FORUM II
Dispersion und Retention von Ultrafeinstaub/Nanopartikeln in der Lunge
Dr. Otto Creutzenberg Dirk Schaudien, PhD
Fraunhofer-Institut für Toxikologie und Experimentelle Medizin Hannover
Einzelnes Nanopartikel
Agglomerat
Aggregat
Agglomerate aus Aggregat
Projektausschreibung
Projektausschreibung:
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA)
Forschungsprojekt F2133:
Dispersion und Retention von Stäuben mit ultrafeinen Primärpartikeln
in der Lunge
Gliederung
in vitro Ansätze (TEM)
in vivo Ansätze
• Intratracheale Instillation (TEM, BAL)
• Akute Inhalation (TEM)
TEM: Transmissionselektronenmikroskopie BAL: Bronchoalveoläre Lavage
TEM analysis
• Fixation in 5% glutaraldehyde solution (pH 7.2)
• PET-membrane was cut out and postfixed in 1% osmiumtetroxid in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer.
• Following dehydration of cells in a graded series of ethanol the membranes were infiltrated with epoxy resin and embedded.
• An ultramicrotome (Ultracut E, Richard-Jung) was used for cutting ultrathin sections (70nm).
• Positioning on copper grids and observed with a transmission electron microsope (Zeiss, Leo 910).
16HBE140- A549
10, 100, 1000 1, 24, 48
(from apical side) Air-liquid
Interface Culture Human
epithelial cell lines Calu-3
Human lung fibroblasts LK004 cells
Particle concentration
(ng/cm2) Exposure
duration (hrs) Method
Cell type Cell line
Selection of Cell Lines
Rationale for Dosing in vitro
in vivo: 300 µg/lung (no overload conditions)
in vitro: lung surface is approx. 3000 cm2/lung; conversion in vivo Æ in vitro: approx. 100 ng/cm² dosing scheme: 10 - 100 - 1000 ng/cm²
Results
Most useful cell types: A549 and LK004 cells
After 1 hr nanoparticles were predominantly found attached to the cellular surface After 24 hrs these particles were mainly within the cells
-41 436
0.15 %
Na2HPO4buffer 0.1 %
Constantan
n.m.
180 after 24 h
-24 180
0.15 %
Na2HPO4buffer 0.1 %
TiO2 T805
n.m.
216 after 17 h
-55 212
0.15 %
Na2HPO4buffer 0.1 %
TiO2 P25
ζpotential (mV) Z-Average
(nm) Medium
Concen- tration
(%) Substance /
particle type
Comparison of TiO2 P25 (hydrophilic) and TiO2 T805 (hydrophobic)
Comparison of the diameters of TiO2P25 particles after 1hr and 24hrs of treatment
Comparison of the diameters of TiO2T805 particles after 1hr and 24hrs of treatment
Increase of agglomerates No increase of agglomerates
Gliederung
in vitro
Ansätze (TEM)
in vivo Ansätze
• Intratracheale Instillation (TEM, BAL)
• Akute Inhalation (TEM)
Diameter of the TiO2P25 particles at different time points after instillation
Diameter of the TiO2T805 particles at different time points after instillation
TiO2 P25 nanoparticles within a macrophage TiO2P25 nanoparticle within the
TiO2T805 nanoparticles within the lung lining fluid 1 hour after instillation
TiO2T805 nanoparticles within a macrophage 28 days after instillation
- Particle suspension medium: Compatible with lung milieu
- Lavage was performed using saline or phosphate buffer (not altering per se the agglomerate status of particles)
- Single lavage only to keep the particle concentration high for ZetaSizer Analysis
TiO2 P25 TiO2 T805
Hydrophilic Hydrophobic
Forming rapidly larger agglomerates Remaining at stable agglomerate size
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm)
Record 129: T805 Stammlösung 1Tag 1 Record 134: NaCl-BAL nach T805 0,2% 15 min /Att=6 3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 129: T805 Stammlösung 1Tag 1 Record 139: NaCl-BAL nach T805 0,2% 1h /Att=6 2
0 5 10 15 20
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 129: T805 Stammlösung 1Tag 1 Record 148: NaCl-BAl nach T805 0,2% 4h /Att=6 2
TiO2T805
15 min
0 20 40 60 80
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 129: T805 Stammlösung 1Tag 1 Record 153: NaCl-BAL nach T805 0,2% 1d /Att=6 1
1 hr
5 hrs
24 hrs
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm)
Record 94: P25 0,2% frisch 2 Record 102: PPuffer-BAL nach P25 0,2% 15min Att=6 1
0 5 10 15 20 25
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 94: P25 0,2% f risch 2 Record 106: PPuf f er-BAL nach P25 0,2% 1h Att=6 2
TiO2 P25
15 min
1 hr
0 10 20 30
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 94: P25 0,2% frisch 2 Record 122: PPuffer-BAL nach P25 0,2% 4h Atten =6 3
5 hrs
Precipitation!
Gliederung
in vitro
Ansätze (TEM)
in vivo Ansätze
• Intratracheale Instillation (TEM, BAL)
• Akute Inhalation (TEM)
Acute inhalations: Single Exposure of Rats to Various Nanoscaled Aerosols for 6 hrs
I Constantan - spark generator (no ageing) II Constantan - spark generator (ageing)
III Constantan - nebulisation of particle suspension
IV Europiumoxid - nebulisation of particle suspension
0.E+00 2.E+06 4.E+06 6.E+06 8.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+07 1.E+07
0 100 200 300 400
time [min]
concentration [ 1/cm³ ]
I Acute inhalation Iof a constantan aerosol: Spark generator without ageing
Average number concentration: 9.6·106 [1/cm³]
Average size distribution: 43 nm (mean mobility diamete GSD: 1.9
Assumptions
Minute volume: 0.2 L/min Surface area; 0.4 m² Deposition rate: 50%
Particle loading: 108 [1/cm²]= 1 [1/µm²].
II Acute inhalation of a constantan aerosol: Spark generator with ageing
Average number concentration: 4.6·105 [1/cm³]
Average size distribution: 124 nm (mean mobility diamet GSD: 1.9
Assumptions
Minute volume: 0.2 L/min Surface area; 0.4 m² Deposition rate: 50%
Particle loading: 6 x 106 [1/cm²]= 0.06 [1/µm²].
0.E+00 1.E+05 2.E+05 3.E+05 4.E+05 5.E+05 6.E+05
0 100 200 300 400
time [min]
concentration [ 1/cm³ ]
I Acute inhalation of a constantan aerosol (spark generator without ageing)
Constantan particle detected 1 h after end of inhalation in the cytoplasm of an epithelial cell (size: approx. 100 nm)
Dispersion of constantan particles in a phosphate buffer incl BSA
(0.15 w-% constantan, 0.15 w-% di-sodium-phosphate, 0.15 w-% BSA) Aerosol concentration: 41.6 ± 5.4 mg/m3 (constantan/phosphate/albumin)
13.9 mg/m3 (constantan)
MMAD: 1.37 µm – GSD: 1.53 MPPD model: 6.7% (P)
2.7 % (TB) 50.6% (H)
Deposited mass: approx. 94 µg/6 hrs (P + TB) approx. 67 µg/6 hrs (P)
0 2 4 6 8
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 236: Kon 0,15%, 0,15%PPuff, 0,15% BSA 40 min Utr St4/ 5. Ansatz 1
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000
-200 -100 0 100 200
Total Counts
Zeta Potential (mV) Zeta Potential Distribution
Record 292: Kon 0,15%, 0,15%PPuff , 0,15% BSA 40 min Utr St4/ 5. Ansatz 2
0 5 10 15 20
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
ζpotential
Impinger (Z-average: 281 nm)
Stock suspension constantan
2 3 2 3
Dispersion of Eu2O3 particles in a phosphate buffer incl BSA
(0.1 w-% Eu2O3, 0.15 w-% di-sodium-phosphate, 0.25 w-% BSA) Aerosol concentration: 45.1 ± 7.9 mg/m3 (Eu2O3/phosphate/albumin)
9 mg/m3 (Eu2O3)
MMAD: 1.35 µm – GSD: 1.65 MPPD model: 6.1% (P)
2.4 % (TB) 50.7% (H)
Deposited mass: approx. 55.1 µg/6 hrs (P + TB) approx. 39.6 µg/6 hrs (P)
ζpotential
Impinger (Z-average: 281 nm)
Stock suspension constantan
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Intensity (%)
Size (d.nm) Size Distribution by Intensity
Record 263: Eu2O3 0,1%, 0,15 PPuff, 0,25% BSA 1h Utr St5 /4.Ansatz 1
0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000
-200 -100 0 100 200
Total Counts
Zeta Potential (mV) Zeta Potential Distribution
Record 289: Eu2O3 0,1%, 0,15 PPuff , 0,25% BSA 65min Utr 2 min Usch / 4. Ansatz 2
10 20 30 40
Intensity (%)
Size Distribution by Intensity
Urine Blood Heart
0.854 0.272 294
0.088 93.8 32.3
Liver
0.031 0.016 10.8
0.016 5.5 5.7
Kidneys
0.011 0.008 3.9
0.023 2.9 8.3
Spleen
0.009 0.011 3.1
0.006 3.8 2.2
Brain
35,047 34,467
36,779 Lungs
5 days 1 day
1 hour Preserved
organs
% of lungs ng/organ
% of lungs ng/organ
% of lungs ng/organ
Retained europium oxide per organ - means (n=3)
1 hr after end of exposure: 36.8 µg in lungs = approx. 90% of the amount predicted by the MPPD model.
Eu2O3 nanoparticles within lung lining fluid Eu2O3nanoparticles within lung lining
Zusammenfassung
Agglomeratstatus Suspension
• Herstellung nanoskaliger wäßriger Suspensionen aus den Bulk-Materialien Æ hoher mechanischer/energetischer Aufwand sowie Hilfsstoffe nötig
• Nanopartikel mit hydrophober Oberfläche sind im Lungenmilieu stabiler als gleiche mit hydrophiler Oberfläche (Beispiel: TiO2 P25 – TiO2 T805)
Agglomeratstatus Zellen/Lunge
• Nanoskalige Partikel zeigten bei Wechselwirkung mit Zellen (in vitro) oder nach Deposition im Respirationstrakt (in vivo) vorherrschend eine Tendenz zur Bildung größerer
Agglomerate.
• Umgekehrt war ein Agglomeratzerfall nur von geringer Relevanz.
Danke !
¾
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA) Dr. B. Orthen, Prof. T. Gebel
Allen beteiligten Mitarbeiter/innen
am Fraunhofer ITEM
Projektausschreibung
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA)
Forschungsprojekt F2246:
Toxische Wirkungen verschiedener Modifikationen eines Nanopartikel nach Inhalation
Vergleich dreier nanoskaliger Titandioxide im 28-Tage Test
Vergleich dreier nanoskaliger Titandioxide im 28-Tage Test
600 g Anatas/
Rutil 80/20 TiO2P25 vom
freien Markt;
charakterisiert von EU
hydrophilic
unbehandelt 60
22 NM-105
600 g Rutil
UV TITAN M262 hydrophilic
Glycerin 60
20 NM-104
600 g Rutil
UV TITAN M212 hydrophobic
Dimethicone (Silikon) 60
20 NM-103
Bestand im ITEM Modifikation
Name Oberfläche
modifiziert mit:
Spez. Oberfläche (m2/g)
PPD (nm) EU/JRC-
Name
TiO2Proben; charakterisiert und bereitgestellt von der EU Kommission/JRC (Ch. Klein), jeweils Flaschen von 20 ml Volumen, Argon-befüllt, for "in vitro and single use" zu 2 g
Vergleich dreier nanoskaliger Titandioxide im 28-Tage Test
Design
• Phys.-chem. Charakterisierung, Agglomeratverhalten
• in vitro: Agglomeratverhalten, Zytotoxizität
• in vivo: Pilottest
• in vivo: 28-Tage Inhalationstest
- Zeitpunkte: 1, 45 und 90 Tage nach Expositionsende - Orientierung an OECD 412
- Histopathologie
- Partikelretention in der Lunge - TEM-Analysen