• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Daniel Grumiller March 10th 2021

Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II

(2.1) Jordan block structure in AdS3/log CFT2

Prove that the Hamiltonian H = L0 + ¯L0 = i∂t has a Jordan block structure in the CFT dual to critical topologically massive gravity when acting on the pair of logarithmic mode (ψlog) and left-moving quasi- primary (ψL) with SL(2) weights (2,0). (notation alert: L0,L¯0 are the Virasoro zero modes)

(2.2) QNEC2 constraint on entanglement with kink

Assume that entanglement entropy (expressed as a function of the size of the entangling interval) in a (relativistic, unitary) QFT2 has a kink, meaning that it is continuous, but has at least one point where its first derivative jumps. Prove that the QNEC2 inequality implies an inequality for the slopes on the left and right sides of the kink.

(2.3) Domain walls and holographic RG flow Consider an AdS3 domain wall metric

ds2 = dρ2+e2A(ρ) −dt2+ dx2

that models an RG flow from the UV (ρ→ ∞) to the IR (ρ → −∞), in the sense that this geometry can be dual to the ground state of a QFT2. Show that this metric has the expected Killing vectors and deduce conditions on the functionA(ρ) such that the domain wall really can describe an RG flow between CFT2 fixed points in the UV and IR.

These exercises are due on April 13th 2021.

(2)

Hints/comments:

• If you exploit the result announced in the lectures, ψlog = −2(it + ln coshρ)ψL and recall what it means for ψL to have SL(2) weights (2,0) then this exercise is not much longer than a 2×2 matrix. You should find (21) in 1302.0280.

• Recall the QNEC2 inequality

2πhT++i ≥ d2S(λ, L+λ) dλ2

λ=0

+ 6 c

dS(λ, L+λ) dλ

λ=0

2

and make a suitable ansatz for EE to acommodate the kink. Before calculating, think what a kink, i.e., a term of the form xθ(x), will generate on the right hand side of QNEC, and you will be half there.

Try to answer this question first without cheating, but if you must, feel free to have a look at 2007.10367.

• For the first part ask yourself: which Killing vectors should you expect if this geometry is supposed to be dual to the ground state of a QFT2? For the second part ask yourself: what do you know about monotonicity properties inherent to an RG flow and in particular about the relation between UV and IR values of the central charge? Then recall that at a fixed point the central charge is given by the Brown–Henneaux value, c= 3`/(2G), where ` is the AdS radius and G Newton’s constant and note that you can relate the AdS-radius to the function A(ρ). There is not much you need to calculate.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

For the second part you can either use the analogy to special relativity in four spacetime di- mensions (only one sign changes as compared to special relatvity) and directly write

[For cross- checks: your result for the number of asymptotic Killing vectors should be infinitely many for (a) and six for (b).] If you carefully did part (b) you should have some

Then verify for each of the three cases which of the Killing vectors preserve the asymptotic form of the dilaton field, L ξ X = O(δX), where δX denotes the allowed fluctua- tions of

Thus, the most general ansatz for a central extension of the 2+1 dimensional Galilei algebra should lead you to five candidates for non-trivial central extensions, four of which

In particular, establish a holographic dictionary relating the number N of Majorana fermions, the coupling strength J , the Goldstone bosons, the asymp- totic symmetries and

It is a general feature of Chern–Simons theories that for relaxed boundary conditions where all generators contain functions that are allowed to fluctuate the resulting

(The other sector is analogous, up to sign changes, and does not need to be considered here.) Derive the canonical boundary charges and their asymptotic symmetry algebra..

If you additionally recall the Penrose di- agram of BTZ you can again make a shortcut, just by declaring the locus r = r + to be your asymptotic boundary and omitting the regions