• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Small Lake -Large Impact?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Small Lake -Large Impact?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

References:

Lenz J, Jones BM, Wetterich S, Tjallingii R, Fritz M, Arp CD, Rudaya N, Grosse G (2016). Impacts of shore expansion and catchment characteristics on lacustrine thermokarst records in permafrost lowlands, Alaska Arctic Coastal Plain. Arktos, 2 (25), 1-15.

Sediment data of this study on PANGAEA: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41063-016-0025-0

Meyers PA and Lallier-Verges E (1999).Lacustrine sedimentary organic matter records of Late Quaternary paleoclimates. Journal of Paleolimnology 18, 211-218.

Josefine Lenz1,2, Benjamin M. Jones3, Sebastian Wetterich1, Rik Tjallingii4, Michael Fritz1, Christopher D. Arp2, Natalia Rudaya5, Guido Grosse1,6

1Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research; 2University of Alaska Fairbanks; 3US Geological Survey;

4Helmholtz Center Potsdam German Research Center for Geosciences; 5Novosibirsk State University; 6University of Potsdam

Small Lake - Large Impact?

Sedimentary records from Northern Alaska reveal lake expansion history and carbon dynamics

Results and Discussion:

Expanding Peatball Lake intersecting with different catchment units

Thermokarst Lakes:

Ubiquitous and dynamic

features

Relevance of thermokarst lake records

Carbon source or sink?

Study area of Peatball Lake

Holocene lake

archive

• Wide range of organic matter sources in sublittoral deposits

according to Meyers & Lallier-Verges (1999)

• In thermokarst lakes also indicator of carbon degradation

C) Modern Peatball Lake

expanding into upland remnants and drained basins

source: balanced between re-deposited thermokarst basins and upland deposits

B) Shore expansion into upland remnants and drained basins

source: upland bluffs

and re-deposited thermokarst lake sediments

A) Initial Lake Phase ~ 1,400 yrs ago as a remnant of a drained lake

source: re-deposited thermokarst sediments

A B C

mean expansion rate between 1955 and 2002:

0.46 m yr-1

650 m/0.46 m yr-1

= 1,413 years

Degradation of organic matter

Upland Near-shore Center TOCavg. 30 wt% 1.6 wt% 7 wt%

TNavg. 1.4 wt% <0.2 wt% 0.5 wt%

14C (cal

yr BP) 6,840±100

in 159 cm 130-3,480

(mixed) 500-4,330 (mixed)

Key findings

Thermokarst activity since ~1,400 years based on 3 independent methods

Large impact of landscape morphology and genesis on sedimentation dynamics

Recycling and re-deposition of permafrost carbon

Core material

• Cold-monomictic, subcircular lake of 1.2 km²

• lake ice thickness 1.5-2 m

• Complex catchment situation within

drained lake basins and upland remnants

Core

ID Location Core length

(cm) Water depth (cm)

P1 Near-shore 50 148

P2 Center 100 215

P3 Center 49 230

Origin of organic matter Lake age estimation

• P2 base dated 3x 14C (plant remains and bulk): 1,370-1,470 cal yr BP

210Pb/137Cs: Max. age 2,100 yrs

• Age estimation by inverted mean

shoreline expansion rate: 1,413 yrs

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

By applying a combination of high resolution optical imagery and complementary radar and elevation data, the study aims at explaining (i) how thermokarst lakes react

Our sedimentary records reflect the complexity of depositional environments in thermokarst lakes due to spatio-temporal changes in lake and catchment morphology as well as the impact

Analysis: Applying the globally available Harmonized Landsat-8 Sentinel-2 product (HLS) (Claverie et al., 2016) to the same-day acquisition image-pairs while also deriving a own

Applying the globally available Harmonized Landsat-8 Sentinel-2 product (HLS) (Claverie et al., 2016) to the same-day acquisition image-pairs while also deriving a locally

1) to quantify the organic C and N variability with depth and along geomorphologic gradients in thermokarst-affected terrain; 2) to understand depositional

Figure 4.11: Summary of biomarker parameters of BAL16-B4: calibrated radiocarbon dates (infinitive ages in red), absolute lipid concentration per g of sediment, absolute

These ndings suggest that either organic matter is decomposed very rapidly or sediment input in Goldstream Lake is generally minerogenic dominated and, thus, may

PeRL study areas are widely distributed throughout Arctic lowlands in Alaska, Canada, Russia, and Europe and cover a latitudinal gradient of about 20 ◦ (55.3–75.7 ◦ N), including