• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung:"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

www.nul-online.de 1

Literaturverzeichnis zur Veröffentlichung:

S

PEAK

, A., Z

ERBE

, S. (2019): Städtische Baumpflanzungen auf dem Prüfstand – was leisten sie, wie können sie schaden? Das Beispiel der Stadt Meran in Südtirol (Norditalien). Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 51 (8), 366-373.

BMUB (2015): Grün in der Stadt – für eine lebenswerte Zukunft. Grünbuch Stadtgrün.

Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB), Berlin.

BOCHOW, M. (2010): Automatisierungspotenzial von Stadtbiotopkartierungen durch Methoden der Fernerkundung. Logos, Berlin.

CALFAPIETRA,C.,FARES,S.,MANES,F.,MORANI,A.,SGRIGNA,G.,LORETO,F. (2013): Role of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOC) emitted by urban trees on ozone concentration in cities: a review.

Environ. Pollut. 183, 71-80.

CARIÑANOS,P.,CASARES-PORCEL,M.,QUESADA-RUBIO,J.-M. (2014): Estimating the allergenic potential of urban green spaces: a case study in Granada, Spain. Landsc. Urban Plann. 123, 134-144.

CHAPARRO,L.TERRADAS,J.(2009): Ecological services of urban forest in Barcelona. Center de Recerca Ecologica I Applications Forestals, Bellaterra, Spain.

COMUNE DI MERANO (2010): Merano Garden City.

DOBBS,C.,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,ZIPPERER,W.C.(2011):A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape Urban Plann. 99,196-206.

–,KENDAL,D.,NITSCHKE,C.R.(2014):Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol. Ind.43,44-55.

DÖHREN,P. VON,HAASE, D. (2015): Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol. Indic. 52, 490-497.

ELMQVIST,T.,FRAGKIAS,M.,GOODNESS,J.,GÜNERALP,B.,MARCOTULLIO,P.J.,MCDONALD,R.I.,PARNELL,S., SCHEWENIUS,M.,SENDSTAD,M.,SETO,K.C.,WILKINSON, C. (2013): Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities. Springer Netherlands.

EU (2007): Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. European Commission.

FRANKE,T.,BÖHME,C.,STRAUSS,W.C.,BECKMANN,K.J.,MÜLLER,A.,MARSHALL,T. (2012): 5 Jahre LEIPZIG CHARTA – Integrierte Stadtentwicklung als Erfolgsbedingung einer nachhaltigen Stadt. Integrierte Stadtentwicklung in den 27 Mitgliedstaaten der EU und ihren Beitrittskandidaten.

Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (Hrsg.).

FREUDENBERG,M.(2003):CIs of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/16, OECD Publishing, Paris.

GRUNEWALD,K.,BASTIAN, O. (Hrsg.) (2012): Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Konzept, Methoden und Fallbeispiele. Springer Spektrum, Heidelberg

HAASE,D.,LARONDELLE,N.,ANDERSSON,E.,ARTMANN,M.,BORGSTRÖM,S.,BREUSTE,J.,GOMEZ-BAGGETHUN,E., GREN,Å.,HAMSTEAD,Z.,HANSEN,R.,KABISCH,N.,KREMER,P.,LANGEMEYER,J.,RALL,E.L.,MCPHEARSON,T., PAULEIT,S.,QURESHI,S.,SCHWARZ,N.,VOIGT,A.,WURSTER,D.,ELMQVIS,T. (2014): Quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43 (4), 413- 433.

HÉDL, R. (2007): Is sampling subjectivity a distorting factor in surveys for vegetation diversity? Folia Geobot. 42, 191-198.

I-TREE (2017): i-Tree. Tools for assessing and managing forests and community trees.

I-TREE ECO (2017): Field manual.

ISTAT (2017): Italian National Institute of Statistics.

KOLSTAD, C.D. (2010): Environmental Economics. 2. Aufl., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

KONIJNENDIJK,C.C.,RICARD,R.M.,KENNEY,A.,RANDRUP,T.B.(2016):Defining urban forestry – a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4, 93-103.

LAKES,T.,KIM,H.-O. (2012): The urban environmental indicator “Biotope Area Ratio” – An enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing.

Ecol. Ind. 13, 93-103.

(2)

www.nul-online.de 2 LYYTIMÄKI, J. (2015): Ecosystem disservices: embrace the catchword. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 136.

–,SIPILÄ, M. (2009): Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Green. 8 (4), 309-315.

MACARTHUR,R.,WILSON, E.O. (1963): An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373- 387.

MCPHERSON,E.G. (1984): Planting design for solar control. In: McPherson, E.G. (Hrsg.): Energy-conserving Site Design. Am. Soc. Oc Landsc. Arch., Washington, DC, S. 141-164.

MEA (2005): Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.

Meteo Alto Adige (2017): Historical climate data.

MICHALCOVÁ,D.,LVONČÍK,S.,CHYTRÝ,M.,HÁJEK, O. (2011): Bias in vegetation databases? A comparison of stratified-random and preferential sampling. J. Veg. Sci. 22, 281-291.

MULLANEY,J.,LUCKE,T.,TRUEMAN,S.J. (2015): A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc. Urb. Plann. 134, 157-166.

NARDO,M.,SAISANA,M.,SALTELLI,A.,TARANTOLA,S.,HOFFMAN,A.GIOVANNINI, E. (2005): Handbook on constructing CIs: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Papers No. 2005/03, OECD Publishing, Paris.

NOWAK,D.J.,WALTON,J.T.,STEVENS,J.C.,CRANE,D.E.,HOEHN,R.E. (2008): Effect of plot and sample size on timing and precision of urban forest assessments. Arboriculture & Urb. For. 34 (6), 386-390.

OGREN, T.L. (2015): The Allergy-fighting Garden. Ten Speed Press, New York.

PATAKI,D.E.,CARREIRO,M.M.,CHERRIER,J.,GRULKE,N.E.,JENNINGS,V.,PINCETL,S.,POUYAT,R.V.,WHITLOW,T.H., ZIPPERER, W.H. (2011): Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9 (1), 27-36.

PHILLIPS, R. (1978): Trees in Britain, Europe and North America. Pan Books Ltd, London PIGNATTI, S. (2017): Flora d’Italia, Band 1. Edagricole Ltd., Bologna.

PLOTKIN,J.B.,MULLER-LANDAU, H.C. (2002): Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology 83 (12), 3344-3356.

PONCE-DOLOSO,M.,VALLEJOS-BARRA,Ó,ESCOBEDO,F.J.(2017):A formula for monetary valuation of urban trees in central Chile. Bosque 38(1), 67-78.

ROLOFF A. (2013): Bäume in der Stadt. Besonderheiten – Funktion – Nutzen – Arten – Risiken. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

ROY,S.,BYRNE,J.,PICKERING, C. (2012): A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urb. For. Urban Green. 11, 351-363.

RUSSO,A.,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,CIRELLA,G.T.,ZERBE, S. (2017): Edible green infrastructure: an approach and review of provisioning ecosystem services and disservices in urban environments. Agric. Ecosyst.

Environ. 242, 53-66.

–,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,ZERBE, S. (2016): Quantifying the local-scale ecosystem services provided by urban treed streetscapes in Bolzano, Italy. Environmental Science 3 (1), 58-76.

SAISANA M.,SALTELLI,A.,TARANTOLA,S.(2005):Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the analysis and validation of composite indicators. J Royal Stat. Soc. A 168(2), 307-323.

SCHULTE,W.,SUKOPP, H. (2000): Stadt- und Dorfbiotopkartierungen: Erfassung und Analyse ökologischer Grundlagen im besiedelten Bereich der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – ein Überblick. Natursch Landschaftspl 32 (5), 140-147.

SEDGHY,F.,VARASTEH,A.-R.,SANKIAN,M.,MOGHADAM, M. (2018): Interaction between air pollutants and pollen grains: the role on the rising trend in allergy. Rep. Biochem. & Molecular Biol. 6 (2), 219-224.

SHAPIRO,J.,BÁLDI,A.(2014):Accurate accounting: how to balance ecosystem services and disservices.

Ecosyst. Serv.7,201-202.

SIMBERLOFF,D.S. (1972): Models in biogeography. In: SCHOPF, T.J.M. (Hrsg.): Models in paleobiology.

Freeman, San Francisco, S. 160-191.

SIMBERLOFF,D.(2015):Non-native invasive species and novel ecosystems. F1000Prime Rep.7,47.

SOTO,J.R.,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,KHACHATRYAN,H.,ADAMS,D.C.(2018):Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosyst. Serv.29,31-39.

(3)

www.nul-online.de 3 SPEAK,A.,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,RUSSO,A.,ZERBE, S. (2018a): Comparing convenience and probability sampling for

urban ecology applications. J. Appl. Ecol. 55 (5), 2332-2342.

–,ESCOBEDO,F.J.,RUSSO,A.,ZERBE, S. (2018b): An ecosystem service-disservice ratio: Using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees. Ecol. Ind. 95, 544-553.

SWAIN,H.M.,BOUGHTON,E.H.,BOHLEN,P.J.,O’GENE, L.L. (2013): Trade-offs among ecosystem services and disservices on a Florida ranch. Rangelands 35 (5), 75-87.

VOGT,J.,GILLNER,S.,HOFFMAN,M.,THARANG,A.,DETTMANN,S.,GERSTENBERG,T.,SCHMIDT,C.,GEBAUER,H.,VAN DE RIET,K.,BERGER,U.,ROLOFF, A. (2017): Citree: a database supporting supporting tree selection for urban areas in temperate climate. Landsc. Urb. Plann. 157, 14-25.

ZERBE,S.,PLAGG,B.,POLO,A. (2018): Städtische Ökosysteme und menschliche Gesundheit. Ein interdisziplinarer Brückenschlag zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung und Renaturierung urbaner Lebensraume. In: FEHR,R.,HORNBERG, C. (Hrsg.): Stadt der Zukunft – Gesund und nachhaltig.

Brückenbau zwischen Disziplinen und Sektoren. Oekom, München: 169-185.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The distribution of total studies per main ecosystem services group showed relatively similar patterns for Provisioning and Supporting Services relative to the five main

The really interesting aspects of this study were never completed , due most l y to computer difficulties. These were the education process of the decision maker

While the European Soil Charter of 1972 set the basis for a multi-functional understanding of soil, mono-functional approaches have overruled in the last decades: Agronomists

Keywords: life cycle assessment, ecosystem services, biodiversity, soil quality, landscape

Since the relationships of grazing intensity with fodder pro- duction and plant species richness are opposite, the provision of both services at a given site is difficult and

The Paris Agreement’s Article 8 states: “Parties recognize the importance of averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of

Combining comprehensive BN models with GIS, this study mapped the supply, demand, and flow of nine ES for local stakeholders in a forest frontier landscape in Tanintharyi

The systems approach would recognize the constraints believed to be known and suggested by the planetary environmental boundaries as delineating the “safe operating space” for