• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Topologically Massive Gravity – A theory in 3 Dimensions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Topologically Massive Gravity – A theory in 3 Dimensions"

Copied!
30
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Topologically Massive Gravity – A theory in 3 Dimensions

Sabine Ertl

Institute of Theoretical Physics Vienna University of Technology

Lunch-Club

16.11.2010

(2)

Outline

• Motivation for 3 dimensional gravity

• Building the theory of Topologically Massive Gravity

• Finding solutions to TMG: Topologically Massive Mechanics

• Outlook

(3)

Why three dimensions?

Three-dimensional gravity is ...

... classically simpler ... physically interesting

... quantum mechanically solvable

(4)

Why three dimensions?

Three-dimensional gravity is ...

... classically simpler

• Einsteins theory in 2+1 dimension probably the simplest model of gravity

• No local degree of freedom

• All perturbative solutions to Einsteins field equations are pure gauge

• Weyl tensor vanishes→Riemann tensor fully determined by Ricci tensor

... physically interesting

... quantum mechanically solvable

(5)

Why three dimensions?

Three-dimensional gravity is ...

... classically simpler ... physically interesting

• Black holes (for Λ<0): BTZ

→Thermodynamics of BTZ black holes

• For a modified theory: gravitons

... quantum mechanically solvable

(6)

Why three dimensions?

Three-dimensional gravity is ...

... classically simpler ... physically interesting

... quantum mechanically solvable

• Promising toy model to approach the quantization of GR

• Toy model for quantum gravity

• AdS/CFT correspondence

(7)

Building the theory: TMG

Let’s start with Einstein-Gravity in 3 dimensions IEH= 1

16πG Z

d3x√

−g R

equations of motion:

Rµν = 0

no black holes!

(8)

Building the theory: TMG

Let’s add a cosmological constant:

IEH+CC= 1

16πG Z

d3x√

−g (R−2Λ) Equations of motion:

Gµν =Rµν−1

2gµνR+ Λgµν = 0

• 3 vacuum solutions: Minkowski(Λ = 0), de-Sitter>0), anti de-Sitter<0)

• For Λ<0, use parameterization Λ =−`12 → R = 6Λ

• BTZ black hole

But still no graviton!

(9)

Building the theory: TMG

Let’s add a gravitational Chern-Simons term ITMG= 1

16πG Z

d3x√

−gh R+ 2

`2 + 1

2µεαβγΓρασβΓσγρ+2

σβτΓτγρi

• Massive propagating degree of freedom and 2 massless boundary gravitons

[Li, Song, Strominger [1]]

• CS-Term: maximally chiral

• Equations of motion

Gµν+ 1

µCµν= 0

Black holes and Gravitons!

(10)

Some Aspects of TMG

ITMG= 1 16πG

Z d3x√

−gh R+ 2

`2 + 1

2µεαβγΓρασβΓσγρ+2

σβτΓτγρi

• Unstable/inconsistent for genericµ → choice of sign of EH-term

• Exception: chiral/logarithmic point µ`= 1:

2 different theories exist (depending on boundary conditions):

Brown-Henneaux: chiral CFT (unitary) [Li, Song, Strominger [1]]

Grumiller-Johansson: LCFT (non-unitary) [Grumiller, Johansson [3]]

• Additional boundary terms [Kraus, Larsen [2]]

IGHY+BCC = 1

8πG Z

d2x√

−g

K− 1

`2

(11)

Topologically Massive Mechanics

Finding solutions to TMG is tricky (trivial solutions, no-go theorems), therefore

Simplification: stationary axi-symmetric TMG

[Clement 1994 [4] and in 2010 Ertl, Grumiller, Johansson [5]]

Set up: stationary axi-symmetric 3d lineelement + 2d metric → ITMG

ds2=gµνdxµdxν+ e2

X22 gµν =

X+ Y Y X

µν

with X= (X+,X,Y)

and detg =X2=XiXi =XiXjηij =X+X−Y2 X2= 0 : ‘centre’

(12)

Topologically Massive Mechanics

Finding solutions to TMG is tricky (trivial solutions, no-go theorems), therefore

Simplification: stationary axi-symmetric TMG

[Clement 1994 [4] and in 2010 Ertl, Grumiller, Johansson [5]]

ITMM= Z

dρe 1

2e−22− 2

`2 − 1

2µe−3ijkXijk

Hamiltonian constraint: G = 122+`22µ1ijkXijk = 0 Equations of motion: X¨i=−1 ijk 3 ˙Xjk+ 2XjX˙¨k

(13)

Topologically Massive Mechanics

Finding solutions to TMG is tricky (trivial solutions, no-go theorems), therefore

Simplification: stationary axi-symmetric TMG

[Clement 1994 [4] and in 2010 Ertl, Grumiller, Johansson [5]]

Conserved angular momentum (first integrals to equations of motion ) Ji =ijkXjk1 5 ˙X2+12`2

Xi+1 (XX) ˙˙ Xiµ1X2i combination with Hamiltonian constraint

ijkJiXjk =12X22−(XX)˙ 2`22X2 using equations of motion

XJ=1 (XX)˙ 2−X22

(14)

Topologically Massive Mechanics

Finding solutions to TMG is tricky (trivial solutions, no-go theorems), therefore

Simplification: stationary axi-symmetric TMG

[Clement 1994 [4] and in 2010 Ertl, Grumiller, Johansson [5]]

simple but difficult to find analytic solutions→non-existence results:

• |µ`|= 1: Einstein solutions

• |µ`|= 3: null warped black hole

(15)

Classification of all Solutions

In general: 6d phase space containing a 4d subspace (Einstein, Schr¨odinger, Warped AdS)→classification into 4 sectors:

Einstein

X¨ = 0

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(16)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0

• Solution to EOM:X=X(0)ρ+X(2)

• All stationary, axisymmetric solutions of Einstein gravity

• Solutions are locally and asymptotically adS X= a, 1

a, ±2

` ρ+ 1

X= a, 0, ±2

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(17)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0 BTZ solution

ds2=a(dx+)2+1

a(dx)2± e2r1

α+e−2rα

dx+dx−`2dr2

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(18)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0 BTZ solution

ds2=−4G` Ldu2+ ¯Ldv2

− `2e2r+ 16G2L¯Le−2r

dudv−`2dr2 L= (r++r)2

16G`

¯L= (r+−r)2

16G` m=L+ ¯L j=L−L¯

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(19)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

• Solutions are: X= sρ(1∓µ`)/2+aρ+b, 0, ±2`ρ

• spacetimes with asymptotic Schr¨odinger behaviour:

ds2

r→0∼`2±2 dx+dx−dr2

r2 +β (dx+)2 r2z

z = 1∓µ`

2

• µ`=∓3: z=2: null warped AdS

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

(20)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨ ds2= sρ(1∓µ`)/2+aρ+b

(dx+)2±4ρ

` dx+dx−`222

• z <1: Asymptotic AdS

• z = 1:µ`= 1: 2 logarithmic solutions

Asymptotically AdS: reminiscent of the log-mode [Grumiller, Johansson [3]]

Marginally violated asymoptotically AdS condition

[Skenderis et. all.[6]] [Grumiler, Sachs [7]]

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(21)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

• General solutions X=X(−2)ρ2+X(0)ρ+X(2)

• Locally and asymptotically warped (squashed or stretched) AdS

[Nutku [8]] [Anninos, Li, Padi, Song, Strominger [9]]

• Warped AdS candidate for stable TMG backgrounds

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

(22)

Classification of all Solutions

Einstein

X¨ = 0

Schr¨ odinger

X¨ 6= 0, linear dependence ofX,X˙,X¨

Warped

X¨2=...

X = 0, linear independence ofX,X˙,X¨

Generic

X¨26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0

These solutions are neither Einstein, Schr¨odinger nor warped AdS In fact: Any generic solution must be non-polynomial inρ

(23)

Generic Sector

The generic sector is described by the constraints: ¨X26= 0 and/or ˙XX¨ 6= 0 Solving for solutions: numerical analysis

Analytic Center

Completely Generic Einstein

Warped

Schrödinger

(24)

Example of the Generic Center I

Naked Singularity – non-anaylitc center

(25)

Example of the Generic Center II

Soliton - no center

(26)

Zooming out ...

... evidence for asymptotic warped AdS behaviour

(27)

... damped oscillations around warped AdS

(28)

Outlook

• a lot of new 3D gravity theories: NMG, GMG, MSG, HOMG, BIG

• apply TMM recipe on those novel theories

• CFT’s

• create new 3D theories

• still open questions in TMM

Topography of landscape of solutions

boundary conditions and corresponding asymptotic symmetry group

stability?

Soliton interpretation as finite energy excitations around WAdS?

Soliton asymptotics to AdS or Schr¨odinger?

Kink solutions?

(29)

Thank you for your attention

(30)

References

W. Li, W. Song, and A. Strominger, “Chiral Gravity in Three Dimensions,”JHEP04(2008) 082, 0801.4566.

P. Kraus and F. Larsen, “Holographic gravitational anomalies,”JHEP01(2006) 022,hep-th/0508218.

D. Grumiller and N. Johansson, “Instability in cosmological topologically massive gravity at the chiral point,”JHEP07(2008) 134,0805.2610.

G. Clement, “Particle - like solutions to topologically massive gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) L115–L120,gr-qc/9404004.

S. Ertl, D. Grumiller, and N. Johansson, “All stationary axi-symmetric local solutions of topologically massive gravity,”1006.3309.

K. Skenderis, M. Taylor, and B. C. van Rees, “Topologically Massive Gravity and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,”JHEP09(2009) 045,0906.4926.

D. Grumiller and I. Sachs, “AdS3/LCFT2– Correlators in Cosmological Topologically Massive Gravity,”

JHEP03(2010) 012,0910.5241.

Y. Nutku, “Exact solutions of topologically massive gravity with a cosmological constant,”Class. Quant.

Grav.10(1993) 2657–2661.

D. Anninos, W. Li, M. Padi, W. Song, and A. Strominger, “Warped AdS3Black Holes,”JHEP03 (2009) 130,0807.3040.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

→ New Massive Gravity, Extended New Massive Gravity, Generalized Massive Gravity, Massive Supergravity, Higher Order Massive Gravity, Born-Infeld Massive Gravity.. •

I If yes: we would have an interesting quantum theory of gravity with BHs and gravitons to get conceptual insight into quantum gravity. I if no: potentially exciting news for

I Applications include thermodynamics from Euclidean path integral and calculation of holographic stress tensor in AdS/CFT?. I Straightforward applications in quantum

We obtained the variational field equations and for any particular choice of coupling constants, we have shown that the correspond- ing field equations in a natural gauge admit both

We show that cosmological topologically massive gravity at the chiral point allows not only Brown–Henneaux boundary conditions as consistent boundary conditions, but also slightly

Besides the obvious application to general relativity with a self-interacting scalar matter field, an example relevant to string theory is also discussed in detail, namely 2D type

I Partition functions on gravity and LCFT sides appear to match If conjecture true: first example of AdS 3 /LCFT 2 correspondence!.. Summary

I Partition functions on gravity and LCFT sides appear to match If conjecture true: first example of AdS 3 /LCFT 2 correspondence!.. Summary