• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

CrimeandregionalgrowthinItaly Lanzafame,Matteo MunichPersonalRePEcArchive

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "CrimeandregionalgrowthinItaly Lanzafame,Matteo MunichPersonalRePEcArchive"

Copied!
33
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Crime and regional growth in Italy

Lanzafame, Matteo

Università degli Studi di Messina, Dipartimento SEAM

February 2013

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44343/

MPRA Paper No. 44343, posted 13 Feb 2013 14:56 UTC

(2)

Crime and regional growth in Italy

Abstract

!

"

Keywords: #

JEL Classifications: #$% &' ( '

(3)

$

Crime and regional growth in Italy

1. Introduction

) *+'

,

-

. /

0 1 # # 1 / / 0

2

1 3

$''* $' '4 $''54 6 6 **78

, (

3 $''*4 $' $8 -

3

# 2 $''98

/

!

: !

3 8 # 2

2 !

3 ;

(4)

%

8 !

- /

2

! 3

8 <

2 !

. = #

:

! " "

2 1

2

1

1 ) 3$' '8 > *7*

/ $''$ !

3 8 ")6 - ! 2

6 3$''&8 *+ **

3 8

")6 <

2 ? , 36 **%8

6

3$''&8 !

@ # 3$''78

(5)

&

!

-

*5% **+ 6 "

36 "8 6 3 ***8 - 6 " !

!

")6 )

3$' 8 3:) 8 '%

$''$ $''5 - 2

@ 3A /8

: " /@ 3:" /8 - A /

!

:) :) 1 6 3$''&8

6 3$' $8 !

/ 1

*7' !

# 6 3$' $8 1 ,

, B

*7' 5 ")6

!

:

(

!

(6)

+

2 A

! 2

1

/ @ 3 ! 8

2

36 / **+8

2 - 2

36 $''58

/ 2

3 "8 36 / **+8

0 ?# # = " ,

3##= "8 6 3$''58 ?1 " , 31 "8

@ = - 3$' $ 8 - "

##= " 1 "

1

-

2 ##= " 1 "

(7)

5

: = - 3$' $ 8

? , 3 8 "

- / $

/ %

-

"

/ & / +

/ 5

2. Data and preliminary analysis

- 3 8

*7' $''+ A

")6

3 8

$

-

!

3 ) $' '4 # $''78

%

) 2

- $'

C ,1 ! 6

3 # $''78D A :

- 1 1 !

$: ? , ? ,

%1 6 3$''&8 6 3$' $8 !

: @

(8)

7

?# . / = ( , 3#(=. /8

. / 3 /-1-8

&

/-1- ?# $ , 3 ?# / ,8

B

+

Figure 1. Descriptive statistics

−20246

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Labour productivity, % growth rate Crime rate Mean regional values

CAL

SIC CAM

PUG SAR

LIG

BAS LAZ PIELOM

MOL TAA ABR EMR FVG VEN TOS UMB MAR

051015Crime rate

Mean values, 1970−2005

−.15−.1−.050.05.1Labour productivity, % growth rate −1 0 1 2 3

Log of crime rate

/

; 3 6 1

# 8 .

@ 3

# $' 8 - 2 3

8

&

#(=. / B E # E / - #(=. /

D;; ; ;

+ ,

/-1- ?# , - B

B

(9)

9

: -

")6 A

$ & 3 8 '' ''' *7'

& 5$ $''+

**' - 2

$7

3 1(8 * # 3#1 8 !

!

. A 3 "8

: :

- B

3. Model and empirical methodology

-

3 8

3-:68 -

% = # 3 8

$&

ω λ

= + 3$8

(10)

*

$ '

= 3 8 = $ ( %

# $& !

3 8 '' ''' -

-:6 3 8

=@ 3$8

! ( ) ω : 3 8 3$8

@

$&

ω λ

= + 3%8

:

1 ) 31() 8

3%8

F

' '

)

* * + +

* +

$&

ω ρ

λ

= =

= + ∑ + ∑ + 3&8

3.1. Estimation framework

2 =

- 3$' $ $' $ 8 -

3&8 = $ ' = $ (

(11)

'

$&

ω λ ′

= + + = φ ′ ! + ε 3+8

$& = π ϕ + ′ + ϑ ! + ϑ ! + υ 358

! = ο ′ !

+ ς = κ ′

+ ς 378

!

!

! φ - ε

σ

$

- $& !

! -

! 3 ο = κ = 8

$& $&

$& ! .

3+8 378 3 8 ( $& )

6 ' (

!

!

1 !

-

0 " 3 "8 6 / 3 **+8

(12)

- "

φ ′ ! 1

-

2 6 3$''58 ?#

# = , 3##=8

- ##=

! !

: 6 3$''58

3+8

( )

! = φ

− − ω λ ′ $& − ε 398

'

φ '

φ

=

= ∑ 4 '

'

=

= ∑ 4 ω '

'

ω

=

= ∑ 4 λ '

'

λ

=

= ∑ $& '

'

$&

=

= ∑

'

ε '

ε

=

= ∑ : ' → ∞ φ ' ε = '

3+8

$&

$

$&

ω λ ε

= + + + + 3*8

- # # = " 3##= "8 "

3*8 - ##= "

(13)

$

G

'

G

$$ ,

'

λ

λ

=

= ∑

5

. ##=

! ! φ -

##=

##=

. 3*8

= - 3$' $ 8

1 " 31 "8

? , - 1 "

D

$ (

$&

λ

=

= ′ + ∑ + G G

3 '8

$& G

ω λ ′

= + + + + 3 8

- / 3 '8

( − - 3 8

G

? ,

7

!

3 '8

(

5A

3*8 # # = 6 3##=68

7- ? , ! ! !! 3

8

(14)

%

3 G

8 !

3 8

G

1 '

G

!

9

- ##= 1 "

- ! G

G

- : 6 3-:68

-:6

*

1 " ##= "

1 "

G

'

G

,

'

λ

λ

=

= ∑ = 1 "

- #

= 3$''*8 G

λ !

1 " ##= "

##= " 1 "

;

- !

9( ? , 36 *9&8 =

- 3$' $ 8 . 3$''98

B ( '; →' -

= 3$''*8 1 "

* 2 1 " = - 3$' $ 8

##=

(15)

&

3.2. Estimation results

A " 1() 3&8 @

'

:

3 ( $''58

1 /

# 3/ #8 1() 3 '8

2 -

/

2 ( $& )

3 $' $8 A

( $& ) -

$&

$&

- " - /

< 3 ** 8

:

'1 $& 1

) 2 : 31):8 3) 2 : *7*8 - 1): - 1 1 ! B

A

1() 3 '8

(16)

+

< + 5

1

" 2

- 2

3#)8 6 3$''&8

Table 1. Standard MG estimations and CD test

= " " " "

)

' ' ' ' '9'H ' ''+ ' '7$H

$& ' ''+II ' ''$II

$& ' ' +II ' ' 'II

' '%$II ' '%+II ' '%+II ' '%*II

J

'K + 5

#) $+ 55 $+ $+ $5 '7 $+ &&

' ''' ' ''' ' ''' ' '''

. D II H K 'K 6

< 3 ** 8

- #)

( )

$

' '

+ + +

$ (

' '

ρ

= = +

  

=    −     ∑ ∑   3 $8

ρ

+

(

+

+ : (

+

> % '

(17)

5

( ) '

$' #)

2

E " #)

- 1

B 1

" 2

- ##= " 1 "

Table 2. CCEMG and AMG estimations: Model specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

' $5I ' &'I ' $*5II ' %'7II ' %%%II ' %$+II

$& ' ''$I ' ''%II ' '' ' ''$H ' '' ' ''$H

# ' 99%II ' 9*$II

' ''$ ' ''+ ' '&+II ' '&5II ' '&7II ' '&9II J

'K % % %

. D II I H K +K 'K 6

< 3 ** 8

Table 3. CCEMG and AMG estimations: Model specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

' &H ' $ I ' $99II ' $*$II ' %$+II ' % +II

$& ' ''*II ' ' 'II ' ''5I ' ''*II ' ''& ' ' 'II

# ' 99% ' 999II

' ''$ ' ''+ ' ''5H ' ''9 ' ''$ ' ''7H

J

'K $ % $

. D II I H K +K 'K 6

< 3 ** 8

(18)

7

- $ ##= " 1 " $& -

##= "

!

1 " $& 3 ' 8

1 " -

- % $&

!

$& ' ''$

$&

' ' '

!

4. Extensions and robustness of the results

- !

2 2

$& $& < !

3&8

/ 2 3

/ **&4 # $''%8 : 2 3 **$8

D

( )

% = . /

α δ

#

− −α δ

3 %8

(19)

9

$ '

= = $ ( % #

-:6 . / 2

α δ

1 -:6 @ 3$8 = ω λ + $&

@

$& 0

γ ζ α δ

= + + + 3 &8

( )

γ = ω − α δ − ζ = λ ( α δ ) 0

$& A 3&8 3 &8

2 <

- 2

) 2

. 3

# $''%4 # $''+8D

( )

. = 1 + − .

3 +8

(20)

*

1 !

' '5

$

1 -

3$''&8 @ D

/# =

π( )

3 58

/#

7 π = ' '7

% &

- 1

##= " 1 " 2

<

@

3 &8 ;

= - 3$' $ 8 !

@ "

4.1. Panel Granger causality tests

: " 3 *5*8 % ?" ,

2 % 2

$: # 3$''+8 2 .' 1'

(

+

)

1'

%A / ) - 3$''&8

&

1 # 3$''%8 # 3$''+8

7 =#) 3 L $'''8

(21)

$'

: " 2

% % " 2 B %

B

"

!

3 1 $'''4

. ( A $'' 4 LM $''58 1

+

-

< = 2 3 *998

" 3C1(8

2 ω β 2

δ %

= =

= + ∑ + ∑ + 3 78

$ '

= = $ ( ω 3 8 !

2 3 78

'

D

$

'

' ' '

/ '

δ '

δ '

δ

= = =

= = =

∑ ∑ ∑ 3 98

- % " 2 3 D %2 8 -

3 98 "

+1 3 '8 B 1):

3 &8 0 0 ;

!

(22)

$

" 1 "

5

)

!

= $ 1

;

1 - & " 1 " "

<

B

Table 4. Panel Granger Causality Tests

Estimator

Null hypothesis MG MG AMG AMG

→$& ' + ' *% & ' % &*

$& → 9 7$II * +9II ' 97 & 7%H

→0 ' $$ ' %7 ' ' ' $%

0 → 9 77I 7 59II 7 '+I 7 ''I

→ $+ 7$II 9 +7II 5 *7I & $

→ + $5H ' +% 55 ' %9

( . N . N

. D I H +K 'K F→F ? " ,

/ < 3 ** 8

5A 1 " ##= "

1 ##= @

D " @

" 2 2 1 " ##= "

(23)

$$

2

0

" : "

2 $& 1 "

2

7

! !

3 &8

4.2. Extended model results

- ##= " 1 " 3 &8 - + 5

" 0 $& 3 $& 8 !

9

-

? , -

' '' $& ' ''7 $&

- + 5 -

3 0 8

%% %9 0 9

7- #) 36 $''&8 "

3 8 - "

9- - + 5 A

D -

(24)

$%

Table 5. CCEMG and AMG extended model estimations: Specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

$& ' '' I ' '' I ' '' H ' ''$H ' '' II ' ''$I

0 ' %5%II ' %+9II ' %79II ' %7$II ' %%%II ' %%$II

' $' ' 5% ' 'I ' +I ' $ I ' %H

# ' **+II ' **$II

' '' ' '' ' '$*II ' '$*II ' '$9II ' '$9II

J

'K ' '

. D II I H K +K 'K 6

< 3 ** 8

Table 6. CCEMG and AMG extended model estimations: Specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

$& ' ''7II ' ''9II ' ''7II ' ''*II ' ''7II ' ''*II

0 ' %7' ' %5&II ' %9&II ' %75II ' %%7II ' %%9II

' 9$ ' 77 ' & I ' & I ' +$I ' %7I

# ' **9II ' **&II

' ''' ' ''$ ' ''% ' ''% ' ''$ ' ''&II

J

'K ' '

. D II I K +K 6

< 3 ** 8

3 &8

*

*A 3 &8 -

- 1$ 1% 1 ! - + 5

(25)

$&

5. Discussion of the results

-

, 1

!

B

! /

*7' $''+ *

@

$&

( )

I

= − ζ G $&$& $& (

(

$&

=

= ∑

- + ζ G = − ' '' A

33#4 8

( )

I

G

3#4 = − = − ζ $&$& 3 *8

' 3#4 >

$& = $&

: $ 3#4

A ! .

(26)

$+

-

$ $ 6 7 0 7 +' C : C

" = ( - E * %

3#4 + 9

# 3#4 *7' $''+ $*

' 9 -

/ 7 7 ' + $ 5 ' %+

#

$'

Figure 2. PLOSS by region: Models with CRit, ζ = 30.001

−.20.2.4.6.8 Average annual loss

−100102030Cumulative loss

PIE LOM TAA VEN FVG LIG EMR TOS UMB MAR LAZ ABR MOL CAM PUG BAS CAL SIC SAR Cumulative loss Average annual loss

- B

@ $&

$& 2 2

-

: $ 2

$': - 1& 1 !

(27)

$5

@

6. Conclusions

- :

!

2

# !

2 3 "8 36 / **+8

6 3$''58 = -

3$' $ 8 0 ?# # = " , 3##= "8

?1 " , 31 "8 : = - 3$' $ 8

? , "

1

! *7' $''+ /

' %+ ' 9

1

! !

(28)

$7 - 2

References

1 6 6 / 1= 3$'''8 / D

& 5 ! 9$D 9$0$

> . / 3$''98 ) : 1 6 (

%D 9* 5%

> / 3 **&8 - D =

) ! 7 %&D &%0 7%

6 # / 3$''%8 - D 1 8 0 3

7 $D % $'5

6 6 6 3$' $8 ) O ) !

D ' ;B +&$ &77& $' $ ' '9+ !

2 6 > L $''' P) / # " OQ

& 5 *'D 5'09%

/( = 3$''*8 # / ) . 6 D 1 .

= 6(1 6 . 797'

6 3$''*8 . 2 D =

! & 5 $9D 7

# : 3$' 8 A O

, $ $D & 5*

(29)

$9

# : 3$''+8 1 / 0 ! , 5

31 ) 8 . <

# 2 > 3$''98 = D D

/

) C E 3$' 8 @ :) D 1

) ! 3 7 $7D %$ &$

) # = 3$' '8 ) # = " O .70 5%D %%' %&+

) 2 )1 : A1 3 *7*8 ) = 1 - /

E ( ) ! 7&D &$7 &%

= 3$' $8 = 6 - / < /

) $D 5 7

= - : 3$' $ 8 . - D / < 1

6 1 4-! 8 ! D ' ;B &59

''9& $' $ ''7$' !

= - : 3$' $ 8 6 1 " 6

= / A 2 6 + + ) = E !

" #A> 3 *5*8

%7D &$&0&%9

< # 3 ** 8 < ( ( ( O ( 8 $D $ $5

< = 2 ) . A ( </ 3 *998 =

+5D %7 0 %*+

LM 3$''58 =! D " =#)

$%D *790**$

3$''*8 O & &%D '' ' %

3$' '8 - %*D 977

9*+

(30)

$*

. ( ( 3$''58 : ) : : " ) !

7 $ 8 0 %9D '+ '75

3$''58 # 89 9

) ! ( 5 0&%

2 ." ( ) A ). 3 **$8 1

7 ) ! '7D &'7 &%7

# " 3$''78 1 & 5 !

D &+'0&5$

. ( E A ) 3$'' 8 # D 2 :)

4-! 8 !

5%D +%0 7

6 ( 6 : 3 **78 / D

$ 7 9 $*70% 9

6 1 3 *9&8 = 1 ( " (

1 & 5 $+D $$ $&7

6 " 3$''&8 / D

*+ 0 ** ( &D 0%&

6 < 3$''&8 " ) - # / ) 6 R1

) 6 / )6 . $&'

6 < 3$''58 =

7&D *570 ' $

6 < / N / ( 3 ***8 6 " = ) <

6 ) ! *&D 5$ 5%&

6 < / ( 3 **+8 = ( ) <

6 ) ! 59D 7*0 %

(31)

%'

6 6 3$' $8 - D 2

A 2 6 . 959

6 ( 3 **%8 2 ) 2 6 E 6 6 .>

- - 1 ) / 3$''&8 - 2

E / ) / = / A 2 6 .

% &$

(32)

% Appendix

Table A1. ADF unit root tests on $&

( $ # (

6 6 = ' & 5II

' % +99I

- 1 1 -11 ' & &++II

C C=. ' + $5%II

: C " :C" ' & %5*II

" ' % 9$+I

= ( = ( ' + $+%II

- - / ' $ 9''

E E % 5$5

1( ' 7 7%II

1R ' & +7$II

1 1 ( ' + &+II

$ & %*&II

# #1 $ % %+H

1 6E" ' $ $%%

1/ & % +%$I

# #1 % 7$*I

/ / # ' &&&

/ /1( ' & 5+'II

. D - C ,1 6 36 =8 II I H

K +K 'K 1 1):

@ . 6 3 **+8

Table A2. CCEMG and AMG extended model estimations: Specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

' & I ' 5*II ' %'+II ' % 5II ' %& II ' %%9II

$& ' ''$II ' ''$I ' '' ' ''$I ' ''' ' ''$I

0 ' %$9II ' %$%II ' '%&7II ' %%+II ' %$'II ' %'*II

' $'% ' *' ' '*$ ' '*% ' ' ' '99

# ' 9**II ' *'+II

' ''% ' ''+ ' '%7II ' '%7II ' '%9II ' '%9II

J

'K ' ' '

. D II I K +K 6

< 3 ** 8

(33)

%$

Table A3. CCEMG and AMG extended model estimations: Specifications with $&

= ##= " ##= " 1 " 1 " 1 " 1 "

)

G

G

' %9I ' &%I ' $**II ' %'7II ' %%5II ' %$5II

$& ' ''7II ' ''9II ' ''+H ' ''7I ' ''& ' ''9I

0 ' %%+II ' %%$II ' %+'II ' %%5II ' % *II ' %'*II

' 5+ ' +9 ' $ H ' *H ' %5H ' 5

# ' 9*7II ' *'%II

' ''% ' ''+ ' '' ' '' ' ''+ ' ''&

J

'K

$

. D II I H K +K 'K 6

< 3 ** 8

Table A4. PLOSS by region: Models with CRit, ζ = 30.001

( $ # 3#4 1 3#4

6 6 = $ 9 ' '5

% ' '*

- 1 1 -11 5 57 ' *

C C=. 7 & ' $

: C " :C" 7 %' ' $'

" 75 ' '+

= ( = ( 5 9* ' *

- - / 7 &5 ' $

E E 7 +7 ' $

1( * %$ ' $5

1R *7 ' '+

1 1 ( 5 7' ' *

+ 75 ' 5

# #1 $ +9 ' %+

1 6E" 7 &9 ' $

1/ ' *+ ' '%

# #1 $9 ** ' 9

/ / # 7 57 ' &*

/ /1( & 9' ' %

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Diese wurde monatlich um eine Stunde verkürzt, aber trotzdem durfte man nachts einige Stunden nicht auf die Straßen, was zu bedeuten hatte, dass die Barbesuche oder Weinabende

Any statement which is provable in predicative con- structive mathematics (no powersets, no ϕ∨¬ϕ, no ¬¬ϕ ⇒ ϕ, no axiom of choice) is true in any arithmetic universe..

Current account sustainability in advanced economies.

Stefano Andretta (Università degli Studi Roma Tre), Giovanna Capitelli (Università degli Studi Roma Tre), Cristiano Giometti (Università degli Studi di Firenze), Silvano

Dipartimento di Storia delle Arti Università degli studi di Pisa mailto: spagnolo@arte.unipi.it

Un progetto a cura di Gloria Antoni (Università degli Studi Roma Tre); Matteo Chirumbolo (The Courtauld Institute of Art); Gianluca Petrone (Sapienza Università di Roma);

Mari D'Agostino, Docente Università Degli Studi di Palermo Giusto Picone, emerito Università Degli Studi di Palermo Gaetano Gucciardo, docente Università Degli Studi di Palermo

Università degli Studi di Foggia, Università degli Studi di Napoli, Federico II, Università degli Studi di Foggia. 5