• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Inverse Problem of Dynamics for Systems Described by Parabolic Inequality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Inverse Problem of Dynamics for Systems Described by Parabolic Inequality"

Copied!
14
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

W O R K I I G P A P E R

INVERSE PROBLEM OF DYNAMICS FOR SYSTEMS DESCRIBED BY PARABOLIC INEQUALITY

Yu.

S. osipov

November 1989 WP-84101

I n t e r n a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e for Applied Systems Analysis

(2)

INVERSE PROBLEM OF DYNAMICS FOR SYSTEMS DESCRIBED BY PARABOLIC INEQUALITY

Yu. S. osipov

November 1989 WP-84101

Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Sverdlovsk, Ural Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R.

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations.

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE

FOR

APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria

(3)

FOREWORD

This paper deals with a specific inverse problem of dynamics for a system described by a parabolic inequality. The aim is to reconstruct the input (the control) of the system on the basis of an on-line measurement corrupted by an error.

The techniques applied to the eolution are a combination of those developed in posi- tional control theory and the theory of ill-posed problems. This paper was contributed by the author during his visit to the SDS Program.

A. Kurzhanski Program Leader System and Decision Sciences Program.

(4)

Inverse Problem of Dynamics for Systems Described by Parabolic Inequality

Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ural Scientific Center

Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Sverdlovsk

The considered problem is concerned with the following questions.

Let t be the time variable. Consider an evolutional system C on an interval T = [to,8]. We are interested in some unknown characteristic el(t), ~ E T of the system (e.g., may be a collection of some parameters of the system, or of some disturbances acting on the system or of controls etc.). We are to reconstruct Cl(t) on the basis of measurements of some other characteristic e2(t), ~ E T of the system C. The results of measurements ~ ( t ) are not precise, the error being estimated by h.

The smaller h is, the more precise should be the reconstruction (in the appropriate sense). This is the stability property of the reconstruction algorithm Dh.

We consider two types of reconstruction problems. In the problems of the first type (which we call problems of program reconstruction) the measurements ~ ( t ) are known for all ~ E T a t once. Hence the input of the reconstruction algorithm is the function ((t), to

<

t

<

8. The output of Dh is a function (Ih)(t), to

<

t

<

8 close (in a suitable sense) to the characteristic t l ( t ) , to

<

t

<

8 for h small enough.

In problems of the second type (we call them problems of dynamical reconstruction) the characteristic is t o be restored simultaneously with the process of system motion.

Here in every current moment t the input of the algorithm Dh is the previous history

ci

= fi(-) = {((r), to

<

r

<

t) of the measurements ( made prior to the moment t. The output of Dh in the moment t is a function

which approximates (in the proper sense) the characteristic (l(r), to

<

r

<

t

,

for small h

.

(5)

Here Dh is to satisfy the property of physical realizability [2], [3]: if &')(r), to

<

r

5

tl

and h2)(r), to

5

r

<

t2 are such that

then the functions Dh([')(.), Dh(12) are equal on [to,( *)

.

Below we consider a problem of the second type for a system described by a para- bolic inequality. We develop further the method for dealing with such kind of problems proposed in [l-31. The method is based on some ideas of positional control theory [l417]

and ill-posed problems theory [18].

The present paper is connected with [l-131.

Let V and H be real Hilbert spaces, V * and H * be the spaces dual to V and H respectively. We identify H with H*. It is supposed that V

c

H is dense in H and is embedded into H continuously. Denote by ( s , . ) ~ and

I-IH

and

I-lv)

the scalar pro- duct and the corresponding norm in H (in V).

Let t be the time variable, ~ E T = [tO,f?]. Consider on T a control system

E.

The state of the system is y ( t ) ~ V . The evolution of the state is given by the following condi- tions for almost all ~ E T the inequality holds ([19,20]):

and

Here a(wl,w2) is a continuous on V bilinear symmetrical form satisfying for eome cl > 0 the condition

+:V-(-oo,+oo] is a convex proper lower semicontinuous function (or +:H-(-oo,+oo] is a convex proper lower semicontinuous function satisfying the regularity condition [21,22];

B : U-H ia a linear continuous operator, U is a uniformly convex real Banach space;

fcL2(T;H); u(.) is a control, i.e. measureable on T function for almost all ~ E T having values in bounded closed convex set P c U ; y o ~ { w f V : +(w)

<

+oo). Under the above assumptions in w 1 s 2 ( T ; H ) n L 2 ( T ; V ) there exists a unique function y(t) = y(t;to,yo,u(-)), ~ E T , satisfying (1.1), (1.2) (see [19-221). We call it a motion of system

E

from the initial state yo corresponding to control u(.).

(6)

Consider the following problem of dynamical reconstruction. Let V = H,'(R) ( or

V

= H1(R)),

H

= L'(R),u = L'(R),B be the identity operator (see notation in [19,20]).

Now in (1.1) we take

Let the control u be of the form

Here G(t)

c

R is such that the set {(t,z) : ~ E T , z ~ G ( t ) ) is Lebesgue measureable; XG is the characteristic function of G; the function u0 satisfies the inequality

where

pl, p2

are positive numbers.

Let the measurement of the system state y,(t) = y,(t,-) be possible in every current moment t, the measurement result ~ ( t ) = ~ ( t , . ) satisfying the estimation

Suppose that the motion being observed is generated by the unique control of the type (1.4)) (1.5)

Consider the problem of dynamical reconstruction with

Remark 1.1. Let e.g., (1.1), (1.2) describe the process of diffusion of a substance in a domain R and y(t,-) be the concentration of substance in R in the moment t. Then we deal with the reconstruction of intensity of the substance sources and their location (see

[121).

We proceed the following way (see [12, 131). To the system C we put into correspondence a control system C1 (the model) which is a copy of

E.

(7)

The control v ( . ) E L ~ ( T ; L2(f2)) in the model is chosen for almost all t E T from convex bounded closed set P which contains all the L2(f2) functions of the form x B - g ( z ) where

B

c

f 2 is a measurable set, g ( - ) is a measurable function, g : f 2 -,

[P1,p2].

Consider a partition ri of interval T ,

t O = r O < r l <

- . .

< r , = e ;

m = m ( h ) , 6 ( h ) =

maxi(^^+^

- ri), 6(h)

<

ch, c = conet > 0

.

Take

~ ( t ) = J h ) ( t ) = vi, ri 5 t < T ; + ~

,

i = ~ ~ . . . ~ m where vi are (the unique) points of minimum of the functional

$ ( p ) = 2(z(ri i to, Y O , v(.)) - ( ( ~ i ) , p I L y n )

+

a ( h ) I ~ I i a ( ~ )

.

The function a ( h ) > 0; a ( h ) -+ 0 , h / a ( h ) -, 0 as h -, 0. Form the set

sjh)

= [ri, r,+1) X { Z E ~ : v ~ ( z ) 2

,.'I ,

where p is some positive number

B1 <

p

< B2.

Denote

where d(S.(B),

d h ) )

is the Lebesgue measure of the symmetric difference of sets S.,

~ ( ~ 1 ) .

Theorem. I f h -, 0 then the following is valid

(,,(h) -

u*ILa( zLa(n))

-,o

d(S(B), ~ ( h ) ) -, 0

.

(8)

Remark 1.2. Similar to [ 1 2 ] one can obtain an estimate of reconstruction accuracy.

2 . Consider an example. Let

4

be a convex continuous function under the assumption of Section 1 . Then the system ( 1 . 1 ) is equivalent to the equation

Here A is an elliptic coercive operator

For ( 2 . 1 ) consider a concrete variant of reconstruction problem [ 1 2 ] . Let R be a two-dimensional domain

and

~ y = a2

a2y/az; +

b2 a 2 y / a z i

.

For the sake of simplicity we confine the considerations to the case of reconstruction of location G ( t ) , t E T. Let it be known a priori that the control being restored satisfying the

<

R . inequality

1

u ( t , . )

1

-

A closed ball in L ~ ( R ) of radius R is taken as P. Then

For the considered variant of the problem the calculations were carried out for the following data

(9)

The motions of the dynamical system and the auxiliary model were calculated with the help of an explicit difference scheme with constant time step r = S(h) and constant spatial steps 71 and

r2

in zl and z2 respectively.

The set G ( t o ) is depicted in Fig. 1 and Figs. 2 and 3 show the results of reconstruc- tion of the set

where

a t the moments t = 0.5

,

t = 0.9 respectively for

The unknown set is reconstructed with the help of rectangles with centres in the mesh nodes and sides 71 and 7 2 parallel to axes zl, z2 respectively.

The author wishes t o express gratitude to A.V. Kryazhimski, A.V. Kim, A.I.

Korotki, V.I. Maksimov for valuable discussions and assistance, and also to A.M. Ustyu- zhanin for help in computer simulation of the illustrative example.

(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)

References

(11 Osipov, Yu.S., Kryazhimski, A.V. Method of Lyapunov functions for problems of motion modelling. 4th Chetayev's Conference on Motion Stability, Analytical Mechanic and Control. Zvenygorod (USSR), 1982. Abstracts, p. 35 (in Russian).

[2] Kryazhimski, A.V., Osipov, Yu.S. On modelling of control in a dynamical system.

Izv. Akad. Nauk USSR, Tech. Cybern. 1983. No. 2, pp. 51-60 (in Russian).

(31 Osipov, Yu.S., Kryazhimski, A.V. On dynamical solution of operator equations.

Dokl.

Akad.

Nauk (USSR), 1983. Vol. 269, No. 3, pp. 552-556 (in Russian).

(41 Kurzhanski, A.B. Control and observation under uncertainty. Moscow, Nauka, 1977 (in Russian).

[5] Gusev, M.I., Kurzhanski, A.B. Inverse problems of dynamics of control systems. In:

Mechanics and Scientific-Technical progress. Vol. 1, Moscow, Nauka, 1987 (in Rus- sian).

[6] Kryazhimski, A.V., Osipov, Yu.S. Inverse problems of dynamics and control models. In: Mechanics and Scientific-Technical progress. Vol. 1, Moscow, Nauka,

1987, pp. 196211 (in Russian).

[7] Kryazhimski, A.V. Optimization of the ensured result for dynamical systems.

Proceedings of the Intern. Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley (USA), 1986. pp.

1171-1179.

(81 Osipov, Yu.S. Control problems under insufficient information. Proc. of 13th IFIP Conference "System modelling and Optimizationn, Tokyo, Japan, 1987. Springer, 1988.

[9] Kryazhimski, A.V., Osipov, Yu.S. Stable solutions of inverse problems for dynami- cal control systems. Optimal Control and Differential Games, Tr. Matem. Inst. im.

Steklova, USSR, 1988. Vol. 185, pp. 126146 (in Russian).

[lo]

Maksimov, V.I. On dynamical modelling of unknown disturbances in parabolic vari- ational inequalities. Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1988. Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 743-750 (in Rus- sian).

[ l X ] Kim, A.V., Korotki, A.I. Dynamical modelling of disturbances in parabolic systems.

Izv. Akad. Nauk, USSR. Tekhn. Kibernet. (in Russian, t o appear).

[12] Kim, A.V., Korotki, A.I., Osipov, Yu.S. Inverse problems of dynamics for parabolic systems. Prikl. Math. Mekh. (in Russian, to appear).

[13] Osipov, Yu.S. Dynamical reconstruction problem. 14th IFIP Conference, Leipzig, 1989.

(14)

Krasovski, N.N., Subbotin, A.I. Game-theoretical control problems. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1987.

Krasovski, N.N. Controlling of a dynamical system. Moscow, Nauka, 1985 (in Rus- sian).

Osipov, Yu.S. On theory of differential games for the systems with distributed parameters. Dokl. Akad. Nauk, SSSR, 1975. Vol. 223, No. 6 (in Russian).

Osipov, Yu.S. Feed-back control for parabolic systems. Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 1977, Vol. 41, No. 2 (in Russian).

Tikhonov, A.N., Arsenin, V.Ya. Solution of ill-posed problems. Wiley, New York, 1977.

Duvaut, G., Lions, J.-L. Les inequations en mecanique et en physique. Dunod, Paris, 1972.

Glowinski, R., Lions, J.-L., Tremolieres, R. Analyse numhrique des inequations variationnelles. Dunod, Paris, 1976.

Barbu, V. Optimal feed-back controls for a class of nonlinear distributed parameters systems. SLAM J . Contr. Opt., Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 871-894.

Brezis, H. Operateurs maximaux monotones et semigroupes de contractions dans les espaces de Hilbert. North-Holland, Elsevier, 1973.

Kurzhanski, A.B., Osipov, Yu.S. On the problems of program pursuit. Izv. Akad.

Nauk, USSR, Tech. Cybern., No. 3, 1970. (Translated as Engineering Cybernetics) Osipov, Yu.S. Inverse problems of dynamic. Report on 7th International Seminar, Tbilisi, 1988.

Kurzhanski, A.B. Identification

-

a theory of guaranteed estimates. IIASA Working Paper WP-88-55, 1988.

Kurzhanski, A.B., Khapalov, A.Yu. On the state estimation problem for distributed systems. Analysis and Optimization of Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Vol. 83, Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Kurzhanski, A.B., Khapalov, A.Yu. Observers for distributed parameter systems.

Control of Distributed Parameter Systems. Fifth WAC Symposium. University of Perpignan, 1989.

Kurzhanski, A.B., Sivergina, I.F. On noninvertible evolutionary systems:

guaranteed estimation and the regularization problem, ILASA Working Paper, November 1989, forthcoming.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Furthermore, such approaches may also reveal the structural connectivity of hybrid systems [75] where the coupling dynamics occurs at discrete events in times, such as in networks

Общие конструкции применяются к задаче моделирования процесса загрязнения грунтовых вод, для которой исследуется проблема

This problem is an ill-posed problem; for its solving a special mathematical method, based on the method of conjugate equations and Tikhonov's regularization technique,

In section 3 we apply the estimation methodology of section 2 to a groundwater con- tamination transport model integrated in XGW: A Prototype Expert System User In- terface

In this paper we formulate and study a minimax control problem for a class of parabolic systems with controlled Dirichlet boundary conditions and uncertain distributed

Due to the nonlinearity of localization problem, the observations of type (1.7) make the latter be quite different from the case of precise observations.. Here and

Assume that disturbances (;.. Definitions of informational domain and observability can be easily adjusted for this class of observed systems. The proof of this

The optimal sensor location problem under stationary observations have been studied by many authors in the stochastic setting (mainly with the trace of state