• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Multiple sea-ice states and abrupt MOC transitions in a general circulation ocean model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Multiple sea-ice states and abrupt MOC transitions in a general circulation ocean model "

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Multiple sea-ice states and abrupt MOC transitions in a general circulation ocean model

Submitted to Climate Dynamics

Yosef Ashkenazy 1 , Martin Losch 2 , Hezi Gildor 3 , Dror Mirzayof 1 , Eli Tziperman 4

1

Dept. Solar Energy and Environmental Physics, BIDR, Ben-Gurion University, Israel

2

Alfred-Wegener-Institut fu !r Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany

3

Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

4

Earth and Planetary Sciences & School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

ashkena@bgu.ac.il (http://www.bgu.ac.il/~ashkena)

Numerical experiments

Conclusions:

•  Indications for multiple seaice states under cold climate conditions.

•  In the NH, changes in seaice cover may be associated with changes in the MOC.

•  Transition cold-warm and warm-cold transtions are possible. Possible implications for the DO events.

•  The multiple states of the SH are more pronounced and exist in all experiments.

•  Seasonality may enhance or suppress the multiple seaice states.

Sea ice has been suggested, based on simple models, to play an important role in past glacial-interglacial oscillations via the so-called “sea-ice switch”

mechanism. An important part of this mechanism is that multiple sea-ice extents exist under the same land ice configuration. This hypothesis of multiple sea-ice extents is tested with a state-of-the-art ocean general circulation model coupled to an atmospheric energy- moisture-balance model. The model includes a dynamic-thermodynamic sea-ice module, has a realistic ocean configuration and bathymetry, and is forced by annual mean forcing. Several runs with two different land ice distributions represent present-day and cold-climate conditions. In each case the ocean model is initiated with both ice-free and fully ice- covered states. The present-day runs converge approximately to the same sea-ice state for the northern hemisphere while for the southern hemisphere a difference of 䍐3" latitude between the sea-ice extents of the different runs is observed. The cold climate runs lead to meridional sea-ice extents that are different by up to four degrees in latitude in both hemispheres.

While approaching the final states, the model exhibits abrupt transitions from extended sea-ice states and weak meridional overturning circulation, to less extended sea ice and stronger meridional overturning circulation and vice versa. These transitions are linked to cooling and warming of the North Atlantic high- latitude deep water. Such abrupt changes may be associated with the Dansgaard-Oeschger events, as proposed by previous studies.

Abstract

Background

The sea-ice was previously suggested to underlie the glacial-interglacial via the sea-ice-switch (SIS) mechanism. Is this mechanism valid in an oceanic general circulation model?

The model

MITgcm coupled to an atmospheric energy moisture balance model (EMBM); dynamic/thermodynamic ice model is used.

(i)  Present day initial conditions and land-ice.

(ii)  Cold climate 1: land ice albedo for latitudes 40–90

o

N, sea-ice albedo set to 1, atmospheric CO

2

level of 180 ppm, and increased atmospheric albedo profile.

(iii)  Cold climate 2: As cold climate 1 experiment but with a higher-yet atmospheric albedo.

We first perform a spinup run 4000 years. Then, to capture a possible multiple states we start from either “all water” initial conditions—water is ice- free, or “all-ice” initial conditions—ocean is globally covered with sea ice.

NH Temperature (T)

Ice−Volume (V) T

V V

f

min max

Sea−ice switch "OFF"

Sea−ice switch "ON"

Schematic of the hysteresis loop and the multiple sea ice and temperature states under the same continental ice volume. The arrows indicate the direction of the hysteresis loop.

Results

Air temp. (oC)

−40 −20 0 20

Humidity (g/kg)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

SST (oC)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Present day spinup

SSS (ppt)

30 32 34 36 38

Present day: Results almost identical when starting from the different initial conditions.

Some difference in sea-ice cover of the SH.

Air temp. (oC)

0 1 2 3 4

Humidity (g/kg)

−0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

SST (oC)

−2 0 2 4 6

Cold clim. 1 − "all water" minus "all ice"

SSS (ppt)

−2 −1 0 1 2

NH − "all water"

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

NH − "all ice" minus "all water"

−0.5 0 0.5 1

SH − "all water"

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Cold clim. 1 sea ice area (%)

SH − "all ice" minus "all water"

−0.5 0 0.5 1

5 10 15 20 25 30

NA Max. MOC (Sv)

Present−day

(a)

Cold clim. 1

(b)

Cold clim. 2

(c)

40 50 60

NH seaice extent (deg. N)

(d)

(e) (f)

4 5 6

45 50 55 60 65

SH seaice extent (deg. S)

Time (kyr) (g)

4 5 6

Time (kyr) (h)

4 5 6

Time (kyr) (i)

"all water"

"all ice"

"all water"

"all ice"

NA "all water"

NA "all ice"

"all water"

"all ice"

−3000

−2500

−2000

−1500

−1000

−500

Depth (m)

Cold clim. 1, "all ice"

NA (50oN−70oN) T (oC)

Cold clim. 1, "all ice"

NA (70oN−90oN)

4.5 5 5.5 6

−3000

−2500

−2000

−1500

−1000

−500

Time (kyr)

Depth (m)

Cold clim. 2, "all water"

4.5 5 5.5 6

Time (kyr)

Cold clim. 2, "all water"

−2

−1.5

−1

−0.5

−2

−1.5

−1

−0.5

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

−1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

−5000

−4000

−3000

−2000

−1000 0

Depth (m)

NA MOC (Sv)

t=5.62 kyr Cold clim. 1, "all ice" t=5.7 kyr

−20 0 20 40 60 80

−5000

−4000

−3000

−2000

−1000 0

Latitude

Depth (m)

t=4.51 kyr Cold clim. 2, "all water"

−20 0 20 40 60 80 Latitude

t=4.53 kyr

−5 0 5 10 15 20 25

−5 0 5 10 15 20 25

−5 0 5 10 15 20 25

−5 0 5 10 15 20 25

−4000

−3000

−2000

−1000

Depth (m)

NA temperature (oC) t=5.62 kyr Cold clim. 1, "all ice"

t=5.7 kyr minus t=5.62 kyr

40 60 80

−4000

−3000

−2000

−1000

Latitude

Depth (m)

t=4.51 kyr Cold clim. 2, "all water"

40 60 80

Latitude

t=4.53 kyr minus t=4.51 kyr

−2 0 2 4 6 8 10

−2

−1 0 1 2

−2 0 2 4 6 8 10

−2

−1 0 1 2

The results presented here provide some

support to the SIS mechanism of Gildor

and Tziperman (2001).

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The spatial patterns of SLP anomalies (Figure 5) show some resemblance to the surface air temperature anomalies (Figure 1), especially in autumn, winter and spring: the

The difference between the “all water” and “all ice” runs of the “cold climate

For our analysis we have used the dynamically consistent framework of a high-resolution ocean general circula- tion model to explore the effect of perturbations, in

Basal melt rates for Larsen C Ice Shelf in the FESOM simulations (48 Gt/yr mass loss, 1.0 m/yr mean melting) are therefore considerably higher than in BRIOS, from which 38 Gt/yr

Key region Laptev Sea: freshwater supply (Lena river), ice formation, salt release, strong turbulent heat fluxes Analysis of spatial and temporal variability of sea ice in the

Here we present results from two 150-year long simula- tions with the coupled AOGCM ECHO-GiSP with a model top at 80 km height including the middle atmosphere and

With the help of an adjoint model, it is shown that scalar diagnostics or objective functions in a coarse resolution model, such as the transport through Drake Passage, the strength

In addition to the general hurdles that need to be tackled for efficient exact adjoint code gen- eration, inclusion of bottom topography as a control variable added further