Introd The u price Germ rope.
uncer al. 20 nal m ket d BLECH
devel in fo ident of the settin marke explo and m as to indica Data The d matio young news other (prod quota in €/k perio based Resul There some system with not b ductio relate produ Table produ
duction undervaluatio
reporting is many (KEZEYA
Asymmetric rtain price ex 019). Farm in marketing but development
ER et al. 2019 oped from th reign trade ifying possibl e most impor ng and to fost et developm ore the correl meat and the
evaluate wh ators for legu
and Method data used ha ons‐Gesellsch
g bull meat paper of the r variables, in ucer prices) ation differed
kg and in €/
d January 20 d on Pearson lts and Discu e are strong e prices of an mic differenc
producer pri be observed.
on prices of ed to legume ucer prices w e 1 shows the
ucer prices
Correla
Bruno Kez
on of domes s an obstacle
SEPNGANG et c market info xpectations a
ternal use ca t cannot be d s due to su 9). In earlier he main feed (KEZEYA SEPN
le price indica rtant objectiv ter price sett ment. The aim
ation betwee prices of fiel hether these umes.
ology as been obta haft mbH (A
were taken e region Wes ncluding data refer to the d: legumes, f /piece. With 007 to Januar
was carried o ssion
correlations imal feed, fe ce in the co ices or whole Thus, it is no the variable e prices. Fo were used for e results of t of legumes
ation betw
zeya Sepnga
stic‐grown le e to market al. 2018) an ormation bet re major hin an be an alte de‐coupled fr ubstitution e studies, pric substitutes a
GANG et al.
ators for legu ves to better ing transpare m of the pre en the prices ld beans and e prices can
ained from A AMI), the pri
from the ag stfalen‐Lippe.
a on field pea whole of Ge feed and fert
these month ry 2019, a co out using SPS
s between le ertilisers and orrelations o esale prices ot clear at wh es studied w or the sake o further evalu the correlatio with the p
Rese
‐ Fachber www4.fh‐sw
ween pric feed, fert
ang, Wolfgan
egumes in of t developme nd possibly in
tween actors drances (JOUA
ernative for e rom general effects (ZERH
e indicators and the unit v
2018). How umes remains
understand ency as a bas esent study s of feed, fert
field peas as be used as
Agrarmarkt I ces of pork gricultural we
The prices o as and faba b ermany. The iliser in €/t, hly prices fo orrelation ana
SS software.
egume prices meat produc f these varia of legumes c hich stage of were more cl of simplicity, uation.
on analysis o prices of va
arch No
reich Agrarwirt wf.de/cms/fors
ces of grai tilisers and
ng Stauss, In
fficial nt in n Eu‐
s and
AN et exter‐
mar‐
USEN‐ were value wever, s one price sis for is to tiliser s well price
Infor‐
k and eekly of all beans price meat r the alysis
s and cts. A ables could f pro‐
osely only of the arious
feed liste sign thes peas price kets ence tion Tab.
and
Animal feeds Fertilisers Meat
**. Th lation
otes
schaft, Soest ‐ schungsnotizen
n legumes d meat.
na Stute, Ma dstuffs, fertil
d for which ificance level se variables
s in almost al es of field pe and that fab e due to the c
.
1: Correlatio the prices of
Variab Complete feed for middle fat Milk performa Complete feed for pre‐fatten Complete feed for poultry (la Calcium amm nitrate 27% N Granulated ur 46% Nitrogen Ammonium n 28% Nitrogen Triple superph 46% P2O5 Corn potash 40% K2O Calves Fleckvieh Chicken Ø all t weights Turkeys Cocks Pigs NRW
Young bulls N he correlation (r) n (r) is significant
N
n/
s and pric
arcus Merge isers and m
the correlat of at least 5%
is higher wit ll cases. This as are somew ba beans hav comparativel
ons between various anima bles
dingstuffs tening pig
r N ance feed r N dingstuffs ing pig
r N dingstuffs ying hens)
r N onium itrogen
r N
rea r
N itrate r N hosphate r N r N r N target r N s 18,5 kg r N r N
RW r
N is significant at t at the level of 0.0
Nr. 13e/Mär
ces of
enthaler meat. Only th
ion with leg
%. In general th faba bea could be an what more re ve a stronger ly higher sha
the producer al feed, fertil
Field peas 0,894**
135 0,190
43 0,897**
135 0,892**
135 0,486**
54 0,673**
54 0,659**
54 0,315*
54 0,544**
54 0,325**
135 0,796**
135 0,703**
135 0,529**
131 0,600**
133 the level of 0.01 05 (2‐sided). N.
rz 2019
hose variable ume prices i
, the correlat ns than with indication th elated to food r agricultural
res in animal
r prices of leg isers and mea Faba bea
0,901**
129 0,632**
43 0,916**
129 0,901**
129 0,574**
45 0,760**
45 0,722**
45 0,421**
45 0,604**
45 0,260**
129 0,812**
129 0,727**
129 0,544**
126 0,571**
128 (2‐sided). *. Th Sample.
es are s at a tion of h field hat the d mar‐
refer‐
nutri‐
gumes at.
ns
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
he corre‐
Prices the p umes sever umes poun ating of co prices There lizer p corre since legum could tion w fertili The s N‐con this is duced more produ as it crops is par creas Howe the co the co of rel prote grain that t prices ther d crops the ov The s repre ysis. I betwe betwe regio of nu legum Meat legum
s in the feed prices of legu s in feeding in ral componen s on an aggr
d feed and s price quotat mpound fee s and support e are two pos prices with p
lations only the symbiot mes plants b
be replaced with other fe
zer).
second explan ntaining ferti s that at high d not becaus because of uct. The by‐p is the case s. The produc ribus under t
e in demand ever, the obs
orrelation on orrelation on latively low ein demand, t
production t the positive c s of fertilizer due to the p s and less to verall market maller samp esents a limita
In addition, i een fertilizer een regions ns with high utrients, whic mes.
t prices, whic mes plants, a
d group show umes. This in n Germany. L nts in the fee
egate level a ince few reg tions for legu
d could be u t price forma ssible explana
rices of legum with fertiliz tic compoun inds nitrogen . However, th rtilizers (tripl nation is tha ilizers is neg h N fertilizer
se of the ma the biologic product woul when legum ction of legum
the assumpti d) put pressu erved positiv n the fertilize n the product
N prices in f the demand that is more i correlation be rs containing
rotein or tot the relatively t.
le (45 and 54 ation of the t is importan r prices on
with high an livestock de ch reduces t ch correlate s are also show
Re
w the highest ndicates the Legumes can ed ration. Si are related t gional and tem
umes are ava used as indic ation.
ations for the mes. The firs zers containi nd of the no n and thus m he results als le superphos t the existing gative. The a prices, more ain product o ally fixed N d become th mes would be
mes would inc ion of a non ure on the p ve correlation er market is l
t markets for fertilizers (in for fertilizer n demand). I etween legum g N and othe
al product de y low quantit 4) in the data informative v nt to note tha legume culti nd low livest ensities there
the producti significantly w wn in table
esearch
‐ Fachberei www4.fh‐swf correlations main use of be used as o nce prices of to prices of mporal differ ailable, the p cators for leg e relation of f t is that ther ing nitrogen dular bacter mineral ferti so show a cor
phate and po g correlation argument be legumes are of the grains as the actua e main prod e grown as c crease and (c
‐simultaneou rices of legu ns here show ess relevant r protein bec the case of also rises fo t can be assu me prices and er fertilizers i
emand of all ties of legum a set of this g value of this at the correl vation can d tock densitie e is an oversu on incentive with the pric 1. When use
Notes
ich Agrarwirtsc f.de/cms/forsch
with f leg‐
ne of f leg‐
com‐
renti‐
prices gume ferti‐
e are (N), ria of lizers rrela‐
otash with ehind e pro‐
s, but al by‐
uct – catch ceter‐
us in‐
umes.
w that than cause high or the umed d the is ra‐
field mes in group anal‐
ation differ es. In upply es for ces of ed in
feed poss and prod as in Legu be a legu legu pect The anim in an a low mal ing Here legu of pr Conc The used note suite corr open How ly in turn Ackn part Euro 7276 Liter JOUA
Legu Tran KEZEY
MERG
wert Acke richt ZERH
Wirt Kultu http id=3
haft, Soest ‐ hungsnotizen/
ding, legume sible compon rapeseed m ducts are clos ndicators of le ume grains (a a possible fur me crops in mes in meat ted to be very
comparison mal feed with nimal feed (s wer correlati feed & legum the correlat e the correla
mes and fert rice indicator clusion
prices of the d as indicato ed that the p
ed to this tha elation analy n questions r w strongly the fluenced by l influence th
nowledgemen of the LegVa opean Union in
672.
rature
AN, J., RIDIER, ume Producti
saction Costs
YA SEPNGANG,
GENTHALER, M tungsorientier erbohnen im terstattung. B
USEN‐BLECHER
tschaftlichkeit uren.
://www.demo 00.
Nr. 13e/
crop prices nents and as meal for mea
sely related a egume prices
s raw materi rther link. Du meat substitu t substitutes y strong yet.
of the correla h prices of th
oya meal, rap on than betw mes. The opp ion between ation is sign tilizers. This i rs for legume
e three grou ors in the pri prices of anim an the prices ysis does not remain for an e three produ
egume prices e price of leg nt/Financing:
alue project.
n the Horizon
A., & CAROF,
on: Approach . Sustainabilit , B., STUTE, I . (2018): Mög rten Preisind
Vergleich zur erichte über L P., STEVENS K . Erbsen und oneterbo.agra
/März 2019
are related s possible su at productio and meat pr s.
ials) for meat ue to the low
utes and the in this area, ation of the he main subs peseed meal ween meat &
posite holds n feeding w ificantly high indicates the es: prices for
ups of variab icing of legu mal feed an of mineral fe allow a state n in‐depth ti uct groups ex s? And which gumes?
This work w The project 2020 program
M. (2019). E hed via Opp ty, 11(3), 705.
I. STAUSS, W.
glichkeiten zu dikatoren für
r veröffentlic Landwirtschaf K., SCHÄFER B.‐
d Ackerbohne arpraxisforsch
9
to meat pric ubstitutes for on. Thus, the ices could be t substitutes w market sha low value sh the link is n prices of mea titutes of leg and wheat)
& legumes an true when o heat & fert her than bet e specific suit
feed and me
les studied c umes. It shou
d meat are ertilisers. Sin ement on cau
me series an xamined are a
h product gro
was carried o was funded mme under n
Economic Driv ortunity Cost
., SCHÄFER, B ur Bildung vo Futtererbse hten Marktpr ft 96(3).
‐C., BRAUN J.
en – lohnens hung.de/index
ces as r soya e two e used would ares of hare of not ex‐
at and gumes shows nd ani‐
bserv‐
ilizers.
tween tability eat.
can be uld be better ce the usality, nalysis:
actual‐
oups in
out as by the umber
vers of ts and B.‐C. &
on ver‐
n und reisbe‐
(2019) swerte x.php?
