• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Problem 2.3: Friedrichs’ inequality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Problem 2.3: Friedrichs’ inequality"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

IWR – Universit¨at Heidelberg Prof. Dr. Guido Kanschat

Due date:8.11.2013

Homework No. 2

Numerical Methods for PDE, Winter 2013/14 Problem 2.1:

Given the sequence of functions

fn(x) = |x|3

|x2|+n1.

(a) Show thatfnis continuously differentiable.

(b) Show thatfn → |x|inH1(−1,1)asn→ ∞.

Hint:Use de l’Hˆopital’s rule for quotients of sequences which converge to infinity.

Problem 2.2:

LetΩ = (−1,1). Show that on the space of continuous functions onΩthe norms kfk= sup

x∈Ω

|f(x)| and kfk2= Z

|f(x)|2dx

are not equivalent.

Hint:Find a sequence which is bounded in one norm and tends to zero with respect to the other.

Problem 2.3: Friedrichs’ inequality

(a) Prove Friedrichs’ inequality

kukL2(Ω)≤cku0kL2(Ω), with c= (b−a)2 forΩ = (a, b)and functionsu∈C01(Ω).

(b) Generalize the proof for functions inH01(Ω), using that each function inH01(Ω)is the limit of a sequence inC01(Ω).

Problem 2.4: Weak formulation of Robin boundary value problem

Given is the following Robin-boundary problem

−∆u(x) =f(x), inΩ,

nu(x) +µu(x) =g(x), on∂Ω,

with a bounded domainΩ⊂Rn, which has a smooth boundary∂Ωandµ >0.

(a) Formulate the problem weakly for functionsu∈H1(Ω).

(b) EquipH1(Ω)with an inner product and a norm, such that you can prove existence and uniqueness of a solution to your weak formulation by Riesz representation theorem. Bonus points for showing that the inner product is indeed one.

(c) Setµ= 0. Is there still a unique solution?

Jede Aufgabe 4 Punkte.

Referenzen