇2C
The resulting solution takes the form presented in EFD I.
2.1.4 SCALE ANALYSIS
Consider again the advection-diffusion equation,
∂C/∂t + V. ∇C = κ∇2C
O.O.M (CU/L) (κC/L2)
where U and L are characteristic velocity and length scales.
Thus the dimensionless number representing the ratio of the advective and diffusive effects is the Peclet Number, Pe,
Pe = UL/κ ,
In effect if Pe >> 1 then advection dominates, and if Pe << 1 then diffusion dominates
Likewise, unless there is a scale contraction, the appropriate time-scale is T = L2 /κ
Note that in the atmosphere the molecular diffusivity of most gaseous chemical species varies from 10-5 m2 s-1 in the troposphere
to 10-3 m2 s-1 in the upper stratosphere
(and higher values in the mesosphere)
Thus for significant diffusive mixing on length scales of say 100m would require (c.f. example on diffusion above) ~ 108 s , i.e. a few years.
However if stirring reduces a new length scale (l) for the tracer (c.f. the advection examples above), then the diffusion can become comparable to the advective effect.
One measure of the spatial scaling of a tracer’s structure is defined by ∇ C
and the processes involved in changing that length scale are given by taking the ∇ operator of advection equation
∂C/∂t + V. ∇C = κ∇2C
and for two-dimensional flow the change in the gradient of C along the x-axis is given by, D(∂C/∂x)/Dt = - ( ∂u/∂x ∂C/∂x + ∂v/∂x ∂C/∂y)
Alternatively a convenient scalar measure of the spatial variability of C is given by T = ½{∇ C. ∇ C}
with the time evolution being determined by D(T)/Dt = -∇ C (∇ C.∇)V
= 2T (∂v*/∂n)
Here ω is the vector vorticity, and v* is the velocity component in the n-direction aligned perpendicular to the vector of the gradient of C.
Thus, following a fluid parcel, the three-dimensional vector (∇ C) can be modified in three ways :
- a tendency for "tracer lines" to move against the flow
(c.f. the equation for a material line Da/Dt = {a. ∇ }v ) involving both tilting and compression;
- reorientation by the ambient vorticity; and
- generation / destruction due to spatial variations of diabatic effects.
Likewise the equation for T emphasizes that a decrease of v along the tracer vector connotes enhancement of the gradient.
2.1.5 AREA INTEGRAL
Again consider the simpler advection-diffusion equation,
∂C/∂t + V. ∇ C = κ∇2C
and assume a constant coefficient of diffusivity, and two dimensional flow.
Then the overall spatial variability of C in a given spatial domain S, is given by the integral measure
T
= ∫∫S T dsIt can be shown that
∂
T
/∂t = ∫∫S {( V.∇ C) ∇2C - κ(∇2C)2} ds STIRRING MIXING The first term on the RHS represents stirring and can be positive or negative (but is often locally positive), whilst the second term represents the mixing and is always negative.In effect stirring tends usually to increase T and mixing to decrease T.
Counter-intuitively the indirect effect of stirring is to decrease T by rendering the mixing more efficient !
III SELECTED PHENOMENA / PROCESSES
(A) Mean Large-scale Flow & Associated Inferences
(B) Some Selected Features
Troposphere: Conveyor Belts, ....
S-T Interface Exchange & Mixing
Stratosphere : Brewer Dobson Circulation
Sudden Stratospheric Warming
Ozone hole
(A) Mean Large-scale Flow & Associated Inferences
Lat. & Time Mean Zonal Wind
Inference: Likelihood of high latitudinal dispersion in vicinity of jet streams
Time-Mean Wind at the upper-troposphere
Time-Mean Wind in the mid-troposphere
Time-Mean Wind in the lower-troposphere
Lat. & Time Mean Zonal Stream Function (sic. meridional circulation)
Inferences: (i) mean meridional circulation (very) weak in (stratosphere) troposphere with with stratosphere / troposphere time scales order of years / weeks
(ii) no mean flux at the sub-tropics / extratropics interface !!
Lat. & Time Mean Isentropic Distribution
Inferences: (i) PV Perspectiove : Tracer & linkage to flow (ii) mean meridional circulation is non-adiabatic
(ii) overworld, middle world, and underworld adiabatic sub-division High PV
High PV
Low PV Low PV
Time Mean “column integrated” ozone distribution
Inferences: (i) tropical source BUT maxima in polar & extratropical regions
(ii) hemispheric asymmetry in seasonal distribution (hint of low polar austral winter values
Further space-time features of ozone distribution
Time Mean “tropospheric” distribution
The Hole
Quasi-instantaneous vertical section Instantaneous regional distribution
(B) Selected Features : Troposphere
Some phenomenological transport features
Inferences: (i) vertical (diabatic) circulations versus quasi-horizontal (sic. isentropic) transport (ii) internal to troposphere versus S-T exchange processes
Semi-quantitative comparison of major transport processes
Instantaneous poleward flux at 850 hPa
q
Significant latitudinal & vertical atmospheric transport accomplished by LSWS & their fine-scale accoutrements
Vertical transport: Parcel paths within a warm conveyor belt.
An example of a coherent ensemble of trajectories (CET).
H. Wernli ECMWF Analysis Data
PV Blocking P<400hPa
-24hrs 700hPa
Q [g/kg] TH [K] PV [pvu]
17K
time
Schwierz et al
Key ensemble of trajectories (- a moist CET) for a particular event
Life-cycle of a coherent air-stream event
Two cases studies of individual events
Case II Case I
Case II
Backward trajectories from a cyclone’s PV- tower
Considerations :
(i) From a PV perspective the evolution of a cyclone to its mature phase requires the vertical superposition of positive PV elements
(ii) Backward trajectories from the tower provides
evidence on the system’s origin, and of the key ingredients
Aerosol band
M. Liniger et al
Geographical origin of band’s air parcels
Development of a fine-scale aerosol band
quasi-isentropioc + decidedly non-isentropic prelude to mixing
(B) Some Selected Features: S-T Interface (Exchange & Mixing)
High PV High PV
Low PV Low PV
High PV High PV
Low PV Low PV
Considerations :
(i) Isentropic S-T exchange conceivable in middle world
with accompanying signatures in the PV, ozone and water vapour patterns on isentropic surfaces
(ii) Actual exchange of ozone / humidity dependent upon
in-situ value, and hence on input from overworld/ upper troposphere.
Overview of Stratosphere-Troposphere
Transport Mechanisms
Signatures on middle-world isentropic surface of
PV Water vapour
The strikingly rich spatial structure of many atmospheric constituents and the resulting enhancement of mixing is, to a significant measure, attributable to LSWS & their fine-scale accoutrements.
Quasi-isentropic prelude to mixing:
Tracer evolution in the lowermost stratosphere over a 24- hour period
Stirring Mechansims
Tendril formation
Whirl /Vortex formation
PV- band Instability
High PV High PV
Low PV Low PV
High PV High PV
Low PV Low PV
Asymmetry of PV Anomalies in the Middle World
Predilection for
- positive anomalies in lowermost stratosphere, - negative anomalies in upper troposphere
Consider fate of PV anomalies of opposite sign
Anomaly linked
velocities Anomaly-induced
velocity
Negative PV anomaly in lowermost stratosphere is extruded into troposphere, and the reverse for a positive PV anomaly.
(B) Some Selected Features:
Stratosphere : Brewer Dobson Circulation Sudden Stratospheric Warming Ozone hole
Schematic of
B-D circulation
The Tape Recorder
Sudden Stratospheric Warming
Time-height section in a polar location during a SSW event
NOTE :
- regular occurrence in the polar Northern Hemisphere
- transient feature (multiple events possible in a single winter
Sequence of charts showing total ozone distribution preceding and during an SSW event
Note :
- indication of upward propagation of wave energy from troposphere, - growth with height of accompanying wind and pressure signal, - stirring can produce a reversal of mean zonal wind !!!
Ozone Hole : A one diagram history
Strong stratospheric Polar Vortex : An isolated chemical crucible
Strong PV gradient serves as a barrier to transport
Problem Sheet
1. A horizontal rectangular fluid strip (200 *10 km) is aligned north-south at 60N with a westerly jet of 50 ms-1 at its northern end and a 10ms-1 flow at its southern end. What will be its dimensions (length and lateral scale) four days later ?
2. A square wave with an amplitude of 500km and wavelength 1,000km is immersed in a
deformation field ( u = - αx; v= αy; with α = 10-5 s-1). What are its dimensions 3 days later ?
3. A line tracer is aligned along a radial direction in a Rankine vortex
( v = ωr for r<a; v = ωa2/r for r>a), and is drawn into a spiral shape by the flow. Show that after a long time (T) the spiral arms are separated by a distance (D) such that
D ~ ( π/ωa2) (r3/T).
4. Perform a scale analysis for Problem 3 of the tracer for large T in the presence of diffusion.
Note that the tracer equation takes the form
∂C/∂t + (v/r)∂C/∂θ = κ{∂2C/∂r2 + (1/r2) ∂2C/∂θ 2 }.
5. Assume that the mean meridional circulation of the Hadley cell and Brewer Dobson Circulation are respectively about 0.5 and 0.02 ms-1. Estimate the time-scale of these circulations.