• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Characterization of terr. organic matter transported through the Lena River Delta (NE Siberia) to its adjacent nearshore zone using lignin phenols, δ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Characterization of terr. organic matter transported through the Lena River Delta (NE Siberia) to its adjacent nearshore zone using lignin phenols, δ"

Copied!
12
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Characterization of terr. organic matter transported through the Lena River Delta (NE Siberia) to its adjacent nearshore zone

using lignin phenols, δ

13

C, and ∆

14

C

Maria Winterfeld1,2, Miguel Goñi3, Janna Just4, Jens Hefter2, Pai Han1 & Gesine Mollenhauer1,2

1Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany; 2University of Bremen, Germany;

3Oregon State University, USA; 4Marum, Germany

(2)

2  

Permafrost distribution & Arctic watersheds

Lena Delta a

ta

permafrost distribution: Brown et al., 1997

(3)

3  

Lena River catchment

strong seasonality of discharge à flood end of May/early June with

~50% of annual sediment, DOC, and POC export

Lena River

catchment size: ~2.5 x 106 km2

water discharge: 588 km3 (1999-2008) sediment export: 20.7 Tg/year

DOC export: 5.7 Tg/year POC export: 1.2 Tg/year

22. Mai 2014 (NASA, LANCE-MODIS)

26. Aug 2002

(NASA, LANCE-MODIS)

sources: Holmes et al. 2002, 2012;

Rachold & Hubberten 1999; ArcticRIMS (www.rims.unh.edu)

(4)

4  

Motivation

Sources in the Lena River catchment

Tundra Taiga

Holocene

(recent to 10 x 103 yrs)

1

2

4  

Late Pleistocene (10 to 40 x 103 yrs)

(5)

5  

Research questions

  Does the POM exported to Laptev Sea shelf reflect a watershed integrated signal?

  How big is the contribution from taiga (gymnosperms) versus tundra (angiosperms) in exported POM? Affected by

degradation?

  Can we use bulk POM 14C analysis to characterize soil-derived POM from the watershed?

  What is the soil-derived 14C signature from the Lena catchment?

1

2

plant-derived lignin phenols

POM δ13C & ∆14C

(6)

6  

Sampling locations

(7)

7  

Lignin-phenols – degradation of POM

Winterfeld et al. in review

(8)

8  

Lignin phenols – sources of POM

Winterfeld et al. in review

(9)

8  

Lignin phenols – sources of POM

~50% contribution from taiga and tundra

Winterfeld et al. in review

(10)

9  

POM ∆

14

C

4,050 yrs BP 780 yrs BP 1,730 yrs BP 2,800 yrs BP

5,500 yrs BP

14C age [years BP]

780 yrs BP 1,730 yrs BP Laptev Sea

Winterfeld & Mollenhauer in review

Lena

Delta Lena

Delta

Laptev Sea

surface water

particulate organic matter

surface sediment

particulate organic matter

14C [‰]

1,250 yrs BP -150

(11)

1950 AD

~1,730 yrs BP

~4,050 yrs BP

~7,300 yrs BP

~18,420 yrs BP

~12,930 yrs BP 1

~

~

~

~~

10   10  

POM ∆

14

C

Winterfeld & Mollenhauer in review

(12)

Conclusion

1

2

  degradation in suspended matter & surface sediments > soils à degradation of during thawing and/or transport or finer

fraction of POM

~50% contribution from gymnosperm & angiosperm à

despite tundra area only ~12% of catchment area

  estimated ∆14C of soil derived POM between –190 to –700‰

(1640 to 9720 14C years BP)

à reflects heterogeneity and age range of catchment soils more accurate than bulk POM 14C

plant-derived lignin phenols

POM δ13C & ∆14C

11  

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

To char- acterize the material discharged by the Lena River, we an- alyzed the lignin phenol composition in total suspended mat- ter (TSM) from surface water collected in spring

It is constructed using both data sets, but drawn so as to have bounded curvature (using cubic b-splines). Amplitude of the

The single (double) superscript indicates that points where the simulated results have been taken may deviate up to 40(20) km from the station positions provided by KP..

The south-eastern part of the Laptev Sea, which includes the Lena Delta region, represents a large, shallow, estuarine area with dominant depths of about 10–30 m and complex shape

Spring season with sea ice coverage 17-04-2011, MODIS max. Petersburg), Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research, Arctic and Antarctic

Simulations use optimal boundary conditions (with corrections). Simulations are driven by the ECMWF forcing with a) and without c) the freshwater forcing caused

In Figure 5.5, simulation results of a model run using measured water surface temperatures as the upper boundary condition are shown and therefore snow cover and

Brown et al., 1997 Hugelius et al., 2014.. Sampling locations Sampling locations.