THE GREA T TR ANSF ORMA TION CLIMA TE – C AN WE BEA T THE HEA T ?
Climate change, the Anthropocene, rising CO 2 levels, the Earth Summit in Rio, wind turbines, combined heat and power generation, desertification, biodiversity loss, Germany’s Renewable Energy Act, change agents – what do all these terms mean exactly and how are they all linked?
This book offers answers.
The evidence for man-made climate change is overwhelming. Other global environmental changes, such as the loss of biodiversity, are closely linked to climate change and to our customary industrial economic practices. We can stop a global climate desaster if engineers, business- people and policy-makers all pull together and if all work on the great transformation across national borders.
Any transformation of society must begin in people’s minds; only then can it be achieved technically with any chance of economic success.
www.die-grosse-transformation.de
w w w.w b g u .d e ISBN 978-3-936191-41-7
THE GREAT
TRANSFORMATION
Here are the experts of the German Advisory Council on Global Change who are quoted in this book:
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, physicist
introduces us to why there has to be a major societal trans- formation.
Reinhold Leinfelder, geologist
explains that we humans today are definitely having a huge impact on nature, even if we still don’t fully know – and can’t predict – all the consequences of our actions.
Stefan Rahmstorf, climatologist
sets out the empirical data and shows why the evidence for climate change is overwhelming.
Dirk Messner, political scientist
believes there is a chance that the world community can still agree on joint measures to combat climate change.
Jürgen Schmid, engineer
is convinced that a CO
2-free economy is technically feasible.
Nebojsa Nakicenovic, systems analyst
thinks about how reducing people’s consumption of fossil fuels and animal proteins might benefit – rather than damage – newly industrializing and developing countries in particular.
Renate Schubert, economist
calculates that the consequences of doing nothing about climate would cost the world economy much more than all the investments needed to limit it.
Sabine Schlacke, lawyer
believes business won’t be able to manage the great trans- formation alone unless governments create incentives and lay down the right kind of legal framework.
Claus Leggewie, political scientist
reflects on how changes in societal attitudes happen – in every individual.
Scientists become comic-book heroes fighting climate change
A major transformation is needed to stop climate change; in other words, we have to learn to live and to produce what we need in
sustain able ways. Scientists, politicians and citizens will have to work together to achieve
this. In this book, eminent scientists show us that we can beat the heat – and how to do it!
THE GREAT
TRANSFORMATION
CLIMATE – CAN WE BEAT THE HEAT?
WBGU
THE GREAT
TRANSFORMATION
CLIMATE – CAN WE BEAT THE HEAT?
Idea and concept:
Alexandra Hamann, Claudia Zea-Schmidt, Reinhold Leinfelder
Scenario:
Alexandra Hamann and Claudia Zea-Schmidt Scientific advisor:
Reinhold Leinfelder Graphics:
Jörg Hartmann, Jörg Hülsmann,
Robert Nippoldt, Studio Nippoldt, Iris Ugurel
© 2014 WBGU, Berlin All rights reserved ISBN 978-3-936191-41-7
This project would not have been possible without the generous assistance and voluntary cooperation of members of the
German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU).
The prologue was drawn by Iris Ugurel (Berlin).
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Dirk Messner and Renate Schubert were drawn by Robert Nippoldt (Münster).
Reinhold Leinfelder, Jürgen Schmid and Sabine Schlacke were drawn by Jörg Hülsmann (Berlin).
Stefan Rahmstorf, Nebojša Nakiçenoviç, Claus Leggewie and the spectacular finale were drawn by Jörg Hartmann (Münster).
The cover art is the work of Studio Nippoldt (Astrid Nippoldt, Christine Goppel and Robert Nippoldt).
Translation by Bob Culverhouse (Berlin).
Editorial management and scientific advice by WBGU Secretariat (Berlin).
Special thanks for proofreading go to Vincenzo Zambrano (Toronto, Canada).
This project was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research within the framework of the Science Year 2012 – Project EARTH: Our Future. It is based on the study World in
Transition – A Social Contract for Sustainability published by the WBGU in 2011.
Free copies of the comic-book can be ordered from
www. wbgu. de The original edition of this book has been published in German under the title
Die große Transformation. Klima – kriegen wir die Kurve?
© 2013, Verlagshaus Jacoby&Stuart, Berlin www.jacobystuart.de
Content
Prologue - 4
Chapter 1
Why we need to transform ourselves - 12
Chapter 2
Planet Earth in The Anthropocene – The Age of Humans - 24
Chapter 3
Hot stuff: climate change - 36
Chapter 4
We’re not that stupid. A glance into the past - 48
Chapter 5
Technically, everything is possible - 60
Chapter 6
A task for the whole world - 72
Chapter 7
Who is going to pay for it? - 84
Chapter 8
The State also has a role to play - 96
Chapter 9
Politicians can’t manage it alone - 108
Annex The WBGU - 122 The publishers - 123 Members of the WBGU - 124
The artists - 126
Glossary - 127
References - 137
ProloGue
P
RECAMBRIAN, ABOUT THREE BILLION YEARS AGOL
IVING ROCKS: PRESENT-DAY STROMATOLITES INS
HARKB
AY,W
ESTERNA
USTRALIA.I
N THEP
RECAMBRIAN THEY WERESPREAD ALL OVER THE WORLD.
6
F
OR THE FIRST TIME, CYANOBACTERIASTORE *CARBON DIOXIDE (
CO
2) AND RELEASE OXYGEN WITH THE HELP OFPHOTOSYNTHESIS.
S
TROMATOLITES GRADUALLY GROW IN THE SHALLOW WATER – SEDIMENTARY ROCKS CONSISTING MAINLY OF COLONIES OF CYANOBACTERIA AND CALCIUM DEPOSITS.O
XYGEN CONQUERSTHE WORLD.
C
AMBRIAN, 542-488 MILLION YEARS AGO:O
XYGEN IS REQUIRED FOR ANIMALS TO DEVELOP.A
LMOST ALLGROUPS OF ANIMALS HAVE THEIR ORIGINS HERE.
S
ILURIAN, 444-416 MILLION YEARS AGO:T
HE FIRST PIONEERS ON LAND DEFY THE DANGEROUSUV
RADIATION.* NAMES AND TERMS MARKED WITH AN *ASTERISK ARE EXPLAINED IN THE GLOSSARY.
D
EVONIAN, 416-359 MILLION YEARS AGO:A
FTER ARTHROPODS, MOLLUSCS AND PLANTS, FISH MOVE ONTOTHE LAND.
C
ARBONIFEROUS, 359-299 MILLION YEARS AGO:T
HEE
ARTH IS COVERED BY FORESTS OF LYCOPSIDS UP TO 40 METRES HIGH.S
INCE THIS TIME, HEAT AND PRESSURE HAVE BEEN TURNING DEAD FORESTS INTO COAL.T
HE *CARBON BOUND IN THE PLANTS IS STORED IN THE GROUND.P
LANTS THAT HAVE SUNK IN THE SWAMP TURNINTO PEAT IN THE ABSENCE OF AIR.
PEAT AND WOOD
COAL
COAL PEAT AND WOOD
SANDS AND CLAYS
LIGNITE
LIGNITE
LIGNITE
LIGNITE
W
HEN THE SEA FLOODS THE SWAMP, SEDIMENTSCOVER THESE LAYERS OF PEAT.
A
S THE PRESSURE BUILDS UP AND THE TEMPERATURERISES, LIGNITE IS FORMED FIRST.
T
HE MORE LAYERS ARE DEPOSITED,THE MORE WATER IS FORCED
OUT OF THE LIGNITE.
T
HE LIGNITE GRADUALLY BECOMES COAL,WHICH WE ARE STILL MINING
TODAY.
8
P
ARALLEL TO THIS, CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS FORM ON THE SEABED FROM DEAD MARINE ORGANISMS SUCH AS PLANKTON AND ALGAE IN THE ABSENCE OF OXYGEN.M
ICROSCOPIC ORGANISMS SINK TO THE BOTTOM.S
EDIMENTS ARE DEPOSITED.A
NAEROBIC BACTERIA TRANSFORM THE REMAINS OF THE MICROORGANISMS INTOBITUMEN, A PRECURSOR OF CRUDE OIL.
C
RUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS FINALLY FORM UNDER HIGH PRESSURE AND AT HIGH TEMPERATURES; THEY COLLECTIN SO-CALLED RESERVOIR ROCKS.
J
URASSIC, 200-145 MILLION YEARS AGO:A
NIMALS AND PLANTS HAVE DEVELOPED IN EVER GREATER DIVERSITY – INCLUDINGDINOSAURS AS TALL AS A HOUSE.
C
RETACEOUS, 145-65 MILLION YEARS AGO:E
MERGENCE OF FLOWERING PLANTS.T
ERTIARY, 65-2.6 MILLION YEARS AGO:A
T THE TRANSITION BETWEEN THEC
RETACEOUS AND THET
ERTIARY, ABOUT HALF OF ALL ANIMAL SPECIES ONE
ARTHDIE OUT.
P
LEISTOCENE, APPROX. 2.6 MILLION - APPROX. 11,500 YEARS AGO:A
NCESTORS OF TODAY‘S HUMANS ARE BEGINNING TO USE AND CONTROL FIRE.T
HE LATEST FINDS SUGGEST THAT HOMO ERECTUS ALREADY PLAYED WITH FIRE AROUND A MILLION YEARS AGO.A
BOUT 200,000 YEARS AGO, HOMO SAPIENS, THE ‚WISE HUMAN‘, ENTERS THE STAGE.O
NLY ABOUT 30,000 YEARS AGO DOPEOPLE LEARN HOW TO IGNITE FIRE FOR THEMSELVES.
F
OR A LONG TIME HUMANS LIVE AS HUNTERS AND GATHERERS, UNTIL THEY START TO GROW CROPS, DOMESTICATE ANIMALS AND SETTLEDOWN – APPROX. 10,000 YEARS AGO.
T
HEY START TO BUILD CITIES ...10
... AND REPLACE MUSCLE POWER WITH MACHINES.
T
HE AGE OF INDUSTRIALIZATION BEGINS IN THE MID-18TH CENTURY.W
ITH IT, THE DEMAND FOR ENERGY RISES.T
O GENERATE ENERGY, HUMANS BURN THE FOSSILCARBON STORED IN COAL, CRUDE OIL AND GAS CONVERTING IT TO
CO
2 WITHTHE AID OF OXYGEN.
T
HE LIBERATEDCO
2 IS ADDED TO THE NATURALCO
2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE, THUS CAUSING THE HUMAN-MADEGREENHOUSE EFFECT: THE GLOBAL CLIMATE STARTS TO WARM UP.
CHAPTER 1
WHY WE NEED TO
TRANSFORM OURSELVES
H
ANSJ
OACHIM (J
OHN)S
CHELLNHUBER ISD
IRECTOR OF THEP
OTSDAMI
NSTITUTE FORC
LIMATEI
MPACTR
ESEARCH (PIK
).H
E IS ALSO EXTERNALP
ROFESSOR AT THE*
S
ANTAF
EI
NSTITUTE,C
HAIRMAN OF THE *C
LIMATEKIC
ANDC
HAIR OF THEG
ERMANA
DVISORYC
OUNCIL ONG
LOBALC
HANGE (WBGU
).P
OTSDAM,T
ELEGRAFENBERG,A
LBERTE
INSTEINS
CIENCEP
ARKS
INCE THEB
EGINNING OFI
NDUSTRIALIZATION THE SCALE OF MAN-MADE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES HAS REACHED A NEWDIMENSION.
A
T THAT TIME ABOUT ONE BILLION PEOPLE LIVED ON EARTH.T
ODAY THERE ARE 7 BILLION OF US, AND IN 2050ABOUT 9 BILLION PEOPLE WILL INHABIT THIS PLANET.
14
O
NE OF THE DRIVING FORCES BEHIND THIS EXPANSION LIES INTHE USE OF *FOSSIL ENERGY RESOURCES SUCH AS COAL, OIL
AND NATURAL GAS ...
... THEY MAKE INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE
POSSIBLE.
F
URTHERMORE WE ENCOUNTER A FAST-GROWINGFLOW OF INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS, A GROWING VOLUME OF TRAFFIC AND SO
FORTH ...
T
HIS RESULTS IN HIGHERCO
2- EMISSIONS ANDTHEREFORE HIGHER GLOBAL TEMPERATURES.
T
HE*CLIMATE IS WARMING UP.
O
N THE WAY TO HIS OFFICE,J
OHN PASSES THE FAMOUSE
INSTEINT
OWER.M
ANY AREAS OF OUR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT REVEAL CRITICAL DEVELOPMENTS.S
OIL, FRESH WATER RESOURCES, FORESTS AND OCEANS ARE BEING OVER-EXPLOITED OR EVENDESTROYED.
B
IODIVERSITY, THE RICHNESS OF NATURE, IS DECLININGDRAMATICALLY.
A
ND THE HUMAN INFLUENCE ON BASIC CHEMICAL PROCESSES LIKE FOR INSTANCETHE *CARBON CYCLE IS ENORMOUS.
16
W
HAT IS AT STAKE IS THE ABILITY OF THE EARTH SYSTEM TO CONTINUE PROVIDING HUMAN CIVILIZATION WITH THE STABLELIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEM IN WHICH WE EVOLVED.
I
F WE DO NOT TURN DOWN THE HEAT WE SHALL COLLIDE WITH THE *P
LANETARYGUARD RAILS.
H
ERE, AN ENERGY-OPTIMIZED OFFICE BUILDING IS BEING CONSTRUCTED.I
N ORDER TO ALTER OUR COURSE AND TO PREVENT THE EARTH SYSTEM FROM BREAKING DOWN, WE MUSTRE-INVENT OURSELVES.
T
HE »GREAT REFRACTOR« IS THE MAIN TELESCOPE OF THEA
STROPHYSICALO
BSERVATORY.W
E NEED A CHANGE TOWARDS *SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ...T
HE CENTRAL BUILDING OF THEPIK
...... FOOD SECURITY, MEDICAL CARE, EDUCATION,
RECREATION IN A NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND SO
FORTH.
F
OR ME SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISESCERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL V ALUES AND RIGHTS,
SUCH AS ...
*PLANETARY BOUNDAR
IES
18
R
IGHT NOW AM
EETING OF THEWBGU
IS TAKING PLACE.S
INCE 1994 THEWBGU
HAS BEENDEVELOPING
P
LANETARY GUARD RAILS FORC
LIMATEC
HANGE AS WELL AS FORB
IODIVERSITY AND OTHER AREAS OF GLOBAL CHANGE.T
HEWBGU
DESCRIBES THESEP
LANETARY GUARD RAILS AS MEASUR ABLE DA- MAGE THRESHOLDS.O
NCE THEY ARE TRANSGRESSED, THE IMMEDIATE OR FUTURE CONSEQUENCES WOULD BE INTOLERABLE AND PUT OUR CIVILIZATION AT RISK.S
TAYING WITHIN THE GUARD RAILS MEANS STAYING SAFE.Source: Rockström et al., 2009 CHEMICAL
STRATO SPHE
RIC
OZONE
CYCLE
*NITRO GEN
*PHOS PHORUS
GLOBAL FRESH WATER USE BIO
DIVER SITY LOSS
LAND USE CHANGES
CYCLE
*DEP LETION POLLUTION
LOADING (NOT YET
ATM
OSPHERIC AEROSOL
(NOT YET
QUANTIFIED)
QUANTIFIED)
CLIMATE CHANGE
*OCEAN ACIDIF ICATION
F
OR INSTANCE, THE 2 °C C
LIMATE-P
ROTEC-TION
G
UARDRAIL HAS BEEN PICKED UP INTER-NATIONALLY AND ADOPTED BY MANY
NATIONS.
I
T STATES THAT GLOBAL WARMING MUST BE KEPTBELOW 2 °
C
TO ENABLEUS TO SUCCESSFULLY DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE
RISE IN TEMPERATURE.
I
AM REALLY CONCERNED THAT THE PROGRESSWE HAVE MADE INTERNATIONALLY IS NOT
AS SUBSTANTIAL AS IT NEEDS TO BE.
A
COMPARISON:I
F THE TEMPERATURE OF THE HUMAN BODY INCREASESBY ONLY 2 °
C
, WECALL IT FEVER.
I
F THE TEMPERATURE EXCEEDS 40°
C
, ONE ORGAN AFTER THE OTHER BREAKS DOWN, AND FINALLY THE WHOLE HUMANSYSTEM COLLAPSES.
GREENHOUSE EFFECT
20
F
IRST OF ALL WE HAVE TO*DECARBONIZE THE ENERGY SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, WHICH MEANS REPLACING FOSSIL RESOURCES WITH RENEWABLE ONES IN ORDER
TO LIMIT GLOBAL WARMING TO A MAXIMUM OF 2 °
C
.T
HIS WILL ONLY BE POSSIBLE IF EVERY SINGLE PERSON IS PREPARED TO QUESTION HIS OR HER WAY OF LIFE.I
N ORDER TO BEABLE TO STAY WITHIN THE GUARD RAILS, WE HAVE TO PUT THINGS
ON THE RIGHT TRACK IN THIS DECADE!
C
LIMATEC
HANGE IN PARTICULAR HAS A VERY LONG »BRAKINGDISTANCE« AND MUST THEREFORE
BE LIMITED IMMEDIATELY.
S
UCH FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES OF CHANGE REQUIRE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION.A
ND – ABOVE ALL – A WORLD SOCIETY OF GLOBAL CITIZENS THATPRESSES AHEAD WITH SOLVING PROBLEMS WHICH CANNOT BE SOLVED BY SINGLE COUNTRIES.
F
OR TOMORROW‘S GLOBAL SOCIETY THE SAME APPLIESAS FOR TODAY‘S NATIONAL SOCIETIES, NAMELY THAT THE RIGHTS OF FUTURE GENERATIONS MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.
I
N MY LECTURESI
ALWAYS ASK THREE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS:D
O YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE BETTEROFF THAN YOUR GRANDPARENTS WERE IN
THEIR TIME?
D
O YOU THINK YOUR GRANDCHILDREN WILL BE BETTER OFF THAN YOU ARE NOW?D
O YOU THINK THIS IS OKAY?22
S
INCE THERE SHOULD BE SOMEONE SPEAKING FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS,I
HAVE REPEATEDLY SUGGESTED APPOINTING OMBUDSPEOPLE TOREPRESENT THOSE WHO DO NOT YET HAVE A VOTE IN PARLIAMENT.
T
HIS WOULD BE ANEXTENSION OF DEMOCRACY.
T
HE PAST SHOWS THAT PEOPLE AND ENTIRE CIVILIZATIONS HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE.F
ORINSTANCE, AROUND 11,000 YEARS AGO PEOPLE
STARTED TO PURSUE … … AGRICULTURE AND STOCK FARMING.
T
HEY CHANGED FROM A NOMADIC TO A SEDENTARY SOCIETY.T
HIS ALSO BECAMEPOSSIBLE BECAUSE THE CLIMATE HAD STABILIZED AND GROWN INTO A RELIABLE
FACTOR.
N
EOLITHICA
GE 11 000Y
EARSA
GOS
TONEA
GET
HIS WAS THE SO-CALLEDN
EOLITHICR
EVOLUTION.T
HE SECOND GREAT CULTURAL CHANGE HAPPENED SOME 250 YEARS AGO: THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION.T
HIS WAS WHENTHE AGE OF FOSSIL FUELS STARTED.
Chapter 2
PLANET EARTH IN
THE ANTHROPOCENE –
THE AGE OF HUMANS
R
EINHOLDL
EINFELDER IS A GEOLOGIST AND PALAEONTOLOGIST FOCUSING ON GEOBIOLOGY,A
NTHROPOCENE RESEARCHAND KNOWLEDGE COMMUNICATION.
H
E WORKS AT THEF
REEU
NIVERSITYB
ERLIN AND THE *R
ACHELC
ARSONC
ENTERM
UNICH.R
EINHOLD IS ON HIS WAY TOF
RANKFURT.W
HAT WE NEED NOW IS A THIRD GREAT REVOLUTION – THE *G
REATT
RANSFORMATION TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY.T
HE HUMAN-INDUCED IMPACT ON THEE
ARTH SYSTEM HAS TAKEN ON SUCH HUGE PROPORTIONS THAT MANY SCIENTISTS SUPPORT THE SUGGESTIONMADE BY
N
OBELP
RIZEW
INNERP
AULC
RUTZEN:TO REGARD THE INDUSTRIAL PRESENT AS A NEW GEOLOGICAL ERA ...
... AS THE *
A
NTHROPOCENE, THE ‘A
GE OFM
ANKIND’.P
AULC
RUTZEN26
F
OR MILLENNIA, HUMANSHAVE REBELLED AGAINST THE SUPERPOWER WE
CALL ’
N
ATURE‘.I
N THE 19TH AND 20TH CENTURIES, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, FOSSIL FUELSAND A FAST-GROWING POPULATION LED TO HUGE CHANGES IN THE
E
ARTH SYSTEM.W
E TOOK CONTROL OF NATURE – INCLUDING THE CLIMATE, THE ENVIRONMENT, EVENDNA
.T
ODAY, WE NO LONGER LIVE IN’BIOMES‘, I.E. NATURAL HABITATS, ...
... BUT IN ’ANTHROMES‘: HUMAN-MADE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES.
O
VER-RIPE FRUIT ’A
NTI-MUSH GENE‘L
ONG-LASTING FRUITM
ORE THAN THREE-QUARTERS OF THE ICE-FREE LANDMASS OF THEE
ARTH ISAFFECTED.
T
HE BARRIERS BETWEEN NATURE AND CULTIVATED LAND THAT WERE MAINTAINED FOR SO MANY YEARS ARE COLLAPSING.W
E DECIDE WHAT THE CHARACTERISTICS OF NATURE ARE AND WHAT NATURE WILL BE IN THE FUTURE.T
HIS MEANS THAT WE HAVE A GREAT RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST NOT ONLY THINK ABOUT OURSELVES, BUTLONG-TERM, I.E. ALSO FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
A
ND WHAT CANI
EXPECT DOWN THERE?T
HE *WWF
HAS CALCULATED THAT, IF WE CONTINUE OUR*BUSINESS-AS-USUAL PATH, WE WILL NEED TWO
E
ARTHSTO MEET OUR RESOURCE NEEDS, POSSIBLY AS EARLY
AS 2030.
A
REA OFL
ANDNOT CHANGED CHANGED
B
YH
UMANS28
F
ORESTS, SAVANNAS AND GRASSLANDS ARE DISAPPEARING AT INCREASING SPEED AS THEYARE CLEARED AND PLOUGHED UNDER FOR AGRICULTURE.
T
HE GROWING DEMANDS OF A GROWING WORLD POPULATION MEAN THAT MORE AND MORE FARMING LANDIS NEEDED, BECAUSE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE EATING MORE AND
MORE ANIMAL FOODSTUFFS.
M
EAT PRODUCTION DEVOURS HUGE QUANTITIES OF VEGETABLE FEED ANDWATER.
Source: UNEP 2011
INCREASE OF THE WORLD POPULATION AND THE PRODUCTION OF MEAT, FISH AND
SEAFOOD
30
20
10
0
1992 1997
FISH AND SEAFOOD +32%
MEAT +26%
WORLD POPULA TION +22%
2002 2007
T
HE EXPANSION OF AREAS UNDER CULTIVATION BY DEFORESTATION AND OVERGRAZING IS LEADING TOSOIL DEGRADATION.
W
E LOSE UP TO 24 MILLION TONNES OF SURFACESOIL EVERY YEAR AS A RESULT OF EROSION –
T
HES
OIL OF AN AREA THE SIZE OFS
WITZERLAND.A
NDTHIS IS IRREVERSIBLE.
*
S
ALINIZATION AND*DESERTIFICATION ARE FURTHER CONSEQUENCES
OF OVERUSE.
T
HE PROBLEM HAS BECOME ESPECIALLY EVIDENT INC
HINA.S
EVERAL TIMES A YEAR, WHEN STORMS BLOW DESERT SAND INTOB
EIJING FROM THENORTH, THE ALARM IS SOUNDED IN THE CITY BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF
RESPIRATORY PROBLEMS.
T
HE DEVASTATION OF SUCH LARGE TRACTS OF LAND THERE HAD TAKEN ON SUCH PROPORTIONS THAT THE GOVERNMENT LAUNCHED A GIGANTIC REAFFORESTATION PROGRAMME IN 1970.A
BELT OF FOREST ALMOST 4,500 KM LONG IS BEING PLANTED IN A TOTAL OF 13 PROVINCES. 35 MILLION HECTARES OF FOREST ARE TO BE PLANTED OVER A PERIOD OF ALMOST 80 YEARS.T
HAT‘S AN AREA ABOUT THE SIZE OFG
ERMANY.30
W
E’RE GRADUALLY BEGINNING TO REALIZE THAT MANY OF THE RAW MATERIALS WE USE ARE FINITE.O
RES, CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS ARE THE BEST KNOWNEXAMPLES.
A
S LATE AS 2004 IT WAS BELIEVED THE EXTRACTION OF CRUDE OIL WOULD PEAK IN 2007.A
LTHOUGH NEW RESOURCES ARE BEING TAPPED ALL THE TIME BY NEW TECHNOLOGIES, E.G. *FRACKING, THEY ALL TEND TO INVOLVE IMMEN-SE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.
W
E NEED LITHIUM FOR BATTERIES AND *RARE EARTHSAND METALS FOR INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION.
W
E EXTRACT THEM FROM CONCENTRATED DEPOSITS ...... AND SPREAD THEM ALL OVER THE WORLD WHEN WE DISPOSE OF ELECTRONIC WASTE AND EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
CONVENTIONAL CRUDE OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION IN BILLIONS OF BARRELS
1930 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0
1940
*US 48 EUROPE RUSSIA OTHERS MIDDLE EAST HEAVY OIL DEEP SEA ARCTIC/ANTARCTIC
Source: ASPO 2004 NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
I
N ADDITION, CORAL REEFS AND MANGROVES ARE BEING DESTROYED, LAKES OVER- FERTILIZED, RIVERS PAVED OVER, AND FISHSTOCKS MERCILESSLY OVER-FISHED.
M
ILLIONS OF TONNES OF POINTLESSLY KILLED FISH AND OTHER CREATURES, SO-CALLED ‘BY-CATCH’, ARE SIMPLY THROWN OVERBOARD.
A
LL THIS CAUSES A MASSIVE LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY.T
ODAY WE ARE DEALING WITH AN EXTINCTION EVENTCOMPARABLE TO THE ONE THAT TOOK PLACE 65 MILLION YEARS AGO, WHEN
ALL THE DINOSAURS AND HALF OF ALL THE OTHER ANIMALS DISAPPEARED FROM THE FACE OF THE
E
ARTH.32
F
RANKFURTP
ANAMAW
E WILL ALSO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUE OF WATER IN A DIFFERENT FORM, BECAUSE IT’S NOT ONLY GETTING SCARCER, IT’S ALSO BEING POLLUTEDBY INDUSTRY, AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLDS.
A
THIRD OF HUMANITY IS AFFECTED BY *WATER SCARCITY, AND ABOUT 800 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE NO ACCESSTO SAFE DRINKING WATER ...
... WHILE OTHERS HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH TO BATHE IN.
LITTLE OR NO WATER SCARCITY
LOOMING PHYSICAL WATER SCARCITY
PHYSICAL WATER SCARCITY
ECONOMIC WATER SCARCITY NO DATA AVAILABLE
Source: UNESCO 2009
H
OW DEATH ZONES ARE FORMED HEATSALT WATER
SALT WATER
DEAD ALGAE DEATH ZONE
LOW-OXYGEN SALT WATER
Source: The Times Picayune 2007
Source: Nasa / Earth Observatory 2008 OXYGEN
LIVING ORGANISMS
DEATH ZONES IN EUROPE
THE WARMING OF THE OCEAN MAKES THE LAYERS OF WATER MORE STABLE; THIS PREVENTS OXYGEN FROM THE AIR PENETRATING TO DEEPER REGIONS OF THE SEA. WARM, FRESH WATER FROM RIVER ESTUARIES REINFORCES
THIS EFFECT.
NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FROM FERTILIZERS AND SEWAGE CAUSE ALGAE TO GROW QUICKLY. DEAD ALGAE SINK AND DECOMPOSE. AS A RESULT, OXYGEN IS ALSO
CONSUMED IN DEEPER LAYERS.
THE OXYGEN IS COMPLETELY USED UP – DEATH ZONES FORM WHERE FISH AND
MICRO-ORGANISMS DIE EN MASSE.
FRESH WATER ALGAL
BLOOMS
DYING FISH
FRESH WATER FRESH WATER
N
ITROGEN FERTILIZERS AND PHOSPHATES – ESSENTIAL FOR FOOD PRODUCTION – ARE PUTTING IMMENSE STRAIN ON OUR ECOSYSTEMS.A
LMOST HALF OF THEM END UP IN THE OCEAN, AND THERE THEY LEAD TO THE CREATION OF LOW-OXYGEN DEATH ZONES, WHICH ARE UNINHABITABLE FORMOST ORGANISMS.
O
NE OF THE BIGGEST UNDERWATER DESERTS IS IN THEB
ALTICS
EA.G
LOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES CAN MUTUALLY REINFORCE OR WEAKEN EACH OTHER.B
UT THE MOST COMMON EFFECT IS MUTUAL REINFORCEMENT.I
T TRIGGERS ABRUPT, NON-LINEARCHANGES IN ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
E
ARTH SYSTEM.B
OCAS DELT
ORO,P
ANAMA34
W
HEN THE CHANGES BECOME TOO BIG, SYSTEMS CAN COLLAPSE; WE THENSPEAK OF *TIPPING POINTS IN THE
E
ARTH SYSTEM.O
NE OF THE MOST DRAMATIC EXAMPLES OF A HUMAN- ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM THAT HAS REACHED A TIPPING POINTIS THE HEAT COLLAPSE OF TROPICAL CORAL REEFS.
R
EINHOLD EXAMINES THE BIODIVERSITY AND HEALTHOF REEFS.
C
ORAL REEFS ARE BY FAR THE MOST BIODIVERSE ECOSYSTEMS IN THE OCEAN.A
T THE SAME TIME, THEY ARE UNDER THREAT FROMWARMING, SEA-LEVEL RISE, ACIDIFICATION, OVERFISHING AND OVER-FERTILIZATION.
F
OR A LONG TIME, NO MAJOR CHANGE IN THE REEF WAS NOTICEABLE.B
UT IF TOO MANY FACTORS COME TOGETHERFOR TOO LONG, THE TIPPING POINT IS EXCEEDED.
T
HE CHANGES TRIGGERED BY THIS TAKE ON A LIFE OF THEIROWN AND CAN NOW NO LONGER BE INFLUENCED BY HUMANITY.
A
LMOST ALL REEFS MAY BE DESTROYED IN 30–50 YEARS BECAUSE MANY CORALS CANNOT SURVIVE AT HIGHER WATER TEMPERATURES.T
HE RAMIFICATIONS FOR COASTAL PROTECTION AND FISH STOCKS ARE VAST: REEFS ARE INDISPENSABLEFOR SUPPLYING FOOD FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
T
IPPING POINTS IN A CORAL REEF:A
)I
F A HEALTHY REEF IS STRESSED, IT CAN LOSE ITS EQUILIBRIUM; USUALLY, HOWEVER, IT FINDS ITS WAY BACK ON ITS OWN.B
)I
F THE ECOSYSTEM IS DISRUPTED FOR A LONG TIME (E.G. BY OVERFISHING), ALGAE ARE NO LONGER EATEN OFF; THE TIPPING POINT IS PASSED AND THE CORAL REEF BECOMES AN ALGAL REEF.C
)T
HE REEF EVENTUALLY DIES.HEAT, STORMS ETC.
’NATURAL‘ STRESS
A) HEALTHY REEF
B) ALGAL REEF
C) DEAD REEF
’ARTIFICIAL‘ STRESS AS A RESULT OF PERMANENT
OVER-FERTILIZATION, OVERFISHING, ACIDIFICATION, ETC.
CHAPTER 3
HOT STUFF: CLIMATE CHANGE
S
TEFANR
AHMSTORF ISP
ROFESSOR OFP
HYSICS OF THEO
CEANS ATP
OTSDAMU
NIVERSITY AND HEAD OFE
ARTHS
YSTEMA
NALYSIS AT THEP
OTSDAMI
NSTITUTE FORC
LIMATEI
MPACTR
ESEARCH.H
IS RESEARCH FOCUSES ON THE ROLE OF THE OCEANS INCLIMATE CHANGE.
T
HE RESEARCH SHIPS
TANLEYR
.R
IGGS IS INR
OANOKES
OUND BY THEO
UTERB
ANKS NEARN
AG‘SH
EAD,N
ORTHC
AROLINA,USA
.H
UMANITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RISE WE ARE EXPERIENCING TODAY.F
IRSTLY AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF FOSSIL FUELS; SECONDLY AS A RESULT OFDEFORESTATION.
T
HERE IS A SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS ON THE BASIC FACTSAND FIGURES ABOUT HUMAN- INDUCED CLIMATE CHANGE; BY NOW IT IS ALSO ACCEPTED AT ALL
POLITICAL LEVELS.
S
TEFAN IS TAKING SOIL SAMPLES FROM A LAYER OF PEAT SEVERAL METRES THICK TO STUDY HOW THE SEA LEVEL HAS CHANGED OVER THE PASTMILLENNIA.
PACIFIC
ATLANTIC
NAG’S HEAD
NORTH CAROLINA
38
W
HEN THERE IS NO HUMAN INTERFERENCE, THE *CARBON CYCLE IS IN EQUILIBRIUM.H
OWEVER,OUR USE OF FOSSIL FUELS IS INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON BY 5 GIGATONNES A YEAR.
T
HE CONCENTRATION OFCO
2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE HAS INCREASED RAPIDLY SINCE CA. 1850, FROM 280 PPM (A TYPICAL VALUE FOR WARM INTERGLACIAL PERIODS) TO OVER 390 PPM.CO
2 IS A RADIATIVE FORCING GAS: THE HIGHER ITS CONCENTRATION IN THE ATMOSPHERE, THE MORE THE SURFACE TEMPERATURES RISE.I
F THECO
2CONTENT IN THE AIR DOUBLES, THE AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RISES BY 2-4°
C
.S
UNLIGHT SHINES ON THEE
ARTH.A
THIRD OF IT IS REFLECTED, THE REST IS CONVERTED INTO HEAT IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND ON THEE
ARTH’S SURFACE.T
HEE
ARTH CAN ONLY GET RID OF HEAT BY RADIATING IT BACK OUTINTO SPACE.
H
OWEVER, GREENHOUSE GASES PREVENT THE ATMOSPHERE FROMLETTING LONG-WAVE THERMAL RADIATION THROUGH.
A
LOT OFTHE RADIATION EMITTED FROM THE SURFACE IS ABSORBED AND
RERADIATED BACK DOWN.
G
LOBAL ENERGY FLOWS AND GREENHOUSE-GAS EFFECT, DATA INW
ATTS/M2CARBON (C) FLOWS IN GIGATONNES (GT) PER ANNUM (BOLD TYPE: TOTAL AMOUNTS OF STORED
CARBON IN GT)
FOSSILE FUELS
> 12 000
SOILS 1500 LAND PLANTS
560
TOTAL OCEAN + 2 GT C/A
MIXED LAYER 900
*SEDIMENTATION 0,1 MARINE SEDIMENTS 30 MILLION
MEDIUM AND GREAT DEPTHS
37 000
REFLECTED SOLAR RADIATION
INCOMING SOLAR
RADIATION ESCAPING
LONG-W RADIATIONAVE
ABSORBED BY THE ATMOSPHERE
*ATMOSPHERIC WINDOW GREENHOUSE
GASES
BACK- RADIATION EMITTED BY THE
ATMOSPHERE
*LATENT HEAT REFLECTED BY
CLOUDS, *AEROSOLS AND THE ATMOSPHERE
79
REFLECTED BY THE SURFACE 23
ABSORBED BY THE SURFACE
*NET ABSORPTION 1 W/M2
*CONVECTION *EVAPO-
RATION RADIATION BY
THE SURFACE ABSORBED BY THE SURFACE 102
79 341
161 17 78
80
30 40
40
80 396
333 333 356
169 239
17 9
60 60
92 90 1
123
*NET DESTRUCTION OF VEGETATION
Source: WBGU 2012
Data: IPCC 2007 ATMOSPHERE
830 = 390 *PPM CO2 +5 GT C/A
^
I
F WE DO NOT CHANGE OUR WAYS SOON, WE EXPECT TEMPERATURESTO INCREASE BY AN AVERAGE OF 4-7°
C
OVER THE NEXT 100 YEARS.B
Y TAKING RESOLUTE MEASURES TO PROTECT THE CLIMATE, WE COULD LIMIT WARMING TO 2°C
, BUT ONLY IF WE START TAKING ACTION STRAIGHT AWAY.B
Y WAY OF COMPARISON, THE LAST GREAT GLOBAL WARMING TOOK PLACE AT THE END OF THE LASTI
CEA
GE APPROXIMATELY 15,000 YEARS AGO.O
VER A PERIOD OF 5,000 YEARS THE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE ROSE BY APPROXIMATELY 5°C
.A
N UNLIMITED MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING COULD REACH SUCH A SCALE IN A FRACTION OFTHAT TIME – AND IT’S STARTING FROM A CLIMATE THAT’S ALREADY WARM.
I
CE-COVERED REGIONS DURING THEP
LEISTOCENE GLOBAL MEAN TEMPERATUREWARMING RELATIVE TO PRE-INDUSTRIAL PERIOD (°C)
SUCCESSFUL CLIMATE PROTECTION BUSINESS AS USUAL
Source: Nature 2009
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
40
T
HE EXACT COORDINATES AND ELEVATION OF THE SITE AREDETERMINED USING
GPS
AND LASERS.T
HE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE IS RELATIVELY EASY TO PREDICT, BUT IT’S MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT THE EFFECTS OF WARMING ON THE ICE MASSES, THE SEA LEVEL OR VEGETATION.R
EGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN WARMING, ASSUMING A MEAN GLOBAL WARMING OF ABOUT 4°C
UP UNTIL THE END OF THE CENTURY.T
HE CONTINENTS AND POLAR REGIONS ARE THE MOST SERIOUSLY AFFECTED.T
HE EVIDENCE FOR THE IMPACT OF OUR GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ON THE CLIMATE IS BASED ON DECADES OF RESEARCHWORK AND THOUSANDS OF STUDIES.
I
T‘SPRACTICALLY INCONCEIVABLE THAT THIS COULD ALL BE SUDDENLY OVERTURNED BY NEW
RESULTS.
Source: IPCC 2007 0 2 4 6 8
°C
S
TEFAN COMES ON BOARD TO TAKE SEDIMENT CORES IN THE LAGOON.A
ND THE *TIPPING ELEMENTS MAKE LIFE EVEN MORE DIFFICULT FOR US: CERTAIN REGIONS OR PROCESSES REACT PARTICULARLY SENSITIVELY AND ACT AS SELF-REINFORCING ELEMENTS IN THE SYSTEM.W
HEN THE HIGHLY REFLECTIVE ICE SURFACES MELT, THIS REVEALS THE DARK OCEAN, WHICH ABSORBS MUCH MORE SOLAR HEAT AND FURTHERACCELERATES THE MELTING.
O
THER TIPPING ELEMENTS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO CALCULATE.F
OR EXAMPLE, WHEN THE *PERMAFROST INS
IBERIA THAWS, IT RELEASES METHANE, WHICH IS A MUCH MORE AGGRESSIVE GREENHOUSE GASTHAN
CO
2 – BUT NO ONE YET KNOWS TO WHAT EXTENT AND WITH WHAT CONSEQUENCES.J
UST ONE EXAMPLE: HALF OF THE SUMMER SEA-ICE COVER ON THEA
RCTICO
CEAN HAS ALREADY DISAPPEARED.COMPARISON OF THE EXTENT OF THE ARCTIC SEA ICE IN 1979 AND 2012
42
A
ND THE GLACIERSARE ALSO DISAPPEARING RAPIDLY ALL OVER
THE WORLD.
Y
OU CAN READ HOW SEA LEVELS HAVE CHANGED FROM PEAT DEPOSITS INCOASTAL SALT MARSHES.
A
COLLEAGUE WINCHES THE CORE SAMPLES OUT OF THE WATER.MISSISSIPPI RIO GRIJALVA
ORINOCO AMAZON
RHINE SEBOU
NILE SCHATT-
AL-ARAB GANGES-
BRAHMAPUTRA JANGTSEKIANG
COASTAL DELTAS MOST SERIOUSLY THREATENED
BY FLOODING
EXTREME RISK SERIOUS RISK MEDIUM RISK RED RIVER
MEKONG MAHAKAM CHAO
PHRAYA
ZHUJIANG MOULOUYA
SENEGAL VOLTA
NIGER
INDUS MAHANADI GODAVARI
KRISHNA
RIO SÃO FRANCISCO
M
ANY OF TODAY’S MEGACITIES ARE SITUATED IN ESTUARIES, MAKING THEM PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE TO SEA-LEVEL RISE.I
N SOME WAYS, THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ARE COMING FASTER THAN EXPECTED.F
OR EXAMPLE, THE MELTINGOF SEA ICE AND ICE SHEETS WAS UNDERESTIMATED, AS WAS THE RISE IN THE
SEA LEVEL.
T
HEM
UELLERG
LACIER INN
EWZ
EALAND.T
HE LINE SHOWS THE EXPANSE OF THE GLACIER 100 YEARS AGO.Source: IPCC 2007
SEA LEVEL OVER 2000 YEARS
0 + 0,6 - 0,1
0 500 1000 1500 2000
+ 2,1
SEA LEVEL (METRES)
SEA LEVEL RISE (MM/YEAR)
E
VEN IF WE MANAGE TO GREATLY REDUCE GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS AND LIMIT GLOBAL WARMING TO 2°C
, THE SEA LEVELIS LIKELY TO RISE MORE THAN 1 METRE OVER THE NEXT TWO OR
THREE CENTURIES.
D
URING THEM
EDIEVALW
ARMP
ERIOD, THE SEA LEVEL ROSE SLOWLY BETWEEN THE YEARS 1000 AND 1400.T
HEN IT WAS STABLE FOR SEVERAL CENTURIES, UNTIL THE END OFTHE 19TH CENTURY; SINCE THEN THERE HAS BEEN THIS STEEP RISE IN RESPONSE TO THE
CURRENT GLOBAL WARMING.
0,2
0,0
-0,2
44
T
HIS PUTS COASTAL CITIES AND LOW-LYING ISLANDS AT RISK.H
URRICANES LIKES
ANDY, WHICH HITN
EWY
ORK INO
CTOBER2012 – CAUSING DEVASTATING DAMAGE, FLOODED ROADS AND SUBWAYS, POWER FAILURES AND MANY DEATHS – HIGHLIGHT THE URGENCY OF THE PROBLEM.
B
ECAUSE COASTAL FLOODING FROM HURRICANES WILL GET WORSE AS THE SEA LEVEL RISES.T
HE RISK OF EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS IS ALSO INCREASING.T
HE NUMBER OF FLOODS, DROUGHTS AND FOREST FIRESWILL INCREASE WORLDWIDE.
S
TEFAN ON HIS WAY TO A WORKSHOP ON COASTAL PROTECTION INN
AG’SH
EAD.F
OREST FIRES INS
PAIN 2012F
LOODING IN SOUTHERNR
USSIA 2012A
ND OF COURSE, THIS HAS AN EFFECT ON THE WATER SUPPLY AND FOOD SECURITY.B
OTH THE MODELS AND THE DATA SHOW AN INCREASE IN THESTRENGTH, AND POSSIBLY ALSO IN THE FREQUENCY, OF HURRICANES AS
A RESULT OF HIGHER SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES.
E
XTREME DROUGHT IN THEUSA
2012H
URRICANEK
ATRINA IN THEUSA
IN 2005
46
N
AG’SH
EADA
LTHOUGH GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION DOES NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO DECLINE IN WARMER CLIMATIC CONDITIONS, SOME HARVESTS WILL BE LOST IN POORER AND WARMER COUNTRIESAS A RESULT OF WATER SCARCITY AND
WEATHER EXTREMES.
T
HE WATER SUPPLY INL
IMA IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON THEA
NDEAN GLACIERS.W
HILE THE POPULATION IS GROWING, THE GLACIERS ARE MELTING, AND NO ONECAN STOP THEM.
I
F THE MOUNTAIN GLACIERS DISAPPEAR,THIS WILL THREATEN WATER SUPPLIES TO MAJOR CITIES LIKE
L
IMA.T
ODAY AT 9 AM,S
TAKEHOLDERW
ORKSHOPS
EA-L
EVELV
ENICE 2012A
T PRESENT, THE SEA LEVELS ARE RISING AT A RATE OF ABOUT 3 CM PER DECADE.B
UT IF GLOBAL WARMING CONTINUES, THIS RATE WILL SPEED UP, SIMPLY BECAUSE THE ICE MASSES MELT FASTER THEWARMER IT BECOMES.
I
T COULD REACH 10 CM PER DECADE.T
HATWOULD MAKE IT A LOT MORE DIFFICULT FOR US HUMANS TO ADAPT TO SEA-LEVEL RISE.
CO
2 ACCUMULATES IN THE ATMOSPHERE BECAUSE OF ITS LONG LIFESPAN, SO THATFURTHER WARMING CAN ONLY BE PREVENTED IF WE
GET OUR ENERGY FROM A DIFFERENT SOURCE.
*
S
TAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP,N
AG’SH
EAD 2012:S
TEFAN TALKS WITH REPRESENTATIVESOF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER GROUPS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN CLIMATE CHANGE AND COASTAL
PROTECTION.
I
T‘S NOT EASY TO PREDICT THE EXACT CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH A DRASTIC CHANGE IN THE CLIMATE, SO SURPRISESARE QUITE POSSIBLE.
CHAPTER 4
WE’RE NOT THAT STUPID.
A GLANCE INTO THE PAST
D
IRKM
ESSNER IS DIRECTOR OF THE *G
ERMAND
EVELOPMENTI
NSTITUTE (DIE
) INB
ONN, CO- DIRECTOR OF THE *C
ENTRE FORA
DVANCEDS
TUDIES ONG
LOBALC
OOPERATIONR
ESEARCH,D
UISBURG, AND DEPUTY CHAIR OF THEWBGU
.D
IRK‘S CHAUFFEUR DROPS HIM OFF AT THEI
NSTITUTE.A
ND DON‘T FORGET, THE NEW CAR IS BEINGDELIVERED TODAY.
I
N THEG
LOBALG
OVERNANCES
CHOOL AT THEG
ERMAND
EVELOPMENTI
NSTITUTE,D
IRK HAS BEEN TRAINING SCIENTISTS AND PRACTIONERS FROM EIGHT *EMERGING ECONOMIESSINCE 2007.
O
H!H
OPE IT‘S NOT ONE OF THOSE ELECTRIC THINGS;I
TOLD YOU BEFORE THERE‘S NO WAY
I
‘M GOING TO DRIVEONE OF THOSE.
T
O MAKE SURE THAT THE AMOUNTS OFCO
2 DON‘T KEEP ON INCREASING, IT‘S ESSENTIAL TO DECOUPLE GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FROM GREENHOUSE- GAS EMISSIONS, ESPECIALLY IN THE FIELDS OF ENERGYSUPPLY, URBANIZATION AND LAND USE.
50
T
HERE ARE NO ESTABLISHED ROLE MODELS FOR THIS GREAT TRANSFORMATION TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY, BECAUSE COMPARABLE SOCIETAL SHIFTS HAVE BEEN EVOLUTIONARY, I.E. THEY DEVELOPED FROMHISTORY.
A
BOUT 9000BCE
HUMANS STARTED TO DOMESTICATE ANIMALS AND TO GROW CROPS.T
HIS ENABLED THEM TOSETTLE DOWN.
W
HEN THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION BEGAN OVER 250 YEARS AGO, HUMANS NUMBEREDABOUT 1 BILLION AND ONLY EXERTED A MARGINAL AND LOCALLY LIMITED INFLUENCE
ON THE
E
ARTH SYSTEM.S
LASH-AND-BURN FARMING INF
INLAND AROUND 1887.T
HE EFFECTS ON THEE
ARTH SYSTEMWERE STILL MANAGEABLE AT THAT TIME.
T
ODAY, HUMANS ARE THE BIGGEST GEOLOGICAL FORCE IN THEE
ARTHSYSTEM.
GLOBAL POPULATION
GROWTH IN BILLIONS
Source: UN 2012
0.98 BILLION
1800 1950 2000 2012
2.52 BILLION 6.1 BILLION
7 BILLION
REST OF THE WORLD
CHANGE OF VIEW
T
HE WORLD ECONOMY IS CHANGING RADICALLY. 1.3 BILLION PEOPLE BELONGED TO THE GLOBAL MIDDLE CLASS IN 1989, WITH 80% OF THEM LIVING IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES.B
Y 2030THE GLOBAL MIDDLE CLASS WILL NUMBER ABOUT 5 BILLION PEOPLE, AND 80% OF THEM WILL BE LIVING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES.
I
F THERE IS NOT
RANSFORMATION TO SUSTAINABILITY, THIS DEVELOPMENT TREND WILL LEAD TO THE DEGRADATION OF THE NATURAL LIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEMS.
T
HE ’DISCOVERY‘ OF A LIFESTYLE THAT IS CONSCIOUSLY GEARED TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITYIS COMPARABLE TO THE ADVENT OF THE
E
NLIGHTENMENT IN THE 17TH CENTURY.B
OTH CONCEPTS CALL FOR AN EXTENSIVE REORGANIZATION OF THE SOCIETY IN WHICH THEYEMERGED.
T
HE RECOVERY OF EMERGING ECONOMIES DIFFERENT REGIONS’ PERCENTAGE SHARES OF THE WORLD ECONOMYMIDDLE EAST
USA JAPAN
RUSSIA
INDIA WESTERN EUROPE
CHINA
FORECAST 1700
% 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
1820 1870 1900 1913 1950 1978 2003 2008 2015 2030 2050
Source: Die ZEIT 2008
52
I
MMANUELK
ANT DESCRIBEDTHE
E
NLIGHTENMENT AS AN ESSENTIAL CHANGE IN THE WAY PEOPLE THINK, A NEW ERA FOR MANKIND IN WHICH THE NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONSOF HUMAN COEXISTENCE ARE REVOLUTIONIZED.
T
HEPERSPECTIVE FROM WHICH PEOPLE JUDGED THEMSELVES
AND THEIR SOCIETIES HAD FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED.
E
NLIGHTENMENT IS THE HUMAN BEING‘S EMERGENCE FROM HIS SELF-INCURRED MINORITY.A
S HUMANS WE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STABILITY OFTHE
E
ARTH SYSTEM.I
S ALL THISPOSSIBLE?
S
O THEREFORE, WENEED TO COOPERATE GLOBALLY.
W
E NEED A GLOBAL SENSE OF COMMUNITY, A’WE-IDENTITY‘.
W
E MUST INVENT A PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION MODEL FOR 9 BILLION PEOPLE – WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THEE
ARTH SYSTEM.A
RELIGIOUS VIEW OF THE WORLD VERSUS A KNOWLEDGE-BASED VIEW OF THE WORLDT
HEE
NLIGHTENMENT WAS ABOUT THE INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF ’HUMAN RACE‘; YETFOR MANY
E
NLIGHTENMENT THINKERS SLAVES WERE NOTPART OF IT.
M
ANY PROPONENTS OF THEE
NLIGHTENMENT WERE FANTASTIC FUTURE-ORIENTED MINDS AND VISIONARIES, BUT THEY WERE ALSO CHILDREN OF THEIR TIME.S
LAVERY IS AN EXAMPLE OF THIS CONTRADICTION.T
HEUS C
ONSTITUTION OF 1787 BEGINS WITH THE FAMOUS FORMULA ’WE THE PEOPLE‘ – YET SLAVERY REMAINED PART OF SOCIETAL REALITY IN THEUSA
FOR ANOTHER EIGHT DECADES ... ... AND ULTIMATELY LED TO THE
A
MERICANC
IVILW
AR OF 1861-1865.D
ENISD
IDEROT (1713-1784)V
OLTAIRE (1694-1778)J
EAN-J
ACQUESR
OUSSEAU(1712-1778)
I
MMANUELK
ANT (1724-1804)M
ONTESQUIEU(1689-1755)
D
AVIDH
UME (1711-1776)54
R
IO DEJ
ANEIRO,J
UNE 2012S
O IT’S A LONG, HARD ROAD WITH MANY SETBACKS FROM A SOPHISTICATED PHILOSOPHY AND IDEA TO SOCIETAL REALITY.L
INEAR PROGRESS IS UNKNOWNIN WORLD HISTORY.
S
EEN FROM THIS PERSPECTIVE, THE SUSTAINABILITY PARADIGM HAS HAD A BREATHTAKING CAREER.E
VEN THOUGH THE *UN C
ONFERENCE ONS
USTAINABLED
EVELOPMENT INR
IO MUST BE REGARDED AS A FAILURE.N
OTHING IS LEFT OF THE SPIRIT OF CHANGE AT THE FIRST *E
ARTHS
UMMITOF 1992.
T
HE FINAL DECLARATION DID NOT GENERATE FRESH IMPETUS, AND THE LARGENUMBER OF PROBLEMS ADDRESSED HAD THE EFFECT THAT NOT A SINGLE ONE WAS RESOLUTELY TACKLED.
Y
OU COULD REALLY SPEAK OF AR
IOM
INUS 20 CONFERENCE.H
OWEVER, SCIENTISTS, THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND CIVIL SOCIETY ARE MORE ADVANCED AND MORE MATURE THAN POLITICAL LEADERS INW
ASHINGTON,B
RUSSELS,B
ERLIN,N
EWD
ELHI ANDB
EIJING.T
HIS WAS SHOWN BY THE CONFERENCE PROGRAMME INR
IO.T
HE TRANSFORMATION TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY IS NOT A FUTURE PROJECT: IT‘S ALREADY IN FULLSWING.
W
IND FARM ATL
AKET
URKANA INK
ENYAF
OR EXAMPLE, INR
IO DEJ
ANEIRO OVER 50 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN CONCERT WITH MANY PRIVATE COMPANIES COMMITTED THEMSELVES TO AMBITIOUS INITIATIVES FOR MORE SUSTAINABILITY IN THEENERGY SECTOR.
T
HESE INCLUDED COUNTRIES LIKEG
HANA,B
ANGLADESH,I
NDIA ANDM
OROCCO.P
ETERA
LTMAIER, GERMAN FEDERAL MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENTR
AJENDRAK
UMARP
ACHAURI, CHAIR OF THE *INTERGOVERNMENTALPANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
J
ENNIFERM
ORGAN, DIRECTOR OF THE CLIMATE AND ENERGY PROGRAMME AT THE *WORLD RESOURCESINSTITUTE
I
F THEG
ERMAN*
E
NERGIEWENDE SUCCEEDS, IT COULD ENCOURAGE EMULATORSWORLDWIDE.
56
A
GROUP OFA
FRICAN GOVERNMENTS, THEW
ORLDB
ANK, MAJOR PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS LIKEC
ONSERVATIONI
NTERNATIONAL AND CORPORATIONS IN TURN AGREED CONCRETE INITIATIVES TO PROTECT NATURAL ASSETS INA
FRICAN COUNTRIES.P
ROJECTS LIKE THE CROSS-BORDER *P
EACEP
ARKS FOCUS ON ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AND ECOTOURISM.
T
HESE APPROACHES WERE FURTHER DEVELOPED INR
IO.S
OLAR ENERGY PLANT NEARM
OUNTA
BU INR
AJASTHAN,I
NDIAK
ANDEHK
.Y
UMKELLA,D
IRECTORG
ENERAL OF THEU
NITEDN
ATIONSI
NDUSTRIALD
EVELOPMENTO
RGANIZATION (UNIDO
)C
ITIES FORGED ALLIANCES, AND CORPORATIONSPRESENTED THE LATEST ENVIRONMENTAL
TECHNOLOGIES.
ANGOLA
ZAMBIA
Source: www.tfpd.co.za ZIMBABWE
BOTSWANA
SWAZILAND
LESOTHO
SOUTH AFRICA NAMIBIA
MOZAMBIQUE
KAVANGO ZAMBEZI
KGALAGADI
GREATER MAPUNGUBWE
GREAT LIMPOPO
LUBOMBO
MALOTI DRAKENSBERG AI-AIS-RICHTERSVELD
O
N THE POLITICAL LEVEL, THEEU
AND THEUSA
ARE MUTUALLY BLOCKING EACH OTHER.M
OREOVER, THERE ARETENSIONS BETWEEN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING
ECONOMIES.
T
HE RESULT IS AN INTERNATIONAL CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP AND CONFIDENCE, A *G
-Z
ERO WORLD IN WHICH NO LEADING POWER IS EFFECTIVELY TAKING THE INITIATIVEAND NO COALITIONS CAPABLE OF TAKING ACTION ARE EMERGING.
58
H
ELLO!D
IRK MEETSP
ANJ
IAHUA,C
HINESE CLIMATE SCIENTIST AND THE MOST HIGHLY RANKING CONSULTANT IN THE FIELD OF CLIMATE PROTECTION.C
URRENTLY THE TRANSFORMATION PROCESS MIGHT BE REACHING ATIPPING POINT.
O
N THE ONE HAND, THE CURRENT GROWTH MODEL IS HISTORICALLY LEGITIMIZED, AND IT SEEMS TO BE RESISTANTTO CHANGE BECAUSE IT HAS LED TO ENORMOUS PROSPERITY IN MANY
COUNTRIES.
O
N THE OTHER HAND, THEREIS A BROAD CONSENSUS THAT THIS RESOURCE-WASTING AND CLIMATE-DAMAGING PATH OF DEVELOPMENT NO LONGER OF- FERS A FUTURE FOR THE NEXT
GENERATION.
A
ND BECAUSE HARDLY ANYONE STILL BELIEVESIN THE FUTURE VIABILITY OF THE FOSSIL-BASED SOCIETY, PROSPECTS FOR REFORMS ARE
EMERGING.
I
N ADDITION, WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGIES AND THE KNOWLEDGE FOR DESIGNING THETRANSFORMATION.
I
FC
HINA ANDE
UROPE RESOLUTELY PURSUED A LOW-CARBON SOCIETY, THIS WOULD REPRESENT A BREAKTHROUGH AND OTHER COUNTRIES WOULD FOLLOWSUIT.
M
ANY THINGS HAVE STARTED MOVING.B
UTTHE TRANSFORMATION TO A LOW-CARBON SOCIETY CAN ALSO BE FOILED BY THE SO- CALLED REBOUND EFFECT.
F
OR EXAMPLE, CARS ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT, ANDCO
2 EMISSIONSARE BEING REDUCED; HOWEVER, SINCE THEIR NUMBER KEEPS GROWING FASTER AND FASTER, THE SAVINGS ARE IMMEDIATELY OFFSET OR EVEN EXCEEDED,
SO WE MUST REMAIN VIGILANT.
E
VERYONE, I.E. THE WHOLE OF SOCIETY, MUST ACCELERATETHE TRANSFORMATION INTO A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY,
BECAUSE YOU CAN‘T NEGOTIATE WITH NATURE.
CHAPTER 5
TECHNICALLY, EVERYTHING IS
POSSIBLE
J
ÜRGENS
CHMID WAS THE DIRECTOR OF THE *F
RAUNHOFERI
NSTITUTE FORW
INDE
NERGY ANDE
NERGYS
YSTEMT
ECHNOLOGY (IWES
) INK
ASSEL UNTIL 2012.A
LPHAV
ENTUS, OFFSHORE TEST FACILITY FOR WIND TURBINES, 45 KM OFFB
ORKUM IN THEN
ORTHS
EA.T
HE DECARBONIZATION OF THE ENERGY SYSTEMS HAS BEENTECHNICALLY POSSIBLE FOR SOME TIME NOW.
O
NE OF THESOLUTIONS IS WIND ENERGY.
I
N THIS TEST FIELD MORE THAN 150 SCIENTISTS ARE EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF WIND, *WEATHER AND WAVES ON THE NACELLES, STEEL TOWERS AND ROTOR BLADES OF THE TURBINES, AND WHETHER THEY CAN WITHSTAND THE STRESSES FAR OUT TO SEA FOR 20 YEARS.62
T
HE TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE USE OF*RENEWABLE ENERGIES AND FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY HAVE DEVELOPED MORE QUICKLY
THAN EXPECTED.
S
INCE WE ARE PURSUING VARIOUS DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES – I.E.SOLAR, WIND, HYDROPOWER AND GEOTHERMAL ENERGY – AND THEIR
OVERALL POTENTIAL IS MUCH HIGHER THAN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ENERGY THAT IS NEEDED, WE CAN STILL ENSURE A 100% POWER SUPPLY EVEN IF ONE TECHNOLOGY CONTRIBUTES LESS OR NOTHING AT TIMES.
W
E CAN ACHIEVE THIS WITH SMART POWER GRIDS AND BYSTORING THE ELECTRICITY.
S
MART GRIDS CONTROL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN POWER GENERATORS, STORAGE FACILITIES AND ELECTRICAL CONSUMERS.C
ONSUMERSS
TORAGE POWERP
LANTC
ONTROL*
R
ENEWABLE ENERGYI
F THIS INNOVATION DYNAMIC CAN BE SUSTAINED, AND RENEWABLES ARE GIVEN PRIORITY, THEN AN ENERGY SYSTEM THAT IS 100% BASED ON RENEWABLES COULD BE IMPLEMENTED AS EARLY AS 2050 – NOT ONLY ING
ERMANY, BUT ALL OVER THE WORLD.V
ISION OF A GLOBAL RENEWABLE ENERGY SUPPLY BY 2050500 400 300 200 100 0
1970
SAVINGS THROUGH:
GAS FROM WIND AND SOLAR SOLAR POWER WIND SOLAR HEAT GEOTHERMAL POWER HYDROPOWER HEAT FROM BIOMASS POWER FROM BIOMASS NUCLEAR ENERGY NATURAL GAS CRUDE OIL COAL E-MOBILITY CHP AND HEAT PUMPS DIRECT POWER GENERATION (WIND, SOLAR, HYDROPOWER)
PRIMARY ENERGY (EXAJOULES/YEAR)
Source: WBGU 2011
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
T
HERE ARE TWO VIABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR STORAGE.O
NE OF THESE IS PUMPED STORAGE POWERP
LANTS, WHICH HAS BEEN IN USE FOR SOME TIME.T
HE OTHER IS STORING THE ELECTRICITY IN THE FORM OF GAS.T
OGETHER WITH THEC
ENTRE FORS
OLARE
NERGY ANDH
YDROGENR
ESEARCHB
ADEN-W
ÜRTTEMBERG WE‘RE DEVELOPING AN IDEA FOR COUPLING ELECTRICITY AND GAS.Y
OU TAKE THE EXCESS ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES AND MAKE METHANE OUT OF IT.T
HIS GAS CAN BE USED TO GENERATE HEAT, OR AS A FUEL, OR BE STORED IN NATURAL GAS NETWORKS.T
HE NATURAL GAS NETWORKS ALREADY EXIST.T
HE METHANE CAN BE CONVERTED BACK INTOELECTRICITY WHENEVER NECESSARY.
I
N THIS PROCESS YOU ONLY RELEASE AS MUCHCO
2 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE AS YOU PREVIOUSLY EXTRACTED FROM IT, MAKING THIS TECHNOLOGYCARBON NEUTRAL.
4H
2O 4H
2+ 2O
24H
2+ CO
2 CH
4+ 2H
2O
GENERATED POWER SURPLUS POWER
POWER
SURPLUS POWER
SHORTAGE
COMBINED HEAT AND POWER
GENERATION (CHP)* TRANSPORT
HEAT
GAS STORAGE COMBINED CYCLE
GAS TURBINES ELECTROLYSIS METHANIZATION
CARBON DIOXIDE FROM ATMOSPHERE, INDUSTRY, ETC.
WATER
HYDROGEN
OXYGEN METHANE
NATURAL GAS PIPELINE
LOWER BASIN
UPPER BASIN
POWERHOUSE
POWER GRID
WATERWAY LOWER BASIN
UPPER BASIN
POWERHOUSE
POWER GRID
WATERW AY
Source: www.pskw.atSource: ASUE e. V.
4
2