• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Prediction of Arctic sea ice on subseasonal to seasonal time scales

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Prediction of Arctic sea ice on subseasonal to seasonal time scales"

Copied!
46
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Prediction of Arctic sea ice on subseasonal to seasonal time scales

Lorenzo Zampieri

lorenzo.zampieri@awi.de

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

ECMWF Seminar

September 15 th 2017

(2)

Overview

Research Motivation and Objectives S2S Forecasts and Observations The Verification Metrics

Predictive Skills of S2S Forecasts Systems

Comparison of Predictive and Prescriptive Systems Considerations on Metrics Behavior

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 1 / 29

(3)

Research Motivations

and Objectives

(4)

Importance of Sea Ice Forecasts

Why do we need (Arctic) sea ice forecasts?

Climate change causes a decrease in summer sea ice extent and thickness

New scenarios for human activities in the Arctic region Marine transport

Offshore fuel industry Mineral extraction Tourism

Formulation of seasonal sea ice forecasts is required

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 3 / 29

(5)

Importance of Sea Ice Forecasts

Why do we need (Arctic) sea ice forecasts?

Climate change causes a decrease in summer sea ice extent and thickness

New scenarios for human activities in the Arctic region

Marine transport Offshore fuel industry Mineral extraction Tourism

Formulation of seasonal sea ice forecasts is required

th

(6)

Importance of Sea Ice Forecasts

Why do we need (Arctic) sea ice forecasts?

Climate change causes a decrease in summer sea ice extent and thickness

New scenarios for human activities in the Arctic region Marine transport

Offshore fuel industry Mineral extraction Tourism

Formulation of seasonal sea ice forecasts is required

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 3 / 29

(7)

Importance of Sea Ice Forecasts

Why do we need (Arctic) sea ice forecasts?

Climate change causes a decrease in summer sea ice extent and thickness

New scenarios for human activities in the Arctic region Marine transport

Offshore fuel industry Mineral extraction Tourism

Formulation of seasonal sea ice forecasts is required

th

(8)

Figure: Hypothetical September navigation routes. Smith and Stephenson (2013)

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 4 / 29

(9)

The Forecasts Verification

Are we able to effectively verify a sea ice forecast?

New dedicated verification metrics are needed to quantify the quality of the forecasted

ice edge position

th

(10)

The Forecasts Verification

Are we able to effectively verify a sea ice forecast?

New dedicated verification metrics are needed to quantify the quality of the forecasted

ice edge position

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 5 / 29

(11)

Research Objectives

This research consists in an extensive verification analysis of the S2S database with the following objectives:

Assessment of the predictive skills for S2S forecast systems Evaluation of the verification metrics behavior

th

(12)

Forecasts and

Observations

(13)

The Forecasts - S2S Database

The S2S (subseasonal to seasonal) database collects mainly atmospheric forecasts (2003-2017). However, sea ice concentration is also provided.

Model Name Ocean Sea Ice Frequency Ens. Size Length

BoM 3 twice a week 33 62 days

ECCC weekly 21 32 days

ECMWF 1 twice a week 51 46 days

HMCR weekly 20 61 days

ISAC-CNR weekly 41 31 days

JMA twice a week 25 33 days

CMA 3 3 daily 4 60 days

ECMWF 2 3 3 twice a week 51 46 days

KMA 3 3 daily 4 60 days

MΒ΄ etΒ΄ eo France 3 3 weekly 51 32-61 days

NCEP 3 3 daily 16 44 days

UKMO 3 3 daily 4 60 days

th

F. Vitart et al. (2017)

(14)

The Forecasts - S2S Database

The S2S (subseasonal to seasonal) database collects mainly atmospheric forecasts (2003-2017). However, sea ice concentration is also provided.

Model Name Ocean Sea Ice Frequency Ens. Size Length

BoM 3 twice a week 33 62 days

ECCC weekly 21 32 days

ECMWF 1 twice a week 51 46 days

HMCR weekly 20 61 days

ISAC-CNR weekly 41 31 days

JMA twice a week 25 33 days

3 3 daily 4 60 days

3 3 twice a week 51 46 days

3 3 daily 4 60 days

3 3 weekly 51 32-61 days

3 3 daily 16 44 days

CMA ECMWF 2 KMA

MΒ΄ etΒ΄ eo France NCEP

UKMO 3 3 daily 4 60 days

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 8 / 29

(15)

The ”True State”

ASI sea ice concentration data produced by University of Bremen.

The resolution is ∼ 6 km.

Models own analysis

The idea behind the models own analysis is to define virtual observations based on the control forecasts evaluated at the initial time of each single forecast.

th

G. Spreen et al. (2008)

(16)

The ”True State”

ASI sea ice concentration data produced by University of Bremen.

The resolution is ∼ 6 km.

Models own analysis

The idea behind the models own analysis is to define virtual observations based on the control forecasts evaluated at the initial time of each single forecast.

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 9 / 29

G. Spreen et al. (2008)

(17)

Verification Metrics

(18)

IIEE - Integrated Ice Edge Error

β€”β€” Observation edge

β€”β€” Forecast edge

IIEE = O + U

Conceptually simple and easy to calculate from sea ice concentration

IIEE is an area (m 2 ) Decomposition into Misplacement Error ME = 2min(O , U) and

(Absolute) Extent Error AEE = |O βˆ’ U |

EE = O βˆ’ U

IIEE = AEE + ME

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 11 / 29

H.F. Goessling et al (2016)

(19)

IIEE - Integrated Ice Edge Error

β€”β€” Observation edge

β€”β€” Forecast edge

IIEE = O + U

Conceptually simple and easy to calculate from sea ice concentration

IIEE is an area (m 2 ) Decomposition into Misplacement Error ME = 2min(O , U) and

(Absolute) Extent Error AEE = |O βˆ’ U |

EE = O βˆ’ U

IIEE = AEE + ME

th

(20)

SPS - Spatial Probability Score

SPS is the evolution of IIEE in the probabilistic forecasts world.

SPS is defined as the spatial integration of the local (Half) Brier Score.

SPS = Z

S

(p o [sic β‰₯ 15%] (~ x) βˆ’ p f [sic β‰₯ 15%] (~ x)) 2 dS

SPS can be applied to deterministic forecast, in this case SPS = IIEE It allows a probabilistic description of the observations

SPS is an area (m 2 )

Dividing the SPS (or the IIEE) by the climatological length of the edge we obtain an estimation of the mean distance between the edges

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 12 / 29

H.F. Goessling (submitted)

(21)

MHD - Modified Hausdorff Distance

MHD(A, B ) = max (

1

|A|

X

a∈A

d (a, B), 1

|B|

X

b∈B

d (A, b) )

d (a, B ) = inf

b∈B [d (a, b)]

d (A, b) = inf

a∈A [d (a, b)]

th

D.S. Dukhovskoy et al. (2015)

(22)

Benchmark values for IIEE and SPS

IIEE and SPS are not straightforward to interpret without reference values.

Those have been calculated using the observed sea ice concentration Persistence from the previous year (PER1)

Persistence from forecast beginning (PERF) Climatological median ice edge (CMID)

Jan 01 Jan 15 Feb 01 Feb 15 Mar 01

0.0

0.51.01.5

2.0

Benchmark values for IIEE and SPS from AMSR2 data

Forecast Time

10 6 ( km ) 2

PER1 PERF CMIE

Jul 01 Jul 15 Aug 01 Aug 15 Sep 01

0

123

4

Benchmark values for IIEE and SPS from AMSR2 data

Forecast Time

10 6 ( km ) 2

PER1 PERF CMIE

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 14 / 29

(23)

Predictive Skills of

S2S Forecast Systems

(24)

Single Forecast Verification

Ens. members: 50 Start: 01.01.2016

Forc. length: 60 days

Jan 01 Jan 15 Feb 01 Feb 15 Mar 01

0.0

0.51.0

1.5

Verification of Sea Ice Edge Position MΓ©tΓ©o France βˆ’ AMSR2 Forecast start: 2016βˆ’01βˆ’01

Forecast Time

106

(

km

)

2

IIEE SPS ME AEE benchmark

Jan 01 Jan 15 Feb 01 Feb 15 Mar 01

0.00.40.81.2

Ensemble Members Spread MΓ©tΓ©o France Forecast start: 2016βˆ’01βˆ’01

Forecast Time

106

(

km

)

2

IIEE(emβˆ’em)

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 16 / 29

MΓ©tΓ©o France

(25)

Extensive visualization of the results

th

(26)

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Target Time

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Spatial Probability Score Model: UKMO Observations: ASI Sea Ice Concentration

10

6

km

2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●

● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●

● ●

● ●● ● ●●

● ●

● ●●

βˆ’1.5 βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: AEE Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

● ● ● ●●

● ●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●●●

●

● ●● ●

●

●● ● ● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●

● ●

● ● ● ●

● ●

0.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 18 / 29

(27)

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Target Time

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Spatial Probability Score Model: UKMO Observations: ASI Sea Ice Concentration

10

6

km

2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●

● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●

● ●

● ●● ● ●●

● ●

● ●●

βˆ’1.5 βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: AEE Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

● ● ● ●●

● ●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●●●

●

● ●● ●

●

●● ● ● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●

● ●

● ● ● ●

● ●

0.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

th

(28)

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●●●

●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●●

●●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●

●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Target Time

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Spatial Probability Score Model: UKMO Observations: ASI Sea Ice Concentration

10

6

km

2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●

● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●● ●

●●●● ● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●

● ●

● ●● ● ●●

● ●

● ●●

βˆ’1.5 βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: AEE Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●● ●

●● ● ● ●● ●

● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●●

●● ●●●●●●

●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●● ● ●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

● ● ● ●●

● ●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●●●

●

● ●● ●

●

●● ● ● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●

● ●

● ● ● ●

● ●

0.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 18 / 29

(29)

Predictive Skills Evaluation

●● ●●● ● ● ●● ●● ● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●● ●●●● ●●●●●●●

● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

0.0

0.51.01.52.02.5

3.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●

● ●

●●●● ● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●●

● ●

● ●● ● ●●

● ●● ●●

βˆ’1.5

βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.5

2.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: AEE Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

● ● ● ●●

● ●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●● ●●●

●●

● ●● ●

●

●● ● ● ●

●●

● ●● ● ●

● ●

● ● ● ●

● ●

0.0

0.51.01.5

2.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: UKMO Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●●●●●●●●●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●●

●●

●●

●

●●

●●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0.0

0.51.01.52.02.5

3.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: CMA Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2016

106 km2

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

βˆ’1.5

βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.5

2.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: AEE Model: CMA Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2016

106 km2

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●●●●●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●

●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●

0.0

0.51.01.5

2.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: CMA Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2016

106 km2

th

UKMO CMA

SPS AEE ME

(30)

UKMO - CMA Comparison

Ens. members: 3 Start: 01.07.2016

Ens. members: 3 Start: 01.07.2016

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 20 / 29

UKMO CMA

(31)

S2S Forecasts Systems Predictive Skills

Forecast System

Season Issues

Winter Summer Assimil. O-Mlt. O-Frz.

CMA 7 7

ECMWF 2

KMA 7

MΒ΄ etΒ΄ eo France 7 7

NCEP 7 7

UKMO 7

th

7

(32)

ECMWF - Predictive vs. Prescriptive

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●

●●●●●●●●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●

βˆ’1.5βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: EE Model: ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●

0.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● ●● ●●

● ●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●●

●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: SPS Model: Pres. ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●●● ●●● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●●

● ● ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●

βˆ’1.5βˆ’1.0βˆ’0.50.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: EE Model: Pres. ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

●●●

●●●

●

●●

●●●●●

●●

● ● ●●● ●

●

● ● ●

●

● ● ●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●

●

●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0.00.51.01.52.0

Target Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Ver. Metric: ME Model: Pres. ECMWF Avg. Period: 2003 βˆ’ 2014

106 km2

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 22 / 29

ECMWF 2 ECMWF 1

SPS AEE ME

(33)

ECMWF - Predictive vs. Prescriptive

Predictive Version Start: 01.08.2016

Prescriptive Version Start: 31.07.2016

th

ECMWF 2 ECMWF 1

(34)

Verification Metrics

Behavior

(35)

Comparison of MHD and NIIEE

th

(36)

Comparison of MHD and NIIEE

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Target Time

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Norm. Integrated Ice Edge Error Model: UKMO Verification against UKMO own analysis

km

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Target Time

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Mod. Hausdorff Distance Model: UKMO Verification against UKMO own analysis

km

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 25 / 29

NIIEE

MHD

(37)

Comparison of MHD and NIIEE

Forecast Lead Time Correlation Coeff. Scaling Factor

Day 1 0.915 0.75

Day 8 0.813 1.18

Day 18 0.872 1.23

Day 32 0.860 1.24

Day 44 0.770 1.24

Day 60 0.672 1.23

The NIIEE and the MHD estimations of the mean distance between the edges are comparable! However...

NIIEE is sensitive to the normalization procedure MHD is subject to noise likely caused by outliers MHD computation is much more demanding

th

(38)

Conclusions

(39)

Features of S2S Forecasts Systems

Despite the early development stage of Arctic sea ice predictions on the seasonal time scale some of the S2S models are promising, exhibiting better predictive skills than the observation-based climatology and persistence.

Critical aspects concerning the data assimilation procedure and the tuning of the models, which can strongly affect the forecasts quality.

Expected benefits from an increased ensemble size could not be detected.

The comparison of different versions of the ECMWF forecast system shows the benefits brought by a coupled dynamical description of the sea ice instead of its prescription based on persistence and

climatological records.

th

(40)

Metrics Behavior

IIEE and SPS are effective verification metrics to describe the quality of the sea ice edge position.

Simplicity - Comprehensibility - Stability

MHD is also able to evaluate the quality of the forecasted ice edge position. However it is less flexible than the two previous ones and affected by biases.

Verification against satellite observation useful to monitor models skills.

Verification against models own analysis useful to study the model response to modification in data assimilation.

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 28 / 29

(41)

Thank you for your attention

th

(42)

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 1 / 5

(43)

Climatological Ice Edge Length

●

●

●

●

● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Time

Jan 01 Mar 01 May 01 Jul 01 Sep 01 Nov 01 Jan 01

Climatological Ice Edge Length βˆ’ ASI Sea Ice Concentration

10 3 km

High res.

Low res.

th

(44)

MHD Problems - 1

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 3 / 5

(45)

MHD Problems - 2

th

(46)

Alternative applications

Lorenzo Zampieri (AWI - Uni HB) Prediction of Arctic sea ice September 15 th 2017 5 / 5

Referenzen

Γ„HNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The aim of this paper is to compare the forecast performance of three structural econometric models 1 ; the ARIMAX model, the Kalman filter model and the non- parametric model

Our temperature records covering the years 2001 through 2005 exhibited not only seasonal variations but also an overall slight temperature increase, even at 2500 m water depth at

Tundra species with amphi-atlantic and west arctic distributions suffered frequent and heavy range losses during cold stages in response to glaciations that ushered in

The negative trend shows a pronounced seasonality; the largest decrease occurs in autumn with magnitudes up to -4.8 %/decade (relative to the overall long-term mean

Ag- new and Le [1996] show that images of the 85.5 GHz SSM[I brightness temperature contain a temporal dis- placement of features that are related to the drift buoy motion

In early October 1998, a rapid transformation of internal tidal waves was observed, accompanied by a reduction of the associated energy at all depth levels except for the

Given a time series and an identification criterion, it selects the best model type (in time and in levels), number of regimes, order and thresholds in time and levels, and

The changes in the energy budget have implications not only on the Arctic surface climate where the strongly increased latent heat fluxes in winter, spring and autumn lead to