• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Supplementary Information For the manuscript: “Modulation of defensive reactivity by

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Supplementary Information For the manuscript: “Modulation of defensive reactivity by"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

page 1 / 1

Supplementary Information

For the manuscript: “Modulation of defensive reactivity by GLRB allelic variation: Converging evidence from an intermediate phenotype approach”

Supplement contents:

Supplementary information for the GLRB Risk groups as classified for the rs7688285 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) as used in the main article:

- Sample characteristics of samples 1 and 2 (Table S1)

- Supplementary results on GLRB modulation of fear conditioning: statistical details and visualization for behavioral measures of fear conditioning of sample 1 (Table S2; Figure S1) - Supplementary results on GLRB modulation of fear conditioning: Statistical details and

visualization for behavioral measures of fear conditioning of sample 2 (Table S3; Figure S2) - Supplementary results on GLRB modulation of brain morphology (Table S4)

- Supplementary results on GLRB modulation of startle reflex reactivity: full statistical

information (Table S5, Figure S3) and single trial inter-trial interval (ITI) response (Figure S4).

Supplementary results for the GLRB Combined Risk groups (combined risk: at least one risk allele in rs17035763, rs191260602, rs7688285, or rs78726293):

- Sample characteristics for the Combined Risk group from samples 1 and 2 (Table S6)

- Functional and structural MRI results on GLRB modulation for the Combined Risk group from sample 1 (Tables S7 - S9)

- Functional MRI results on GLRB modulation for the Combined Risk group from sample 2 (Tables S10, S11)

- Startle reflex reactivity on GLRB modulation for the Combined Risk group from sample 1 (Table S12)

Supplementary figure legends

Supplementary Figure S1. (A) Subjective fear ratings of fear/stress/tension and (B) skin conductance reactions (SCRs) for sample 1. Risk group status was defined as carrying at least one risk allele (A allele).

Supplementary Figure S2. Valence ratings (upper half) and arousal ratings (lower half) of the fear conditioning paradigm of sample 2. Risk group status was defined as carrying at least one risk allele (A allele).

Supplementary Figure S3. Inter-trial interval (ITI) startle blink magnitudes (T-Scores) divided by the first and second time block (blocl1, block2) of the experiment for Risk vs. No-Risk group in sample 1.

Risk group status was defined as carrying at least one risk allele (A allele).

Supplementary Figure S4. Single trial inter-trial interval (ITI) responses per Risk group in sample 1.

Risk group status was defined as carrying at least one risk allele (A allele).

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Given that a growing body of evidence indicates that aware- ness of stimulus contingencies is not necessary for fear conditioning (see above), the present study examined

Unadjusted scatterplots illustrating the relationship between global circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) and major clinical markers

ADG: average daily gain, SCFA: short-chain fatty

Results based on BLASTx hits to protein models from Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Tribolium castaneum (Tc), Dendroctonus ponderosae (Dp), and Anaplophora glabripennis (Ag)..

Supplementary Figure S2: Dispersion of raw and DESeq2 adjusted read counts about empirical mean for comparisons of triplicate RNA-seq data within A) control maize (Cn; Treatment T7)

[1] Lole KS, Bollinger RC, Paranjape RS, Gadkari D, Kulkarni SS, Novak NG, Ingersoll R, Sheppard HW, Ray SC (1999) Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from

Shown are trajectories with R 2 -values that are at least 0.9 or higher (C) Probability-plot showing the normalized probability of finding exponent in our RibE-mV SPT dataset..

[r]