• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Tumor Mechanism

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Tumor Mechanism"

Copied!
4
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

INFECTION ANDIMMUNITY, May 1979,p.573-576

0019-9567/79/05-0573/04$02.00/0 Vol.24, No. 2

Mechanism of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Tumor Necrosis:

Requirement for Lipopolysaccharide-Sensitive Lymphoreticular Cells

DANIELA N. MANNEL, DAVIDL. ROSENSTREICH, AND STEPHAN E. MERGENHAGEN*

Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Received for publication 5 February 1979

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces rapid necrosis of intradermal fibrosarcomas in mice. The mechanism(s) by which LPS produces tumor necrosis has been investigatedusinghistocompatible LPS-sensitive (C3H/HeN) and LPS-resistant (C3H/HeJ)mouse strains.C3H/HeN-or C3H/HeJ-derivedfibrosarcomas were necrotized byLPS whenthey were grafted onto C3H/HeN mice but were not affected when growing on C3H/HeJ mice, indicating that LPS does not act directly on the tumor itself. In contrast, lethally X-irradiated C3H/HeJ mice exhibitnecrosis of theirtumorswhen reconstituted with C3H/HeN bone marrow cells,whereasC3H/HeN micenolongerexertLPS-induced tumor necrosis after the adoptive transfer of C3H/HeJ bone marrow cells. These findings clearly indicate that LPS produces necrosisof tumors by activatinghost lymphoreticular cells.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin)-induced tumornecrosis isawwell-known phenomenon (8, 13, 16), but the mechanisms) by which this effect is mediated isnotwell understood. It has been suggested that LPS acts directly on the tumorcells (5) orthat necrosis is due to vaso- constriction and intravascular coaggulation withinthetumor (1). Morerecently it has been reported that LPS induces the release ofa tumor necrosis factor frommacrophagesinvivo(7, 10).

Thisfindingaswellasotherssuggeststhat LPS exerts aninfluenceontumorsbytheproduction ofhumoralmediators(6).

C3H/HeJ miceareresistanttoall known ef- fects ofLPS,whereas theclosely related,histo- compatible C3H/HeNmousestrain is LPSsen- sitive. Inaddition, it ispossibletorenderC3H/

HeJ mice sensitivetoLPSbytheadoptivetrans- fer of C3H/HeN spleen or bone marrow cells and renderC3H/HeNmiceLPS resistantbythe reciprocaltransfer(9, 14).UsingC3H/HeJmice and theadoptivetransfer model system,wehave investigated the mechanism by which LPS in- duces tumor necrosis. Our data suggest that LPS does not act directly onthe tumor cells or on

the hostvasculature. Instead, our findings are

consistent with the hypothesis that LPS me-

diates tumor necrosis solely by an effect on

lymphoreticularcells.

Female mice, 6to 12 weeks ofage, were ob- tained from the Division ofResearch Services, National Institutes of Health (C3H/HeN) and

from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine(C3H/HeJ).Escherichia coli K-235 LPS was prepared by the phenol-water extraction method of McIntire et al. (11). Bone marrow cellswereobtained by gently grinding and then rinsing femurs and tibiae of the donor mice in cold RPMI medium (GIBCO Laboratories, Grand Island, N.Y.). Bone fragments were re- movedby allowing themtosettle for5min; the cells were washed and then suspended in me- diumto aconcentration of10i cellsperml. Cell viability exceeded 90% as determined by the exclusion oftrypanbluedye.Mice received850 R of X-irradiation andwerereconstituted within 6 h by tail vein injection of 107 bone marrow cells. Four weeks afterreconstitution, the mice wereused in thetumorexperiments.In astudy tobereportedseparately,850R of X-irradiation completely abrogated the ability of these mice toformspleniccolony-forming units (Michalek etal., manuscriptinpreparation).

Tumors (fibrosarcomas) were inducedbyin- jecting miceintradermally with1mgof 3-meth- ylcholanthrenein0.2ml oftrioctanoin(tricapry- lin; Sigma ChemicalCo.,St.Louis, Mo.)onboth sidesof theback.Fortumorpassage,solidpieces were inoculated subcutaneously as previously described (2). Experimental tumors were in- duced byinoculating single tumor cell suspen- sions which were obtainedfromminced tumor

fragments by enzymatic digestion (2). Tumor cells(106)wereinjectedintradermally,andafter

573

(2)

574 NOTES

14 days the mice with tumors (7 ± 1 mm in diameter) were injected intraperitoneally with 50 Mig of LPS. Tumor necrosis was determined by visualinspection ondays 1, 3, 5,and 7. The results on day 3 are reported because the ne- crotic response did not change later on. Only tumorswith >25% necrosis of the surfacewere scored as positive. In certain experiments, an established fibrosarcoma(tumor 1023) was used that had been induced in a C3H/HeIcr male mouse (12). All statistical analyses were per- formedusingthe Fischertest(4).

To determine if the derivation of thetumor from either endotoxin-sensitive or -resistant mice wouldinfluence itssensitivity to LPS-in- duced necrosis in vivo, tumors were induced with methylcholanthrene in C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice and then tested in both C3H/

HeNandC3H/HeJ hostsfor their LPSsensitiv- ity. AC3H/HeN (LPS-sensitive)-derivedtumor wasnecrotized in >70% (11/15) of the animals afterinjection of50 ug of LPS when carriedon theendotoxin-sensitiveC3H/HeNmousestrain;

only 7% (1/14) of the tumorswerenecrotizedon

C3H/HeJ mice (P<0.001; controltumor-bear- ing mice of both strains, injected with saline, showed no necrosis[0/5 for eachstrain]). Ina similartype of experiment employing a trans- planted C3H/HeJ (LPS-resistant)-derived tu- mor,again >60% (5/8) of the endotoxin-sensitive mice (C3H/HeN) showed tumor necrosis afterinjection of50,ugofLPS,whereasnoneof thetumors (0/7) on endotoxin-resistant (C3H/

HeJ) mice developed necrosis (P< 0.02;in sa- line-injected controls,0/5ofC3H/HeN and1/4 ofC3H/HeJ mice showed necrosis). To deter- mine if theinability of C3H/HeJ miceto necrose transplanted tumors was due to an abnormal tumorgrowthpatterninthese mice, thegrowth curvesofatumorderived from a LPS-sensitive mouse were comparedin C3H/HeN and C3H/

HeJmice.The growth curves of the 1023 (C3H/

HeIcr) fibrosarcomaafter intradermal injection ofC3H/HeJandC3H/HeN mice with106cells do not show any difference in growth rates of this tumor ineither group of mice (Fig. 1). These experiments indicate that the origin of the tumor doesnotinfluenceitssusceptibilityto endotoxin- inducednecrosis and also suggest that LPS does not actdirectlyon thetumor itself.

Sincetheabilitytonecrotize tumors with LPS is dependent upon the LPS sensitivity of the host and not on the origin of the tumor, we attemptedto alter hostsensitivity to LPS by X- irradiation andreconstitution of the irradiated recipient with bone marrow cells from either LPS responder ornonresponder mice. The re- sults obtained with these chimeric mice are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The transfer of 107

10e

g_-

E -8W

w 7-

2B 61-

cr0 2 5L~

4

j

30 L

&C3H/HeN

0C3H/HeJ

5 10 15

GROWTHTIME(Days)

20 FIG. 1. Growth rate curvesoffibrosarcoma1023in C3H/HeNandC3H/HeJmice. Atotalof106tumor cells in 0.05mlofRPMI1640 wereinjectedintrader- mally on day0 in the backsofthe animals. Each pointrepresentsthemean tumordiameter±standard errordeterminedfromagroupof30animals.

TABLE 1. SusceptibilityofaC3H/HeN-derived fibrosarcomatoLPS-induced necrosis when implantedinC3H/HeN,C3H/HeJ,andchimeric

mice

Mice with Source of ncoi

bonemarrow

tumotc/

p

Recipient' forreconstitu- tota m"

tin total mice

injected'

C3H/HeJ 2/14

C3H/HeJx C3H/HeJ 2/12 <0.001 C3H/HeJx C3H/HeN 15/16

C3H/HeN 11/15

C3H/HeNx C3H/HeN 18/19 <0.001 C3H/HeNx C3H/HeJ 5/29

a Subscript X denotes recipient

animals

that re- ceived 850 R of X-irradiation before reconstitution with107bonemarrowcells.

b Necrotic response determined onday3after LPS (50jg)injection.

'Datacombined fromtwoseparateexperiments.

bone marrow cells from LPS responder mice (C3H/HeN) to irradiated C3H/HeJ mice ren- dered the latter (>90%) susceptible to the tu- mor-necrotizing influence of LPS when en- grafted with either the C3H/HeJ-orC3H/HeN- derived fibrosarcoma. Reconstitution with au- tologous bone marrow cells did not alter the responsive state of the host. On the other hand, C3H/HeNmicecould be rendered almost totally nonresponsive to tumor necrosis with LPS by adoptive transfer of C3H/HeJ bone marrow cells, since only 11 to 20% of these chimeras exhibited LPS-induced tumornecrosis when en- graftedwith either type oftumor. Thus, adop- tively transferredbone marrow cells caused sig- INFECT. IMMUN.

(3)

NOTES 575

TABLE 2. SusceptibilityofaC3H/HeJ-derived fibrosarcoma to LPS-induced necrosis when implantedinC3H/HeN, C3H/HeJ,andchimeric

mice

Mice with

Source of ncoi

bone marrow tumorsic

Recipients forreconstitu- tumors/ p tin total mice tion injected"

C3H/HeJ 0/15

C3H/HeJx C3H/HeJ 2/10 <0.004

C3H/HeJx C3H/HeN 6/6

C3H/HeN 10/11

C3H/HeNx C3H/HeN 3/4 <0.09

C3H/HeNx C3H/HeJ 2/10

aSubscript X denotes recipient animals that re- ceived 850 R of X-irradiation before reconstitution with 107bone marrowcells.

bInjected with50ILgof LPS.

nificantchanges in the in vivo response of tumor- bearing mice to the necrotizing effect of endo- toxin. These data demonstrate that the tumor itselfdoes not need to be LPS sensitive to be necrosed, which is strong evidence against a direct necrotic effect ofLPS on the tumor. In addition, sinceit is extremely unlikely that the processofX-irradiation and bone marrow recon- stitution wouldsignificantly alter the endothelial cells of the host, our findings argue against a directeffect of LPS onthe tumorvasculature.

Finally, since there isnoevidence foranydefect inLPS-induced complement activation in C3H/

HeJmice, it isunlikely that LPS-inducedtumor necrosis is mediated via the complementsystem.

Therefore, the finding that adoptive transfer of bonemarrowcells transfers theability of donor cellstomediatetumornecrosisstronglysuggests thatLPSacts on somebone marrow-derivedcell type toinducetumornecrosis. Theprecisecell(s) and its mechanism of action remain unclear.

However, the data ofCarswelletal. (7) indicate that after BCG infection and endotoxin chal- lenge macrophages release asoluble tumor ne- crosis factor that exerts a cytotoxic effect on tumor cells in vivo and in vitro. Macrophages canalso be activatedby LPStokilltumorcells in vitro bya mechanism thatrequirescell-cell contact(15).Thus,there existatleasttwopath- ways by which LPS can initiate macrophage- mediated tumor necrosis. In addition, it has recently been reported that LPS-mediated tu- mor graft rejection requires a radiosensitive lymphoid cell (3). Therefore, itisnotyet clear whether othermacrophage-related mechanisms and/or lymphoid cells are involved. However, ourdatastronglysuggest that there isan essen- tialrequirementforlymphoreticularcellsinthe initiation ofLPS-inducedtumornecrosis.

We have now demonstrated that C3H/HeJ micecanbe rendered sensitive to a number of diverse LPS-induced events including lethality (9) (Michaleketal.,manuscript in preparation), productionofserumamyloid-associated protein (14), interferon production (Michalek et al., manuscript inpreparation), andtumornecrosis by the adoptive transfer ofLPS-sensitive bone marrow cells. In addition, C3H/HeN mice can also be renderedresistant to all these effects by the adoptivetransfer of LPS-resistant bone mar- rowcells. Thus,there is ample evidence to sup- port thenotion that the diverse manifestations of endotoxin reactions in the susceptible host requirethe participation ofendotoxin-sensitive lymphoreticularcells andpresumably a number ofsolublemediators derived from such cells.

LITERATURE CITED

1. Algire, G. H., F. Y. Legallais, and B. F. Anderson.

1952.Vascular reactions of normal andmalignant tis- suesin vivo. V. Role of hypotension in action of bacte- rial polysaccharide on tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 12:

1279-1295.

2. Bartlett, G.L.,B. Zbar, and H. J. Rapp. 1972. Sup- pression of murine tumor growth by immune reaction tothe Bacillus Calmette-Guerin strain of Mycobacte- rium bovis. J. Natl.Cancer Inst. 48:245-257.

3. Berendt, M. J., G. F. Mezrow, and P. H. Saluk. 1978.

Requirementfor aradiosensitive lymphoid cell in the generation of lipopolysaccharide-induced rejection of a murine tumor allograft. Infect.Immun. 21:1033-1035.

4. Bliss,C.I. 1967. Fischer's exact test for 2 x2tables,p.

63-65.In C. I. Bliss (ed.), Statistics in biology, vol. 3.

McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.

5. Braun, W.1973.Immunologicandantineoplasticeffects of endotoxin: role of membranes and mediationbycyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate.J. Infect. Dis. 128:188- 197.

6. Butler,C.R.,A. M.Abdelnoot,and A.Nowotny.1978.

Bone marrowcolony-stimulatingfactor andtumor re- sistance-enhancing activity ofpost-endotoxin mouse sera.Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A.77:2893-2896.

7. Carswell,E.A., L.J.Old,R.L.Kassel,S.Green,N.

Fiore, and B. Williamson. 1975. An endotoxin in- ducedserumfactorthatcausesnecrosis oftumors.Proc.

Natl.Acad.Sci. U.S.A.72:3666-3670.

8. Galanos, C., 0. Luderitz, E. T. Rietschel, and 0.

Westphal. 1977.Newer aspects of thechemistryand biology of bacterial lipopolysaccharides, withspecial referencetotheirlipidAcomponent, p. 239-335. T. W.

Goodwin (ed.), In Biochemistry oflipids II, vol. 14.

UniversityParkPress,Baltimore.

9. Glode,LM.,S. E.Mergenhagen, and D.L. Rosen- streich.1976.Significantcontribution ofspleencells in mediatingthe lethal effects of endotoxin in vivo. Infect.

Immun.14:626-630.

10. Green,S.,A.Dobriansky,E. A.Carswell,R.L.Kas- sel,L. J.Old,N.Fiore,andM. K.Schwartz.1975.

Partialpurificationofaserumfactorthatcausesnecro-

sis oftumors.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.73:381-385.

11.McIntire, F.C., H. W.Sievert,G. H.Barlow,R. A.

Finley,and A.Y.Lee.1967.Chemical,physical,and biologicalpropertiesofalipopolysaccharidefromEsch- erichiacoliK-235.Biochemistry6:2363-2372.

12.Meltzer,M.S., R. W.Tucker,K.K.Sanford,and E.

J.Leonard. 1975.Interaction of BCG-activatedmac-

rophageswithneoplasticandnonneoplasticcell lines in vitro:prelabeledtarget cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.54:

VOL. 24,1979

(4)

576 NOTES 117-1184.

13.Parr,L,E.Wheeler, andP.Alexander. 1973. Similar- ities of the anti-tumor actions of endotoxin, lipid A and double strandedRNA. Br.J. Cancer 27:370-389.

14. Rosenstreich,D.L,and K.P. W. J.McAdam.1979.

Lymphoidcellar in endotoxin-induced production of the amyloid-relatedserumamyloid A protein. Infect. Im-

mun.23:181-183.

INFECT. IMMUN.

15.Ruco, L. P., M. S. Meltzer, and D. L. Rosenstreich.

1978. Macrophage activation for tumor cytotoxicity:

control of macrophage tumoricidal capacity by the LPS gene. J. Immunol. 121:543-548.

16. Shear, M. J. 1944. Chemical treatment of tumors. IX.

Reaction of mice with primarysubcutaneous tumors to injection of a hemorrhage-producing bacterial polysac- charide. J.Natl. Cancer Inst. 4:461-476.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

[r]

inhibitors with PARP inhibitors may enhance tumor cell cy- totoxicity by counteracting Topol activity and favoring the accumulation of SSBs and unresolved

In order to better identify the actual residues involved in the interaction between the TIP peptide within the C-terminus of ENaC-α, we have performed a molecular docking study..

Scienti fi c Knowledge on the Subject: The lectin-like domain of TNF, mimicked by the TIP peptide, improves alveolar liquid clearance (ALC) in multiple animal models of both

The ability of PMNLs to exhibit natural killer (NK) cell activity, TNF production, interleukin-1 (IL-I) production, and proliferative responses on mitogenic stimulation was

At first sight, our finding that human recombinant TNFa is not involved in the induction of seveal APP in rat hepatocytes is in contrast to the observations of Perlmutter et

Even though T N F was characterized as the endogenous mediator of endotoxin- induced tumor necrosis, it has not been possible to separate the beneficial tumor necrotic effect as

(ii) Production of tumor necrosis factor and cytotoxic serum activity were both dependent upon normal LPS responsiveness; LPS-insensi- tive C3H/HeJ mice or X-irradiated LPS-sensi-