• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Daniel Grumiller May 19th 2021

Gravity and holography in lower dimensions II

(10.1) Flat space holography in two bulk dimensions

Consider a 2d dilaton gravity model with vanishing kinetic potential U(X) = 0 and constant self-interaction potential V(X) = Λ. Af- ter showing that all classical solutions are locally Ricci-flat, derive the asymptotic Killing vectors for the boundary conditions

ds2 =−2 dudr+ 2 P(u)r+T(u) du2

where δP 6= 0 6= T and check how the two state-dependent functions P and T transform under these asymptotic Killing vectors.

(10.2) Flat space holography in three bulk dimensions Take a scaling limit of a rotating BTZ black hole metric ds2BTZ =−(r2−r2+)(r2−r2)

`2r2 dt2+ `2r2 dr2

(r2−r+2)(r2−r2)+r2

dϕ−r+r

`r2 dt2

where you keep fixed the inner horizon and rescale the outer horizon r+ = `ˆr+ with the AdS-radius `. Then take the limit ` → ∞ and study the resulting metric. In particular, show that this metric is Ricci flat (and hence solves flat space Einstein gravity) and construct the associated Penrose diagram (or rather, a 2d slice thereof). Are these geometries stationary in the asymptotic region? Do they describe black holes? [And if not, what else do they describe?]

(10.3) Flat space holography in arbitrary dimensions?

There are more than 16,000 papers quoting Maldacena’s seminal work on AdS/CFT. Perhaps it is possible take the limit of infinite AdS radius (like in the previous exercise) to all these papers, thereby establishing a flat space holographic dictionary. Discuss the possible prospects and challenges for such a research program.

These exercises are due on June 8th 2021.

(2)

Hints/comments:

• You should find the asymptotic Killing vectors ξ=(u)∂u−(0(u)r+ η(u))∂r and the transformation laws δξP =P0 +0P +00 and δξT = T0+ 20T +η0−ηP.

• If you recall how ` entered in the equations of motion it is straightfor- ward to show that your limiting metric must obey Rµν = 0, without actually having to calculate the Ricci tensor (though doing so explic- itly also works, of course). If you additionally recall the Penrose di- agram of BTZ you can again make a shortcut, just by declaring the locusr=r+ to be your asymptotic boundary and omitting the regions where r > r+ from your diagram (an explicit construction of the Pen- rose diagram using conformal compactification also works). Regarding the final questions simply calculate the asymptotic norm of the Killing vector ∂t and make sure to remember the precise definition of a black hole.

• I leave this to you, but let me add five random remarks (that you need not consider, but you can).

1. The conformal group is finite dimensional in higher dimensions, while the BMS group is infinite dimensional in any dimension.

2. Taking the naive limit ` → ∞ in a Fefferman–Graham expansion produces nonsense, but you can exploit diffeos before any limits.

3. There are different ways you might think about the dual field theory, depending on where you want to put it (I+, I,i0,i+, and/or i) 4. In asymptotically flat spacetimes we do already have a nice set of observables, namely S-matrix elements.

5. Flat space is not just the limit of AdS for vanishing cosmological constant, but also of dS.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

For the second part you can either use the analogy to special relativity in four spacetime di- mensions (only one sign changes as compared to special relatvity) and directly write

[For cross- checks: your result for the number of asymptotic Killing vectors should be infinitely many for (a) and six for (b).] If you carefully did part (b) you should have some

~ = 1) to deduce the length dimension of ψ, and then write down all the terms that are powers of ¯ ψψ and have either coupling constants that are dimensionless (these are the

Then verify for each of the three cases which of the Killing vectors preserve the asymptotic form of the dilaton field, L ξ X = O(δX), where δX denotes the allowed fluctua- tions of

Thus, the most general ansatz for a central extension of the 2+1 dimensional Galilei algebra should lead you to five candidates for non-trivial central extensions, four of which

In particular, establish a holographic dictionary relating the number N of Majorana fermions, the coupling strength J , the Goldstone bosons, the asymp- totic symmetries and

It is a general feature of Chern–Simons theories that for relaxed boundary conditions where all generators contain functions that are allowed to fluctuate the resulting

(The other sector is analogous, up to sign changes, and does not need to be considered here.) Derive the canonical boundary charges and their asymptotic symmetry algebra..