• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung: Hennig, S., Hölbling, D., Abad, L., Tiede, D. (2021): Contributory- Bürgerwissenschaften und naturräumliche Fragestellungen – Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung webbasierter Anwendungen am Beispiel des citizenMorph- Proj

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung: Hennig, S., Hölbling, D., Abad, L., Tiede, D. (2021): Contributory- Bürgerwissenschaften und naturräumliche Fragestellungen – Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung webbasierter Anwendungen am Beispiel des citizenMorph- Proj"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

www.nul-online.de 1

Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung:

Hennig, S., Hölbling, D., Abad, L., Tiede, D. (2021): Contributory-

Bürgerwissenschaften und naturräumliche Fragestellungen – Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung webbasierter Anwendungen am Beispiel des citizenMorph-

Projektes. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 53 (4), 14-23

Agarwal, B.B., Tayal, S.P. (2009): Software engineering. Laxmi Publications, Bangalore.

Al-Dalou’, R., Abu-Shanab, E. (2013): E-participation levels and technologies. ICIT 2013 The 6th International Conference on Information Technology.

Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., Wilderman, C.C. (2009):

Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, D.C.

Brenton, P., von Gavel, S., Vogel, E., Lecoq, M.-E. (2018): Technology infrastructure for citizen science. In: Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., Bonn, A. (Hrsg.), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press, London.

Bross, J., Sack, H., Meinel, C. (2007): Encouraging participation in virtual communities: The “IT- summit-blog” case. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet 5 (2), 113-129.

Cohn, J.P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58 (3), 192-197.

Coleman, D.J., Georgiadou, Y., Labonte, J. (2009): Volunteered Geographic Information: The Nature and Motivation of Produsers. IJSDIR 4 (2009), 332-358.

Corbett, J. (2009): Good practices in participatory mapping. A review prepared for the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).

Crowstone, K. Fagnot, I. (2008): The motivational arc of massive virtual collaboration. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.5.

Eitzel, M.V., Cappadonna, J.L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R.E., Virapongse, A., West, S.E., Kyba, C.C.M., Bowser, A., Cooper, C.B., Sforzi, A., Metcalfe, A.N., Harris, E.S., Thiel, M., Haklay, M., Ponciano, L., Roche, J., Ceccaroni, L., Shilling, F.M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Kiessling, T., Davis, B.Y., Jiang, Q. (2017):

Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2 (1), 1-20.

Fritz, S., See, L., Brovelli, M. (2017): Motivating and Sustaining Participation in VGI. In: Foody, G., Fritz, S., See, L. et al. (Hrsg.), Mapping and the Citizen Sensor (93-117). Ubiquity Press, London.

Gryl, I., Nehrdich, T., Vogler, R. (2013): geo@web. Zur Entfaltung und Anverwandlung eines neuen Forschungsfeldes. In: Gryl, I., Nehrdich, T., Vogler, R. (Hrsg.), geo@web. Medium, Räumlichkeit und geographische Bildung (9-31). Springer, Wiesbaden.

Haklay, M. (2013): Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information – overview and typology of participation. In: Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. (Hrsg.), Crowdsourcing Geographic

Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (105-122). Springer, Berlin.

Haltofová, B. (2019): Critical success factors of geocrowdsourcing use in e-government: a case study from the Czech Republic. Urban Research & Practice 13 (2), 434-451.

Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K.T., Uhlik, J., Dörler, D. (2019):Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. PNAS 116 (2), 8089-8092.

Hennig, S. Voger, R. (2016): User-centred map applications through participatory design: Experiences gained during the “YouthMap 5020” project. The Cartographic Journal 53 (3), 213-229.

– (2018): Motivation und webbasierte Geopartizipation. AGIT Journal 2018 (4), 282-291.

–, Hölbling, D., Ferber, N., Tiede, D. (2019): Rahmenkonzept und Komponenten für Citizen Science Projekte. Das Projekt citizenMorph. AGIT Journal 2019 (1), 2–13.

–, Abad, L., Hölbling, D., Tiede, D. (2020): Implementing Geo Citizen Science Solutions: Experiences from the citizenMorph Project. GI_Forum 8 (1), 3-14.

(2)

www.nul-online.de 2 Herfort, B., Eckle, M., Porto de Albuquerque, P., Zipf, A. (2015): Towards assessing the quality of

volunteered geographic information from OpenStreetMap for identifying critical infrastructure.

Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2015 Conference.

Holeman, I., Kane, D. (2020): Human-centered design for global health equity. Information Technology for Development 26 (3), 477-505.

IAP2 (2014): IAP2’s public participation spectrum. https://www.iap2.org.au/About-Us/About-IAP2- Australasia-/Spectrum (Zugriff 29.03.2020).

Kermish-Allen, R., Sibuma, B., Switzer, A., MacPhee, M. (2017): Citizen Science. In: Kermish-Allen, R., Sibuma, B., Switzer, A., MacPhee, M. (Hrsg.), CIRCL Primer Series. http://circlcenter.org/citizen- science (Zugriff 10.12.2020).

Kimura, A.H., Kinchy, A. (2016): Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2 (2016), 331-361.

King, S., Brown, P. (2007): Fix My Street or Else: Using the Internet to Voice Local Public Service Concerns. ICEGOV '07: International conference on theory and practice in electronic governance.

KUM Kompetenzzentrum Usability im Mittelstand (2019): Methodenhandbuch. Nutzerzentrierte Entwicklung. http://www.usabilityzentrum.de/dokumente/Methodenhandbuch.pdf (Zugriff 10.12.2020).

Lamourex, Z., Fast, V. (2019): The tools of citizen science: An evaluation of map-based crowdsourcing platforms. Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada 7 (4), 1-7.

Liberatore, A., Bowkett, E., MacLeod, C.J., Spurr, E., Longnecker, N. (2018): Social Media as a Platform for a Citizen Science Community of Practice. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 3 (1), 3.

McCully, W., Lampe, C., Sarkar, C., Velasquez, A., Sreevinasan, A. (2011): Online and offline

interactions in online communities. WikiSym ’11: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration.

Milovanovic, D. (2003): Interactive planning – use of the ICT as a support for public participation in planning urban development: Serbia and Montenegro cases. 39th ISoCaPR Congress 2003.

Mogstad, A., Høiseth, M., Pettersen, I.N. (2018): Co-creation in Public Service Innovation: A review of how to encourage employee engagement in co-creation. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018.

Morais, A.M.M., Raddick, J., dos Santos, R.D.C. (2013): Visualization and characterization of users in a citizen science project. Proc. SPIE 8758, Next-Generation Analyst, 87580L.

Munger, N. (2016): Strategies for onboarding new users. https://blog.intercom.com/strategies-for- onboarding-new-users (Zugriff 16.01.2020).

Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., Crowston, K. (2012): The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (6), 298-304.

–, Zimmernab, D.E., Crall, A., Laituri, M., Graham, J., Spapel, L. (2010): User-friendly web mapping:

Lessons from a citizen science website. IJGIS 24 (12), 1851-1869.

Nielsen, J. (1994): Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, USA.

– (2006): Digital divide: the 3 stages. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/digital-divide-the-three- stages/ (Zugriff 02.03.2020).

NOAA Coastal Services Center (2014): Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for participatory mapping.

In: Cuocco, E.P. (Hrsg.), Social Science Tools for Coastal Management: Considerations, Insight, Strategies (51-66). Nova Publishers, New York, USA.

Ooms, K., Skarlatidou, A. (2018): Usability Engineering and Evaluation. The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge (1st Quarter 2018 Edition).

https://gistbok.ucgis.org/bok-topics/usability-engineering-evaluation (Zugriff 10.12.2020).

Pánek, I. (2016): From mental maps to geoparticipation. The Cartographic Journal 53 (4), 300-307.

Peris, M., Sperling, A., Blinn, N., Nüttgens, M., Gehrke, N. (2011): Participatory design of Web 2.0 applications in SME networks. 24th Bled eConference eFuture: Creating Solutions for the Individual, Organisations and Society.

Pressman, R.S., Maxim, B.R. (2014): Software Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Renz, J., Staubitz, T., Pollack, J., Meinel, J. (2014): Improving the onboarding user experience in MOOCS. EDULEARN 2014.

(3)

www.nul-online.de 3 Roy, H.E., Pocock, M., Preston, C.D., Roy, D.B., Savage, j., Tweddle, J.C., Robinson, L.D. (2012):

Understanding citizen Science and environmental monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF.

NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum.

See, L., Mooney, P., Foody, G., Bastin, L., Comber, A., Estima, J., Fritz, S., Kerle, N., Jiang, B., Laakso, M., Liu, H.-Y., Milčinski, G., Nikšič, M., Painho, M., Pődör, A., Olteanu-Raimond, A.-M., Rutzinger, M. (2016): Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf. 5 (5), 55.

Simm, D. (2008): Boring, boring ... geomorphology? The need for higher education to engage with schools and further education. Geophemera, 102, 6-10.

Skarlatidou, A., Hamilton, A., Vitos, M, Haklay, M. (2017): What do volunteers want from citizen science technologies? A systematic literature review and best practice guidelines. JCOM 18 (1), A02.

Sommerville, I. (2018): Software engineering. Pearson, Bonn.

Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., Klok, J. (2007): Early user involvement in research and design projects – A review of methods and practices.23rd EGOS Colloquium (European Group for Organizational Studies).

Thielmann, T., van der Velden, L., Fischer, F., Vogler, R. (2012): Dwelling in the Web: Towards a Googlization of Space. HIIG Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-03.

USABILITY.GOV (2014): User experience basics. https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user- experience.html (Zugriff 20.02.2020).

Van Dijk, J. (2012): The evolution of the digital divide – the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In: Bus, J., Crompton, M., Hildebrand, M., Metakides, G. (Hrsg.), Digital Enlightenment Yearbook (57-75). IOS Press Ebooks, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

W3C WAI (2005): Introduction to Web accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (Zugriff 20.02.2020).

Wiggins, A., Crowston, K. (2015): Surveying the citizen science landscape. First Monday 20 (1), 5 January 2015.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Promoting consistent data collection across citizen science initiatives through aligning definitions with global definitions; and.

The first two themes were divided into (i) applications relevant during a flood event, which includes automated street flooding detection using crowdsourced photographs and

Where VGI is very much focused on the spatial component of the information, citizen science is a broader domain in which citizens take part in some aspect of scientific research

A further application area in which VGI can serve as a data source is land cover mapping, which is the focus of two papers in this Special Issue.. In the first paper, Antoniou

There are many current biodiversity- related CS projects that collect information on habitats, and there is a considerable amount of land cover and land use now being

Ambient geographic information (AGI) Citizen-contributed geographic information (CCGI) Citizen Cyberscience Citizen science Collaborative mapping Collaboratively contributed

Relationships between the actual and estimated accuracy for volunteers contributing different amounts of data based on the first two batches of images, labelling (a) 1–29 cases,

Data collected from Geo-Wiki crowdsourcing campaigns and serious gaming applications have led to improved global maps of cropland, forest cover, and land cover distributions..