• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Physical Solutions of The Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity in Two-Dimensions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Physical Solutions of The Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity in Two-Dimensions"

Copied!
11
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Physical Solutions of The Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity in Two-Dimensions

Muzaffer Adak

Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Pamukkale University, 20100 Denizli, Turkey

madak@pau.edu.tr

Tekin Dereli

Department of Physics, Ko¸c University 34450 Sarıyer-Istanbul, Turkey

tdereli@ku.edu.tr

Abstract

A 2D symmetric teleparallel gravity model is given by a generic 4- parameter action that is quadratic in the non-metricity tensor. Vari- ational field equations are derived. For a particular choice of the cou- pling parameters and in a natural gauge, we give a Schwarzschild type solution and an inflationary cosmological solution.

(2)

1 Introduction

In order to investigate the physical implications of General Relativity (GR) some simple limiting cases are often sought. The low energy, static limit is attained by assuming the existence of a time-like Killing vector. However, such configurations have no dynamics. Symmetric limits at arbitrary energy scales on the other hand are obtained by assuming one or more space-like Killing vectors. For example, the assumption of spherical symmetry reduces the gravitational action upon integrating over the angular variables to an effective 2D gravity model in (t, r) coordinates. Such 2D gravity models have recently been used much to discuss black hole dynamics, quantized gravity or numerical relativity [1]. It is well known that Einsteinean gravity in 2D has no dynamical degrees of freedom. One way of making this theory dynamical is to couple a dilaton scalar. It is also possible to introduce further dynamical degrees of freedom by going over to a non-Riemannian space-time by the inclusion of torsion and non-metricity. Generalized 2D gravity models with curvature and torsion and teleparallel theories with only torsion have been studied a lot [2, 3]. On the other hand 2D models including non-metricity received less attention [4, 5]. The symmetric teleparallel gravity (STPG) with zero-curvature and zero-torsion has been introduced relatively recently [6, 7, 8]. Here we consider 2D symmetric teleparallel gravity models with the most general 4-parameter action that is quadratic in the non-metricity tensor [9]. For a particular choice of parameters we have shown that the corresponding set of field equations admit both the Schwarzschild solution and an inflationary cosmological solution. It is remarkable that the STPG equivalent of Einstein gravity in 2D does not admit these solutions.

2 Mathematical Preliminaries

The triple {M, g,∇} denotes the space-time where M is a 2-dimensional differentiable manifold, g is a non-degenerate Lorentzian metric andis a linear connection. g can be written in terms of the co-frame 1-forms

g=gαβdxα⊗dxβ =ηabea⊗eb (1) where {ea} is an orthonormal co-frame and {dxα} are the co-ordinate co- frame 1−forms. We take ηab = Diag(−,+) and gαβ are the co-ordinate components of the metric. The dual orthonormal frame is determined from the relations eb(Xa) = ıaeb = δba. Similarly, dxβ(∂α) = ıαdxβ = δαβ. Here ı denotes the interior product operator that maps anyp-form to a (p−1)- form. We set space-time orientation by the choice²01= +1 or ∗1 =e0∧e1

(3)

where is the Hodge star. Finally, the connection is specified by a set of connection 1-formsab}. The non-metricity 1-forms, torsion 2-forms and curvature 2-forms are defined through the Cartan structure equations:

Qab = 1

2ab= 1

2(Λab+ Λba), (2) Ta = Dea=dea+ Λab∧eb , (3) Rab = ab =ab+ ΛacΛcb (4) Bianchi identities follow as their integrability conditions:

DQab = 1

2(Rab+Rba), (5)

DTa = Rab∧eb, (6)

DRab = 0. (7)

If the non-metricity is non-vanishing, special attention is due in lowering and raising indices under covariant exterior derivative. We make use of the identities

D∗ea = −Q∧ ∗ea+²abTb (8)

D∗eab = −²abQ (9)

whereQ= Λaa=Qaais called the Weyl 1-form. The full connection 1-forms can be decomposed uniquely as follows [4, 5]:

Λab =ωab+Kab+qab+Qab (10) whereωab are the Levi-Civita connection 1-forms satisfying

ωab∧eb =−dea, (11) Kab are the contortion 1-forms satisfying

Kab∧eb =Ta, (12)

and qab are the anti-symmetric tensor 1-forms defined by

qab=−(ıaQbc)∧ec+ (ıbQac)∧ec. (13) In this decomposition the symmetric part

Λ(ab) =Qab (14)

(4)

while the anti-symmetric part

Λ[ab]=ωab+Kab+qab. (15) In writing down gravity models it easily becomes complicated to keep all the components of Qab. Therefore, people sometimes deal only with certain irreducible parts of that. To obtain the irreducible decomposition of non-metricity tensor under the 2D Lorentz group, firstly we write

Qab= Qab

|{z}

trace−f ree part

+ 1 2ηabQ

| {z }

trace part

. (16)

Then

Qab=(1)Qab+(2)Qab+(3)Qab (17) in terms of

(2)Qab = 1

2[(ıaΛ)eb+ (ıbΛ)ea−ηabΛ], (18)

(3)Qab = 1

2ηabQ , (19)

(1)Qab = Qab(2)Qab(3)Qab (20)

where Λ := (ıbQba)ea.These irreducible components satisfy

ηab(1)Qab =ηab(2)Qab= 0, ıa(1)Qab= 0, ea(1)Qab = 0. (21) Thus they are orthogonal in the following sense:

(i)Qab∧ ∗(j)Qab =δijNij (no summation overij) (22) whereδij is the Kronecker symbol andNij are certain 2-forms. We calculate

(1)Qab∧ ∗(1)Qab = Qab∧ ∗Qab(2)Qab∧ ∗(2)Qab(3)Qab∧ ∗(3)Qab ,

(2)Qab∧ ∗(2)Qab = (ıaQac)(ıbQbc)1 +1

4Q∧ ∗Q−aQ)(ıbQab)1,

(3)Qab∧ ∗(3)Qab = 1

2Q∧ ∗Q . (23)

(5)

3 Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity

We formulate STPG by a variational principle from an action I =

Z

M

³

L+Rabρab+Taλa

´

(24) whereLis a Lagrangian density 2-form quadratic in the non-metricity ten- sor,ρabandλaare the Lagrange multiplier 0-forms imposing the constraints

Rab = 0 , Ta= 0. (25)

The gravitational field equations are derived from (24) by independent vari- ations with respect to the connection ab} and the orthonormal co-frame {ea} (and the Lagrange multipliers):

λa∧eb+ab =−Σab , (26)

a=−τa (27)

where Σab = ∂Λ∂La

b andτa= ∂e∂La. In principle (26) is solved for the Lagrange multipliersλa andρab and substituted in (27) that governs the dynamics of the gravitational fields. It is important to notice thata rather than the Lagrange multipliers themselves appear in (27). Thus we must be calculating a directly and that we can do by taking the covariant exterior derivative of (26):

a∧eb=−DΣab. (28) We used above the constraints

Ta= 0 , D2ρab=Rbc∧ρac−Rca∧ρcb = 0 (29) where the covariant exterior derivative of a (1,1)-type tensor is given by

ab=ab+ Λbc∧ρacΛca∧ρcb . (30) Finally we arrive at the gravitational field equations

ab−τa∧eb = 0. (31) We now write down the most general Lagrangian density 2-form which is quadratic in the non-metricity tensor [9]:

L= 1 2κ

" 3 X

I=1

kI(I)Qab∧ ∗(I)Qab+k4

³(2)Qab∧eb

´

∧ ∗

³(3)Qac∧ec

´# . (32)

(6)

where k1, k2, k3, k4 are dimensionless coupling constants and we also intro- duced κ = 8πGc3 with G being Newton’s gravitational constant. Inserting (23) into (32) we find

L= 1 2κ

h

c1Qab∧ ∗Qab+c2aQac)(ıbQbc)1 +c3Q∧ ∗Q+c4aQ)(ıbQab)1 i

(33) where we defined new coupling constants:

c1 = k1,

c2 = −k1+k2 , c3 = 3

4k1+1 4k2+1

2k3+1 4k4 , c4 = k1−k21

2k4. (34)

We remark at this point that STP equivalent of the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian density will be obtained for the choicec1 =−1, c2 = 0, c3 =

−1, c4= 2. We wish to show this briefly. Firstly we use the decomposition of the full connection (10), withKab = 0,

Λab=ωab+ Ωab where Ωab =Qab+qab . (35) By substituting that intoRab(Λ) we decompose the non-Riemannian curva- ture as the follows:

Rab(Λ) = ab+ ΛacΛcb

= Rab(ω) +D(ω)Ωab+ Ωaccb. (36) Here Rab(ω) is the Riemannian curvature 2-form and D(ω) is the covari- ant exterior derivative with respect to the Levi-Civita connection. To set Rab(Λ) = 0 for STP space-time yields the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian 2- form

LEH = Rab(ω)∧ ∗eab

= −[D(ω)Ωab]∧ ∗eabaccb∧ ∗eab (37) Here after using the equality

d(Ωab∧ ∗eab) = [D(ω)Ωab]∧ ∗eabab[D(ω)∗eab] (38)

(7)

we discard the exact form and noticeD(ω)∗eab = 0 because Ta(ω) = 0 and Qab(ω) = 0 (see eq.(9)). Thus, up to a closed form

LEH = 1

2κΩaccb∧ ∗eab

= 1

2κ(Qac+qac)(Qcb+qcb)∧ ∗eab

= 1

2κ(Qac∧Qcb+qac∧qcb)∧ ∗eab

= 1

2κ[−Qab∧ ∗Qab−Q∧ ∗Q+ 2(ıbQ)(ıaQab)1] (39) whereκ is gravitational coupling constant.

4 Solutions

We obtain the following contributions to the variational field equations (31) coming from (33):

Σab = X4

i=0

ciiΣab , τa= X4

i=0

ci iτa (40) where

1Σab = 2∗Qab , (41)

2Σab = ıcQac∗eb+ıcQbc∗ea , (42)

3Σab = 2ηab∗Q , (43)

4Σab = 1

2(ıaQ)∗eb+1

2(ıbQ)∗ea+ηabcQcd)∗ed, (44)

1τa = −(ıaQbc)∧ ∗Qbc−Qbca∗Qbc), (45)

2τa = (ıbQbc)(ıdQcd)∗ea2(ıaQbd)(ıcQcd)∗eb , (46)

3τa = −(ıaQ)∧ ∗Q−Q∧a∗Q), (47)

4τa = (ıbQ)(ıcQbc)∗eaaQ)(ıcQbc)∗ebbQ)(ıaQbc)∗ec.(48) One can consult Ref.[8] for the details of variations.

A generic class of solutions will be obtained in the coordinate frame eα = dxα in which Λαβ = 0. We call this the natural or inertial gauge choice:

Rαβ =αβ+ ΛαγΛγβ = 0, (49) Tα =d(dxα) + Λαβ∧dxβ = 0, (50) Qαβ =1

2Dgαβ =1

2dgαβ 6= 0. (51)

(8)

After a frame transformation via the zweibein ea = haαdxα and setting Λab=haαΛαβhβb+haαdhαb we obtain the orthonormal components

Rab =haαRαβhβb = 0, Ta=haαTα= 0, Qab=Qαβhαahβb 6= 0. (52) This shows that in the natural gauge, the field equations may be solved just by a metric ansatz.

4.1 Static solutions First we consider

g=−f2(r)dt2+g2(r)dr2. (53) The co-ordinate components of the metric and the zweibein reads, respec- tively, as follows

gαβ =

µ −f2 0 0 g2

, haα=

µ f 0 0 g

. (54)

The coordinate components of non-metricity is found to be Qαβ =1

2dgαβ = Ã f f0

g e1 0 0 −g0e1

!

(55) where prime denotes the derivative with respect to r. The orthonormal components are obtained through a frame transformation

Qab =Qαβhαahβb= Ã f0

f ge1 0 0 gg20e1

!

. (56)

In the above configuration the only non-trivial field equation comes from the trace of (31):

aa= 0 (57)

that reads explicitly α

f0

f

0 +

µf0 f

2# +β

g0

g

0

µg0

g

2#

+ (β−α)f0 f

g0

g = 0 (58) whereα= 2c1+ 4c3+c4, β = 2c1+ 2c2+ 4c3+ 3c4 . Mathematically, this equation has infinitely many solutions because there are two functions and

(9)

only one equation. That is, giveng(r) we determine the correspondingf(r).

Physically, however, due to the observational success of the Schwarzschild solution of GR, we seek solutions of the form

f(r) = µ

a+b r

p

, g(r) = µ

a+ b r

q

. (59)

Then (58) becomes

(p−q+ 1 + 2ar

b )(pα+qβ) = 0 (60) and therefore we let β = pqα. We note here that STP Einstein-Hilbert action corresponds to the choice p = 0 with arbitrary q. Finally with p = 1/2, β = α and a suitable choice of a and b, the Schwarzschild metric is obtained:

g=−(1−2m

r )dt2+ dr2

(1 2mr ). (61)

4.2 Cosmological solutions

For cosmological solutions we start with the metric

g=−dt2+R2(t)dr2 (62)

whereR(t) is the expansion function. In the natural gauge, the non-metricity has just one non-zero component

Q11=−R˙

Re0 , others = 0 (63)

where dot denotes the derivative with respect to t. For this configuration, the only non-trivial part of (31) is, again, its trace;aa= 0 which reads

α

 ÃR˙

R

!. +

ÃR˙ R

!2

= 0. (64)

This equation accepts two classes of solution, as well.

1. Forα6= 0, we obtain

R(t) =a+bt (65)

whereaandbintegration constants. The case of STP Einstein-Hilbert action belongs here.

(10)

2. Forα= 2c1+ 4c3+c4 = 2k3+ 12k4 = 0, we set ÃR˙

R

!. +

ÃR˙ R

!2

=S(t) (66)

where S(t) is any t dependent function. This result contains many familiar solutions. For example;

ForS =H2: Hubble constant, we obtain the Robertson-Walker metric satisfying the perfect cosmological principle. A co-ordinate transformation tan2kr= 2kρ, takes the metric to

ds2=−dt2+e2Ht 2

(1 + 142)2 . (67)

5 Conclusion

In this paper we investigated the symmetric teleparallel gravity in two- dimensions. After giving the orthogonal, irreducible decomposition of the non-metricity tensor under the 2D Lorentz group, we wrote down the most general four-parameter Lagrangian density 2-form quadratic in the non- metricity tensor. We obtained the variational field equations and for any particular choice of coupling constants, we have shown that the correspond- ing field equations in a natural gauge admit both the static Schwarzschild solution and an inflationary cosmological solution.

(11)

References

[1] D Grumiller and R Meyer, Ramifications of lineland (arXiv:hep- th/0604049) to appear in The Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Quanti- zation, Dualities and Integrable Systems, 23-28 January 2006, Denizli, Turkey and the references therein.

[2] Y N Obukhov,Phys. Rev.D69 (2004) 064009 [3] M Adak,Gen. Rel. Grav.(arXiv:gr-qc/0509010)

[4] T Dereli and R W Tucker,Class. Quant. Grav. 11(1994) 2575

[5] F W Hehl, J D McCrea, E W Mielke and Y Ne’eman,Phys. Rep.258 (1995) 1

[6] J M Nester and H J Yo, Chinese J. Phys. 37 (1999) 113 (arXiv:gr- qc/9809049)

[7] M Adak and ¨O Sert,Turk. J. Phys. 29(2005) 1 (arXiv:gr-qc/0412007) [8] M Adak, M Kalay and ¨O Sert, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15 (2006)...

(arXiv:gr-qc/0505025)

[9] Y N Obukhov, E J Vlachynsky, W Esser and F W Hehl, Phys. Rev.

D56 (1997) 7769

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

How does the scale factor evolve in time, if the universe is dominated by dust, photons or vacuum

How does the scale factor evolve in time, if the universe is dominated by dust, photons or vacuum

In this paper, we have shown how to compute the period lattice of loosely periodic func- tions, and applied the technique to the computation of the unit group of a finite extension K

bound on the degree of a smooth algebraic curve invariant under a polynomial vector field;.. an algebraic curve invariant under a vector field must contain a

One obvious difference is that the classical n-point functions involve only tree diagrams, whereas the loop diagrams of quantum field theory are missing... This is why in (3.50)

One obvious difference is that the classical n-point functions involve only tree diagrams, whereas the loop diagrams of quantum field theory are missing.. This is why in (3.50)

The local existence and uniqueness of solutions was shown in [2] for a one-dimensional setting with insulating boundary conditions, and for the case of higher dimensions with

It is a particular case of a thermoelastic system given by a coupling of a plate equation to a hyperbolic heat equation arising from Cattaneo’s law of heat conduction.. In a