• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

environmental impacts of exhaust gas scrubber discharge

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "environmental impacts of exhaust gas scrubber discharge"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Ship emissions and the air-sea interface

Growing concern about environmental impacts (marine ecosystems to human health) of increased international maritime transport.

~80% of shipping fuel is low-grade, high sulfur resulting in significant emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur oxide (SOx), nitrogen oxide (NOx), heavy metals, particles (PM), and organic matter (OM) to the atmosphere.

CO2, SOx, NOx affect air quality and climate via atmospheric chemistry and radiative forcing.

Aerosols (including PM and OM), heavy metals, SOx, NOx deposit to and dissolve in the surface ocean.

Discharge of pollutants to the ocean may reach the atmosphere by outgassing and sea spray formation.

The increasing use of exhaust gas cleaning systems (‘scrubbers’) may lead to other, yet unascertained and unquantified, impacts on the marine environment.

1 Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany

2 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom

3 Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany

4 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

5 Fraunhofer Centre for Maritime Logistics and Services CML, Hamburg, Germany

6 Centre for Marine Environmental Sciences (MARUM), University of Bremen, Germany

7 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

8 Department of European, Public and International Law, Maritime Institute, Ghent University, Belgium

A new perspective at the ship-air-sea-interface: the

environmental impacts of exhaust gas scrubber discharge

Sonja Endres

1,a

, Frances E. Hopkins², Katherine Houghton³, Monica Mårtensson

4

, Johannes Oeffner

5

, Birgit Quack

1

, Pradeep Singh

6

, David Turner

7

, Frank Maes

8

a

contact: sendres@geomar.de

Sea area Date of regulations Sulfur limits (% m/m)

Emission control areas (ECAs) Before 1 July 2010 1.5%

1 July 2010 - 1 Jan 2015 1.0%

After 1 Jan 2015 0.1%

Other sea areas Before Jan 2012 4.5%

1 Jan 2012 - 1 Jan 2020 3.5%

After 1 Jan 2020 0.5%

Emission control areas (ECAs)

Options for emission reductions Legal aspects of ship emissions and scrubbers

Global and regional efforts to reduce the environmental impact of ship emissions:

International regulations on ship emissions:

1982 UN Convention on Law of the Sea, Article 192-196:

source-based approach, central role of flag states

1992 Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)

2008 Revision of Annex IV (NOx Technical Code, ECAs) 2011 Revision of Annex IV (control of greenhouse gases) 2012 European Union’s Sulfur Directive 2012/35

Although the atmosphere and the ocean are tightly coupled, international law and regulation treats both very differently.

MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 4 states that scrubbers can be used if SOx in exhaust ≤ emissions from engines using low-sulfur fuel.

Numerous guidelines for levels of monitoring and compliance of scrubber wash water were released by MEPC.

Exhaust gas cleaning systems operating in open loop mode, (‘scrubbers’), are low-cost alternatives to high-cost, low-sulfur fuel.

mixed layer CO2

NOx

[SOx]

hydrocarbons

PM CO

sea surface microlayer

organic matter

pools

Export Autotrophic

production

Carbonate chemistry Respiration

nutrients

pH trace metals,

pollutants

Heterotrophic production

& recycling

lower atmosphere

land

radiative forcing aerosol formation atmospheric chemistry

nutrients, trace metals,

particles

outgassing, sea spray atmopsheric

deposition

scrubber wash water

temperature, turbidity Higher

trophic levels

Research priorities

Monitoring:

• Increased global monitoring of ship emissions and effect of emission reduction technologies.

• Improved spatial and temporal measurements of pollutants along shipping lanes/in ports.

Comparison of alternative emission reduction technologies.

Experimental studies:

• Increased understanding of the ecological and biogeochemical effects of wash water discharge from shipping (considering seasonally- and spatially-variable phytoplankton communities, cumulative effects and interactive effects with other environmental parameters).

Forecasting:

• Improved modelling of ship emissions and the use of scrubber technology in the future.

Legislation:

• Improved aspects of implementation, compliance, inspection and enforcement.

• Increased standards of scrubbers, identify new ECAs and establish more port reception facilities for advanced waste management of scrubber residues (sludge).

Clean gas

Exhaust

Wash water

Sea water inflow

Outflow

Scrubbing residues

Alternative technologies (removing SOx and/or NOx): novel engine technologies, exhaust gas recirculation, fuel conversion or switching, selective catalytic reduction, wetpacs, humid air motor, fuel emulsifier.

Scrubber residues: Contaminants include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals, and nitrate, but in practice amount and composition of scrubber residues is not well known.

Wet scrubber technology:

SOx dissolves in seawater/freshwater spray and is removed from the exhaust gas:

SO gas H O ⁄ O → SO 2H HCO H → CO H O

The resulting wash water has very low pH and elevated temperature.

ECAs are not limited to SOx, but can also deal with PM and NOx.

Five sulfur emissions control areas (orange): Baltic Sea, the North Sea, North American area (most of U.S. and Canadian coast), and the U.S.

Caribbean Sea area.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In particular, the GAINS (Greenhouse gas–air pollution Interactions and Synergies) model (Amann et al 2011a) was used to calculate land based anthropogenic emissions for 2000, 2005

(1) development of an inventory by sector and fuel for three key years, (2) development of detailed estimates for smelting and inter- national shipping, (3) calculation of a default

Note how- ever, that the values given for gross emissions of biomass burning (e.g., fuelwood) and those from land-use changes are not necessarily additive because

Keywords: Systems analysis; Input-output model; Global warming; Carbon dioxide; Total emission control; Environmental tax (Carbon

These strategies are evaluated on the basis of: the national emissions levels in the year 2000, the relative emission reductions (compared the year 1980), the annual costs

Although the average costs are only slightly higher than US-1985 standard (5642 DMIton), the marginal costs are considerably higher (8730 DMIton NO, removed) because they

Since Scenario 2 is taken as the starting point for trading, Scenario 3 (one-to-one trading) keeps the total European emissions constant at this level, but achieves cost

Some of the differences in total NO, emission rates between RAINS and those re- ported by countries can be explained by the fact that some fuel used in