• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Austria: Recourse to the assets of people in inpatient long-term care to be abolished as from 1 January 2018

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Austria: Recourse to the assets of people in inpatient long-term care to be abolished as from 1 January 2018"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The assets of people in inpatient long-term care (LTC) will in future no longer have to be utilised before the provider of Social Assistance steps in to bear costs not covered by other individual financial resources. It is possible that this will cause a structural modification of the Austrian long-term care regime, as demand for inpatient LTC is likely to rise substantially.

LEGAL NOTICE

This document has been prepared for the European Commission. However, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

MARCEL FINK EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY NETWORK JULY 2017

Austria: Recourse to the assets of people in

inpatient long-term care to be abolished as from 1 January 2018

ESPN Flash Report 2017/60

Description

On 29 June 2016 the Austrian Parliament passed a Constitutional Provision (Verfassungsbestimmung), prohibiting recourse to the assets of people in inpatient long-term care (so- called Pflegeregress) as from 1 January 2013.

In Austria, up to now, it has been in principle the individual in need of LTC who is responsible for financing his/her stay in a residential or nursing home.

Personal income used for this purpose typically consists of a retirement pension plus “LTC cash benefit”

(Pflegegeld).

Furthermore, personal assets (such as savings or real estate) have to be used for financing inpatient LTC before the respective provider of Social Assistance (Sozialhilfe) steps in to bear uncovered costs. This LTC recourse-to-assets is then subject to specific regulations in each of the nine federal provinces (Bundesländer), which are responsible both for LTC services and for Social Assistance.

The recently voted Constitutional Provision (amending section §330a of the General Law on Social Insurance/ASVG) prohibits recourse to the assets of persons living in inpatient LTC facilities, as well as recourse to the assets of their relatives, heirs or gift- recipients, to cover costs for LTC

otherwise to be borne by Social Assistance. This new provision will enter into force in all federal provinces by 1 January 2018 at the latest.

At the same time it was legislated (as new §330b ASVG) that the Federal Republic will transfer in total €100 million per year to the federal provinces in order to compensate for the losses of revenue which the federal provinces face due to the ending of Pflegeregress.

Outlook & commentary

The first main element of the Austrian LTC regime is the LTC cash benefit. It is granted without means testing (against income or assets) at one of seven possible levels that correspond to different levels of individual care requirements or the health status of the person in need of care.

The second main element consists of the institutional inpatient, ambulatory, semi-outpatient and outpatient (i.e. at- home) care services. Establishing and upgrading these services is the responsibility of the nine federal provinces. Access to formal LTC benefits in kind and to LTC services is, in principle, not free of charge: these are only covered by the federal provinces via Social Assistance if the LTC services cannot be financed via a person’s own financial resources, plus – in some

(2)

concerning the abolition of even more far-reaching instruments involving recourse to the income of family members, decided on in some federal provinces over the last ten years, shows that the abrogation of such rules raises the demand for formal inpatient care substantially.

It appears that these potential dynamics, which may however be interpreted in different ways (e.g.

as professionalisation and de- coupling of family LTC duties, or as presenting financing problems for public-sector budgets), were not widely discussed in the very short reform debate. The same holds for other, even broader, problems and challenges of the Austrian LTC-regime.

Further reading

Parliamentary Correspondence, N0. 838, 29.06.2017:

https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT /PR/JAHR_2017/PK0838/

Statistics Austria: LTC cash benefits;

http://www.statistik.at/wcm/idc/id cplg?IdcService=GET_NATIVE_FIL E&RevisionSelectionMethod=Latest Released&dDocName=020067

Authors

Marcel Fink (Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna)

The Flash Reports are produced by the European Social Policy Network (ESPN) established in 2014 to provide the European Commission with independent information, analysis and expertise on social policies in 35 European countries. The topics covered are identified by ESPN experts in the light of significant developments in their countries, or in some cases suggested by the Commission or the Flash Reports’ editorial team (Eric Marlier, Slavina Spasova and Bart Vanhercke). The ESPN is managed by LISER (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research), APPLICA and the OSE (European Social Observatory). More information on the ESPN: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1135&langId=en.

federal provinces – the financial resources of spouses and/or parents of the person in need of LTC. “Financial resources” until now include not only individual income, but also assets, in the form of savings or real estate for example, where the latter has to be utilised before the Social Assistance provider steps in. If real estate cannot be utilised immediately, as, for instance, when the spouse of the person in need of LTC lives in the dwelling, it may become subject to a lien within the land register in favour of the Social Assistance provider and then utilised at a later time.

Furthermore in several federal provinces, previously donated gifts to relatives etc. may be claimed back by the Social Assistance provider.

The abolition of all forms of recourse to the assets of people in inpatient long-term care (and of their relatives) derives from an ad- hoc decision by the Parliament.

One main argument of the Social Democratic party, pushing for this decision, was that the recourse to assets is unfair because it may imply a quasi-inheritance tax of 100%, especially for middle income households, whereas no official inheritance tax exists in Austria. With one minor exception (the “Neos” party, which holds 9 out of 183 seats in the National Assembly) all political parties

agreed to abolish the Pflegeregress after just a few days of debate.

This quick decision-making process took place against a backdrop of early elections due to be held in Austria on 15 October 2017 amongst strategies to distribute

“electoral bonbons” and/or to prevent this topic becoming an election issue.

Still, the impact of this decision may turn out to be substantial, in effect having a structural impact on the Austrian LTC-regime. About 75,000 people (or ca. 16% of all people currently receiving the LTC cash benefit) recently lived in nursing homes and related institutions of inpatient care, of which – reportedly (exact data are missing) – in about 40,000 cases recourse has been had to assets (Pflegeregress).

In this context it may be argued that the demand for formal inpatient care will rise substantially as soon as the recourse to assets is abolished, as this instrument deterred people from opting for formal inpatient care in order to (at least partly) retain assets for the purposes of later bequest.

According to statistics on the LTC cash benefit, more than 150,000 persons in Austria have care needs of more than 160 hours a month (Statistics Austria), signalling potential additional demand for formal inpatient care.

Furthermore, previous experience

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

+ Obtained permanent employment. ++ Obtained temporary employment. ++ Placement in education/training other than employment training within the scope of labour market

A decade of monitor- ing at Swiss Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research (LWF) sites: can we observe trends in atmospheric acid deposition and in soil solution acidity. Envi-

Diese oder eine ähnliche Frage muß man sich wohl als Studierender immer mal stellen. Wenn man die Zeichen der Zeit bzw. der demo- kratisch legitimierten Regierung zu

Figure 1. Possible scenarios of the stability of LTD at  individual  synaptic  connections  over  extended  periods  of  time.  (A)  Left:  A  synaptic 

a certain graph, is shown, and he wants to understand what it means — this corre- sponds to reception, though it involves the understanding of a non-linguistic sign;

According to article 31(3) of the Implementing Regulation, the institution in the place of stay or residence informs the competent institution, if it provides benefits in

SED S005 – Information on Change of Entitlement to Benefits in Kind – Long term care Enables the institution of the Member State of Residence/Stay to inform the

This SED has to be used by the Institution in the Member State of Residence (or Stay) to reply to the Competent Institution whether the insured person