• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Mathematics for linguists

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Mathematics for linguists"

Copied!
8
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Gerhard J¨ager

gerhard.jaeger@uni-tuebingen.de

Uni T¨ubingen, WS 2009/2010

November 5, 2009

(2)

Weak orderings

A relationR is a weak ordering iff R is

transitive,

reflexive, and

anti-symmetric

Strict ordering

A relationR is a strict orderings iff R is

transitive,

irreflexive, and

(3)

Examples:

A={a, b, c, d}

R1={ha, bi,ha, ci,ha, di,hb, ci,ha, ai,hb, bi,hc, ci,hd, di}

R2={hb, ai,hb, bi,ha, ai,hc, ci,hd, di,hc, bi,hc, ai}

R3=

{hd, ci,hd, bi,hd, ai,hc, bi,hc, ai,ha, ai,hb, bi,hc, ci,hd, di,hb, ai}

corresponding strict orderings:

S1 ={ha, bi,ha, ci,ha, di,hb, ci}

S2 ={hb, ai,hc, bi,hc, ai}

S3 ={hd, ci,hd, bi,hd, ai,hc, bi,hc, ai,hb, ai}

(4)

A weak orderingR⊆A×A and a strict ordering S correspond to each other iff

R=S∪idA

further examples:

and< N×N

and are subsets of ℘(A)×℘(A)

(5)

Terminology

LetR be an ordering (strict or weak).

ais a predecessor ofb iff R(a, b).

ais a successor of biff R(b, a).

ais a immediate predecessor ofb iff

a6=b,

R(a, b), and

there is noc6∈ {a, b} such thatR(a, c)andR(c, b).

ais an immediate successor ofb iff bis an immediate predecessor ofa.

(6)

LetR⊆A×Abe an ordering (strict or weak).

An element x∈A isminimal iff there is noy 6=x which is a predecessor ofx.

An element x∈A isleast iff x is the predecessor of all other elements of A.

An element x∈A ismaximal iff there is noy 6=x which is a successor of x.

An element x∈A isgreatest iff x is the sucessor of all other elements of A.

An ordering has at most one least and at most one greatest element, but ther may be any number of minimal or maximal

(7)

Linear ordering

An ordering islinear(or total) iff it is connected.

If an orderingR is not linear, there are two elementsa andbsuch that neitherR(a, b)norR(b, a). The ordering is thus not complete, but partial.

(8)

further kinds of orderings:

An orderingRA×Aiswell-foundediff every restriction R(B×B)to a subsetBAcontains a minimal element.

To put it another way: a well-founded ordering does not have infinitely descending branches.

An orderingRA×Aisdense iff for any pair of elementsx andywithR(x, y), there is a third elementz, which differs fromxandy, such thatR(x, z)andR(z, y).

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Prove: Let CP(R, G) be defined as the set of critical pairs regarding R and the set of equations G oriented in both ways?. If R is left-linear, then the following statements

Fülle die freien Felder mit den richtigen Termen aus, wie im Beispiel vorgegeben.. Hinweis: Es kommen

Fülle die freien Felder mit den richtigen Termen aus, wie im Beispiel vorgegeben.. Hinweis: Es kommen

Übungsblatt..

[r]

Let ϕ(S, R, x) be a first-order formula over the signature ¯ τ ∪ {R, S} such that R and S occur only positively (i.e. in the scope of an even number of negations) in ϕ and such that

Let Φ PA be the axiom system of Peano arithmetic and let Cons Φ PA be the formula that expresses the consistency of Φ PA (as defined in

Mathematische Grundlagen der Informatik RWTH