• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Enhancing species richness with unfertilised sown meadows

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Enhancing species richness with unfertilised sown meadows "

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

13

th

International IFOAM Scientific Conference, Basel, 28-31 août 2000, VDF Hochschulverlag AG, ETH-Zürich, p. 462

Enhancing species richness with unfertilised sown meadows

Eric Mosimann and Jacques Troxler

Swiss Federal Research Station for Plant Production of Changins (RAC), CH-1260 Nyon e-mail : eric.mosimann@rac.admin.ch

Keywords : extensive meadows, sowing method, management, botanical diversity, nutritive value Introduction

Restoring species richness in lowland regions is a priority in Switzerland. Ecological compensation areas on arable crop land are therefore subsidised. In a first experiment, we tried to optimise the botanical composition by using the generative potential of permanent grassland. In a second trial, we compared the effect of two cutting systems on the forage production of two seeds mixtures.

Material and methods

First experiment. The 0.8 ha field located at an altitude of 500 m a.s.l. has been ploughed after maize in 1995 and is characterised by a slope with superficial soil (xeromorphic) and a depression with deep soil (hydromorphic). In May 1995 a grasses-legumes-flowers mixture has been sown on half of the plot. Main components of these commercial seeds were Arrhenatherum elatius, Dactylis glomerata, Festuca pratensis, Lotus corniculatus and flowers ecotypes. The second part was sown between July and September 1995 using the fresh cut grass from species rich meadows (Mesobromion) of the region spread out on the harrowed soil (meadows seeds).

Second experiment. The experimental field is situated at an altitude of 650 m a.s.l. The trial was carried out in replicated small plots between 1995 and 1997. Main species of the two seeds mixtures were: Arrhenatherum elatius, Dactylis glomerata, Festuca pratensis and Onobrychis viciifolia for mixture 1; Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne, Lotus corniculatus and flowers ecotypes for mixture 2. Treatment 1 was the “ official ” management with a first cut done after the 15th June. Treatment 2 included a first cut before 10th May followed by a long regrowth till end of August, with the goal to favour the reproduction of wild animals.

Results and discussion

First experiment. The meadows seeds were firstly contaminated with annual weeds (fig. 1). In 1999, the main flower in all plots was Rhinantus alectorolophus which caused the decrease of grasses. The plot sown with meadows seeds contained 55 species on superficial soil. The other plots were less diversified with 37 species.

Second experiment. A late first cut influenced favourably legumes when a first cut in May increased the contribution of grasses (tab. 1). In that case the harvested forage can be used for dairy cows. Other cuts have a very low nutritive value, particularly 1st cut in treatment 1 and 2nd cut in treatment 2.

Figure 1. Evolution of the botanical composition (1st experiment, %)

Table 1. Characteristics of two mixtures under two management (2nd experiment)

Conclusions

Enhancing plant species richness of unfertilised sown meadows can be achieved by using the seeds potential of existing meadows. There is no negative effect on the forage production when the management is adapted to the needs of wild animals as lark, hare or deer.

Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Mixture 1 Mixture 2 Botanical composition (%)

grasses 48 46 58 62

legumes 52 36 42 26

flowers - 17 - 12

Yield (t DM ha-1)

1st cut 8.7 5.1 4.1 2.3

2nd cut 3.9 1.7 6.2 4.9

3rd cut 2.7 1.4 3.2 1.7

total 15.3 8.2 13.5 8.9

Energy content (NEL, MJ kg-1 DM)

1st cut 4.6 4.9 6.0 6.3

2nd cut 4.8 5.4 4.6 4.3

3rd cut 5.6 5.3 5.6 5.7

Organic matter digestibility (%)

1st cut 61 64 75 78

2nd cut 62 69 59 61

3rd cut 73 75 73 74

Treatment 1 Treatment 2 (1st cut mid-June) (1st cut beginning of May)

Weeds

Grasses Legumes

Flowers

Meadows seeds Commercial seeds

96 97 98 99

20 40 60 80 100

Weeds

Grasses Legumes

Flowers

96 97 98 99

20 40 60 80 100

Weeds

Grasses Legumes

Flowers

20 40 60 80 100

96 97 98 99

20 40 60 80 100

96 97 98 99

Weeds

Grasses Legumes

Flowers

Xeromorphic soilHydromorphic soil

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

expected relationship (Figure 4B), could be due to habitat filtering at the scale of the relevé.. Relevé α-diversity per relevé of Cape restios versus the probabilistic species

Specifically, diversity effects were the result of beneficial interactions between grass and legume species for the majority of forage production and N cycling functions for all

Natural ecosystem type Natural systems Organic farming/ Low input Reduced tillage systems High-input systems. Calcaric Leptosol Oehl

etliche, mehrere Cerastium holosteoides etliche, mehrere Dactylis glomerata zahlreich, viele Festuca arundinacea wenige, vereinzelt Festuca pratensis etliche, mehrere. Festuca

Cardamine pratensis etliche, mehrere nein. Festuca rubra sehr

Key words: Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca pratensis Huds., genetic variability, Lolium perenne L., RAPD markers, vegetative growth

Danach folgen Rotschwingel (Festuca rubra spp.), Schafschwingel und verwandte Arten (Festuca ovina), Wiesenrispe (Poa pratensis) sowie alle anderen Rispengräser (Poa spp.)

** Chromosomenzählung durch T.. 1: Merkmale von Festuca lemanii und F.. 3) ist ein (30)50–70(95) cm hohes, stark beblättertes ausdauerndes Horst- gras; Erneuerungssprosse