• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Effects of ocean acidification on North Sea

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Effects of ocean acidification on North Sea"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Henriette G. Horn, Nils Sander, Maria Algueró-Muniz, Martin G.J. Löder, Maarten Boersma, Ulf Riebesell* and Nicole Aberle

Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Kurpromenade 201, 27498 Helgoland, Germany

* Representing the KOSMOS Team, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany

Effects of ocean acidification on North Sea microzooplankton communities

• No significant effect of elevated pCO2 values on MZP biomass

• No response of MZP biomass to 1st phytoplankton bloom but slight increase in MZP biomass in response to 2nd bloom

• No effect of pCO2 on MZP species composition

Summary

Microzooplankton (MZP) is an important competitor for food and a food source for larger mesozooplankton at the same time. Its ability to act as trophic upgrader for mesozooplankton by buffering nutritional imbalances of algae might gain importance given the expected decrease in algal food quality with ocean acidification.

With phytoplankton growth being enhanced at high CO2 conditions, we expect an enhanced MZP growth as well.

Introduction

• 10 outdoor mesocosms, 55,000 L each

• 400 and 1000 ppm target CO2, 5 replicates

• Runtime 107 days (March – June 2013)

• Weekly MZP sampling

• Determination of abundance, biomass, size classes and species or genus by microscopic counts

• 24h dilution experiments to determine the MZP grazing impact

Methods

Photo: M. Nicolai

References

¹ Rose, J. M., Feng, Y., Gobler, C. J., Gutierrez, R., Hare, C. E., Leblanc, K., Hutchins, D. A. (2009). Effects of increased pCO2 and temperature on the North Atlantic spring bloom. II. Microzooplankton abundance and

grazing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 388: 27-40. BREMERHAVEN

Am Handelshafen 12 27570 Bremerhaven Telefon 0471 4831-0 www.awi.de

Conclusions

MZP densities stayed low throughout the experiment. As it was also shown by studies conducted with plankton communities from the Atlantic¹, MZP is probably more temperature dependent than sensitive to acidification.

The results of this experiment point at complex responses of MZP to ocean acidification in temperate oceans.

• No significant differences in MZP biomass between CO2 treat- ments

• No reaction of MZP to1st bloom

• Slight increase in MZP biomass at 2nd bloom but no response to CO2 treatments

• Large variation between meso- cosms

• Community dominated by small Strombidium sp. during 1st and 2nd bloom (day 33 and day 57)

• Density of Myrionecta rubrum higher during the 1st bloom

• Species >40µm increased after 2nd bloom, especially Laboea strobila

• Conducted on day 35 at 1st phytoplankton bloom peak

• Phytoplankton growth rates (left) were lower for high CO2 treatments except for Arco- cellulus

• Phytoplankton grazing mortality (right) indicates higher MZP grazing at high pCO2 values

Plankton succession Species composition Grazing experiment

Contact:

Henriette.Horn@awi.de

Lohmaniella oviformis Balanion comatum Myrionecta rubrum Laboea strobila

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

To shed more light on this, I studied the effects of OA on the eco- physiology of dinoflagellates under N-replete (Publication I) and N-limited conditions

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel www.geomar.de – BIOACID Phase II Final Meeting Kiel 6 - 7

In order to gain a perspective on what factors control the sensitivity of calcifying macroalgae to ocean acidification, we discuss the re- ported physiological responses of

huxleyi at the northern end of transect during mid ‐ March 2004 occurred at complete mixing and high nutrient concentration, possibly during an early stage of the spring

Despite much higher coccolithophore abundance in the greenhouse treatment, particulate inorganic carbon production (calcification) was significantly decreased by the combination

Main discrepancies between model and observations are a large zooplankton peak, required by the model to end the phytoplankton spring bloom at the 47øN, 20øW site, and the

A major reason for this low variability found in the DYNAMO (and also CME) models is the lack of horizontal resolution which does not allow a full res- olution of eddy dynamics,

The comparison of the corresponding bottom pressure anomalies (mean annual cycle) to the geoid variations estimated from the GRACE mission (in cm watercolumn analog, lower left