NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
Work Home Conflict among nurses in Europe
- results from the European NEXT - Study
(QLK6-CT-2001-00475)
Angelika Kuemmerling, Michael Simon, Hans-Martin Hasselhorn and the NEXT-Study Group
NEXT –
nurses‘ early exit study
once she was a nurse...
NEXT-Study Group European co-ordination Hans-Martin Hasselhorn Bernd Hans Müller FB D – Safety Engineering University of Wuppertal Gauss-Strasse 20 D 42097 Wuppertal, Germany Email: next@uni-wuppertal.de Internet: www.next-study.net
University of Wuppertal
the problems:
• lack of nurses
• many nurses leave their profession due to a work home conflict
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
the questions:
work home conflict (WHC):
1. intensity?
2. European comparison?
3. consequences?
4. Which aspects at work are responsible for WHC?
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
the tool:
European NEXT-Study:
assessing reasons, circumstances and
consequences of premature departure from the nursing profession.
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
The NEXT-Study:..
10 participating countries
FIN
S
UK
NL
B
PL
D
NEXT basic assessment
nursing force
• 77,681 nurses contacted
• 39,893 respondents
• response rate 51% (32-77%)
• 585 institutions In this analysis:
• 27,603 registered nurses
• 8 countries
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
Work home conflict scale by Netemeyer et al. (1996)
• The demands of work interfere with my home and family life.
• The amount of time my job takes makes it difficult to fulfil family responsibilities.
• Things I want to do at home do not get done because of the demands of my job.
• My job produces strain that makes it difficult to fulfil family duties.
• Due to work-related duties, I have to make changes to my plans for family activities.
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
work family conflict (WFC)
family work conflict (FWC)
Work home conflict - 2 directions
WORK HOME
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
1 2 3 4 5
BE D FIN FR IT NL PL SLK
WFC &
FWC scores (mean)
work family conflict (WFC) family work conflict (FWC) max.
min.
Work family conflict &
family work conflict scores (RN)
50
25 75
work family conflict - histogram
min. max work home conflict
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
frequen- cy
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Std.dev. = 26.20 mean = 42.2
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
the questions:
work home conflict (WHC):
1. intensity?
2. European comparison?
3. consequences?
4. Which aspects at work are responsible for WHC?
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
WFC vs burnout by quartiles
23
32
38
52
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
low medium low
medium high
high
Belgium Germany Finland France Italy Norway Netherlands Poland Slovakia
mean burnout
score (0-100)
work-family-conflict
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
WFC vs intention to leave the nursing profession by quartiles
14
18
20
31
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
low medium low
medium high
high
Belgium Germany Finland France Italy Norway Netherlands Poland Slovakia
proportion frequently
consi- dering leaving
the profession
(%)
work family conflict
the questions:
work home conflict (WHC):
1. intensity?
2. European comparison?
3. consequences?
4. Which aspects at work are responsible for WHC?
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
model of work family conflict (Greenhaus and Beutell (1985)
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands
1.
Slovakia Poland Netherlands Italy
France Finland Germany Belgium
4.
3.
2.
causes of WFC
- multiple linear regression
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands
1.
overtime
Slovakia
overtime
Poland
overtime
Netherlands
overtime
Italy
overtime
France
overtime
Finland
overtime
Germany
overtime
Belgium
4.
3.
2.
causes of WFC
- multiple linear regression
quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands
1.
overtime not day
shift
Slovakia
not day shift overtime
Poland
overtime day &
night shift
Netherlands
overtime
Italy
not regular day work overtime
France
day & night shift overtime
not regular day work
Finland
overtime
Germany
overtime day &
night shift
Belgium
4.
3.
2.
causes of WFC
- multiple linear regression
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands quantitativ e demands
1.
quality of leadership overtime
not day shift
Slovakia
quality of leadership not day
shift overtime
Poland
working hours/week overtime
day &
night shift
Netherlands
emotional demands gender
(women+) overtime
Italy
not regular day work overtime
emotional demands
France
day & night shift overtime
not regular day work
Finland
emotional demands overtime
working hours/week
Germany
overtime working
hours/week day &
night shift
Belgium
4.
3.
2.
causes of WFC
- multiple linear regression
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
shift patterns and work family conflict
0 10 20 30 40 50
shift work with nights shift work without nights only night shift day work others day work regular hours
work familiy conflict score (+ 99% CI)
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
summary results
• quantitative demands highest predictor (= perceived work pressure)
• irregularity is second predictor
• unpredictability = overtime
• leadership only on Poland and Slovakia
• international benchmarking shows that WHC is not inevitable
• WFC may be a psychosocial topic at OH work
the NEXT-Consortium
1. University of Wuppertal,
Hans-Martin Hasselhorn, Bernd Müller, Peter Tackenberg, Angelika Kümmerling, Michel Simon
2. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Malin Josephson, Per Lindberg, Eva Vingård
3. Private University of Witten, Andreas Büscher, Steffi Stelzig 4. FIOSH, Dortmund, Karl Kuhn, Beate Beermann
5. UCL, Brussels, Sabine Stordeur, William D’hoore 6. FIOSH, Turku, Marjukka Laine, Gustav Wickström 7. APHP, Paris, Madeleine Estryn Behar, Olivier Nezet, Claire
Charton, Jean-Francois Caillard
8. University of Milano, Donatella Camerino, Paul Conway, Alberto Bertazzi
9. University of Twente, Beate van der Heijden, Esther van der Schoot
10. NCSR, London / Edinburgh, Simon Anderson
11. City University, London, Dinah Gould, Marina Fontenla 12. CIOP, Warszaw, Maria Widerszal-Bazyl, Pjotr Radkiewicz 13. Jagiellonian University Krakow, Janusz Pokorski, Joanna
Pokorska, Halszka Oginska, Ewa Pietsch
14. P.J. Safarik University Kosice, Maria Kovarova, Alzbeta Hanzlikova, Marian Rimarcik, Marek Jurkovic
D
S D D B FIN F I NL UK UK PL PL SLK
NEXT-Kitakyushu 2004
NEXT –
nurses‘ early exit study
once she was a nurse...
NEXT-Study Group European co-ordination Hans-Martin Hasselhorn Bernd Hans Müller FB D – Safety Engineering University of Wuppertal Gauss-Strasse 20 D 42097 Wuppertal, Germany Email: next@uni-wuppertal.de Internet: www.next-study.net
University of Wuppertal