• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Peter K¨ ohler

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Peter K¨ ohler"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Center for Environmental Systems Research

Peter K¨ ohler

, Thomas Ditzer

, Reinhold Glauner

§

, Andreas Huth

*: Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, D-34109 Kassel, Germany, email: koehler@usf.uni-kassel.de

§: Institute for World Forestry, Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Leuschnerstr. 91, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany

Introduction

Orang Utan dispersing/predating seeds.

Timber harvest in tropical forests is a widely discussed topic for its impacts on deforestation and land conversion. As log- ging techniques and cycles vary, damages to the residual forest underly dramatic changes. Beside its function as global sink for carbon dioxide a logged-over for- est following practises of reduced-impact logging is also expected to increase eco- nomic profit compared to a conventional logged forest. Other studies show convinc- ingly that only economic profit will lead to conservation and sustainable practises. In this context, criteria for sustainability and ecological certification of timber wood are subject of much current debate. Comput- erised simulation models aiming to esti- mate growth and yield of tropical rain for- est should become a useful tool to broaden this discussion.

In this study we use the rain forest growth model Formind2.0 for analysing the ef- fect of various recruitment scenarios and different logging strategies on forest dy- namics. Is there an optimal combination of the logging parameters (strategy, cycle length, recruitment assumptions) which maximise yields and minimise changes in the forest structure?

The model Formind

Formind2.0 is an individual-oriented process-based forest growth model to sim- ulate the spatio-temporal dynamics of uneven-aged mixed forest stands. For complete model description of current ver- sion please refer to literature (K¨ohler and Huth, 1998; Kammesheidtet al. , 2000).

The model describes forest dynamics as a mosaic of interacting forest gaps of 20 m2×20 m2 in size. Within these plots trees are not spatial-explicit dis- tributed, and thus all compete for light and space following the gap model ap- proach. The carbon balance of each in- dividual tree incl. photosynthesis and res- piration is modelled explicitly. Thus, we can match measured diameter incre- ment for different PFT, size and light conditions accurately. Allometric rela- tionships connect above-ground biomass, stem diameter, tree height and crown di- mensions. Details of growth processes are taken from related model Formix3- Q (Ditzer et al. , 2000). Beside increas- ing mortality through self-tinning in dense plots one of the main processes of mortal- ity is gap creation by falling of large trees.

This process as well as seed dispersal from mature trees interlinks neighbouring plots with each other. Seed production rates of mature trees are effective rates regard- ing recruitment of seedling at a diameter threshold of 1 cm, where seed loss through predation is already incorporated.

Species grouping

We simulate forest dynamics for a dipte- rocarp lowland rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia.

Mortality i+1

i+2 Respiration

Tree physiognomy

Cohort i Photoproduction

Biomass

Tree number

new cohorts Competition for Light

Recruitment of Seedlings

Interactions inFormind2.0. Main variables, processes within individuals,

andinteracting processes.

468 shrub and tree species of that area were assigned to 13 different plant functional types (PFT) based on their successional status (early, mid, late) and maximum height at maturity (shrubs, understorey, lower canopy, upper canopy, emergents). Species list avail- able at http://www.usf.uni-kassel.de/

usf/archiv/dokumente.en.htm. (K¨ohler et al. , 2000).

Recruitment scenarios

As former versions of the model were based on a recruitment scenario with con- stant input of seeds into a seed pool (SP: seed pool), independing on stand- ing trees, we analyse the effect of those simplifications on model results. Alter- natively input of new seeds into a seed pool depends on local mother trees of each PFT of a certain size (ST: seed tree). Three intermediate scenarios (MS:

mixed seeds) are included in the analy- sis. Ecological meaning of ST might be a highly fragmented forest with recruitment depending on local production, whereas in SP simulation area might be embedded in a large intact forest area with unaltered seed dispersal.

ST MS1 MS2 MS3 SP Recruitment scenario 0

20 40 60 80 100

Localreruitment[%]

100 80 60 40 20 0

Constantinput[%]

Definition of recruitment scenarios.

Logging scenario

We distinguished reduced impact (RIL) and conventional logging (CON). Both differ in damages to residual stand as shown in figure and table. Only trees of mid and late successional species with a diameter d ≥ 60 cm are logged. Cycles length between 20 and 80 years were anal- ysed.

4: Area loss 1: Felling 3: Skidding

5: Mortality

Impact of different logging scenarios on forest. Damages depend on area position

within forest.

Impact of different logging scenarios on forest.

Effects RIL CON

1 Felling damage ∼crownsize 2 Felling direction gaps random 3 Skidding damage 25% 55%

4 Area loss 12% 33%

5 Mortality 10yr after ×2 ×3

Results

Surprisingly, recruitment assumptions do not influence quantity of harvest yields, but its quality as species composition is biased towards mid successional species in seed tree scenarios. Yield were maximised in long logging cycles and reduced impact logging strategy. Some examples of forest dynamics of shown in following figures.

0 100 200 300 400 500

Seed tree Mixed seeds 2 Seed pool

20y RIL

0 100 200 300 400 500

80y RIL

0 100 200 300 400 500

Bolevolume[m3 ha-1 ]

20y CON

0 100 200 0

100 200 300 400 500

0 100 200 Time [y]

0 100 200 80y CON

Development of bole volume (m3 ha−1) for different scenarios. Simulation of 9 ha over 240 y (n=5) of logged forest. Variation of logging cycle (20 y; 80 y), strategy (RIL:

reduced impact; CON: conventional) and recruitment scenarios (seed tree; mixed seeds 2; seed pool). Total, early successional spp., mid-successional spp.,late

successional spp.

It is not clear if and how seed dispersal will alter in response to high fractions of early successional species as seen in most conventional scenarios. Habitats of most animals acting as seed dispersers or predators are altered and their futures are uncertain. Thus, we understand our results as very optimistic.

Simple relationships of logging impacts as function of logging intensity emerge from analysis. They are easily comparable with field data and validate our analysis as reasonable. Furthermore, they are a practical tool for estimating impacts of human disturbances on residual forests.

0 2 4 6 8 10 0

20 40 60 80 100

Basalarea[%]

residuals

... ... . . . ...

. . ... ... ... . .. .. . . ....

. . . .. . . . ... ...

. .. .... ... ..

. .... . . ... ... ...... .... .... .... .............

. . .. .. ... .. ....

. ...... .. ... .... ..... . .. .. . ....... . . ... ...... .

. . .... ....

. ...

.. .... ..

... .. ..... ......... ...... . . .. .. . ..... . . .... .... .... .. ..... .. .. .

. . .. .... .

. ... .... . .. ... ... .

. .... ..... ... .. ... .

. .... ... .... . . ...... .. ..... ..... .... . ... ...

......

. .. . .. ... . ...... .

.. .... ..... .. .. ..... .. .. . . ..........

. .... .....

. . . .... . ...... ......... . .

. . ... . ..... . ....... .. .. . .... ... . .. . .. ..

. .. ........ . .. .......

....... . . ...... . . . .. . . .....

. ... .... . ...

. .. . .... . .. . ... .. ...

. .. . . ..... . . . . .... . ..... ....... . y=83.3-3.2x; r2=98.4%

y=70.7-5.1x; r2=85.2%

0 2 4 6 8 10

Basal area removed [m

2

ha

-1

] damaged

.. .. . .. .... .. . . ... ... ... .... .. .. ...... ....... . ...

. .. . .. . ... . ... ... . ... .... .. . .. ... .. ... .. ... .. . ... ... . ... ... .. .... . ... .. ..... ....... .... ... ..... . .. . ... .. ..... .. ........... .... .. ... .... . .... .......... ...... ... . . ..... .................. ............ .. ........... .................... .... . . ..... . .. . .. .. ... ..... .... ... ... . ... ..... .. ... .. ...... ..... ...... .. ... ...... .. ... ...... ... .... ... .... .. ... ........ .. . ..... .. ..... .. ... .... ............ . ......... .... .. ..... . .... . .... .. .. . .... . .. .... .......... ... . . ..... ... .............. ... . ........... ...... .. .. . .. ... ..... ............ .... . .... ... ...... .. . .. ......... ..... y=15.9+0.7x; r2=77.9%

y=28.0+2.6x; r2=77.8%

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 logged

.. .. . .. .... .. . . ... ... ... .

.. .. . ....

. . . .. . . . ... ... .

. .. .... .. .. . ... ... .... ...... ... ..... ... .. .... ............... ........ ..... .

.. . ...

.. . .

.. ....... . .. .. . ...... . . . ... ... ... .

. . .... ... .. ... .... .. .... .. .. ...... ........ ... .. ... .. . ........ . .. .... ... ...

.. .. .. ..... .. . . . . .... . . . . .. ....... . .. ... ...... .

.. ... ..... .. .. ... ...... .... ... .... .. ..... .. .. ... .... . ... .... .......... ...... . . ..... ..

.. .. ....... . .. .. .... .. . . . . ... ...... .

.. ... ... ... . . . ... . .. . ..... .. ... ... . ............. . .. . .... .... .. ... ... . .. . .. . . .

. .. ........ . . ... ....... . .. ......... . ...... .. . . ..

. ...... .. ... .. ... .... .... .. ..... ...... . .. ..... ... . . .... .......... .

. ...

y=0.6+2.6x; r2=99.7%

Effects of different logging strategy (reduced impact, conventional) and intensity on the forest structure. Basal area (residuals, damaged, logged) as function of removed

basal area.

Conclusions

Formind2.0is able to analyse various logging strategies with respect to their impacts on residual rain forest. Reduced impact logging strategies with cycles length of 80 years gained highest timber yields. However, in highly fragmented landscapes long term recruitment of most tree species is questionable. As recruitment is important for species composition large disturbances of any kind threaten late successional tree species with extinction.

References

Ditzer, T., Glauner, R., F¨orster, M., K¨ohler, P., and Huth, A., 2000. The process-based stand growth model FORMIX3-Q applied in a GIS-environment for growth and yield analysis in a tropical rain forest. Tree Physiology, 20, 367–381.

Kammesheidt, L., K¨ohler, P., and Huth, A., 2000. Sustainable timber harvesting in Venezuela: a modelling approach.

Journal of Applied Ecology, in press.

ohler, P., Ditzer, T., and Huth, A., 2000. Concepts for the aggregation of tropical tree species into functional types and the application on Sabah’s lowland rain forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16(4), in press.

ohler, P. and Huth, A., 1998. The effect of tree species grouping in tropical rain forest modelling - Simulation with the individual based model FORMIND. Ecological Modelling, 109(3), 301–321.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

We investigated how three microbial groups (bacteria, fungi, protists), alone and in full- factorial combinations, affect plant performance and potential growth–defence relationships

Hydroporus umbrosus Hygrotus inaequalis Hyphydrus ovatus Ilybius ater Ilybius crassus Ilybius fenestratus Ilybius guttiger Nartus grapii Noterus crassicornis Rhantus exsoletus

Table 2.2 Net Impact of Bt on Cotton Yield and Profit per Acre 35 Table 2.3 Net Impact of Bt on Household Living Standard 38 Table 3.1 Maize Hybrids Released by the

The graphs represented the mean values of radicle protrusion, full germination, hypocotyl length and infected seeds percentage of DH Sollux x Gaoyou from seed germination test

Für alle Arbeiten muß das Gerät am Traktor angebaut sein. Traktor abstellen und Zündschlüssel

In line with the Code of Conduct of the International Plant Exchange Network (IPEN), of which Rostock Botanical Garden is a member, the following conditions apply to this

In the Lauson chronosequence, after 65 years since deglaciation, vegetation cover increased due to the additive contribution of the alpine grassland species that partially

Anecdotal as well as experimental evidence suggest that some non-host cereal species, such as oats (Avena sativa) and maize (Zea mays), can induce germination in