The flow space associated to a CAT(0)-space (Lecture IV)
Wolfgang Lück Bonn Germany
email wolfgang.lueck@him.uni-bonn.de http://www.him.uni-bonn.de/lueck/
Göttingen, June 24, 2011
Outline
We introduceCAT(0)-spacesandCAT(0)-groupsand state their main properties.
We construct theflow space FS(X)associated to a CAT(0)-space and collect its main properties.
We discuss the mainflow estimate.
CAT(0)-spaces
Definition (CAT(0)-space)
ACAT(0)-spaceorHadamard spaceis a geodesic complete metric space(X,dX)such that any geodesic triangle∆inX satisfies the CAT(0)-inequality
dX(x,y)≤d
R2(x,y)
for allx,y ∈∆and all comparison pointsx,y in the comparison triangle∆⊆R2.
A metric spaceX is calledgeodesicif for any two pointsx,y ∈X there exists a geodesic segment joiningx andy, i.e., an isometric embeddingc: [0,dX(x,y)]→X withc(0) =x and
c(dX(x,y)) =y.
Ageodesic triangle∆inX consists of three pointsp,q,r and a choice of geodesic segments[p,q],[p,r]and[q,r].
Acomparison triangle∆for geodesic triangle∆is a geodesic triangle∆⊆R2given by three pointsp,q andr such that
dX(p,q) =dR2(p,q),dX(p,r) =dR2(p,r), anddX(q,r) =dR2(q,r).
Ifx belongs to the segment[p,q], then itscomparison pointx is the point on the geodesic[p,q]uniquely determined by
dX(p,x) =dR2(p,x)anddX(x,q) =dR2(x,q).
A simply connected complete Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature is a CAT(0)-space.
There is a unique geodesic segment joining each pairs of points and this geodesic segment various continuously with its endpoints.
IfX is a CAT(0)-space, thenX and every open ball and every closed ball inX are contractible.
Definition (Generalized geodesic)
Let(X,dX)be a metric space. A continuous mapc:R→X is called a generalized geodesicif there arec−,c+∈R:=R`
{−∞,∞}
satisfying
c−≤c+, c− 6=∞, c+6=−∞,
such thatc is locally constant on the complement of the interval Ic := (c−,c+)and restricts to an isometry onIc.
Definition (Boundary of a metric space)
LetX be a metric space. Two geodesic raysc,c0: [0,∞)→X are calledasymptoticif there exists a constantK withdX(c(t),c0(t))≤K for allt ∈[0,∞). The boundary∂X ofX is the set of asymptotic equivalence classes of rays. Denote byX =Xq∂X the disjoint union ofX and∂X.
Lemma
Let X be aCAT(0)-space and c: [0,∞)→X be a geodesic ray. Then for every x0 ∈X there is a unique geodesic ray c0: [0,∞)→X with c0(0) =x0 such that c and c0 are asymptotic.
In contrast to hyperbolic spaces it is in general not true for a CAT(0)- space that for two distinct elementsy,z ∈∂X there exists a geodesicc:R→X joiningy andz.
Ageneralized geodesic rayis a generalized geodesiccthat is either a constant generalized geodesic or a non-constant generalized geodesic withc−=0.
Fix a base pointx0∈X in the CAT(0)-spaceX. For everyx ∈X, there is a unique generalized geodesic raycx such thatc(0) =x0 andc(∞) =x. Define forr >0 the canonical projection
ρr =ρr,x0:X →Br(x0) byρr(x) :=cx(r).
Definition (Cone topology onX.)
LetX be a CAT(0)-space. The sets(ρr)−1(V)withr >0,V an open subset ofBr(x0)are a basis for thecone topology onX.
The cone topology is independent of the choice of base point.
A mapf whose target isX is continuous if and only ifρr◦f is continuous for allr.
X is a compact metrizable space.
∂X ⊆X is closed andX ⊆X is dense.
The inclusionX →X is a homeomorphism onto its image which is an open subset.
IfMis a simply connected completen-dimensional Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature, then∂M isSn−1. There are closed topological manifoldsM constructed
byDavis-Januszkiewicz(1991)such that the universal coveringMe admits aπ1(M)-invariant CAT(0)-metric and∂Me is not
homeomorphic to a sphere andMe is not homeomorphic toRn.
CAT(0)-groups
Definition (CAT(0)-group)
A (discrete) groupGis called aCAT(0)-groupif it acts properly cocompactly and isometrically on a CAT(0)-space of finite topological dimension.
A CAT(0)-groupGsatisfies:
There exists a finite modelE G.
There is a model forBGof finite type;
Gis finitely presented;
There are only finitely many conjugacy classes of finite subgroups;
Every solvable subgroup is virtuallyZn;
The direct product of two CAT(0)-groups is again a CAT(0)-group;
Limit groups in the sense of Sela are CAT(0)-groups;
Coxeter groups are CAT(0)-groups;
The word-problem and the conjugation-problem are solvable.
Question
Is every hyperbolic group aCAT(0)-group?
The flow space of a metric space
Throughout this section let(X,dX)be a metric space.
Definition (Flow space)
LetFS=FS(X)be the set of all generalized geodesics inX; We define ametricon FS(X)by
dFS(X)(c,d):=
Z
R
dX(c(t),d(t)) 2e|t| dt.
Define aflow
Φ: FS(X)×R→FS(X)
byΦτ(c)(t) =c(t+τ)forτ ∈R,c ∈FS(X)andt∈R.
Lemma
The mapΦis a continuous flow and we have for c,d ∈FS(X)and τ, σ∈R
dFS(X) Φτ(c),Φσ(d)
≤ e|τ|·dFS(X)(c,d) +|σ−τ|.
Proof:
We estimate forc ∈FS(X)andτ ∈R: dFS(X) c,Φτ(c)
= Z
R
dX c(t),c(t+τ) 2e|t| dt
≤ Z
R
|τ| 2e|t| dt
= |τ| · Z
R
1 2e|t| dt
= |τ|.
We estimate forc,d ∈FS(X)andτ ∈R
dFS(X) Φτ(c),Φτ(d)
= Z
R
dX c(t+τ),d(t+τ) 2e|t| dt
= Z
R
dX c(t),d(t) 2e|t−τ| dt
≤ Z
R
dX c(t),d(t) 2e|t|−|τ| dt
= e|τ|· Z
R
dX c(t),d(t) 2e|t| dt
= e|τ|·dFS(X)(c,d).
The two inequalities above together with the triangle inequality imply forc,d ∈FS(X)andτ, σ∈R
dFS(X) Φτ(c),Φσ(d)
= dFS(X) Φτ(c),Φσ−τ◦Φτ(d)
≤ dFS(X) Φτ(c),Φτ(d)
+dFS(X) Φτ(d),Φσ−τ ◦Φτ(d)
≤ e|τ|·dFS(X)(c,d) +|σ−τ|.
Lemma
Let c,d:R→X be generalized geodesics. Consider t0∈R. dX c(t0),d(t0)
≤ e|t0|·dFS(c,d) +2;
If dFS(c,d)≤2e−|t0|−1, then dX c(t0),d(t0)
≤ p
4e|t0|+1·p
dFS(c,d).
In particular, c7→c(t0)defines a uniform continuous map FS(X)→X .
Proof of the first assertion
We abbreviateD:=dX(c(t0),d(t0)).
We get
dX(c(t),d(t))≥D−dX c(t0),c(t)
−dX d(t0),d(t)
≥D−2·|t−t0|.
dFS(X)(c,d) =
Z +∞
−∞
dX(c(t),d(t)) 2e|t| dt
≥
Z D/2+t0
−D/2+t0
D−2· |t−t0| 2e|t| dt
=
Z D/2
−D/2
D−2· |t|
2e|t+t0| dt
≥
Z D/2
−D/2
D−2· |t|
2e|t|+|t0| dt
= e−|t0|· Z D/2
−D/2
D−2· |t|
2e|t| dt
= e−|t0|·
2·e−D/2+D−2
≥ e−|t0|·(D−2).
Lemma The maps
FS(X)−FS(X)R → R, c 7→c−; FS(X)−FS(X)R → R, c 7→c+, are continuous.
Lemma
Let(cn)n∈Nbe a sequence inFS(X). Then it converges uniformly on compact subsets to c∈FS(X)if and only if it converges to c with respect to dFS(X).
Lemma
The flow spaceFS(X)is sequentially closed in the space of all maps R→X with respect to the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets.
Definition (Proper metric space)
A metric space is calledproper if every closed ball is compact.
Lemma
If(X,dX)is a proper metric space, then(FS(X),dFS(X))is a proper metric space.
Proof:
LetR >0 andc ∈FS(X).
It suffices to show that the closed ballBR(c)in FS(X)is sequentially compact.
Let(cn)n∈Nbe a sequence inBR(c). There isR0 >0 such that cn(0)∈BR0(c(0)). By assumptionBR0(c(0))is compact.
Now we can apply theArzelà-Ascoli Theorem.
Thus after passing to a subsequence there isd:R→X such that cn→d uniformly on compact subsets.
Lemma
Let(X,dX)be a proper metric space and t0∈R. Then the evaluation mapFS(X)→X defined by c 7→c(t0)is uniformly continuous and proper.
Proof:
We have already shown that the map is uniformly continuous To show that is is also proper, it suffices to show that preimages of closed balls have finite diameter.
IfdX(c(t0),d(t0))≤r, thendX(c(t),d(t))≤r +2|t−t0|. Thus dFS(c,d)≤
Z
R
r +2|t−t0| 2e|t| dt, provideddX c(t0),d(t0)
≤r.
Lemma
Let G act isometrically, properly and cocompactly on the proper metric space(X,dX). Then action of G on(FS(X),dFS)is also isometric, proper and cocompact.
Proof:
The action ofGon FS(X)is isometric.
The map FS(X)→X defined byc 7→c(0)isG-equivariant, continuous and proper.
The existence of such a map implies that theG-action on FS(X)is also proper and cocompact.
Lemma
The subspaceFS(X)Ris closed inFS(X).
LetX be a metric space. Forc∈FS(X)andT ∈[0,∞], define c|[−T,T]∈FS(X)by
c|[−T,T](t) :=
c(−T) ift≤ −T; c(t) if −T ≤t≤T; c(T) ift≥T.
We denote by FS(X)f :=n
c ∈FS(X)−FS(X)R
c− >−∞,c+ <∞o
∪FS(X)R the subspace of finite geodesics.
Lemma The map
H: FS(X)×[0,1]→FS(X)
defined by Hτ(c) :=c|[ln(τ),−ln(τ)]is continuous and satisfies H0=idFS(X)and Hτ(c)∈FS(X)f forτ >0.
The flow space of a CAT(0)-space
Example (Flow space of a manifold of non-positive sectional curvature)
LetM be a simply connected complete Riemannian manifold of non-positive sectional curvature.
Recall thatMis a CAT(0)-space.
Put
P := {(a−,a+)∈R×R|a− <∞,a+>−∞,a− ≤a+};
∆ = {(a,a)∈R×R| −∞<a<∞}.
Define maps
f:STM×P → FS(M), (v,a−,a+)7→c(v)[a−,a+]; p:STM×∆ → M, (v,a)7→cv(a),
Example (continued)
The mapf is compatible with the obvious flows.
Then we obtain pushout
STM×∆ i //
p
STM×P f
M j //FS(M)
wherei is the inclusion andj:M →FS(X)sendsx to constx. In particularf induces a homeomorphism
STM×(P−∆)−∼=→FS(M)−FS(M)R.
Definition (End points of a geodesic) Forc ∈FS(X)we definec(∞)∈X by
c(∞) := lim
t→∞c(t) =
(c(c+) ifc+<∞;
[c|[0,∞)] ifc+=∞.
Definec(−∞)analogously.
Lemma The maps
FS(X)−FS(X)R → X, c7→c(−∞);
FS(X)−FS(X)R → X, c7→c(∞), are continuous.
The two maps appearing above cannot be continuosly extended to FS(X)by the following observation.
Letc be a generalized geodesic withc+<∞andc− =∞. Then c(−∞) 6= c(∞);
dFS(c,constc(∞)) ≤ ec+/2;
τ→∞lim Φτ(c) = constc(∞);
τ→∞lim Φτ(c)
(−∞) = c(∞);
Φτ(c)(−∞) = c(−∞) for allτ >0;
τ→∞lim (Φτ(c)(−∞)) = c(−∞).
Theorem (Embedding the flow space) If X is proper as a metric space, then the map
E: FS(X)−FS(X)R→R×X ×X ×X ×R defined by E(c) := (c−,c(−∞),c(0),c(∞),c+)is injective and continuous. It is a homeomorphism onto its image.
Lemma
If X is proper as a metric space and its covering dimensiondimX is
≤N, thendimX ≤N.
Proof:
LetU ={Ui |i ∈I}be an open covering ofX.
For everyx ∈X there arerx,Wx ⊆Brx(x0)andUx ∈ U such that x ∈ρ−1rx (Wx)⊂Ux.
SinceX is compact, a finite number of the setsρ−1rx (Wx)coverX. Note thatρr =ρr|B
r0(x0)◦ρr0 and hence ρ−1r (W) =ρ−1r0 (ρr|B
r0(x0)(W))ifr0 >r.
Therefore we can refineU to a finite coverV, such that there isr and a finite coverW ofBr(x0)such that
V =ρ−1r (W) :={ρ−1r (W)|W ∈ W}.
Wolfgang Lück (Bonn, Germany) The flow space Göttingen, June 24, 2011 27 / 35
Theorem (Dimension of the flow space)
Assume that X is proper and thatdimX ≤N. Then dim FS(X)−FS(X)R
≤3N+2.
Proof:
Every compact subsetK of FS(X)−FS(X)Ris homeomorphic to a compact subset ofR×X×X×X×R.
Hence its topological dimension satisfies dim(K)≤dim R×X ×X ×X ×R
=2 dim(R) +2 dim(X) +dim(X)≤3N+2.
One shows that FS(X)−FS(X)Rhas a countable basis for its topology.
Now dim FS(X)−FS(X)R
≤3N+2 follows from standard result of dimension theory.
The homotopy action on B
r(x
0)
TheG-action onX induces anG-action onX.
For technical reasons we will not take the spaceX as the space appearing in the axiomatic approach as we have done it for hyperbolic groups. We will take the closed ballBR(x0)for some base pointx0and some very large real numberR.
The prize to pay is that we do not obtain aG-action onBR(x0)but at least the following homotopyG-action.
Definition (The homotopyG-action onBR(x0))
Define ahomotopyG-action(ϕR,HR)onBR(x)as follows.
Forg∈G, we define the map
ϕRg:BR(x0)→BR(x0) byϕRg(x) :=ρR,x0(gx).
Forg,h∈Gwe define the homotopy Hg,hR :ϕRg ◦ϕRh 'ϕRgh
byHg,hR (x,t) :=ρR,x0 t·(ghx) + (1−t)·(g·ρR,x0(hx)) .
x0
x
gx BR(x0)
ϕRg(x)
x0
x
hx BR(x0)
y :=ρR,x0(hx)
gy ghx Hg,hR (x,t)
It turns out that the more obvious homotopy given by convex combination(x,t)7→t·ϕRgh(x) + (1−t)·ϕRg ◦ϕRh(x)is not appropriate for our purposes.
Notice thatHg,hR is indeed a homotopy fromϕRg ◦ϕRh toϕgh since Hg,hR (x,0) = ρR,x0 0·(ghx) +1·(g·ρR,x0(hx))
= ρR,x0 g·ρR,x0(hx)
= ϕRg ◦ϕRh(x),
and
Hg,hR (x,1) = ρR,x0 1·(ghx) +0·(g·ρR,x0(hx)
= ρR,x0(ghx)
= ϕRgh(x).
The map ι
Definition (The mapι) Define the map
ι:G×X →FS(X)
by sending(g,x)∈G×X to the generalized geodesiccgx0,gx fromgx0 togx.
The flow estimate
Theorem (The flow estimate)
Letβ,L>0. For allδ >0there are T,r >0with the following property:
For x1,x2∈X with dX(x1,x2)≤β, x ∈Br+L(x1)there isτ ∈[−β, β]
such that
dFS ΦT(cx1,ρr,x
1(x)),ΦT+τ(cx2,ρr,x
2(x))
≤ δ.
x1
x Br(x1)
Br(x2)